Trump’s “Creative Destruction” of the World Order through an Unusual Hypocritical Strategy

ANGLO AMERICA, 26 Jan 2026

Sakai Tanaka – TRANSCEND Media Service

17 Jan 2026 – Since the beginning of the year, US President Trump has become the “world’s villain.” He is pursuing an unusual hypocritical strategy, in which he is pretending as an “evil/bad guy”, NOT as a “good guy”,  and in which he deliberately defies and destroys the existing “liberal world order” (i.e. the British-based US sole hegemony). No one can stop the barrage of “evil” deeds from the president of the world’s most powerful hegemonic power.

Those who take Trump’s “evil” seriously and who are genuinely angry at him are unaware of the depth of his tricky strategy. To maintain their dominance, the existing British-associated hegemony (i.e. Anglo-American hegemony) has used the media and other authoritarian institutions to brainwash people into believing in a distorted view of “right vs. wrong” or “good vs. evil/bad”.  As long as leaders seek reelection and pretend to be “good people,” they have no choice but to be subordinate to the British-associated dominance. The only way for one to change the conventional world order as such is to play himself as a “bad guy” and be hated by the credulous general public. This risks being hated by voters and losing the election. However, Trump has always portrayed himself as a “bad guy.” His domestic popularity remains strong even after repeated “evil deeds,” making him a perfect fit for a “bad guy” strategy.

Since the end of the Cold War, the Anglo-Americans have continued to distort the world’s view of good and evil, clinging to the hegemony and hindering the development of the global economy and the prosperity of emerging countries. This persistence even after the end of the Cold War has made it necessary to dismantle hegemony and create a new multipolar world order. This is the essence of the turmoil in the world over the past quarter century since 9/11. Trump became the US President to orchestrate the climax of this trend. Now in his second year as president, Trump has unleashed his “bad guy” strategy to creatively destroy Anglo-American hegemony and transition to a new multipolar world order.

The beginning of this “bad guy” strategy was the overthrow of the Venezuelan regime following Maduro’s arrest on 3 January 2026. In order to seize Venezuela’s oil interests, Trump blatantly violated national sovereignty, invaded the country, unjustly detained (arrested) President Maduro, and falsely accused him of drug trafficking, while turning his successor, Acting President Rodríguez, into a puppet. This outrageous and destructive tactic, ignoring international law and global order, has been criticized by (British) media authorities and China and Russia (who stand to benefit from the self-destruction of British hegemony). In reality, Rodriguez is a leftist, just like Maduro, and Trump’s Venezuela strategy is a “soft overthrow” that violates sovereignty but does not completely overthrow the regime.

Venezuela’s left-wing forces can maintain power, no longer be criticized or sanctioned by the United States, and with its active support, they can rebuild the country’s oil industry. Maduro lost power, but he was originally merely a vassal of the heroic Hugo Chavez, and power fell to him unexpectedly after Chavez’s death. The Anglos accuse Trump of “violating national sovereignty,” but the Anglos themselves have been violating the sovereignty of Western Europe, Japan, Korea, Asia, and Africa ever since the end of World War II, turning them into puppets. The Anglos have fooled the world into believing in their “hypocrisy” of respecting national sovereignty while violating the sovereignty of other countries. Trump, on the other hand, is adopting a hypocritical strategy of having the world report his surprisingly soft intervention and economic stimulus measures in Venezuela as a heinous military invasion and violation of sovereignty.

“However, since last autumn, Trump has been attacking and sinking innocent ships in the Caribbean, falsely accusing them of drug trafficking. That’s heinous,” a liberal might say. However, Trump’s entire invasion of Venezuela, including these ship attacks, has only killed about 200 people. What do you mean, “only”? 200 people died? The British have killed about 100 times as many in their various military interventions. They can’t compete with Israel, though.

Starting with Venezuela, Trump is attempting to softly overthrow anti-American leftist governments in Latin America. In a future multipolar world, the United States will become the “pole” of the Americas. The United States can decide what kind of region Latin America will become. Colombian President Gustavo Petro is already courting Trump, asking for a soft overthrow. While outdated liberals are credulously angry, the world is rapidly changing.

 

Trump’s invasion of Venezuela is not only a plan to destroy the Anglo-American world order, but also a strategy of Americanism to realize the multipolar world that Anglos dislike. Americanism is an infringement of national sovereignty. We won’t tolerate it, right? As I’ve said many times, existing Anglos have also hypocritically claimed to “respect” the sovereignty of countries around the world while violating it. Liberals only prefer a “sound-pleasing world system” and are unable to see its true nature. “Sound-pleasing” is a misuse of the word, you say? Authoritarians who like to hunt down words should stop reading my articles. Not just Anglos, but most good people are hypocrites. This includes the Buddhist world, the original petty bureaucrats.

Trump’s involvement with Venezuela has repeatedly trampled on the authority of the Nobel Peace Prize, which is part of the British hegemonic system. Every year, the Nobel Committee has chosen the winners of the Nobel Peace Prize in the fields of human rights, democracy, and international politics, reinforcing the British views of right and wrong. This is a dirty politics of strengthening the British hegemony. The Nobel Prize distorts right and wrong, yet presents it as a noble act of good that transcends politics. In reality, it is extremely hypocritical and filthy.

Last year, Trump repeatedly declared that he was the most deserving of the Nobel Peace Prize, pressuring the Nobel Committee to award it to him. This pressure itself was Trump’s hypocritical strategy to undermine the authority of the Nobel Prize. When the Nobel Committee refused, Trump pressured them to award the prize to Maria Corina Machado, a right-wing Venezuelan opposition figure (a Trump-backed American puppet). The British members of the Nobel Committee, despite their hatred for their arch enemy Trump and for Machado, a Likud puppet, succumbed to pressure and awarded the prize to Machado. The sour-loser British members did not hold a celebration.

Immediately after receiving the award, Machado said, “This Peace Prize is more deserving of Trump than I am. I would like to present it to Trump.” After Trump kidnapped and overthrew Venezuela’s Maduro on 3 January 2026, many expected Machado to take over as president. Instead, he promoted Rodriguez and took a more pragmatic approach, maintaining the left-wing government. Machado, though left without a leg to lean on, seemed to deeply respect Trump (or perhaps believed he still had a chance of winning power), and continued to insist he wanted to present the Nobel Peace Prize to Trump. Seeing this, the Trump camp came up with a new, shady strategy: they invited Machado to the White House to receive the Peace Prize medal. On January 16, Machado presented the medal to Trump. The Nobel Committee was outraged, declaring the Nobel Prize non-transferable.

When Trump was refused, he asked for the prize and had his puppet Machado receive it and present it to him. At first glance, this may seem like a childish and shameful display of Trump’s thirst for power, but when we consider that the Nobel Prize is a tool of the British hegemony, it becomes clear that it is Trump’s shady strategy to destroy British hegemony.

Another manifestation of Trump’s Americanism is his plan to seize Greenland from Denmark. This plan has been criticized as Trump’s desire for territorial expansion or his desire to seize the Arctic’s underground resources, but these views are simply a result of Trump’s shady strategy. Under the guise of imperialism for territory and interests, Trump is attempting to incite internal conflict and dismantle the NATO alliance, a key element of the British hegemony. Europe (the UK and its puppet Western Europe, a.k.a. the UK) has been trapped in a self-destructive cycle of hostility towards Russia and the Ukraine war, which is inevitable due to the Likud faction, which is behind Trump’s actions. To postpone this self-destruction and prolong its life, the UK and Europe have no choice but to rely on US military power. They cannot afford to confront Trump.

Denmark does not want to lose Greenland. However, Britain, behind the scenes, is pressuring Denmark to give up Greenland in order to avoid confrontation with Trump. Britain wants to drag his US military into the Ukraine War, turn Trump, who has reconciled with Russia, back into hostility towards Russia, and revive NATO and the Western alliance, i.e., the British hegemony  [i.e. Anglo-American hegemony] .  Knowing Britain’s intentions, he continues to alternate between reconciliation with Russia and hostility towards Russia (while continuing to communicate with Putin behind the scenes).

While Trump continues his Ukraine War and Greenland dramas, those Western Europeans, including Germany, France, and Italy, are beginning to believe that continuing the Ukraine War will not bring back Trump’s America or defeat Russia, and that they have no choice but to reconcile with Russia. However, this would result in a decisive loss of the hegemony for the UK. Some internal conflicts are emerging between the UK, which wants to continue treating Russia as an enemy, and Germany, France, and Italy, which believe reconciliation with Russia is better.

