UN Moves on Myanmar, Too Little Too Late?
ASIA & THE PACIFIC, 19 June 2017
Daily Times – TRANSCEND Media Service
14 Jun 2017 – It could all be about to kick off in Myanmar. But this time in a good way for the country’s Rohingya Muslim minority. Possibly. Hopefully.
It seems that the UN is finally getting serious about the ethnic cleansing of this community that has been going on since 2012. Last month, the world body appointed a group of experts to the Southeast Asian nation in the hope of having them probe human rights abuses suffered by the Rohingya at the hands of the military junta. Yet Aung San Suu Kyi — the country’s Nobel Peace Prize-winning figurehead — has rejected the mission. On the grounds that it would ignite communal tensions. Not long ago, of course, she was the poster girl for peaceful resistance of the most stoic and dignified kind. Today she wears the hat of the oppressor and seems to find the fit just perfect.
True to form she has this week stamped her foot down on UN hopes of entering the country. On the grounds that such a move would ignite communal tensions. Apparently, only an independent mission headed by a certain Mr Kofi Annan will do. That is, the man whom the world body, if it had any bite left at all, would have long ago seen tried for war crimes over his failure to stop Iraq; before then deciding to keep calm and push the issue of illegal aggression under the plushest of carpets.
Yet there is some silver lining to be had. If one is prepared to, like, really squint. The BBC reported yesterday — the same day that Suu Kyi rejected the UN probe — that the world body is removing its top official to the country. While the latter has claimed the move is simply a routine matter, insisting that she has come to the end of her three-year stint there. The BBC, however, reported anonymous diplomatic and aid sources as saying otherwise. That is, there has been talk of the mission under her stewardship as being “glaringly dysfunctional”, focusing more on establishing ties with the junta than trying to implement mechanisms to safeguard the Rohingya.
We sincerely hope that her removal, if that is, indeed, what it is — is not a case of too little too late. Some academics have termed the ethnic cleansing of the Rohingya as “genocide in progress”, contending that this community is already suffering the four stages of genocide. These being: stigmatisation, harassment, isolation, systematic weakening and then, ultimately mass annihilation. No one has ever been prosecuted, let alone jailed, for the ongoing ethnic cleansing.
At this stage, all we can do is hope that the UN is verbally aggressive in its response to having its fact-finding mission kicked out even before it arrived. Let us also hope that it is equally vocal in not accepting an independent inquiry overseen by Mr Annan. And let us, finally hope against hope that the world will now get serious about the Rohingya Muslims of Myanmar.*
DISCLAIMER: In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Join the discussion!
We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article:
ASIA & THE PACIFIC: