High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program-HAARP: Weapon of Mass Destruction
MILITARISM, 11 Feb 2013
Rosalie Bertell, Ph.D., GNSH – TRANSCEND Media Service
One of the ways in which HAARP is thought to work is similar to firing a cap gun in an avalanche area. The snow is built up, ready to collapse and even the slightest disturbance causes an avalanche. That’s one way that HAARP works. In key areas where seismic pressures are ready to shift, HAARP bombards the already sensitive area with an incredible amount of energy in the form of a beam that reflects off the ionosphere. The earth’s tectonic plates vibrate and an earthquake results.
Background of the HAARP Project
Military interest in space became intense during and after World War II because of the introduction of rocket science, the companion to nuclear technology. The early versions include the buzz bomb and guided missiles. They were thought of as potential carriers of both nuclear and conventional bombs.
Rocket technology and nuclear weapon technology developed simultaneously between 1945 and 1963. During this time of intensive atmospheric nuclear testing, explosions at various levels above and below the surface of the earth were attempted. Some of the now familiar descriptions of the earth’s protective atmosphere, such as the existence of the Van Allen belts, were based on information gained through stratospheric and ionospheric experimentation.
The earth’s atmosphere consists of the troposphere, from sea level to about 16 km above the earth’s surface; the stratosphere (which contains the ozone level) which extends from about the 16 to 48 km above the earth; and the ionosphere which extends from 48 km to over 50,000 km above the surface of the earth.
The earth’s protective atmosphere or “skin” extends beyond 3,200 km above sea level to the large magnetic fields, called the Van Allen Belts, which can capture the charged particles sprayed through the cosmos by the solar and galactic winds. These belts were discovered in 1958 during the first weeks of the operation of America’s first satellite, Explorer I. They appear to contain charged particles trapped in the earth’s gravity and magnetic fields. Primary galactic cosmic rays enter the solar system from interstellar space, and are made up of protons with energies above 100 MeV, extending up to astronomically high energies.
They make up about 100 percent of the high energy rays. Solar rays are generally of lower energy, below 20 MeV (which is still high energy in earth terms). These high energy particles are affected by the earth’s magnetic field and by geomagnetic latitude (distance above or below the geomagnetic equator). The flux density of low energy protons at the top of the atmosphere is normally greater at the poles than at the equator. The density also varies with solar activity, being at a minimum when solar flares are at a minimum.
The Van Allen belts capture charged particles (protons, electrons and alpha particles) and these spiral along the magnetic force lines toward the polar regions where the force lines converge. They are reflected back and forth between the magnetic force lines near the poles. The lower Van Allen Belt is about 7700 km above the earth’s surface, and the outer Van Allen Belt is about 51,500 km above the surface. According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, the Van Allen belts are most intense along the equator, and effectively absent over the poles.
They dip to 400 km over the South Atlantic Ocean, and are about 1,000 km high over the Central Pacific Ocean. In the lower Van Allen Belt, the proton intensity is about 20,000 particles with energy above 30 MeV per second per square centimeter. Electrons reach a maximum energy of 1 MeV, and their intensity has a maximum of 100 million per second per square centimeter. In the outer Belt, proton energy averages only 1 MeV. For comparison, most charged particles discharged in a nuclear explosion range between 0.3 and 3 MeV, while diagnostic medical X-ray has peak voltage around 0.5 MeV.
Project Argus (1958)
Between August and September 1958, the US Navy exploded three fission type nuclear bombs 480 km above the South Atlantic Ocean, in the part of the lower Van Allen Belt closest to the earth’s surface. In addition, two hydrogen bombs were detonated 160 km over Johnston Island in the Pacific. The military called this “the biggest scientific experiment ever undertaken.” It was designed by the US Department of Defense and the US Atomic Energy Commission, under the code name Project Argus. The purpose appears to be to assess the impact of high altitude nuclear explosions on radio transmission and radar operations because of the electromagnetic pulse (EMP), and to increase understanding of the geomagnetic field and the behavior of the charged particles in it.
This gigantic experiment created new (inner) magnetic radiation belts encompassing almost the whole earth, and injected sufficient electrons and other energetic particles into the ionosphere to cause world wide effects. The electrons traveled back and forth along magnetic force lines, causing an artificial “aurora” when striking the atmosphere near the North Pole.
The US Military planned to create a “telecommunications shield” in the ionosphere, reported in 13-20 August 1961, Keesings Historisch Archief (K.H.A.). This shield would be created “in the ionosphere at 3,000 km height, by bringing into orbit 350,000 million copper needles, each 2-4 cm long [total weight 16 kg], forming a belt 10 km thick and 40 km wide, the needles spaced about 100 m apart.” This was designed to replace the ionosphere “because telecommunications are impaired by magnetic storms and solar flares.” The US planned to add to the number of copper needles if the experiment proved to be successful. This plan was strongly opposed by the Intentional Union of Astronomers.
Project Starfish (1962)
On July 9, 1962, the US began a further series of experiments with the ionosphere. From their description: “one kiloton device, at a height of 60 km and one megaton and one multi-megaton, at several hundred kilometers height” (K.H.A., 29 June 1962). These tests seriously disturbed the lower Van Allen Belt, substantially altering its shape and intensity. “In this experiment the inner Van Allen Belt will be practically destroyed for a period of time; particles from the Belt will be transported to the atmosphere. It is anticipated that the earth’s magnetic field will be disturbed over long distances for several hours, preventing radio communication. The explosion in the inner radiation belt will create an artificial dome of polar light that will be visible from Los Angeles” (K.H.A. 11 May 1962). A Fijian Sailor, present at this nuclear explosion, told me that the whole sky was on fire and he thought it would be the end of the world. This was the experiment which called forth the strong protest of the Queen’s Astronomer, Sir Martin Ryle in the UK.
“The ionosphere [according to the under-standing at that time] that part of the atmosphere between 65 and 80 km and 280- 320 km height, will be disrupted by mechanical forces caused by the pressure wave following the explosion. At the same time, large quantities of ionizing radiation will be released, further ionizing the gaseous components of the atmosphere at this height. This ionization effect is strengthened by the radiation from the fission products… The lower Van Allen Belt, consisting of charged particles that move along the geomagnetic field lines… will similarly be disrupted. As a result of the explosion, this field will be locally destroyed, while countless new electrons will be introduced into the lower belt” (K.H.A. 11 May 1962). “On 19 July… NASA announced that as a consequence of the high altitude nuclear test of July 9, a new radiation belt had been formed, stretching from a height of about 400 km to 1600 km; it can be seen as a temporary extension of the lower Van Allen Belt” (K.H.A. 5 August 1962).
As explained in the Encyclopedia Britannica: “… Starfish made a much wider belt [than Project Argus] that extends from low altitude out past L=3 [i.e. three earth radiuses or about 13,000 km above the surface of the earth].” Later in 1962, the USSR undertook similar planetary experiments, creating three new radiation belts between 7,000 and 13,000 km above the earth. According to the Encyclopedia, the electron fluxes in the lower Van Allen Belt have changed markedly since the 1962 high- altitude nuclear explosions by the US and USSR, never returning to their former state. According to American scientists, it could take many hundreds of years for the Van Allen Belts to destabilize at their normal levels. (Research done by: Nigel Harle, Borderland Archives, Cortenbachstraat 32, 6136 CH Sittard, Netherlands.)
SPS: Solar Power Satellite Project (1968)
In 1968 the US military proposed Solar Powered Satellites in geostationary orbit some 40,000 km above the earth, which would intercept solar radiation using solar cells on satellites and transmit it via a microwave beam to receiving antennas, called rectennas, on earth. The US Congress mandated the Department of Energy and NASA to prepare an Environmental Impact Assessment on this project, to be completed by June 1980, and costing $25 Million. This project was designed to construct 60 Solar Powered Satellites over a thirty year period at a cost between $500 and $800 thousand million (in 1968 dollars), providing 100 percent of the US energy needs in the year 2025 at a cost of $3000 per kW. At that time, the project cost was two to three times larger than the whole Department of Energy budget, and the projected cost of the electricity was well above the cost of most conventional energy sources. The rectenna sites on earth were expected to take up to 145 square kilometers of land, and would preclude habitation by any humans, animals or even vegetation. Each Satellite was to be the size of Manhattan Island.
Saturn V Rocket (1975)
Due to a malfunction, the Saturn V Rocket burned unusually high in the atmosphere, above 300 km. This burn produced “a large ionospheric hole” (Mendillo, M. Et al., Science p. 187, 343, 1975). The disturbance reduced the total electron content more than 60% over an area 1,000 km in radius, and lasted for several hours. It prevented all telecommunications over a large area of the Atlantic Ocean. The phenomenon was apparently caused by a reaction between the exhaust gases and ionospheric oxygen ions. The reaction emitted a 6300 A airglow. Between 1975 and 1981 NASA and the US Military began to design ways to test this new phenomena through deliberate experimentation with the ionosphere.
SPS Military Implications (1978)
Early review of the Solar Powered Satellite Project began in around 1978, and I was on the review panel. Although this was proposed as an energy program, it had significant military implications. One of the most significant, first pointed out by Michael J. Ozeroff, was the possibility of developing a satellite-borne beam weapon for anti-ballistic missile (ABM) use. The satellites were to be in geosynchronous orbits, each providing an excellent vantage point from which an entire hemisphere can be surveyed continuously. It was speculated that a high-energy laser beam could function as a thermal weapon to disable or destroy enemy missiles. There was some discussion of electron weapon beams, through the use of a laser beam to preheat a path for the following electron beam.
The SPS was also described as a psychological and anti- personnel weapon, which could be directed toward an enemy. If the main microwave beam was redirected away from its rectenna, toward enemy personnel, it could use an infrared radiation wave- length (invisible) as an anti-personnel weapon. It might also be possible to transmit high enough energy to ignite combustible materials. Laser beam power relays could be made from the SPS satellite to other satellites or platforms, for example aircraft, for military purposes. One application might be a laser powered turbofan engine which would receive the laser beam directly in its combustion chamber, producing the required high temperature gas for its cruising operation. This would allow unlimited on-station cruise time. As a psychological weapon, the SPS was capable of causing general panic
The SPS would be able to transmit power to remote military operations anywhere needed on earth. The manned platform of the SPS would provide surveillance and early warning capability, and ELF linkage to submarines. It would also provide the capability of jamming enemy communications. The potential for jamming and creating communications is significant. The SPS was also capable of causing physical changes in the ionosphere
President Carter approved the SPS Project and gave it a go- ahead, in spite of the reservation which many reviewers, myself included, expressed. Fortunately, it was so expensive, exceeding the entire Department of Energy budget, that funding was denied by the Congress. I approached the United Nations Committee on Disarmament on this project, but was told that as long as the program was called Solar Energy by the United States, it could not be considered a weapons project. The same project resurfaced in the US under President Reagan. He moved it to the much larger budget of the Department of Defense and called it Star Wars. Since this is more recent history, I will not discuss the debate which raged over this phase of the plan.
By 1978, it was apparent to the US Military that communications in a nuclear hostile environment would not be possible using traditional methods of radio and television technology (Jane’s Military Communications 1978). By 1982, GTE Sylvania (Needham Heights, Massachusetts) had developed a command control electronic sub-system for the US Air Force’s Ground Launch Cruise Missiles (GLCM) that would enable military commanders to monitor and control the missile prior to launch both in hostile and non-hostile environments. The system contains six radio subsystems, created with visible light using a dark beam (not visible) and is resistant to the disruptions experienced by radio and television. Dark beams contribute to the formation of energetic plasma in the atmosphere. This plasma can become visible as smog or fog. Some has a different charge than the sun’s energy, and accumulates in places where the sun’s energy is absent, like the polar regions in the winter. When the polar spring occurs, the sun appears and repels this plasma, contributing to holes in the ozone layer. This military system is called: Ground Wave Emergency Network (GWEN). (See The SECOMII Communication System, by Wayne Olsen, SAND 78- 0391,Sandia Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, April 1978.) This innovative emergency radio system was apparently never implemented in Europe, and exists only in North America.
Orbit Maneuvering System (1981)
Part of the plan to build the SPS space platforms was the demand for reusable space shuttles, since they could not afford to keep discarding rockets. The NASA Spacelab 3 Mission of the Space Shuttle made, in 1981, “a series of passes over a network of five ground based observatories” in order to study what happened to the ionosphere when the Shuttle injected gases into it from the Orbit Maneuvering System (OMS). They discovered that they could “induce ionospheric holes” and began to experiment with holes made in the daytime, or at night over Millstone, Connecticut, and Arecibo, Puerto Rico. They experimented with the effects of “artificially induced ionospheric depletions on very low frequency wave lengths, on equatorial plasma instabilities, and on low frequency radio astronomical observations over Roberval, Quebec, Kwajelein, in the Marshall Islands and Hobart, Tasmania” (Advanced Space Research, Vo1.8, No. 1, 1988).
Innovative Shuttle Experiments (1985)
An innovative use of the Space Shuttle to perform space physics experiments in earth orbit was launched, using the OMS injections of gases to “cause a sudden depletion in the local plasma concentration, the creation of a so called ionospheric hole.” This artificially induced plasma depletion can then be used to investigate other space phenomena, such as the growth of the plasma instabilities or the modification of radio propagation paths. The 47 second OMS burn of July 29, 1985, produced the largest and most long-lived ionospheric hole to date, dumping some 830 kg of exhaust into the ionosphere at sunset. A 6 second, 68 km OMS release above Connecticut in August 1985, produced an airglow which covered over 400,000 square km.
During the 1980’s, rocket launches globally numbered about 500 to 600 a year, peaking at 1500 in 1989. There were many more during the Gulf War. The Shuttle is the largest of the solid fuel rockets, with twin 45 meter boosters. All solid fuel rockets release large amounts of hydrochloric acid in their exhaust, each Shuttle flight injecting about 75 tons of ozone destroying chlorine into the stratosphere. Those launched since 1992 inject even more ozone-destroying chlorine, about 187 tons, into the stratosphere (which contains the ozone layer).
Mighty Oaks (1986)
In April 1986, just before the Chernobyl disaster, the US had a failed hydrogen test at the Nevada Test Site called Mighty Oaks. This test, conducted far underground, consisted of a hydrogen bomb explosion in one chamber, with a leaded steel door to the chamber, two meters thick, closing within milliseconds of the blast. The door was to allow only the first radioactive beam to escape into the “control room” in which expensive instrumentation was located. The radiation was to be captured as a weapon beam. The door failed to close as quickly as planned, causing the radioactive gases and debris to fill the control room, destroying millions of dollars worth of equipment. The experiment was part of a program to develop X-ray and particle beam weapons. The radioactive releases from Mighty Oaks were vented, under a “licensed venting” and were likely responsible for many of the North American nuclear fallout reports in May 1986, which were attributed to the Chernobyl disaster.
Desert Storm (1991)
According to Defense News, April 13 – 19, 1992, the US deployed an electromagnetic pulse weapon (EMP) in Desert Storm, designed to mimic the flash of electricity from a nuclear bomb. The Sandia National Laboratory had built a 23,000 square meter laboratory on the Kirkland Air Force Base, 1989, to house the Hermes II electron beam generator capable of producing 20 Trillion Watt pulses lasting 20 billionths to 25 billionths of a second. This X-ray simulator is called a Particle Beam Fusion Accelerator. A stream of electrons hitting a metal plate can produce a pulsed X-ray or gamma ray. Hermes II had produced electron beams since 1974. These devises were apparently tested during the Gulf War, although detailed information on them is sparse.
High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, HAARP (1993)
The HAARP Program is jointly managed by the US Air Force and the US Navy, and is based in Gakona, Alaska. It is designed to “understand, simulate and control ionospheric processes that might alter the performance of communication and surveillance systems.” The HAARP system intends to beam 3.6 Gigawatts of effective radiated power of high frequency radio energy into the ionosphere in order to:
- Generate extremely low frequency (ELF) waves for communicating with submerged submarines
- Conduct geophysical probes to identify and characterize natural ionospheric processes so that techniques can be developed to mitigate or control them
- Generate ionospheric lenses to focus large amounts of high frequency energy, thus providing a means of triggering ionospheric processes that potentially could be exploited for Department of Defense purposes,
- Electron acceleration for infrared (IR) and other optical emissions which could be used to control radio wave propagation properties
- Generate geomagnetic field aligned ionization to control the reflection/scattering properties of radio waves,
- Use oblique heating to produce effects on radio wave propagation, thus broadening the potential military applications of ionospheric enhancement technology.
Poker Flat Rocket Launch (1968 to Present)
The Poker Flat Research Range is located about 50 km North of Fairbanks, Alaska, and it was established in 1968. It is operated by the Geophysical Institute with the University of Alaska Fairbanks, under NASA contract. About 250 major rocket launches have taken place from this site, and in 1994, a 16 meter long rocket was launched to help NASA “understand chemical reactions in the atmosphere associated with global climate change.” Similar experiments, but using Chemical Release Modules (CRM), have been launched from Churchill, Manitoba. In 1980, Brian Whelan’s “Project Waterhole” disrupted an aurora borealis, bringing it to a temporary halt. In February 1983, the chemical released into the ionosphere caused an aurora borealis over Churchill. In March 1989, two Black Brant X’s and two Nike Orion rockets were launched over Canada, releasing barium at high altitudes and creating artificial clouds. These Churchill artificial clouds were observed from as far away as Los Alamos, New Mexico.
The US Navy has also been carrying on High Power Auroral Stimulation (HIPAS) research in Alaska. Through a series of wires and a 15 meter antenna, they have beamed high intensity signals into the upper atmosphere, generating a controlled disturbance in the ionosphere. As early as 1992, the Navy talked of creating 10 kilometer long antennas in the sky to generate extremely low frequency (ELF) waves needed for communicating with submarines. Another purpose of these experiments is to study the Aurora Borealis, called by some an outdoor plasma lab for studying the principles of fusion. Shuttle flights are now able to generate auroras with an electron beam.
On November 10, 1991, and aurora borealis appeared in the Texas sky for the first time ever recorded, and it was seen by people as far away as Ohio and Utah, Nebraska and Missouri. The sky contained “Christmas colors” and various scientists were quick to blame it on solar activity. However, when pressed most would admit that the ionosphere must have been weakened at the time, so that the electrically charged particle hitting the earth’s atmosphere created the highly visible light called airglow. These charged particles are normally pulled northwards by the earth’s magnetic forces, to the magnetic north pole. The Northern Lights, as the aurora borealis is called, normally occurs in the vortex at the pole where the energetic particles, directed by the magnetic force lines, are directed.
Conclusions
It would be rash to assume that HAARP is an isolated experiment which would not be expanded. It is related to fifty years of intensive and increasingly destructive programs to understand and control the upper atmosphere.
It would be rash not to associate HAARP with the space laboratory construction which is separately being planned by the United States. HAARP is an integral part of a long history of space research and development of a deliberate military nature.
The military implications of combining these projects is alarming.
Basic to this project is control of communications, both disruption and reliability in hostile environments. The power wielded by such control is obvious.
The ability of the HAARP / Spacelab/ rocket combination to deliver very large amount of energy, comparable to a nuclear bomb, anywhere on earth via laser and particle beams, are frightening.
The project is likely to be “sold” to the public as a space shield against incoming weapons, or, for the more gullible, a devise for repairing the ozone layer.
Further References:
C.L. Herzenberg, Physics and Society, April 1994.
R. Williams, Physics and Society, April 1988.
B. Eastlund, Microwave News, May/June 1994.
W. Kofinan and C. Lathuillere, Geophysical Research Letters, Vol 14, No. 11, pp 1158-1161, November 1987 (Includes French experiments at EISCAT).
G. Metz and F.W. Perkins. Ionospheric Modification Theory: Past Present and Future, Radio Science, Vo1.9, No. 11, pp 885 -888, November 1974.
This page maintained and copyright ©1996 – 1999 by the Earthpulse Press.
*******************
FURTHER READING:
According to a statement by a university professor taken from Venezuela’s state-controlled public media, Alaska’s High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) caused the recent devastation in Haiti so that the U.S. could take over the impoverished country under the guise of humanitarian aid.
Go to Original – jesus-is-savior.com
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Although it might be a bit late to post this comment for this week (- but the TMS readers will be able to read it by clicking the Archive from next week – ), I have decided to post it as follows:
Needless to say, chemical weapons and nuclear weapons are weapons of mass destruction (WMD). The HAARP weapon is a new WMD. It can be said that HAARP is a new generation of the Manhattan Project. If the Manhattan Project was about the nuclear weapons, “High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program” (HAARP) is about the weapon for the weather control (and possibly mind control as well).
Note that, as the above article indicates, “The HAARP Program is jointly managed by the US Air Force and the US Navy”. That implies that HAARP is not just for the civilian purpose; it is essentially for the military purpose. The above article also says, “HAARP is an integral part of a long history of space research and development of a deliberate military nature. The military implications of combining these projects is alarming.” The article claims, “The ability of the HAARP/Spacelab/rocket combination to deliver very large amount of energy, comparable to a nuclear bomb, anywhere on earth via laser and particle beams, are frightening.”
Remember that the Manhattan Project was said, especially in the early stages, that it was just for some atomic energy research. Then, the outcome of the Project was the atomic bomb. Today, many people are aware that HAARP is essentially a military project, aiming at producing a new scientific weapon – the nature/weather control.
Let me introduce some of websites, among many others, that may be informative for the TMS readers as follows:
Yahoo search on HAARP: http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A0oG7thXgRpRVnUA3rpXNyoA?p=haarp+weapon&ei=UTF-8&type=937811&fr=chr-greentree_ff&xargs=0&pstart=1&b=21&xa=OJBcxwsGmFEZRJby89YVnQ–,1360777943
The above article refers “The HAARP Program is jointly managed by the US Air Force and the US Navy, and is based in Gakona, Alaska.” The official website (University of Alaska) of it is this: http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/
This website provides the summary of the book, “Angels Do Not Play This HAARP”: http://haarp.net/
Wikipedia informs, “The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) is an ionospheric research program jointly funded by the U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Navy, the University of Alaska, and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program
This website explains HAARP as a weather weapon: http://watcherreport.blogspot.com/2011/05/haarp-us-military-secret-weapon.html
This website clearly warns of the weather control weapon that HAARP produces: http://wanttoknow.info/war/haarp_weather_modification_electromagnetic_warfare_weapons
This website provides the reader with some scientific explanation about the weather control weapon: https://goldenageofgaia.com/accountability/weather-warfare/haarp-weapon-total-destruction/
This website also provides rather detail explanations about the weather control weapon: http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/haarp_index.htm
This website argues that HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction and provides very detailed scientific information: http://www.bariumblues.com/haarp1.htm
This website points out the possibility of the use of HAARP weapon that might have caused the earthquake of Fukushima: http://www.naturalnews.com/032670_Fukushima_HAARP.html
This website provides scientific data on the Fukushima earthquake: http://www.technologyreview.com/view/424033/atmosphere-above-japan-heated-rapidly-before-m9-earthquake/
This websites informs, by referring to the European Parliament document, that the HAARP weapon system causes weather modification: http://www.ufo-blogger.com/2011/03/haarp-weapon-system-causes-weather.html
The European Parliament document on HAARP. See, among other pages, pages 4 and 10. Note, on page 4, that HAARP is mentioned as a part of weapon and security issues: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A4-1999-0005+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN
This website carefully discusses the possibility of HAARP as a weather modification weapon: http://www.examiner.com/article/haarp-secret-weapon-for-weather-modification-electromagnetic-warfare
This website claims that HAARP was used to cause the Fukushima earthquake: http://www.morningliberty.com/2011/03/14/top-5-haarp-weapon-targets-who-will-stop-this-madness/
YouTube videos on HAARP:
What is HAARP? http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=haarp&oq=haarp&gs_l=youtube.1.0.0l10.19644.21392.0.25040.7.7.0.0.0.0.298.1204.1j4j2.7.0…0.0…1ac.1.NN6Ip_4T43g
The possible link of HAARP and the Haitian earthquake: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhJfkh0e3l0
Dear Satoshi, many thanks for further enriching the subject, which is mostly unknown to the general public–and even to experts– as corporate media doesn’t touch it.
Best,
Antonio
PS.
This comment contains two topics – Topic One and Topic Two.
Topic One: European Parliament Document
Although I mentioned in my comment on HAARP above, let me mention again here in this comment:
It is about the European Parliament document that I mentioned in the above comment. It is DOC_EN\RR\370\370003, entitled, REPORT
on the environment, security and foreign policy Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defence Policy, dated on 14 January 1999.
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A4-1999-0005+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN
In Topic One, let me quote some remarkable parts from the above mentioned document.
