Students Occupy University of Amsterdam (De Nieuwe Universiteit)

ACTIVISM, 9 Mar 2015

De Nieuwe Universiteit – TRANSCEND Media Service

Maagdenhuis occupation, Amsterdam, February 27,2015. Guido van Nispen/Flickr. Some rights reserved.

Maagdenhuis occupation, Amsterdam, February 27,2015. Guido van Nispen/Flickr. Some rights reserved.

3 Mar 2015 – Amsterdam (Text in English below)

EISEN:

In verband daarmee: behoud van het Bungehuis als UvA-locatie.

De algehele onderliggende motivatie bij al deze punten is onvrede met de huidige bestuurswijze. Top-down, op rendement gericht beleid ondermijnt namelijk waar een universiteit om zou moeten draaien: onderwijs en onderzoek.

Een meer gedetailleerde versie van de eisen van de Bungehuisbezetting is hier te vinden.

  1. Democratisering en decentralisering van het bestuur van de universiteit.
  2. Afschaffing van het huidige allocatiemodel: financiering hoofdzakelijk op basis van input, niet op basis van output.
  3. Stopzetting van het huidige Profiel 2016.
  4. Referenda per instituut en opleiding over de samenwerking tussen de UvA en de VU op de FNWI.
  5. Duurzame, niet-vernederende contracten die oprechte carrièrekansen bieden voor al het personeel.
  6. Een open debat over huisvestingskosten ten opzichte van bezuinigingen op onderwijs en onderzoek.

DEMANDS:

In connection to this: retaining the Bungehuis as UvA location.

The general motivation behind all these demands is discontent with the current ways of management. Top-down, efficiency-oriented management damages the very thing a university should revolve around: research and education.

  1. Democratisation and decentralisation of university governance.
  2. Abolish current allocation model. Move to financing based primarily on input rather than output.
  3. Cancellation of the current Profiel 2016.
  4. Referendums per institute and programme about collaboration between the UvA and the VU at the FNWI (Faculty of Science).
  5. Provide sustainable, non-humiliating contracts that ensure genuine career opportunities for all staff.
  6. An open debate about housing costs in relation to budget cuts of research and education.

Go to Original – newuni.nl

Share this article:


DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Comments are closed.