Biden’s Nominee for CIA Director

ANGLO AMERICA, 18 Jan 2021

John Kiriakou | Consortium News – TRANSCEND Media Service

If there must be a CIA, I feel better with Bill Burns being in charge of it.

William Burns in 2014 as U.S. deputy secretary of state.
(State Department)

11 Jan 2021 – President-elect Joe Biden has finally named a new CIA director, one of the final senior-level appointees for his new administration.  Much to the surprise of many of us who follow these things, he named senior diplomat Williams Burns to the position.  Burns is one of the most highly-respected senior U.S. diplomats of the past three decades.  He has ably served presidents of both parties and is known as both a reformer and as a supporter of human rights.

Burns is currently the president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, an important Washington-based international affairs think tank.  He served as deputy secretary of state under President Barack Obama and was ambassador to Russia under President George W. Bush and ambassador to Jordan under President Bill Clinton.  He was instrumental in the negotiations that led to the Iran Nuclear Deal and spent much of his career focused on the Middle East Peace Process.  Burns joined the Foreign Service in 1982.

When he made the announcement of Burns’ appointment, Biden said,

“Bill Burns is an exemplary diplomat with decades of experience on the word stage keeping our people and our country safe and secure.  He shares my profound belief that intelligence must be apolitical and that the dedicated intelligence professionals serving our nation deserve our gratitude and respect.  The American people will sleep soundly with him as our next CIA Director.”

The message from Biden is clear:  The CIA will not be led by a political hack like Mike Pompeo, a CIA insider like John Brennan, or someone associated with the CIA’s crimes of torture, secret prisons, or international renditions like Gina Haspel.  Instead, the organization will be led by someone with experience engaging across a negotiating table with America’s enemies, someone experienced in solving problems, rather than creating new ones, someone who has dedicated much of his career to promoting peace, rather than to creating war.

Rank & File Response

The question, though, is what will be the response from the CIA’s rank-and-file to Burns’ appointment?  I can tell you from my 15 years of experience at the CIA that there will be two reactions.  At the working level, analysts, operators, and others will continue their same level of work no matter who the director is.  Most working level officers don’t even care who the director is.  It doesn’t matter to them.  They never encounter the director and policies made at that top level generally don’t impact them on a day-to-day basis.

At the senior levels, the leadership levels, CIA officers will be of two minds.  Some will welcome Burns and his professionalism.  They’ll welcome a director who doesn’t attract adverse press because of a past history of committing war crimes or crimes against humanity.  (Even if they supported those crimes when they were being committed, press attention is always unwelcome.)  They’ll welcome a director who didn’t head secret prisons overseas.  They’ll welcome a director who wasn’t in charge of Guantanamo.  They’ll welcome a director who wasn’t in charge of maintaining a secret “kill list.”

Others will resent Burns, though, as they resented an earlier outsider, Admiral Stansfield Turner.  Turner had been appointed by President Jimmy Carter to “clean up” the CIA.  Turner then fired fully a third of the CIA’s operations officers, some just months away from qualifying for retirement.  He was universally reviled after that, and he never regained the trust of agency personnel.

That’s not Burns’ style.  He’s not a military officer who demands fealty.  He’s a diplomat, a negotiator.  The CIA has to be cleaned up.  Its policies have to be reformed.  If there must be a CIA, I feel better with Bill Burns being in charge of it.  At the very least, we should give him enough time to at least get started.

_____________________________________________

John Kiriakou is a former CIA counterterrorism officer and a former senior investigator with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. John became the sixth whistleblower indicted by the Obama administration under the Espionage Act—a law designed to punish spies. He served 23 months in prison as a result of his attempts to oppose the Bush administration’s torture program.

Go to Original – consortiumnews.com


Tags: , , ,

 

Share this article:


DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


There are no comments so far.

Join the discussion!

We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.

*

code

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.