Quote (p.4):
The European Parliament, —– having regard to the hearing on HAARP and Non-lethal Weapons held by the Foreign Affairs Subcommitee on Security and Disarmament in Brussels on 5 February 1998, —
Unquote:
Quote (p.6)
T. whereas, despite the existing conventions, military research is ongoing on environmental
manipulation as a weapon, as demonstrated for example by the Alaska-based HAARP
system,
Unquote:
Quote (p.10):
27. Considers HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) by virtue of its farreaching
impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological
and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body before any
further research and testing; regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration
to send anyone in person to give evidence to the public hearing or any subsequent meeting
held by its competent committee into the environmental and public risks connected with the
high Frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP) programme currently being
funded in Alaska;
28. Requests the Scientific and Technological Options Assessment (STOA) Panel to agree to
examine the scientific and technical evidence provided in all existing research findings on
HAARP to assess the exact nature and degree of risk that HAARP poses both to the local
and global environment and to public health generally;
29. Calls on the Commission, in collaboration with the governments of Sweden, Finland,
Norway and the Russian Federation, to examine the environmental and public health
implications of the HAARP programme for Arctic Europe and to report back to Parliament
with its findings;”
Unquote:
Quote (pp.19-20, including the footnotes):
HAARP – a weapons system which disrupts the climate
On 5 February 1998 Parliament’s Subcommittee on Security and Disarmament held a hearing the
subject of which included HAARP. NATO and the US had been invited to send representatives, but
chose not to do so. The Committee regrets the failure of the USA to send a representative to answer questions, or to use the opportunity to comment on the material submitted.(22)
HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) is run jointly by the US Air Force and
Navy, in conjunction with the Geophysical Institute of the University of Alaska, Fairbanks. Similar
experiments are also being conducted in Norway, probably in the Antarctic, as well as in the former Soviet Union.(23) HAARP is a research project using a ground based apparatus, an array of antennae each powered by its own transmitter, to heat up portions of ionosphere with powerful radio beams.(24) The energy generated heats up parts of the ionosphere; this results in holes in the ionosphere and produces artificial ’lenses’.
HAARP can be used for many purposes. Enormous quantities of energy can be controlled by
manipulating the electrical characteristics of the atmosphere. If used as a military weapon this can
have a devastating impact on an enemy. HAARP can deliver millions of times more energy to a
given area than any other conventional transmitter. The energy can also be aimed at a moving target which should constitute a potential anti-missile system.
The project would also allow better communications with submarines and manipulation of global
weather patterns, but it is also possible to do the reverse, to disrupt communications. By
manipulating the ionosphere one could block global communications while transmitting one’s own.
Another application is earth-penetrating, tomography, x-raying the earth several kilometres deep to detect oil and gas fields, or underground military facilities. Over-the-horizon radar is another
application, looking round the curvature of the earth for in-coming objects.
From the 1950s the USA conducted explosions of nuclear material in the Van Allen Belts(25) to
investigate the effect of the electro-magnetic pulse generated by nuclear weapon explosions at these heights on radio communications and the operation of radar. This created new magnetic radiation belts which covered nearly the whole earth. The electrons travelled along magnetic lines of force and created an artificial Aurora Borealis above the North Pole. These military tests are liable to disrupt the Van Allen belt for a long period. The earth’s magnetic field could be disrupted over large areas, which would obstruct radio communications. According to US scientists it could take hundreds of years for the Van Allen belt to return to normal. HAARP could result in changes in weather patterns. It could also influence whole ecosystems, especially in the sensitive Antarctic regions.
Another damaging consequence of HAARP is the occurrence of holes in the ionosphere caused by
the powerful radio beams. The ionosphere protects us from incoming cosmic radiation. The hope
is that the holes will fill again, but our experience of change in the ozone layer points in the other
direction. This means substantial holes in the ionosphere that protects us.
With its far-reaching impact on the environment HAARP is a matter of global concern and we have
to ask whether its advantages really outweigh the risks. The environmental impact and the ethical
aspect must be closely examined before any further research and testing takes place. HAARP is a
project of which the public is almost completely unaware, and this needs to be remedied.
HAARP has links with 50 years of intensive space research for military purposes, including the Star
Wars project, to control the upper atmosphere and communications. This kind of research has to be regarded as a serious threat to the environment, with an incalculable impact on human life. Even now nobody knows what impact HAARP may have. We have to beat down the wall of secrecy around military research, and set up the right to openness and democratic scrutiny of military research projects, and parliamentary control.