That does not mean that Trump will side with Germany, France, and Italy and promote reconciliation with Russia. He wants to prolong the Ukraine war because he wants to decisively crush the Anglo-European ruling class (left-right liberal globalists) and irreversibly eliminate Anglo-European hegemony. That’s why he supports Britain and has offered to expand US military support if Britain and Europe send troops to Ukraine. He wants to continue shaking up Britain and Europe, prolonging the Ukraine War and ultimately leading to the elimination of the British [i.e. Anglo-American powers, controlling over the US hegemony].

Trump will attend the Davos Forum, a gathering of European and other elites (globalists) from 19 January 2026 for the first time in four years. The World Economic Forum (WEF), the organizer of the Davos Forum, is an elite organization, associated with the British influential power. The WEF was infiltrated by the Likud faction, forcing the European countries to implement a number of incredibly foolish policies that would self-destruct their economies, including unfounded measures to combat global warming, COVID-19, and immigration. The WEF, which organizes the Davos Forum, was rendered obsolete after founder Charles Schwab was forced to resign due to a minor scandal.  Now, Trump, who has embarked on a tactic to completely destroy the British faction, has picked them up again, forcing the WEF to repeat its self-destructive dance.

Even though the secretly multipolar Trump became the US President, the US Intelligence Community responsible for managing the US hegemony was taken over by the Likud faction, and the British faction was driven out, the United States remains the hegemonic power. As part of his tactics, Trump has openly proclaimed, “I control the world. If anyone doesn’t listen to me, I will impose sanctions such as regime change and high tariffs.” (High tariffs are also a notoriously evil form of “protectionism,” a violation of the WTO agreements, and a “fake strategy” that directly undermines the free trade system that was part of the postwar British hegemony.)

Even as Trump intentionally commits misdeeds and destroys the world order, the US allies in Europe and Japan, South Korea, and elsewhere, remain silent and avoid criticism, hoping to avoid being viewed as enemies by Trump. Meanwhile, Russian President Putin has pointed out that “The United States is destroying the world order and international law. The world should uphold the international legal system (and not follow the US),” and “The traditional global dialogue system is being replaced by a system of military force. The global situation is deteriorating.”

Under the postwar Anglo-American hegemony (which manipulates perceptions of right and wrong), the United States (the United States and the UK) was almost always “good” and Russia (the Soviet Union) was “evil” (except around the time of the end of the Cold War). Now, however, Trump has overturned this to the United States being evil and Russia being good. Regarding Iran, as part of his false evil strategy, Trump is exposing Iran as a puppet of Israel, inciting regime change, and preparing a military attack. In contrast, Putin is trying to mediate between Iran and Israel and maintain peace (even though he knows it will not succeed).

The very reversal of the US-Russia distinction is part of Trump’s hypocritical strategy, which negates the traditional British hegemony’s manipulation of morality and evil. Trump is intentionally promoting Putin. He is intentionally undermining the UK-US (Anglo-American) hegemony by making many countries around the world believe that non-US sides are more legitimate than the US. Trump recently withdrew the US from international organizations under the UN. Europe (the P5, including the UK and France) is also accelerating its self-destruction while continuing to view Russia and China as enemies, losing international credibility. Within the UN, including the P5 (permanent members of the Security Council), the US side, including the US, UK, and France, is losing leadership, and leadership is shifting to non-US sides, including Russia and China. Since 9/11, when the US (Likud-affiliated neoconservatives) declared its unilateral hegemony, the US has continued to scorn the UN for 25 years, but the “results” of that are now becoming apparent.

Another example of Trump’s shady strategy is the construction of an Arc de Triomphe in Washington, D.C., to commemorate his “victory” on the 250th anniversary of American independence. Trump also ordered the Department of Justice to investigate Federal Reserve Chairman Powell, who he accused of lying to Congress about the lavish facilities he had built (for himself) during the Fed headquarters renovation last year. This has led to a flurry of anti-Trump reporting from British puppet media, who claim that “Trump just wants to pressure Powell into making unreasonable interest rate cuts and inflate stock prices in order to win the midterm elections.”

Under the traditional British hegemony, each country was mandated to maintain the independence of its central bank from its government. While each country’s central bank is independent from its own government, at the same time, a network of the British-associated central banks, including the Bank for International Settlements (BIS),  secretly controls these central banks. “Central bank independence” was a device designed to allow the British to dominate the world financially and force other countries to submit to the British hegemony. The economics theory that gave authority to this device was also entirely a British puppet theory (a sham). (Many liberal arts disciplines are similarly sham. With the disappearance of the British hegemony, universities also became meaningless. Long live universities!) Trump intentionally accused Powell of exaggerated crimes, pressured him to lower interest rates, and had the anti-Trump British puppet media attack him. He then actually forced Powell and the US Federal Reserve to lower interest rates and implement QE, thereby destroying central bank independence and the underlying structure of the British hegemony.

