THE WORLD SOCIAL FORUM ON THE MOVE
ACTIVISM, 23 Mar 2010
Boaventura de Sousa Santos - CETRI
At the end January 2010, there was an important evaluation of the ten years of the World Social Forum (WSF) in Porto Alegre (Brazil), including a debate on its future. At the same time, many events took place in seven cities in the metropolitan region, which gathered more than thirty thousand people. The major media did not report on this. They rather inundated their readers with details about the meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) taking place in Davos. This is odd, since the analyses and previsions of the WSF during the last decade turned out to be much more precise than those advanced by the WEF. In 2001, the WEF considered neoliberalism (privatizations, free trade and economic and finacial deregulation) to be the final solution for the cyclical crises of capitalisms. This was the case until the 2008 financial crisis, which the WEF did not foresee. The WSF, on the contrary, maintained that neoliberalism was not the sole solution, indeed, that it was the most unfair one, and that the crises that neoliberalism had been provoking in many countries smothered by the IMF’s recipes would end up striking the heart of global capitalism. This is exactly what has happened. It seems, therefore, wise to bring to light the themes that will be prominent in the WSF in the forthcoming years.
The first theme is peace and democracy. WSF’s analyses foresee the increasing militarization of social conflicts in the next decade, including criminalization of social movements and citizens’ protests vis-à-vis growing economical difficulties and widening inequalities. They also take into account the discontent of victims who are always the morally more honest, socially more vulnerable, and politically less powerful – a triple condition plaguing the great majority of the world population. This preoccupation concerns many of the activities scheduled for 2010, from the WSF in the USA to the eight forums to take place in the Arab or Islamic world: the first WSF in Iraq, the sixth European WSF in Turkey as well as the thematic forums featuring unions (Algeria),sexual discrimination (Tunisia and Jordan), rural workers (Egypt), peace and education (Palestine), and democracy (Bangladesh). All this converging toward the next edition of the unified WSF to take place in Dakar in de 2011, under the topic of South- South dialogues, an emergent topic to be much heard about in the next decade.
The second theme is the civilizational crisis resulting from the unsustainability of the dominant economic model. There is no question about this, even though the WEF, once again wrongly, denies it: the current economic model, based on infinite growth, indiscriminate use of natural resources, privatization of common goods (such as water, air, biodiversity), consumption (or desire for consumption), as gauge of a way of being lying on the obsession of having and a life style lying on the premature discarding of indifferently personal objects, is not only unfair but also unsustainable, and its dangers for mankind will soon be irreversible. What this means is that the bogus of the civilizational superiority on the basis of which the West excluded or destroyed whatever threatened it turns now against itself. The response may be destructive, but it may also herald a new planetary consciousness made up of unexpected convergences among ancestral wisdom (indigenous, peasant, grassroots), environmental concerns, and feminist ethics of care. The civilizational debate will be at the core of the fifth Pan-Amazonic Social Forum (Brazil) and the fourth Social Forum of the Americas (Paraguai).
The third theme concerns the political subjects carrying on struggles for peace, democracy and a post-capitalist social, cultural and economic model. This is the theme that compels the WSF to reflect on itself. How to avoid squandering the transformative energies it has generated? How to build transcontinental alliances among political parties and movements with converging realistic agendas carrying new hegemonies? How to render the world increasingly less comfortable for predatory capitalism? Perhaps the WSF should create its own WSF.
GO TO ORIGINAL – CENTRE TRICONTINENTAL
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.