The Economic Crisis: Seven Proposals

EDITORIAL, 17 October 2011

#186 | Johan Galtung, 17 Oct 2011 - TRANSCEND Media Service

Dialogue of Civilizations, Rhodes Forum, Greece, 9 October 2011

I will work in the tradition of the NGO I represent, TRANSCEND (www.transcend.org): diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy.

The basic diagnosis is the pathological inequality growth in societies, and in the world. In the Mother of Crises, Occupy Wall Street is now a local Arab Spring, as protest, not yet proposals. “The bottom 90 percent”–an interesting US category–has annual average family income around $31,000 whereas the top permille has to be measured in millions, and many of them.  Consequently, there is not enough buying power available to get the wheels of the real economy running, but more than enough liquidity at the top to get the finance economy overheated. At the bottom people suffer, even starve: in the world, 37,000 per day (it used to be 25,000).  At the top, the finance/real economy imbalance destroys the whole economy.

The basic prognosis is that three US bubbles are waiting to burst:

  • the contradiction between a galloping finance economy and a stagnant real economy,
  • the contradiction between the secret M2, money circulating, fed by printing money far beyond any real value it is supposed to reflect,
  • and the contradiction between debt service and people service.

We are only at the beginning; the G20 in 2008 increased the inequality further.  An unlikely 50 percent cut in the preposterous US and Greek military budgets might help.  But the USA will probably be forced into a major devaluation, and an Argentinean solution.

The basic therapy would be a far better balance between bailout and stimulus; and between elites and civil society.  US elites are more responsive to corporations financing their campaigns than to voters electing them.  Corporatocracy, not democracy.  Obama turns his back to voters and bails out his chief donor, Goldman-Sachs.  Better than “too big to fail” would be “too big to exist”: not a few big, but very many small banks.  So let us start there.

[1] The Civil Society should create a maximum of small savings banks that offer investment credit also backed by their capital, but that do not speculate.  The Big Banks will counteract; hence, groups need determination, often as cooperatives.  Investment is tied to specific companies, speculation is roaming around for profit; the commitment over time is sufficient for production to take off not just for short-term profit; there is a solid equity, not just betting. Learn from muslim banking-sharia limit: 30 percent of capital.

[2] The civil society should boycott irresponsible, unprofessional banks that offer credit way beyond their own capital. It is necessary to produce a listing of banks by level of irresponsibility, including bonuses as one indicator.  The worst ones deserve to sink, paving the way for very many smaller ones.  Iceland has emerged from the crisis by letting those banks sink, and the voters have twice refused, in referenda, to make Iceland’s population hostage to credits given to those banks.  Those creditors have to pay for their own lack of professionalism when believing in equally unprofessional bankers .

[3] Moratorium on irresponsible bankers for 3, 10 years, for life.

[4] Debt relief, bailout, for bona fide debtors–those not in debts beyond any reasonable potential for repayment– rather than non bona fide banks.  This would imply the cancellation of many foreclosures, to be protected nonviolently by civil society.

[5] The focus should be on the suffering at the bottom, often minorities, women, the old and infirm. Alleviation of misery is the first priority, economic growth second.  For that purpose, agricultural cooperatives are needed for modern, 3-dimensional, aquatic, labor-intensive food production–not endless furrows destroying a soil poisoned by artificial fertilizer. With sales-points straight to the customer, polyclinics with generic drugs, education run by retired professors. Beat the tuition fees.

[6] Lift the bottom up by having the needy satisfy basic needs.  Lift communities, not individuals, through private, public, civil society and technical sector cooperation, coordinated by some agency (a ministry, an NGO, a church).  Make generous credits available for micro-companies in the fields of basic needs–food, affordable housing, health, education–and employ the most needy themselves, in the USA not only the AFL-CIO aristocracy.  As they lift themselves up, they will pay back the credit, get increasing buying power, and by their numbers stimulate the domestic demand and economy in general.  Learn from the Chinese capi-communism.

[7]  For enlightened governments: forbid short selling (how about short buying?), make the names of buyers-sellers on the market public, sell-buy derivatives only when seller and buyer know what they are doing, contemplate forbidding them as potentially toxic.

Then, in the longer run: Shift the focus of the whole economy from material growth to health-education and basic needs.  We have been terrorized by GNP-Gross National Product, a measure of added value through processing and trading; commissions charged by intellectuals, industrialists, merchants and traders, at the expense of nature.  However, the purpose is not turnover and profit but rich human lives! Switch from GNP to HDI-Human Development Index, UNDPs-United Nations Development Programs.  Promote long lives high on creativity, love and joy, and low on morbidity. And stop putting older people in retirement ghettos, complaining of aging population, cutting out wisdom to balance youth.

In short, lift the bottom up through stimuli, bail-out the worst hit, let incompetent institutions sink.  What we are doing is the opposite: not only bailing out but stimulating, rewarding incompetence and greed, letting the bottom sink further.  Massive revolts are the optimistic reading.  Massive suffering is realistic, and already here. And the most pessimistic reading: the continuation of the same doomed politics.

 

This article originally appeared on Transcend Media Service (TMS) on 17 October 2011.

Anticopyright: Editorials and articles originated on TMS may be freely reprinted, disseminated, translated and used as background material, provided an acknowledgement and link to the source, TMS: The Economic Crisis: Seven Proposals, is included. Thank you.

If you enjoyed this article, please consider a donation to TMS and click here.

Share or download this article:

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC 4.0 License.


4 Responses to “The Economic Crisis: Seven Proposals”

  1. satoshi says:

    In the contemporary society in which everything and everybody are interconnected, it is extremely difficult to take any possibly effective action to solve or minimize the problem, because things in the society are not simply black and white; black and white are interwoven as mentioned. If you attempt to remove one negative element from the problem, even if you will successfully remove it from the problem, a new unexpected and more seriously negative aspect might emerge on the surface of the problem. One of the examples: The US-led NATO “successfully” removed Taliban from the main stage of Afghanistan. The US declared its victory over Taliban. And then, what happened to Afghanistan? We all know that.

    The same or the similar thing could happen to the current economic crisis. Greek workers, for example, complain that their government tries to save almost bankrupting banks by reducing various benefits for their people. In that situation, if Prof. Galtung’s proposals will be effectively implemented in Greece now, what will actually happen to the economy of Greece? Imagine that.

    In the end, this could be a value debate. That is, even if the current crisis would be more serious than ever, is it better for the majority of people in the long run? Or is it better to save these banks as soon as possible to avoid more serious crisis? Let people debate it. Debates by people are an essential part of the process of democracy.

    In that regard, by the way, let me point out as follows: Democracy has, at least, two weak points: First. The decision-making takes time because people debate the issue until they make an agreement or their consensus. Second. By either the relative or absolute majority of their will, people can decide to destroy their democracy by the democratic procedure. (One of the examples: Germany at the time of Nazi’s emergence just before WWII. I do not hope that history repeat itself in this sense, but let people decide what to do, anyhow.) “Vox populi, vox dei.” – William of Malmesbury –

  2. Akifumi Fujita says:

    Very inspiring statement. Yes,indeed, better than “too big to fail” would be “too big to exist.” But TEPCO,Tokyo Elctric Power Company,actually did fail.
    It caused the severe nuclear power plant accident on March 11. In my understanding, the Japanese government will take every possible means to bail out the company, becuase if it sinks,many other big corporations will also sinks with it. But they are too big to exist. How can it be possible? Anyway it is a must for us humans to survive. Social change is badly needed. To where? In the case of Japan, commu-capitalism?

  3. I agree with Mr. galtung.