Harmonizing Dissonance via a Rubik’s Cube Framework


Anthony Judge | Laetus in Praesens - TRANSCEND Media Service

Experimental Guide to Navigation of Hypersensitive Global Polarization


15 Apr 2024 – There is no lack of reference to global division and polarization, whether associated with Russia-Ukraine, Israel-Palestine, or Vaccination-Antivax. Each of these, whether separately or in combination, now constrains discourse — even to the point of dividing families, friends, communities, or collegial groups. The period is a curious feature of a Biblical prophecy (Brothers will turn against their own brothers…, Matthew 10:21-23). There is therefore a case for experimenting with any process which addresses this trend and endeavours to reframe it.

One curious possibility is potentially offered by an interpretative adaptation of Rubik’s Cube — especially in the light of its familiar popularity worldwide. Previous exercises considered other somewhat related possibilities (Interplay of Sustainable Development Goals through Rubik Cube Variations, 2017; Rethinking Rubik’s Cube: a mnemonic device for ways of knowing and engagement?2009). This was concerned with engaging otherwise with what people find meaningful. It explored the possibility of mapping the 8-fold set of the UN’s Millennium Development Goals onto the 3×3 surfaces of Rubik’s Cube — with each surface posing the challenge of eliciting a 3×3 magic square.

In that light, the following exercise explores the possibility of mapping the opposing elements of hypersensitive polarizations onto a Rubik’s Cube. The elaboration of the design possibility was undertaken in an exchange with ChatGPT. This was preceded by a contrasting design exercise, also enabled by ChatGPT (Simulating the Israel-Palestine Conflict as a Strategy Game, 2023). The argument here follows from a concen with the conventional dependence on “flat earth” thinking, ignoring insights of mathematics and physics (Neglect of Higher Dimensional Solutions to Territorial Conflicts, 2024).

In the light of active Chinese interest in the mathematics of Rubik’s Cube, consideration is also given in what follows to the relevance of magic squares, originating in China, and their relation to the Bagua pattern of Chinese tradition. This is understood as justified at this time by the arguments of Susantha Goonatilake (Toward a Global Science: Mining Civilizational Knowledge, 1999), as discussed separately (Enhancing the Quality of Knowing through Integration of East-West metaphors, 2000; Coherent Reconciliation of Eastern and Western Patterns of Logic, 2023).

Rubik’s Cube continues to be the focus of attention from mathematicians, given that it is a tangible manifestation of principles in algebraic abstractions and graph theory. Some implications are noted here. Especially relevant to this argument is the widespread popular familiarity with the challenge it represents for many. As of January 2024, around 500 million cubes had been sold worldwide, making it the world’s bestselling puzzle game and bestselling toy.

TO CONTINUE READING Go to Original – laetusinpraesens.org

Tags: , , , ,

Share this article:

DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

There are no comments so far.

Join the discussion!

We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.

82 + = 92

Note: we try to save your comment in your browser when there are technical problems. Still, for long comments we recommend that you copy them somewhere else as a backup before you submit them.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.