Cuba’s Sending Doctors to Fight Ebola in West Africa — How Will the US React?


Greg Grandin – The Nation

15 Oct 2014 – Last week, BBC News reported that Cuba had sent 165 healthcare workers to Sierra Leone to help that country fight Ebola. Another 296 doctors and nurses are scheduled to arrive in Liberia. In addition to West Africa, Cuba is also sending specialists to Nicaragua, though that country has not yet had a reported case, to prepare local doctors and nurses in case there is an outbreak. A less-reported story is that the United States actively works to dilute the effectiveness of Cuba’s overseas medical assistance, putting its outdated Cold War obsession with Cuba (kept alive by Florida’s coveted twenty-nine electoral votes) ahead of the basic healthcare needs of some of the world’s poorest people.

The State Department runs something called the Cuban Medical Professional Parole Program, which encourages Cuban doctors, optometrists, and nurses (along with their families) to apply for asylum at US embassies and helps facilitate the paperwork. If only the hungry kids from coup-stricken Honduras had such help. The program began under George W. Bush but continues with Barack Obama, and is largely targeted at Cubans in Venezuela. As the West African death toll of Ebola now nears 9000, it would be interesting to know if US diplomats in Sierra Leone are dangling the plums of US-level salaries in front of the Cubans, or if they are willing to put the program on hold and let them fight the disease.

Havana’s been sending healthcare workers to Africa since the early 1960s, staffing clinics and training medical faculties, including in Guinea-Bissau, Uganda and Equatorial Guinea. When white doctors fled South Africa after the end of apartheid, Cuba stepped in. According to one report, Cuba in 2007 had 30,000 healthcare professionals, including 19,000 doctors, working in over 103 countries.

Beyond medical “brigades,” Cuba has joined with Brazil to produce a low-cost meningitis vaccine, targeted against types A and B prevalent in the dry season throughout the so-called “Meningitis Belt,” covering some twenty-three African countries and running from the west of Senegal to Ethiopia. In the mid-2000s, when it appeared that low profit margins would slow commercial production of the vaccine, the World Health Organization put out a call asking for help. Brazil and Cuba, together, responded. Two state-funded institutes—Bio-Manguinhos in Brazil and the Finlay Institute in Cuba—began to produce a cheap, effective vaccine. Cuba batches the active ingredients, and then passes them on to Brazil for final processing. By 2012, according to Science magazine, the two countries have provided over 19 million doses at considerably below market price (95 cents compared to between $15 and $80 on the international market, depending on the strength of the dose). About 5000 people die from the disease a year, with another 80,000 infections. Yet the joint program is widely credited with forestalling epidemics (which, if they were to have occurred, might have been aggravated by increasingly warmer and longer dry seasons) and saving many lives.

Today, with reports that a potential Ebola vaccine is being held up by the bloated, ineffective free market, the Cuban-Brazilian meningitis vaccine is an example of what can be accomplished by public institutions (and though it might not come to anything, a similar south-south venture, this one with Cuba and Thailand, is claiming a breakthrough in identifying an Ebola antibody).

One last thing about those Cuban doctors and nurses: I know the criticisms leveled against Cuba’s medical diplomacy, and I wouldn’t discard them. We don’t know the terms under which they agree to their mission; perhaps they are compelled by family or financial reasons.

Still, take a look at this report by Noticias Martí, another US-funded program meant to provide an “alternative” source of news to Cubans (successor to the infamous Radio and TV Martí). It is meant to increase concerns about the dangers the brigade faces, perhaps hoping that the kind of racist hysteria over Ebola on display in the United States will catch on in Cuba. Based largely on a Wall Street Journal article, the report lets Cubans know that, in contrast to the US responders put up in luxury accommodations, like the Radisson Blu, at $200 a night, Cuban doctors and nurses are sleeping three per room in a cheap, fly-ridden Freetown hotel. Its bait for that “Parole Program” Washington has in place. Noticias Martí also highlights a remark by the director of Cuba’s Institute of Tropical Medicine that, despite having received rigorous training, someone on the brigade “will contract the disease.” Apparently, an Australian WHO official “watched in concern” as the Cubans, upon their arrival in Sierra Leone, “swapped hand-clasps, pats on backs and other potentially hazardous displays of physical affection.”

One hopes that the Cubans will follow best protocols. There is, though, something remarkable about the warmth and affection, about the humanity, especially when contrasted with the xenophobia provoked by the arrival of one infected Liberian to the United States. Cuba’s often described as totalitarian, but there are varieties of totalitarianisms, of the heart as well as the state.


Greg Grandin is the author of Empire’s Workshop, Fordlandia, a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize in history and the National Book Award, and, most recently, The Empire of Necessity: Slavery, Freedom, and Deception in the New World.   He teaches at New York University. 

Go to Original –


Share this article:

DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Comments are closed.