How the UN Can Ignore 8,000 Deaths in Haiti

LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN, 10 Feb 2014

Nathalie Baptiste – Foreign Policy In Focus

Many more Haitians will die from cholera, a disease brought to their country by the very people who were supposed to be saving them from disaster.

Since its independence in 1804, Haiti has suffered from a multitude of ailments—poverty, corruption, instability—common among the developing countries of the world. However, cholera was not one of them. Cholera is an infection of the small intestine that is contracted from drinking water that has been contaminated by human waste. Symptoms include vomiting, diarrhea, and sometimes death.

In October 2010, the first cases of cholera began springing up around the Artibonite River—a life source for thousands of Haitians in the central plateau region—and the first patients began arriving at St. Nicolas Hospital in St. Marc. After rumors begin to spread that UN peacekeepers from Nepal were to blame, Associated Press reporter Jonathan Katz went to the Nepalese base and found that human waste was leaking into the river.

This was no coincidence. The strain of the disease infecting Haitians was identified as the same strain that is endemic to Nepal, while Haiti has not had any recorded evidence of cholera in at least the last century.

In November 2011, the Institute for Democracy and Justice in Haiti (IJDH) filed a petition at the UN headquarters asking for $100,000 for the family members of those killed and $50,000 for those who have been infected. However, in February 2013, a spokesman for UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon stated that the United Nations could not receive the claims because the organization has legal immunity.

The UN’s immunity means that justice will not be served to the people of Haiti. And this is not simply a matter of bygones. While not accepting any blame for the crisis, the United Nations recently released a report warning that the number of deaths will surge if immediate action is not taken. The United Nations began an appeal to raise $2.2 billion over the course of 10 years to combat cholera in Haiti, but UN Special Envoy Pedro Medrano says that money is needed immediately in order to contain the spread and prevent another outbreak.

It is unlikely that the UN will change its position on accepting responsibility for the matter, and it’s similarly unlikely that enough cash will be raised in order to execute an efficient strategy against the disease. Many more Haitians will die from cholera, a disease brought to their country by the very people who were supposed to be saving them from disaster.

It may be time to rethink the United Nations’ legal immunity.

_________________________

Nathalie Baptiste is an intern at Foreign Policy in Focus.

Go to Original – fpif.org

Share this article:


DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Comments are closed.