Public Broadcasters Quit Eurovision 2026 over Participation of Israel
EUROPE, 8 Dec 2025
Ana Vračar | Peoples Dispatch - TRANSCEND Media Service
Source: Ireland Palestine Solidarity Campaign/X
Broadcasters from at least four countries plan to exit Eurovision 2026 after the European Broadcasting Union decided to allow Israel to participate.
5 Dec 2025 – At least four countries will withdraw from next year’s Eurovision Song Contest following a decision to allow Israel to compete. After a European Broadcasting Union (EBU) discussion in Switzerland this week, public broadcasters from Slovenia, Spain, Ireland, and the Netherlands issued statements denouncing the failure to address concerns over Israel’s participation in the contest, while Palestine solidarity movements elsewhere in Europe are demanding from more broadcasters to follow suit.
“For more than a year, we have been warning that we cannot stand on the same stage with a representative of a country that has committed genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza,” said Ksenija Horvat, head of national broadcaster RTV Slovenija’s television program. “Our message is: we will not participate in Eurovision if Israel is there,” added Natalija Gorščak from the same media organization. “This is on behalf of the 20,000 children who died in Gaza.”
Read more: UN adopts resolutions to end Israel’s occupation of Palestinian Territories and Syria’s Golan Heights
Broadcasters highlighted the targeted killing of hundreds of journalists in Gaza as part of their rationale for insisting that Israel be suspended from the competition. They argued that EBU leadership had succumbed to pressure and was hiding behind procedural maneuvers. Rather than hold a vote on Israel’s participation in Eurovision 2026, as requested by several members, including Montenegro, Algeria, Türkiye, and Iceland, the EBU proposed a new set of rules aimed at limiting political influence in contestants’ promotional campaigns. Aggressive messaging by Israel’s representatives has been a recurring issue for EBU members, but Spanish and other broadcasters stressed that technical fixes do not address the actual problem.
“The situation in Gaza, despite the ceasefire and the approval of the peace process, and Israel’s use of the contest for political purposes, make it increasingly difficult to maintain Eurovision as a neutral cultural event,” Spain’s RTVE stated.
Watch: Breaking the silence: Roger Waters on Palestine, censorship, and self-censorship
Artists and networks campaigning for Israel’s cultural boycott welcomed the decision by the four broadcasters. The Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI), a founding member of the Palestinian Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) National Committee, wrote: “We welcome the European broadcasters heeding our call and boycotting Eurovision rather than participating alongside genocidal Israel. By helping to enable and whitewash Israel’s ongoing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, Eurovision organizers, the EBU, are presiding over what is already the most disastrous edition of the contest ever.”
More EBU members are expected to discuss their plans for the 2026 contest as public pressure mounts. In Belgium, Workers’ Party of Belgium (PTB-PVDA) parliamentarian Nabil Boukili called the EBU decision “proof of boundless hypocrisy” and urged Belgian broadcasters to withdraw and refuse to air the event. “Russia was excluded the day after the war in Ukraine began,” Boukili said. “But even after two years of genocide in Gaza, with the bombing continuing, the EBU continues to treat Israel as if nothing had happened.”
Tags: BDS Boycott Divestment Sanctions, European Union, Eurovision, Genocide, Ireland, Israel, Music, Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Join the discussion!
We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.