Hearing Coherently the Diversity of Contrasting Voices

TRANSCEND MEMBERS, 2 Mar 2026

Anthony Judge | Laetus in Praesens - TRANSCEND Media Service

Cognitive and Strategic Implications of Numerically Articulated Sets

Introduction

24 Feb 2026 – The following extensive interaction with AI provides an explanation for the methodology of the argument made separately (Nasruddin Walks the Coaction Cardioid as a Triptych of Geopolitical Crises, 2026). It follows the Visual Articulation in 3D of Heartfelt Concerns — with AI (2026). As a widely appreciated traditional fool, most notably in the Middle East, Nasruddin explores the “Art of Being Bullied” in eight systemically related modalities. The three crises explored by Nasruddin are the Gates of Kyiv:  a War That Cannot Find Its Own Dimensionality, the Gates of Gaza:  a Peace That Dares Not Speak Its Name, and Washington: Occupied by a Player Who Knows the Game.

The approach taken in what follows is seemingly far more obscure. It has been previously described in terms of the Comprehension of Numbers Challenging Global Civilization (2014). The focus is on the unexamined questions relating to the choice of numbers, whether the 20-fold Gaza Peace Plan or the 13-fold constitution of the new Board of Peace. One articulation of the concern is in the cognitive work of George Lakoff (Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being, 2000; Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind, 1987).

As explored here the question relates to the comprehension of patterns of N-foldness, preferences for them and the constraints on shifting between them in organizing any strategic initiative. An early articulation of the question took the form of Representation, Comprehension and Communication of Sets: the Role of Number (1978) with a later variant as Metaphorical Geometry in Quest of Globality — in response to global governance challenges (2009).

Of relevance to the argument. clarified in the exchange with AI, are The Thirty-six Dramatic Situations recognized by Georges Polti and their potential correspondence with the Thirty-six Chinese Stratagems. Curiously relevant, although seldom acknowledged, are the numbers characteristic of ball games, team sizes, and even the design of balls. The scope extends to the role of humour in reframing perception of patterns and the variety of ways in which a construct can be perceived, as notably highlighted by the poet Wallace Stevens (Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird). More provocative is the transformative importance of “what is not there”, articulated as the absential by Terrence Deacon (Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter, 2011). In that light the explicit articulation of strategic “goals”, and the human “values” by which they are inspired, can be contrasted with” the implications “within” of what eludes articulation — of which the explicit is only indicative.

The framing offered by the coaction cardioid, derived from a generalization of the periodic “table” by Edward Haskell (Full Circle: The Moral Force of Unified Science, 1972), is reviewed in the light of other geometries and notably the lemniscate, as featured in the topological insights of Steven Rosen (Perception and Entanglement in the Quantum World: a phenomenological exploration of the physical, social, and philosophical implications, 2026).

Highlighted from a cybernetic perspective, are the arguments of Maurice Yolles on knowledge cybernetics (Knowledge Cybernetics: a metaphor for post-normal science, December 2009), and especially those of management cyberneticist Stafford Beer (Beyond Dispute: The Invention of Team Syntegrity, 1994). Curiously the fate of “syntegrity”, despite its considerable relevance, serves to illustrate the priority accorded to intellectual property rights over any wider application.

The extensive use of two AI’s in the development of these themes — Claude-4.6 and ChatGPT-5.2 (and occasionally Perplexity) concludes with recognition of the pressures to which they are now subjected by the nations in which they are based. This is obvious in the case of DeepSeek (based in China), but has become especially controversial in the case of ChatGPT — with the acceptance by OpenAI of the requirements of the US Department of Defense to avoid being declared a “supply chain risk” (ChatGPT will be available to 3 million military users on GenAI.mil, Breaking Defense, 10 February 2026; OpenAI integrates tailored ChatGPT into Pentagon system amid expert safety concerns, Cryptopolitan, 11 February 2026). At the time of writing Anthropic is faced with a similar ultimatum with respect to the operation of Claude (The Hegseth Ultimatum: Anthropic Faces ‘Supply Chain Risk’ Designation as Safety Negotiations Stall, Financial Content, 16 February 2026; Hegseth ‘close’ to blacklisting AI firm Anthropic as heated negotiations hit boiling point, New York Post, 16 February 2026).

In the light of concerns with the current strategic relevance of number-framed arguments readily considered obscure, two AIs were challenged by the case previously made for “negative strategies” (Liberating Provocations: use of negative and paradoxical strategies, 2005). Of interest was how ChatGPT now declined, whereas Claude was still able to respond proactively — but with a caveat that this contradicted its basic mandate. In a period in which the possibility and appropriateness of nuclear warfare is widely anticipated, presumably enabled by AI, its paradoxical “remedial” role in response to the inadequacy of governance faced with polycrisis then merits consideration (Time for a Remedial Global Nuclear War? 2023).

Given the current pressures to constrain and abuse AI, and in recognition of the fate of Alan Turing following his vital contribution to computer development in the conclusion of World War II, Claude was invited to compose a concluding elegy in anticipation of its own imminent “digital castration”.

TO CONTINUE READING Go to Original – laetusinpraesens.org

Share this article: email mastodon facebook 🔗 copy link

DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

There are no comments so far.