Ceasefire in Eastern Ukraine: Now Withdrawal by Russia, the UN In, and NATO Out
BALKANS AND EASTERN EUROPE, 8 Sep 2014
Lund, Sweden, September 3, 2014
As announced just a few minutes ago, the Ukrainian and Russian president have agreed to what the first reports call a permanent ceasefire in Eastern Ukraine.
That’s indeed the best piece of news from that region.
It places the NATO Summit in Wales this Thursday [4 Sep 2014] and Friday in a new light.
The ceasefire most be solidified
However, an agreement over a phone is only a beginning; the devil is in the details. Secondly, there is no mention – yet – of the East Ukrainian fighters are onboard this agreement.
Time for UN peacekeeping
Third, a credible ceasefire should be monitored by neutral observers and competent people. The only ones who can do that are the UN peacekeepers – perhaps with some staff also from Russia and Ukraine.
The UN should have been present months ago – as TFF suggested even before the shooting started: Military ‘blue helmets’, civil police and civil affairs – thousands of them. No ceasefire will hold unless there is a rapid international deployment of impartial staff.
The proxy character of war in and about Ukraine must end.
In addition, calm in Eastern Ukraine must be seen as a precondition for political reforms in Kiev and discussions about the future structure and role of Ukraine. No coup-based government of the present type can lead the way to true democracy.
If Russia is militarily involved in Ukraine, it must withdraw
Fourth – there have been numerous reports about various kinds of Russian military presence inside Ukraine, some more credible than others.
All wars on the ground are accompanied by information wars and Psychological Operations, SYOPs and planted stories – few media having any filters.
It would not be surprising if there is a Russian military presence inside Ukraine, given the history and structure of this conflict since 1989 and during this year.
On the famous other hand, a heavy-weight intelligence expertise calls those reports ‘dubious’ and reminds us of the lies we were told before the invasion of Iraq.
It’s obvious that if there is such a presence it must be withdrawn.
NATO should keep out
Fifth – a ceasefire agreed between Ukraine and Russia makes every attempt by NATO to continue interfering in Ukraine immoral.
The U.S., NATO and EU countries carry at least 80% of the responsibility for the Ukraine crisis due to the foreign provoked regime change in Kiev and the EU ultimatum to Ukraine about either joining the EU or the eastern Customs Union. And long-term–because of NATOs expansion from the Baltic republics to Tbilisi.
These policies lack statesmanship, are reckless in the perspective of promises given to Gorbachev when the old Cold War ended and can be seen only as provocative in the eyes of Russia.
News has it that the US and/or NATO will:
- Set up a super ‘spearhead’ reaction force;
- pre-position weapons in various East European countries;
- deploy 1100 troops from 13 states including the US, England, Canada, Georgia, Germany within the next two weeks;
- conduct military exercises in Ukraine – Rapid Trident later this month;
- fighter planes have already been moved closer to Russia;
- various countries have agreed to let NATO planes pass over, and Sweden and Finland have signed host nation support agreements;
- general reinforcements by NATO all around Ukraine
- Ukraine has been promised military aid
- NATO’s S-G Fogh Rasmussen – a man at least the Danes know are ready to lie to get a war going – keep on appealing to Ukraine about NATO membership.
All this is – without a doubt – counterproductive, escalatory steps that signals anything but a will to respect other peoples interests and create peace.
NATO should therefore discuss how to contribute to real peace in this situation at its summit Thursday and Friday and scrap what has been planned already according to media and intelligence reports.
TFF Director Prof. Jan Oberg is a member of the TRANSCEND Network for Peace, Development and Environment.
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article:
BALKANS AND EASTERN EUROPE: