Extreme Weather is the New Normal

ENVIRONMENT, 16 Apr 2012

Stephen Leahy – TRANSCEND Media Service

Extreme weather is fast becoming the new normal. Canada and much of the United States experienced summer temperatures during winter this year, confirming the findings of a new report on extreme weather.

For two weeks this March [2012] most of North America baked under extraordinarily warm temperatures that melted all the snow and ice and broke 150-year-old temperature records by large margins.

Last year the U.S. endured 14 separate billion-dollar-plus weather disasters including flooding, hurricanes and tornados.

A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), released Mar. 28, provides solid evidence that record-breaking weather events are increasing in number and becoming more extreme. And if current rates of greenhouse gas emissions are maintained, these events will reach dangerous new levels over the coming century.

Since 1950 there have been many more heat waves and record warm temperatures than in previous decades.

This will only increase in future decades, as will heavier rainfall events in tropical regions and the high latitudes, according to the Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (SREX). 

The hottest day that occurs once in 20 years is likely to become a one-in-two year event by the end of the century, except in the high latitudes of the Northern hemisphere, where it is likely to happen once every five years.

The average tropical cyclone maximum wind speed is likely to increase, but the global frequency of tropical cyclones is likely to decrease or remain unchanged.

The duration and intensity of droughts will increase in southern Europe and the Mediterranean region, central Europe, central North America, Central America and Mexico, northeast Brazil, and southern Africa.

Climate change-driven sea level rise combined with increases in extreme weather will make many places uninhabitable by the end of the century, said Christopher Field, co-chair of IPCC’s Working Group II, which together with Working Group I produced the report.

Places that are already struggling with these problems, such as some small island states and coastal cities like Mumbai, may be amongst those that will be abandoned in coming decades without major reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, Field said in a press conference.

There is no serious scientific debate that the dramatic increase in extreme weather is one of the clearest signs that burning billions of tons of fossil fuels has seriously and permanently disrupted the global climate.

“All weather events are affected by climate change because the environment in which they occur is warmer and moister than it used to be,” Kevin Trenberth, senior scientist at the U.S. National Center for Atmospheric Research, told Tierramérica.

Those additional enormous amounts of heat and moisture now trapped in the atmosphere are the potent fuel for extreme events. It makes little sense to debate whether individual storms or events were caused by climate change when the entire global weather system is being impacted, said Trenberth, who is also an IPCC author.

“The main message from the report is that we know enough to make good decisions about managing the risks of climate-related disasters. Sometimes we take advantage of this knowledge, but many times we do not,” said Field.

Guatemala and Colombia were amongst the worst hit by extreme storms and flooding in 2010, according to the Global Climate Risk Index, produced by a German NGO, Germanwatch. In fact, those countries suffered more than Russia, where a much-publicised heat wave killed an estimated 50,000 people.

The Index has analysed the impacts of extreme weather on the economy and society for the past 20 years.

Between 1991 and 2010, the top ten countries hardest hit by weather extremes in terms of damages and lives lost were all developing countries in the global South, with Bangladesh, Burma and Honduras at the top of the list.

“There is no question that extreme events and damages have been increasing,” said Sven Harmeling of Germanwatch. And it is not because there is simply more infrastructure to be damaged, Harmeling told Tierramérica from Berlin.

Countries are becoming more aware of the risks of extreme weather but few are taking measures to cope, despite the fact that it is far cheaper to prepare than to recover, he said.

It is difficult to allocate precious state or donor funding for a weather event that might not happen for many years. However, a country like Honduras, which was badly damaged by Hurricane Mitch in 1998 and other lesser storms and rainfall events that followed, has never recovered, Harmeling said.

In contrast, Bangladesh has been able to invest heavily in prevention and has suffered far less damage in recent years, he commented.

The IPCC’s SREX is a significant contribution, but there will be gaps, and it is does not have the latest science which provides clearer links between extreme events and climate change, according to Harmeling.

The report recommends countries and regions take “low regrets” measures, which require modest or moderate investments to reduce vulnerability to climate change risks.

These include systems that warn people of impending disasters, changes in land use planning and ecosystem management. The report also recommends improvements in health surveillance, water supplies and drainage systems, as well as development and enforcement of building codes.

Both the Global Climate Risk Index and SREX findings “can be seen as a warning signal to be better prepared for a higher level of extreme weather events in future,” concluded Harmeling.


Stephen Leahy has been an independent environmental journalist for 17 years, published in dozens of publications around the world including  New Scientist, The London Sunday Times, The Guardian,  Al Jazeera, Maclean’s Magazine, Earth Island Journal, The Toronto Star, Wired News, Audubon, BBC Wildlife, and Canadian Geographic.

First published on Tierramerica/IPS as Extreme Weather is the New Normal.

Go to Original – stephenleahy.net


Share this article:

DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

One Response to “Extreme Weather is the New Normal”

  1. David Doerr says:

    It is like viewing a disaster movie in slow-motion, is it not? Millions of acres of trees burn up, and the government wants to invade a foreign land, using the money that could be spent for proper apparatus for truly fighting an effective campaign against massive forest fires. But no. We fracture the crust of the earth to glean what natural gas reserves we might leave for the class of 2112, and create earthquakes that people attempt to deny a relationship to. We deplete so much oil in an insane orgy of consumption, so that we could possibly be laying the foundation for the destruction of the planet. No one inquires as to what effect the removal of virtually every barrel of oil from the crust of the earth has on the game of geologic dominoes. Is there a difference between a planet whose crust is sated with oil, and one whose crust is drained of all of its oil reserves, in geologic terms? What is that difference, and how does the difference change the structure of the planet’s geologic stability? Now is the time to think about this — before it is too late.