Kremlin Says Talks on Ukraine Should First Be Held with US

CONFLICT RESOLUTION - MEDIATION, 7 Nov 2022

Dave DeCamp | Antiwar - TRANSCEND Media Service

Russian officials have repeatedly stated they’re open to talks with the US, but the Biden administration has no interest in diplomacy.

The village of Novoselivka, near Chernihiv.
Photo: Oleksandr Ratushniak : UNDP Ukraine (CC BY-ND 2.0)

30 Oct 2022 – The Kremlin said yesterday that talks over the war in Ukraine must first be held with the US as Russian officials continue to signal that they’re open to negotiations with Washington.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that the US and its Western allies have a say over what Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky could agree to, citing earlier failed peace talks.

“Kiev has a president, a legitimate Ukrainian president, Mr. Zelensky, and it is theoretically possible to reach any agreements with him, but, bearing in mind the March experience, these agreements mean nothing because they can be immediately canceled at the dictation from outside,” Peskov said.

“The March situation” refers to talks between Ukraine and Russia that were held in Istanbul. Following the in-person meeting, a deal seemed possible, and the two sides reportedly reached a tentative agreement. But former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson then traveled in April and told Zelensky not to negotiate with Russia.

According to a report in Ukrainian media, Johnson said even if Ukraine was ready to sign a deal, the West wasn’t, and his visit was a factor in why a Zelensky-Putin meeting didn’t happen at the time.

Also yesterday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Russia was open to talks with the West and said they could be successful if Moscow’s concerns were respected. Lavrov said Russia is “always ready to listen to our Western colleagues if they make another request to organize a conversation.”

For weeks now, Russian officials have been stressing their openness to negotiations, while the US has rejected the idea of diplomacy, at least publicly. The White House said last week that there are no prospects for negotiations and that it’s up to Zelensky when they will begin, and the Ukrainian leader recently hardened his position on talks.

In response to Russia’s annexation of the territory it controls in Ukraine, Zelensky signed a decree ruling out talks with Russia while Putin is still president, essentially calling for regime change before negotiations can happen.

The lack of a diplomatic effort from the US comes after President Biden warned the risk of nuclear “Armageddon” was higher today than at any time since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis.

On Sunday, Lavrov discussed the 1962 crisis and said a major difference between now and then is the fact that there were talks between President John F Kennedy and then-Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev, which resolved the issue.

“Khrushchev and Kennedy found the strength to show responsibility and wisdom, and now from Washington and its satellites, we do not yet see such willingness,” Lavrov said.

______________________________________________

Dave DeCamp is the news editor of Antiwar.com

Go to Original – antiwar.com


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 

Share this article:


DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


There are no comments so far.

Join the discussion!

We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.

Please solve this question to prevent spam, thank you!
8 × = 40

Note: we try to save your comment also when there are technical problems or a mistake in the Captcha. Still, for long comments we recommend that you copy them somewhere else as a backup before you submit them.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.