Sanctions: Another Form of War on Designated Enemies
TRANSCEND MEMBERS, 28 Nov 2022
18 Nov 2022 – The Charter of the United Nations (UN), established in San Francisco in 1945, begins with noble goals, including saving succeeding generations from the scourge of war, and reaffirming faith in fundamental human rights. The UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), proclaimed in Paris in 1945, noted that “disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind,” and affirmed that “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” The specific rights to which all human beings are entitled include, among many others: “a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services….” as expressed in Article 25 of the UDHR.
Tragically, also embedded in the UN Charter are provisions that sabotage those fundamental human rights, resulting in the deaths of literally millions of innocent people who have been denied, directly or indirectly, access to food, clothing, housing, medical care, and necessary social services. Specifically, Article 41 of Chapter VII states that “The Security Council may decide what measures not involving the use of armed force are to be employed to give effect to its decisions, and it may call upon the Members of the United Nations to apply such measures.” Such measures, known euphemistically as sanctions, “may include complete or partial interruption of economic relations, means of communication, and the severance of diplomatic relations.”
The five permanent members of the UN Security Council (UNSC) — notably the victorious powers of World War II (United States, United Kingdom, France, Russia, and China) — played a dominant role in developing the UN Charter. In doing so, they deliberately promulgated mechanisms like sanctions, as well as veto power in the UNSC, which enable any one of these countries to prevent the adoption of any “substantive” draft Council resolution that does not suit their interests. Sanctions allow the UNSC to maintain and expand a world order ensuring their continued dominance through non-military means, thus minimizing injuries and deaths to their own citizens and averting domestic public outcry.
Since the founding of the UN, the Security Council has exercised its power to sanction countries, groups, individuals, and movements judged as noncompliant with its agenda — often in the poorest countries in the world and former colonies of the ruling powers. Since 1966, the Security Council has imposed sanctions on 30 regimes, including the former Yugoslavia, Haiti, Iraq, Angola, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Sudan, Lebanon, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (North Korea), Iran, Libya, Yemen, Al-Qaida, and the Taliban.
In addition to promoting and participating in those UN sanctions, the U.S. government has imposed its own additional “sanctions” to circumvent Russia’s veto power and other systems of checks and balances in the UN. Illegal under international law, these unsanctioned acts of mass deprivation have been imposed on Afghanistan, Balkan countries, Belarus, Burma, Hong Kong, South Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, and Zimbabwe, as well as two former WWII allies and permanent members of the Security Council: China and Russia.
Effects of Sanctions
Both the UN and illegal US sanctions have had disastrous effects on millions of people in former colonies of the Council powers, effects that violate both the UN charter and the UDHR. Research in 69 countries showed that sanctions lowered infant weight and increased the likelihood of death before age three. In 2021, because of UN official sanctions and US unauthorized sanctions, one million children in Afghanistan were on the brink of starvation. In Iran, US sanctions, particularly as increased by President Trump, and sustained by President Biden, have led directly or indirectly to the deaths of countless Iranians. In Cuba, Oxfam recently noted that “[it] has witnessed how the US embargo limits Cubans’ capacity to recover from [health-related] setbacks and curtails access to needed inputs, medicines, technologies, and materials to rebuild”.
Many Americans argue that Russia deserves to be sanctioned because of its invasion of Ukraine. While MAPA stands firmly opposed to Russia’s violation of sovereignty in Ukraine, it is undeniable that sanctions on Russia “have constrained the supply of energy, sending prices skyward and limiting economic growth, especially in countries heavily dependent on imports,” and contribute to a “perfect storm” of economic and humanitarian crises facing some of the world’s poorest countries.”
The Case against Sanctions
There is considerable evidence that sanctions, whether legal or illegal under international law, fail to achieve their stated objectives and can be said to constitute a humanitarian disaster. You can read more about these consensuses at the links below:
What the General Assembly has tried to do
Concerns regarding the humanitarian and health impacts of the US blockades on Cuba among members of the UN General Assembly have led to annual appeals for repeal of the sanctions. In 2021, 189 members of the Assembly voted for the 29th time that the United States should lift its embargo because of its “adverse effects…on the Cuban people.” Only two countries — the United States and Israel — voted against that resolution, with three countries abstaining — Colombia, Ukraine, and Brazil. In May, 2022, Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador called the U.S. economic embargo of Cuba a “genocidal policy.”
What you can do
Given the truth about UN sanctions and what the US calls “sanctions,” despite their not being approved by the UNSC — that they are killing innocent people, largely in the poorest, worst treated nations of the world — a question remains: what can you do about it? One answer, well within your reach, is to join Mass Peace Action and/or Code Pink. You can also sign on to petitions demanding an end to sanctions. Here are some links you can use:
Kathleen Malley-Morrison, Ed.D., Director of the Group on International Perspectives on Governmental Aggression and Peace (GIPGAP), is a member of the TRANSCEND Network and Professor Emerita of Psychological and Brain Sciences at Boston University. She is the author or coauthor of several books, including Family Violence in a Cultural Perspective, and Family Violence in the United States, as well as editor of the four volume series: State violence and the right to peace: An international survey of the views of ordinary people. She has authored numerous articles and book chapters on violence within relationships and nations. Her current efforts to advance peace and social justice are centered primarily in her blog, Engaging Peace. http://engagingpeace.com. She can be reached at: firstname.lastname@example.org
Peace Action, of which Massachusetts Peace Action is a statewide affiliate, began over 50 years ago as SANE and FREEZE, two separate organizations that successfully addressed the nuclear threat. SANE and FREEZE merged in 1987, and in 1993, the organization changed its name to Peace Action. A timeline and more information on Peace Action’s history are available. MAPA began in the 1980s as Massachusetts Freeze, an affiliate of the nationwide Nuclear Weapons Freeze Campaign. In the late 1980s, Mass Freeze joined the national Freeze Campaign in its merger with national SANE: The Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy. In 1993, we became Massachusetts Peace Action.
Tags: Collective Punishment, Inequality, RBIO-Rules Based Internationa Order, Sanctions, State Terrorism, Warfare, West
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article: