Rediscovering Civil Disobedience

ACTIVISM, 24 Oct 2011

George Goehl – The Nation

“There comes a time when silence becomes betrayal,” proclaimed Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. as he took a risk and spoke out forcefully against the War in Vietnam.

As more Americans debate whether to leave the sidelines and join the Occupy Wall Street movement, we should heed Dr. King’s words. Our individual silence is a form of acquiescence, and we speak volumes not only through our action but also through our lack of it. Silence signals that we are okay with what’s happening, or that we have simply given up. While Occupy Wall Street has inspired a new level of consciousness in America, we have only just scratched the surface of what will be needed to shift the political economy of our country.

For activists new to the struggle as well as those who have been hitting the streets since the financial crisis began, this may mean taking on new risks.

As he spoke from the pulpit of Riverside Church in 1967, Dr. King said, “The truth of these words is beyond doubt, but the mission to which they call us is a most difficult one.” Breaking silence entails risk because it means facing one’s fear of ridicule, embarrassment, failure and more. It is easier and safer to remain silent. But as we’ve seen over the last few years, our collective silence has come with its own set of costs in the form of lost jobs, homes and pensions.

Last Tuesday, members of Southsiders Organized for Unity and Liberation (SOUL), an affiliate of National People’s Action, the community organizing network that I direct, took their risk-taking to the next level, with personal courage born of outrage. Sixteen members of SOUL, supported by 150 witnesses, were arrested at the annual convention of the Mortgage Bankers of America as they called on the big banks to reduce principal on millions of underwater home loans and pay their fair share of taxes. The action was part of a series of events organized by Take Back Chicago.

“The big banks have completely disrupted life in our community,” says Will Tanzman, co-executive director of SOUL, which is based on Chicago’s South Side. “They have created a full-on crisis for the families who have been forced from their homes and for neighbors stuck living next to the scores of bank-owned foreclosed properties on each block. They have repeatedly ignored our pleas to put a halt to the foreclosure crisis, and that is why we were called to bring the crisis to them.”

With this as their goal, SOUL members erected a makeshift house in the hotel hosting the mortgage bankers conference. As she was being carried into the police van, Shani Smith proclaimed, “I want to stay in my home. I want to stay in my home.” Ms. Smith is fighting to save her home from foreclosure and help stabilize her community. “My home is in jeopardy, our community is in peril,” said Ms. Smith after she was released. “I’m the president of my block club and we have a saying: Your block today, my block tomorrow. The foreclosure crisis is spreading to more and more communities and we must all fight back.”

To get a sense of what the foreclosure crisis looks like in Ms. Smith’s Calument Heights neighborhood, see the map below. Within a mile of her home, over 500 foreclosures have been filed over the last eighteen months. Neighborhoods to the southwest of hers, such as Ashburn, have been hit even harder, with over 1000 foreclosures filed during the same period.

As divinity student Neil Ellingson was carted off by police, he asked, “What would Jesus do?” Meanwhile the crowd chanted, “You are arresting the wrong people.” The chant raises an important point further brought to light by acts of civil disobedience. Over the last month alone over 100 people have been arrested while protesting foreclosures, while no one from Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs or JPMorgan Chase has been fully held to account for their role in the foreclosure crisis.

SOUL’s action Tuesday underscores the fact that the foreclosure crisis is reaching catastrophic levels in communities nationwide. The impact on communities of color is especially alarming, with often two to three times the number of vacant bank-owned properties as white neighborhoods. Three years ago arrests at protests to stop foreclosures were incredibly rare, but homeowners have been arrested by the dozens in efforts organized by Right to the City in Boston, ACCE in Los Angeles and others over the last few weeks.

Together with Occupy Wall Street and the tar sands protests at the White House, this represents an emerging movement toward rediscovering the principles of nonviolent civil disobedience that were so central to Dr. King’s work.

“We are really at a critical stage in America where corporate greed has taken over,” says Ms. Smith. “Right now we are under the soles of the shoes of Wall Street, and if we want to change that we have to take risks. For me, this act of civil disobedience was done on behalf of my faith, my family and my community.”

Thanks to so many people, like Ms. Smith, who have taken to the streets over the last few weeks, many more are joining the fight to create a more just and sustainable economy. But, getting there won’t be easy, and it won’t be comfortable. With yesterday’s dedication of the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. National Memorial, we should consider how and when each of us will break our silence, and turn up the volume.

Go to Original – thanation.com

Share this article:


DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

2 Responses to “Rediscovering Civil Disobedience”

  1. satoshi says:

    Peace begins with you. Civil obedience to “peace.”

    As such, the title of the above essay should have been “Rediscovering Civil Obedience to Peace”.

  2. satoshi says:

    P.S.

    It is necessary to think about things in terms of “peace.” In the case of the essay above, for example, it is necessary to think about “obedience or disobedience” in terms of peace.

    If you think as such, you can understand that it is those who make war (and any other kinds of violence) are “disobedient to peace.” “Civil obedience to peace” implies “civil disobedience to war (and any other kinds of violence)”.

    But if you think about “obedience or disobedience” in terms of war and any kinds of violence, the title of the essay above is “appropriate.” Peace-loving people, however, think about “obedience or disobedience” in terms of peace. From that perspective, the title of the essay above is inappropriate.

    “Civil disobedience to war” is not enough. If you are simply against something, nothing constructive can be produced. One more step is necessary. “Civil obedience to peace” is that step.

    Think about things in terms of “peace.”