Facebook Takes Flak over Privacy


Omar Chatriwala - AlJazeera

Facebook, the social sharing website, has come under growing criticism for recent changes to its privacy settings, which make it easier for users’ information to be spread beyond the site.

The number of Facebook users interested in deleting their accounts on the website, which boasts more than 400 million registered members, has doubled in the past week, according to figures released by the search engine Google.

A website has also now been launched, urging those “sick of Facebook’s lack of respect for your data” to quit the website in joint protest on May 31. In the site’s first day, it had garnered more than 680 pledges to do so.

Confusing options

The changes made to Facebook recently allow third-part websites, like news outlet WashingtonPost.com and music site Pandora Radio, to automatically tap into a users’ profiles and their friends’ activities without being first asked for permission.

Instead, a user must navigate Facebook’s labyrinthine settings pages to opt-out of the feature.

Many users, first learning of the changes by finding their information on those other websites, have greeted the news with anger.

Some complained they were unaware of, or didn’t understand, the changes made to the company’s more than 5,800-word privacy policy. Others accuse the website of seeking to exploit its users by controlling access to their private information.

Facebook executives, however, say users love the changes, and attribute a negative backlash to media outlets and organisations like the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

A detailed infographic from the New York Times gives you an idea of the complexity of Facebook’s privacy management settings.

Displeasure over the company’s policies has stirred a group of four developers to start work on an alternative to the 400 million user website.

Interest in Diaspora*, which aims to create a more privacy-aware social platform, has been so high that the group met their funding goals in less than a third of the time they’d hoped for.

However, Ben Parr, the co-editor of the social networking blog Mashable, says Facebook does not appear to be significantly impacted by this latest round of anger and criticism.



Share this article:

DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Comments are closed.