Rather than destroying the fraud of central bank independence, Trump is instead expanding and destroying the hypocritical and blatant violation of the norm.  He has continued to do the same with regard to global warming countermeasures. Instead of directly countering the anthropogenic theory of global warming, he has colluded hypocritically with oil interests to advance oil field development and pipeline construction, trampling and nullifying global warming countermeasures. Israel’s war on Gaza and other efforts to eliminate Palestine seem to share the similar intent.

In the academic world, the British puppets have won overwhelmingly both on central banks and global warming,  while those who expose the fraud and offer valid counterarguments have been politically defeated and completely neutralized. Under such circumstances, straightforward approaches are ineffective. All that is left is a hypocritical strategy. With his hypocritical strategy, Trump has brilliantly destroyed the system of distorting good and evil that has dominated the post-war world through the British [i.e. the British-associated Anglo-American powers, including globalists, liberal elites, the US Democrats, the EU, etc., having controlled the world order in the form of the Anglo-American hegemony].  The liberal left, the media, Islamists and other people who are (inadvertently) the British puppets are enraged but unable to change their tendency to defeat, they lose political power, and their rage and despair worsen, shortening their lifespans.  This trend could let those right wing people live happily. The common hypocrisy, in which one pretends as “being good”, is easy because it follows animal instincts, but another type of hypocrisy, in which one pretends as “being evil”, as Trump is pretending now, is difficult because it makes the one who pretends as such feel irrational.

——————————————————————————————————-

Notes:

  1. The hyperlinks with the parentheses ( ) at the end of some paragraphs were added by the original author. Those hyperlinks in the paragraphs and those with brackets [ ], with the italic letters at the end of some paragraphs were added by the translator for the convenience of the reader.
  2. The views and/or opinions in those hyperlinks added by the translator do not necessarily reflect those of his. In addition, it is either impossible or unavailable for the translator to verify the genuineness of the information in those links. He does not take any responsibility for the contents in those relevant links at all.
  3. Some sentences in the article, deemed important and/or emphasized in terms of the context, are expressed in the Gothic letters and/or the Italic letters, by the translator for the convenience of the reader.
  4. The views and/or opinions expressed in the above-mentioned article are those of Sakai Tanaka, who is the original author. His views and/or opinions do not necessarily reflect those of TMS or those of the translator. Therefore, the reader is kindly requested to understand, interpret or judge those views and/or opinions at his or her own responsibility.
  5. The original article in Japanese was published more than a few days or a few weeks ago. Meanwhile, the situations and/or conditions mentioned in the article might have been changed. This also means that the author’s argument expressed and/or the information provided in the article might have become inadequate or less or least adequate, obsolete, out of date or no longer valid by the time the TMS reader reads the same article in English.

——————————————————————————————————-

Original author: After graduating from university, Sakai Tanaka started working at the Kyodo News Agency in 1986. From 1997 he joined Microsoft Network (MSN) and in 1999, due to change of policy at Microsoft, he became an independent journalist. Tanaka has published more than twenty books on international affairs, some translated and published in China, South Korea and Taiwan. He studied at Harvard University from 2000 to 2001 and in 2005 was invited to serve as a senior researcher at the Royal Faisal Institute in Saudi Arabia. Website: tanakanews.com 

——————————————————————————————————-

 Translation:  Satoshi Ashikaga — Google Translate

——————————————————————————————————-

Original in Japanese:  偽悪戦略で世界秩序を創造的に破壊するトランプ


Tags: , , ,

This article originally appeared on Transcend Media Service (TMS) on 26 Jan 2026.

Anticopyright: Editorials and articles originated on TMS may be freely reprinted, disseminated, translated and used as background material, provided an acknowledgement and link to the source, TMS: Trump’s “Creative Destruction” of the World Order through an Unusual Hypocritical Strategy, is included. Thank you.

If you enjoyed this article, please donate to TMS to join the growing list of TMS Supporters.

Share this article:

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC 4.0 License.

There are no comments so far.

Join the discussion!

We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.

8 × 1 =

Note: we try to save your comment in your browser when there are technical problems. Still, for long comments we recommend that you copy them somewhere else as a backup before you submit them.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Read more

Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article:

ANGLO AMERICA: