ExpressLane: CIA’s Secret Spy Tool Steals Biometric Data from Other Intelligence Agencies
WHISTLEBLOWING, 28 Aug 2017
26 Aug 2017 – WikiLeaks has published a document of a CIA project called ‘ExpressLane’ that allows the agency to secretly extract biometric data from the NSA, the DHS, and the FBI as well as non-U.S. agencies.
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) August 24, 2017
The documents from ExpressLane were released by the international whistleblowing organization as part of its ongoing ‘Vault 7’ series on the CIA’s hacking capabilities.
The program is operated by a branch within the CIA called the Office of Technical Services (OTS) and provides a biometric collection system to partner intelligence services around the world “with the expectation for sharing of the biometric takes collected on the systems,” according to a file released by WikiLeaks.
The user guide for the tool states that the program was developed to support OTS in its efforts to verify that biometric data was being given to the CIA.
“ExpressLane v3.1.1 provides an ability to disable the biometric software if liaison doesn’t provide the Agency with continued access.”
ExpressLane is installed and run under the guise of upgrading the biometric software by OTS agents who physically visit the target site.
“OTS/i2c plans to revisit these sites with the cover of upgrading the biometric software to perform a collection against the biometric takes,” a CIA document outlining the program read.
The data exfiltration is then disguised behind a Windows installation splash screen so anyone overseeing the OTS officer installing the “update” doesn’t become suspicious. Meanwhile, the program is siphoning out the agency’s database of biometric data.
ciaexpresslane2 wikileaks spy surveillance bigbrother
The files originate from 2009 and were intended to remain secret until 2034, according to the files.
The exploit by the OTS uses the Cross Match biometric system – a U.S. company that specializes in biometric software for law enforcement and the intelligence offices according to WikiLeaks.
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) August 24, 2017
This all comes as the U.S. Senate wants to label Wikileaks a “non-state hostile intelligence service” which WikiLeaks’ editor and founder Julian Assange has rebuffed as “absurd.” Maybe the CIA needs to be labeled a hostile intelligence service?
My statement responding to the U.S. Senate Intel Committee's attempt to place the "Pompeo doctrine" into law.
— Julian Assange 🔹 (@JulianAssange) August 23, 2017
This will only foment distrust within the Intelligence Community, causing paranoia that the CIA is using some sort of software to spy on its “rivals.”
In a way, this mirrors the PROMIS Inslaw case where the U.S. government was accused of backdooring the PROMIS (Prosecutors Management Information Systems) software that was used for intelligence gathering, according to electronics and computer expert Michael Riconosciuto who worked for the CIA at the time.
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article: