Tarred and Feathered: Exxon/Murdoch/Cheney … At It Again
ENVIRONMENT, 19 Sep 2011
Leslie Griffith - Reader Supported News
It is said those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. And, in my experience, to report on it … again and again … as if the failures of the past offer no instruction at all.
That thought slapped me sober while thinking about tar sands and, moments later, when running across this story on Rupert Murdoch’s and Dick Cheney’s forays into the sticky boondoggle of tar sands’ predecessor – oil shale.
Three decades ago, when just a cub reporter – my first day on the job – I landed smack dab in the middle of a multi-billion dollar story with global consequences – politically, environmentally and economically. If nothing else, both tar sands and oil shale have that much in common.
Unfortunately, the oil shale story was much too complex for an inexperienced reporter fresh off the turnip truck from Tomball, Texas. Had I recognized what was happening at the time, and had I known the history of the situation, perhaps I could have saved taxpayers’ billions. This story still haunts me.
To this day, it is the main reason I stuck with it … and became a reporter. Here is the “doomed to repeat it” part – Americans are walking headlong into a disaster just like the one I walked into thirty years ago.
The tar sands story is just the current disastrous and all-too familiar sequel … the elusive pot of black gold at the end of a make-believe rainbow.
It’s important to explain that two US Presidents had the insight and foresight to want more than to simply kiss the rings of tyrants in order to secure enough oil to keep America moving. Still, they did not know how to spot the imposters among an array of “alternatives.”
Who were those US Presidents with foresight? Jimmy Carter was one, Harry Truman the other.
Back in the 1970s, then-President Carter tried to tackle the energy crisis – a crisis that remains with us today. Toward that end, he formed the Synthetic Fuels Organization. Both Mr. Truman and Mr. Carter understood that if the world was to ever live in peace, we had to turn off the spigot on foreign oil … too much carrot for oil companies (sky-high profits) … and too much stick (subsidies, wars) for the people.
In Mr. Carter’s case, he was forced into a corner. Americans needed gasoline to fuel their cars and the country. In the days and months following the Arab Oil Embargo, Americans sat fuming for hours in long lines waiting for the privilege of buying a few gallons of gasoline.
Mr. Carter, and the oil-dependent nation he led, was being punished … just as we are today.
During Carter’s presidency, the world economy had been wrecked twice in less than ten years by OPEC’s political retaliation. Once, it happened after America supplied massive amounts of arms to Israel, making it possible for Israel to win the 1973 Arab-Israeli war. OPEC’s “ministers,” pissed off by America’s assistance, cut oil supplies to zero. That was the first “oil crisis” of the 70s. Another crisis occurred six years later, in 1979, as a direct result of the fall of America’s long-standing buddy, the Shah of Iran.
Mr. Carter’s far-reaching goal was to pry OPEC ministers’ retaliatory hands away from America’s increasingly exposed neck. Desperate, and willing to give anyone with a new idea billions, the Western Colorado oil shale boom began full-stop.
Tar sand and oil shale are both boondoggles. Both extract very little usable oil. Both take huge amounts of energy to get to it. And both tar sands and oil shale tear up the landscape and damage the water supply. Most important of all, both tar sands and oil shale offer the bogus hope of avoiding political entanglement with foreign oil.
Out of this complex, persistent mess – with nothing more than a fresh reporter’s pad and a pencil behind my ear – some hard lessons were learned.
Chapter Two of my book is called “The Unsanitary Napkin,” and it’s about the oil-shale boom and the miserable bust that followed. Yes, this is a different decade … but just substitute the words “oil shale” for “tar sands.” It’s the same people trying to sell the same boondoggle to the same oil-hungry people.
I guess we all have to learn the hard way. I know I did.
______________________
Leslie Griffith has been a television anchor, foreign correspondent and an investigative reporter in newspaper, radio and television for over 25 years. Among her many achievements are two Edward R Murrow Awards, nine Emmies, 37 Emmy Nominations, a National Emmy nomination for writing, and more than a dozen other awards for journalism. She is currently working on a documentary, giving speeches on “Reforming the Media,” and writing for many on-line publications, as well as writing a book called “Shut Up and Read.” She hopes the book, her speeches, and her articles on the media will help remind the nation that journalism was once about public service … not profit. To contact Leslie, go to lesliegriffithproductions.com.
Go to Original – readersupportednews.or
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.