Greenland Isn’t the Scandal–The System Is

TRANSCEND MEMBERS, 26 Jan 2026

Raïs Neza Boneza – TRANSCEND Media Service

20 Jan 2026 – Europe woke up in 2026 with a hangover and a revelation: Wait… we’re a colony?
Apparently, watching Nicolás Maduro paraded in Nike gear like a petty criminal was funny—until Europeans realized they, too, are potential Maduros. Same script, better tailoring.

Cue France, Britain or Germany sending troops to do “symbolic” military exercises with Denmark, to “discourage” Donald Trump from annexing Greenland. Symbolic being the key word. Because let’s be serious for half a second—just half. Europe is already under American military occupation. The main army stationed on European soil is not French, not German, not Danish. It’s American. And it operates under NATO, that famous “alliance” where everyone salutes and one country gives the orders.

So when Trump says he wants Greenland, he isn’t announcing a rupture. He’s reading the minutes out loud. Greenland is already militarily occupied by the United States. The biggest base there is American. The Americans could arrest French soldiers on Greenland before Macron finishes his press conference. This isn’t provocation. It’s disclosure.

What panics Europe isn’t Greenland. It’s precedent.

For exemple France knows how this story goes—because it wrote half the earlier chapters. A state stitched together by slavery, colonial conquest, and overseas micro-territories suddenly realizes the imperial big brother might start shopping in its backyard. If Greenland can be taken—or “negotiated,” or “economically aligned,” or whatever euphemism is trending—why not Martinique? Réunion? New Caledonia? When Trump knocks on Denmark’s door, French elites hear footsteps in their own hallway.

This is the real late awakening: the realization that neocolonialism does not come with loyalty rewards. Vassals don’t get insurance policies.

And let’s not pretend Trump is improvising. This is a well-rehearsed strategy: manufacture a crisis, then sell the compromise. We’ve seen it with tariffs—threaten 100%, settle at 15%, declare victory. Europe protests, then signs. With Greenland, the playbook is identical. Loud threat. Moral outrage. Symbolic troop movements. Then economic pressure. No war. No rupture. Happy ending—American style. Greenland stays “Danish,” but its resources suddenly speak fluent English.

Meanwhile, Europe clutches international law like a comfort blanket it only remembers when convenient. Threatening to buy or seize territory violates the “rules-based order” the West claims to uphold—except when it doesn’t. Except when it’s Iraq. Or Libya. Or Palestine. Or Congo. Or Haiti. Or, inconveniently, Greenland itself.

And speaking of colonial amnesia: watching European leaders rush to “defend Denmark” over Greenland is surreal. Denmark’s record in Greenland includes forced sterilizations of Inuit women, the removal of children from their families, and decades of social engineering so brutal that elderly women today still say, “I never understood why I couldn’t have children.” Supporting Denmark’s “ownership” of Greenland without centering Inuit voices is not anti-imperialism. It’s colonialism with better PR.

Remembering and paraphrasing my friend and elder Tété-Michel Kpomassie, (as it appears in different translations of An African in Greenland): “I did not go to Greenland to discover a land, but to meet a people—and I found human beings where others had only seen ice.”
The real question is not whether Greenland should be Danish, European, or American. The real question—conveniently avoided—is: What do the Inuit want? Independence? Continued association? Something else entirely? And if Trump “buys” Greenland, who gets the money? The Danish state? That would be colonialism squared.

As Tété-Michel said it again well again and repeated to me: “The cold was not the hardest thing in Greenland. The hardest thing was realizing how invisible its people were to the world.”

But here’s the twist; when Greenland stops being European, some of us won’t cry. Because Europe’s sudden moral outrage is less about justice and more about losing exclusive access.

Trump, of course, doesn’t stop at Greenland. In the same breath, he proposes ethnic cleansing in Gaza—two million people displaced to create a Riviera for investors—and blames plane crashes on diversity. No evidence. No shame. Just noise. This isn’t madness. It’s strategy.

Steve Bannon explained it back in 2018: flood the zone. Three scandals a day. Overwhelm the public. Kill critical thinking by saturation. By the time you process the last outrage, the next one is already law, policy, or profit.

So yes, feeling stunned is normal. That’s the point.

Greenland isn’t a scandal. It’s a stress test. It reveals structural racism, colonial continuity, and the hierarchy of power that Europe pretends ended in 1945. Trump isn’t breaking the system. He’s saying the quiet parts out loud.

And Europe doesn’t know whether to laugh, protest, or salute—because for the first time in a long time, the mirror is facing the right direction.

____________________________________________

Raïs Neza Boneza is the author of fiction as well as non-fiction, poetry books and articles. He was born in the Katanga province of the Democratic Republic of Congo (Former Zaïre). He is also an activist and peace practitioner. Raïs is a member of the TRANSCEND Media Service Editorial Committee and a convener of the TRANSCEND Network for Peace Development Environment for Central and African Great Lakes. He uses his work to promote artistic expressions as a means to deal with conflicts and maintaining mental wellbeing, spiritual growth and healing. Raïs has travelled extensively in Africa and around the world as a lecturer, educator and consultant for various NGOs and institutions. His work is premised on art, healing, solidarity, peace, conflict transformation and human dignity issues and works also as freelance journalist. You can reach him at rais.boneza@gmail.comhttp://www.raisnezaboneza.no

Go to Original – substack.com


Tags: , , , , , ,

Share this article:


DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

There are no comments so far.

Join the discussion!

We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.

7 × = 28

Note: we try to save your comment in your browser when there are technical problems. Still, for long comments we recommend that you copy them somewhere else as a backup before you submit them.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.