Insecurity in Security


Bishnu Pathak, PhD, Peace and Conflict Studies Center – TRANSCEND Media Service

The burgeoning Chinese, In­dian and Pakistani influence raises alarm in transitional Nepal which has an open border with both China and India. India encircles it from three sides east, west and south with a 1,751 km long largely porous border, unmarked and unguarded, whereas China lies to the north with 1,414 km of inac­cessible border. It is not possible to cross this border owing to elevation of snowy mountains and tight secu­rity on the Chinese side. The recent Nepal(Nepo)-India cross border opening has been an ideal conduit for al­leged spies. Nepal has also been a favorable terrain for smuggling il­legal goods, arms and ammunition, counterfeit currency notes, Free Ti­bet literature, etc. Nepal, India and China have been close neighbors for a long time indeed.

Escalating Chinese influence in Nepal has been a grave concern to India. The cordial Sino-India friendship raises suspicion because of India’s role in the Republic Ne­pal proclamation in May 29, 2008. The Nepo-India enmity strengthened when King Birendra adopted a “Peace Zone” policy on his corona­tion day on February 24, 1975. The situation further aggravated while Birendra protested against the merger of Sikkim to India on April 4, 1975. Sikkim had the annexation of Greater Nepal ceded to the East India Company under the Sugauli Treaty of 1816. Article 8 of the Indo-Nepal Peace and Friendship Treaty of 1950 annulled all previous trea­ties and agreements signed between Nepal and the British Government, but in vain. The hostility with India brought Nepo-China closer while Nepal purchased air defense artil­lery from Beijing in June 1988 through the secret pact, ignor­ing the Arms Assistance Agreement of 1965 with India. India protested vigorously stating that Nepal’s action had violated the spirit of peace and friendship treaty, but Nepal insisted that she had the sovereign right to determine her own defense requirements.

Nepal’s National Intelligence Department (NID) has listed 23 Bud­dhist monasteries in the Kathman­du Valley with six of them placed as ‘very sensitive’ and 17 ‘sensitive’ in terms of the Free Tibet movement. Some of them have stored weapons (eKantipur: December 5, 2009). International communities namely, Japan, Taiwan, USA and European nations, etc. financially support the three dozen Buddhist monasteries (eKantipur: December 6, 2009). On September 15, 1974, the Nepalese Army disarmed some 9,000 Khampas (Tibetan tribesmen resisting Chinese authority) engag­ing in guerrilla warfare from the soil of Mustang, Nepal.

Chen Bingde, CoAS of the PLA of China paid his first ever official visit to Nepal, leading an 18-member high level army delegation including Tibetan Commander from March 23-25, 2011. That visit was a major step to expand China’s strategic security influence to further tighten the “One China” policy with the left-alliance govern­ment in Nepal.

During Prachanda’s premiership, China submitted a draft proposal of a Peace and Friendship Treaty in the changed political context on Febru­ary 27, 2009, but this could not ma­terialize owing to the stand of right parties that would not sign. It was not their brainstorming, but the whisper of Indian establishment.

Yunus Ansari, a TV shop owner detained in the tightly-guarded Central Jail for his alleged involve­ment in possessing fake Indian cur­rency was fired at by the Indian con­tract killer Manmit Singh Bhatia at 11:30 am on March 10, 2011. But he suffered a bullet injury in the back. The same assailant had shot dead Majid Manihar at a hotel in Nepal­gunj in October 2009. Jamin Shah, media person, was shot dead by two masked men on a motorbike in Laz­impat in broad daylight on February 7, 2010. It is to be remarkable of that Bhatia was contracted by the Special Task Force of India (Kan­tipur: March 24, 2011).

India’s security concerns expo­nentially increased while Indian Airlines Flight 814 en route from Kathmandu to New Delhi was hi­jacked by five Kashmiri insurgents sympathetic to Pakistan on Decem­ber 24, 1999. The hijackers forcefully landed the aircraft in Kandahar, Afghanistan, via Dubai, Amritsar and Lahore. The hijacking ended in seven days after Indian authori­ties were compelled to release three jailed Islamic militants.

The Indian government sus­pended its flights to Nepal for six months. Fearing such incidents would be repeated in Kathmandu, India put forward the idea of estab­lishing its marshals in Nepal, but in vain. Indian aircrafts still carry security marshals. Air marshals conduct tough security check-up to all passengers of Indian Airlines Flights en route from Nepal to India putting temporary check-point in front of the airline(s) not trusting with Nepal’s security measures and personnel. India fears Nepal becoming a shelter of Islamic fundamentalists and mafia.

In three-day (April 21-23, 2011) official visit in Kathmandu, Indian External Affairs Minister SM Krishna expressed a serious concern on trans-border crime and uttered the need for increased security cooperation between the security agencies of the two countries revising Extradition Treaty and Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT). He wanted to formalize the Bilateral Investment Protection and Promotion Agreement (BIPPA) to ensure protection of Indian investment and proposed to keep Indian security forces at the Indian Embassy in Kathmandu, Nepal. He also raised a concern of Maoist cadres’ protests against India and Indian Ambassador Rakesh Sood. On October 6, 2010, Sood was protested by the Maoist cadres even throwing a shoe at him at Faplu airport claiming of India’s interference in Nepal’s internal affairs. However, none of the proposals of Krishna were addressed officially. The extradition treaty is a decade old demand of India. Even former King Gyanendra rejected proposal of the extradition treaty putting kingdom at risk.

Some Indian businessmen are threatened in Nepal as well as Nepali youth working in the Gurkha regi­ment in the Indian Army. Large num­bers of Nepali workers (servants, guards, etc. in India) are often extorted of their belongings and money by the Border Security Force while traveling back to their homeland. India is silent on such repeated incidents.

After hobnobbing with Indian power and politics in New Delhi, the Tarai-Madhes leaders threaten to re­volt if the left-alliance government tries to proclaim a New Constitu­tion by a two-thirds majority. Bijaya Kumar Gachhedar threatened that they will launch a people’s move­ment shaking hands with the armed insurgents and criminals against such a Constitution. All cultural based leaders of the Tarai-Madhes parties have issued a circular to their cadres living in the Tarai-Madhes to register Hindi as their mother tongue during the ongoing national census in 2011 (Republica: April 10, 2011). Such leaders have more faith in Indian power and politics and vice versa. People in general are against on such circular and prefer to continue their generation-old Maithili, Bhojpuri and Awad languages.

Nepal expelled Mohammed Masood, an upper division clerk at the Pakistani embassy in Nepal after recovering counterfeit Indian cur­rency notes from him. (Economic Times: August 24, 2003). On April 12, 2001, Pakistani First Secretary Mohammed Arshad Cheema was arrested by Nepalese police for pos­sessing more than 16 kg of RDX. Two days later, Cheema and his wife were deported from Nepal (Hindustan Times: January 1, 2001). However, the Embassy refused the allegation. Their press release stated that the Cheema couple had been “framed on false and fabricated charges” violating international diplomatic conventions. CNN-IBM stated that Khalid Mehmood, a senior ISI officer working in the Embassy’s Education Department, runs the network with the help of another ISI officer called Jamil Alam (October 26, 2008). These are only a few examples.

Nepal’s security situation is in a critical state. China asks Nepal to re­strict Tibetan freedom fighters. Dur­ing the first formal visit by Maoist supremo Prachanda in October 2009, Chinese President Hu Jintao asked for a long-term association and Prachanda assured he would resist anti-Chinese activities from Nepal. India fears intensification of People’s War in her territory. Why does India intend to put Nepal un­der her security umbrella?

First, India wants to stop direct confrontation with China. She tries to weaken China strategically and financially, supporting free Tibetan cam­paigners.

Second, India’s strategic security alliance with USA has isolated her from South Asia. Her ambition is to make Nepal’s position similar to Bhutan’s. The turning of a deaf ear to sign a new treaty and to resolve Nepo-India border encroachments has been derailed. Remarkably, most of Nepal’s leaders and bureaucrats took shelter in India after abandon­ing the unfavorable political terrain in Nepal in the past. The bitter truth is that most of the armed insurgents in Nepal, including the Maoists are fostered, sheltered and financed by India.

Third, both China and India pay more attention to their security forces’ recommendations rather than addressing problems through political and diplomatic means. Security forces in South Asia   have hostile relations on the desire to test their power, competition of their new strategies, proliferation of their numbers, arms and ammunition and prevention of criminal acts.

Fourth, India feels it should con­trol anti-Indian Muslim fundamen­talist campaigns in Nepal. India’s proposal of an extradition treaty for deportation of third country nation­als is an example of it. Remarkably, none of the elected gov­ernments have completed their full-term in Nepal because of the Indo-China lose-win strategic and regional games.

As Nepal’s security forces often comprise their professional ethics with power, politics and property, both China and India do have less trust upon Nepal. China and India desire to have their strategic presence in Nepal in the name of security of their people and nation. India intends to intensify free Tibet movement and human rights violation issues to influence the rapid economic development and military power of China from the land of Nepal on the back up of USA. And China wants to stop it. Thus, Nepal is dipping into an insecurity quandary that being restricted people pray for freedom from risk, threat and injustice for their sovereignty, dignity, integrity and unity.

Indeed, a small land-locked country surrounded by two of the world’s most populous and growing superpower nations, Nepal is caught in a unique pull-push insecurity situation as it gropes for true democracy.


Bishnu Pathak, who holds a Ph.D. in Conflict and Human Rights, has been working at the Peace and Conflict Studies Center, (PCS Center, formally known as Conflict Study Center or CS Center) as a Director and a Secretary of the Nepal Institute for Strategies Studies (NISS). He is a Convener of South Asia: TRANSCEND International and Board Member of TRANSCEND Peace University. His book Politics of People’s War and Human Rights in Nepal is a widely circulated volume. He is the author of a number of publications on human rights, UN, security, peace, and federalism including Nepal’s 2008 Constituent Assembly Elections: Converting Bullets to Ballots, brought out by the East-West Center Bulletin, Washington and Approaches to Peacebuilding with peace-conflict lifecycle in “Experiments with Peace” in October 2010, Oslo.

This article originally appeared on Transcend Media Service (TMS) on 16 May 2011.

Anticopyright: Editorials and articles originated on TMS may be freely reprinted, disseminated, translated and used as background material, provided an acknowledgement and link to the source, TMS: Insecurity in Security, is included. Thank you.

If you enjoyed this article, please donate to TMS to join the growing list of TMS Supporters.

Share this article:

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC 4.0 License.

2 Responses to “Insecurity in Security”

  1. Dear Friend,

    Religious, ethnic and national bigotry and prejudice, blended with an education that pushes people in all Governments to wish for and fight for an increase in power and wealth, will prevent any changes to the situation you so clarly describe.

    All the countries you mention are full of foreign spies, specially sent to South East Asia to create trouble, for the benefit of their own country. You also have locals working for those foreign powers.

    Remember that “conflict” is what “pays”, to all these people. They all use their intelligence and inner strength to increase tension in the area. Many media outlets are partners in this maquiavelic plan.

    As I always say and will repeat it until my last breath: rid the world of weapon manufacturing and trading and the “Culture for Peace” will appear in no time.

    Best wishes,


  2. Dear Bishnu,

    I forgot I was going to ask you: in Nepal everybody calls Mahatma Gandhi by his full name? (Mohan Das Karam Chandra Gandhi) in the West, many people think this is a different person.

    Johan says “”Tell me how you behave in conflict. I will tell you how much peace culture you have.”, and this suggests only “some” countries are in conflict. But this is not the case. “All” countries are involved in conflict. Nepal, India, Pakistan, Thailand, Indonesia, Bangladesh, China, Lebanos, Israel, Sri Lanka, etc, etc cannot live without conflict, because of their “business” partners: USA, UK, Russia, France, Norway, Belgium, Switzerland, Canada etc.

    Hope you see my point.
    All good wishes,