A series of international treaties and conventions (the Convention on the prohibition of military or
any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques, the Antarctic Treaty, the Treaty on principles governing the activities of states in the exploration and use of outer space including the moon and other celestial bodies, and the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea) casts considerable doubt on HAARP on legal as well as humanitarian and political grounds. The Antarctic Treaty lays down that the Antarctic may be used exclusively for peaceful purposes.(26) This would mean that HAARP is a breach of international law. All the implications of the new weapons systems should be examined by independent international bodies. Further international agreements should be sought to protect the environment from unnecessary destruction in war.
Footnotes:
(22) This section is based on information from the hearing.
(23) Dr Nick Begich, speaker at the hearing.
(24) The ionosphere contains vast protective magnetic fields know as the Van Allen belts which
intercept charged particles (protons, electrons and alpha particles).
25) In 1958 the US Navy exploded 3 devices containing nuclear material 480 km above the South Atlantic. Designed by the US Department of Defence and the Atomic EnergyCommission under the code name Project Argus. Source: Dr Rosalie Bertell.
(26) Article 1, the Antarctic Treaty.
Unquote:
—–
Topic Two: Weapon Experiment in Kosovo?
By the way, recently I heard a rumor about one of the main reasons why the United State had supported the independence of Kosovo. For a long time I did not understand the reason(s) why the United States enthusiastically supported Kosovo’s independence.
According to that rumor, the United States intends to use Kosovo as a place for new weapon experiments. Kosovo is too small for the construction of a US military airbase, but it may be an appropriate place for a military weapon experiment site. But why Kosovo? What kind of weapon experiment? I do not know. Kosovo is near from the Western European countries. Therefore, the United States might hesitate to construct a chemical or radioactive weapon experiment site. How Kosovo can be used as a place for the experiment of weapons?
Then, I thought about HAARP. Suppose that a HAARP antennae site will be constructed in Kosovo. (A HAARP antennae site does not require an extra-huge space, contrary to a military airbase that requires a huge space.) Then, it will be possible to emit electromagnet signals from the Kosovo HAARP site to Serbia, Russia (St. Petersburg, Moscow, etc.) and the Middle East (Arabic countries). Look at the map and you will understand much clearer what I mean. The electromagnet signals (= the powerful radio beams that heat up a certain portion of the ionosphere above the targeted city/area) from the Kosovo HAARP site may be able to cause an earthquake to destroy one of or some of the targeted cities, including major cities in these countries/regions. Kosovo is rich in natural resources, including oil. (Kosovo is rich in natural resources and this is one of the main reasons why Serbia never gives up Kosovo, not simply because of the historical or emotional reasons.) Therefore, it is no problem to build powerful electric generating facilities in Kosovo, to create powerful radio beams that the HAARP system requires.
That explains why – at least one of the reasons why – the United States enthusiastically supported Kosovo’s independence. The United States has a huge military focal point in Germany, but the US needs to have one more military focal point somewhere between Western Europe and the Middle East. That place can be Kosovo. Germany is a US military supply site, while Kosovo can be a new “strategic weapon” deployment site for the United States, aiming at the Middle East and northeast. This “strategic weapon” (= the HAARP weapon?) is neither chemical nor radioactive one so that it is safe for Western European countries because only antennae (and some powerful electric generating facilities) will be constructed – as mentioned above.
In any case, however, what I have mentioned here in this context is my speculation. Therefore, some people may laugh about it. That is quite all right. Nonetheless, the possibility exists; it is possible to do so. The possibility is one thing; whether it will actually be implemented so is another. But it is not worthless at all to examine that possibility. Remember a part of the above mentioned quotes, which says: “If used as a military weapon this can have a devastating impact on an enemy. HAARP can deliver millions of times more energy to a given area than any other conventional transmitter. The energy can also be aimed at a moving target which should constitute a potential anti-missile system.” (p.19)
I recommend that peace-loving people read all pages (35 pages) of the above mentioned document of the European Parliament.
Scientific research for what? Not for peace and prosperity of the whole humanity but for another mass killing of the humanity? Nuclear weapons are not enough? The “Age of the Post-Nuclear Weapon” has come? History proves that, in most cases, the victims were mostly innocent civilians. Who will possibly become the main victims of a huge earthquake or of the serious damage of the Van Allen belt? The answer is clear.
May peace be with you. May peace be with the whole humanity.
[…] [10] See http://www.transcend.org/tms/2013/02/high-frequency-active-auroral-research-program-haarp-weapon-of-… […]