Is the US Heading for Confrontation with China? The Pentagon’s Multibillion Dollar Indo-Pacific Military Deployment
MILITARISM, 15 Mar 2021
- China and Russia pose the main challenge to US hegemonic aims, especially united.
- Longstanding US policy seeks control over all world community nations, their resources and populations.
- Will US war on China by other means turn hot by accident or design?
9 Mar 2021 – On Sunday [7 Mar], China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi repeated what he and other Beijing officials stressed many times before.
China seeks cooperative relations with the US.
Washington’s rage to dominance prevents it, prioritizing containment of China along with seeking to undermine and isolate the country politically, economically, technologically and militarily.
US Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM) head Admiral Philip Davidson urged Congress to appropriate over $27 billion for new regional military construction, missiles, air defense installations, radar systems, staging areas, intelligence-sharing centers, supply depots and testing ranges to confront China.
The US Pacific Deterrence Initiative (PDI) is all about increasing its military presence in a part of the world not its own to confront China.
Like US hostility toward Russia, Iran, and other nations free from its control, false accusation against Beijing are made with disturbing regularity.
Defense News.com hyped a nonexistent China threat, saying it “boost(ed) (its) defense budget again (that now) exceed(s) $208 billion” — citing a figure released by the country’s finance military.
The amount pales in comparison to countless trillions of US dollars poured down a black hole of waste, fraud, and abuse for militarism, belligerence, and maintenance of the Pentagon’s worldwide empire of bases.
In stark contrast to the US, China’s military spending is for defense, not forever wars.
Threatened by US rage to dominate the country, including by surrounding it with heavily armed Pentagon bases, China must react defensively.
Preparing for possible US aggression is the most effective deterrent against it.
Despite no threat of an attack by China against the US in the Indo/Pacific or anywhere else, Davidson considers Guam-based 360-degree Aegis Ashore missile defense his top priority, along with high-frequency radar in Palau.
He also wants space-based radar systems built and “specialized manned aircraft (for) multi-source intelligence” gathering.
He asked for “highly survivable, precision-strike networks (with) increased quantities of ground-based weapons.”
“These networks must be operationally decentralized and geographically distributed along the western Pacific archipelagos using service agnostic infrastructure,” he said, adding:
“We must convince Beijing that the costs to achieve its objectives by military force are simply too high.”
Unlike US-dominated NATO and Israel, China pursues its geopolitical aims cooperatively with other nations.
Brute force is how the US and its imperial partners operate.
China is the top US target for transformation into a pro-Western vassal state.
According to military analyst Song Zhongping, the “People’s Liberation Army is developing new types of weapons, including hypersonic weapons, to counter the offensive and defensive military strategy by the US.”
If trillions of dollars spent by the US for war on humanity at home and abroad were used to serve its people over exploiting them and others in targeted countries, peace and stability would end forever US wars on invented enemies.
The world and nation would be safer and more fit to live in.
Things are the other way around and getting steadily worse because of US rage to rule the world unchallenged.
Award-winning author Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization and his new book as editor and contributor is titled Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III. His two Wall Street books are timely reading: “How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion, and Class War” (Clarity Press); and “Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity” (Clarity Press). Website: stephenlendman.org (Home – Stephen Lendman). Contact: firstname.lastname@example.org
Tags: Anglo America, Asia and the Pacific, BRICS, China, Conflict, Conflict Analysis, Hegemony, Imperialism, International Relations, US Military, USA, World Order
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Join the discussion!
We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article: