Lula Sets Conditions for Brazil to Join Trump’s Board of Peace
SPOTLIGHT, 2 Feb 2026
Renan Truffi and Sofia Aguiar | Valor International - TRANSCEND Media Service
Brazilian president says group must focus on Gaza and include Palestine.
27 Jan 2026 – President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva spoke by phone on Monday (26) with U.S. President Donald Trump and proposed that the White House’s so-called Board of Peace be limited to addressing the conflict in the Gaza Strip and include a seat for Palestine.
The adjustment proposed by Lula is seen within the Brazilian government as essential for the country to accept the invitation to join the American-led Board of Peace. During the call, President Lula also reiterated the importance of preserving peace and stability in Venezuela.
The conversation had been in the works since Sunday night, when White House officials reached out to Brazilian diplomats to ask whether Lula would agree to speak with Trump the following morning. Although the initiative came from the U.S., Brazil had already been pushing for renewed dialogue between the two leaders for several weeks.
It was the fifth time the two presidents have been in contact since September of last year, when they established an open communication channel.
“Lula proposed that the body presented by the United States be limited to the issue of Gaza and include a seat for Palestine. In this context, he reiterated the importance of a comprehensive reform of the United Nations, including the expansion of permanent members of the Security Council,” the federal government said in a statement.
Lula’s team believes Brazil cannot accept an invitation that undermines longstanding institutions such as the United Nations Security Council.
Policy clash
Accepting a seat on the Board of Peace would contradict Brazil’s foreign policy, which has consistently supported the reform and strengthening of historical multilateral bodies.
People familiar with the matter told Valor that the Board of Peace’s charter—sent to Brazil last week along with the invitation—left the board’s scope of action undefined. This led Brazilian diplomats to suspect that the U.S. intends to use the Board of Peace for broader geopolitical purposes, not just peace efforts in Palestine.
If Trump does not agree to the proposed limits, Brazil is unlikely to take part in the board.
Lula’s team is also dissatisfied with a provision in the board’s structure that allows Trump to veto any decision, even as a lone dissenting voice.
Presidential aides say this would result in even greater “concentration of power” than what already exists in the UN Security Council, where only a few nations have veto power.
The concentration of power at the Security Council has long been a concern for Lula’s administration, which argues that the body must be expanded to reflect greater diversity and equal influence among nations. The Board of Peace, a source said, would only worsen this imbalance.
Despite the reservations, Lula did not give Trump a definitive answer about whether he would accept the invitation, the presidential communications office said.
During the same phone call, Lula reiterated a Brazilian proposal submitted to the U.S. State Department in December 2025 for enhanced cooperation between the two countries in fighting organized crime. This includes freezing criminal assets and sharing financial transaction data.
Brazil sees this security partnership as strategic to Lula’s re-election campaign, aiming to counter right-wing governors’ claims that the federal government is soft on crime.
While Brasília is eager to move forward, the U.S. has yet to seal the deal. Negotiations are expected to continue through March, when Lula is scheduled to make his first state visit to Trump in Washington.
The two leaders also discussed their countries’ economic outlooks, which they described as promising. They praised the “strong relationship” that has led to the lifting of many tariffs on Brazilian products.
Finally, Lula and Trump exchanged views on Venezuela, with Lula emphasizing the need to “preserve peace and regional stability.”
________________________________________________
This article was translated from Valor Econômico using an artificial intelligence tool under the supervision of the Valor International editorial team to ensure accuracy, clarity, and adherence to our editorial standards.
Tags: Board of Peace, Brazil, Gaza, Genocide, Hegemony, Imperialism, Israel, Lula da Silva, Palestine, Trump, USA, Utopia, World Order
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Join the discussion!
We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.
