Fivefold Increase in Terrorism Fatalities since 9/11, Says Report
MILITARISM, 24 Nov 2014
Islamic State, Boko Haram, the Taliban and al-Qaida responsible for most of the 18,000 killings last year.
Terrorism is on the rise, with an almost fivefold increase in fatalities since 9/11, in spite of US-led efforts to combat it in the Middle East and elsewhere around the world, according to a report published on Tuesday [18 Nov 2014].
The Global Terrorism Index recorded almost 18,000 deaths last year, a jump of about 60% over the previous year. Four groups were responsible for most of them: Islamic State (Isis) in Iraq and Syria; Boko Haram in Nigeria; the Taliban in Afghanistan; and al-Qaida in various parts of the world.
The report comes after Isis released a video showing the beheading of the American hostage Peter Kassig, an aid worker in Syria, the fifth such video of the killing of western hostages since mid-August.
The terrorism index raises questions about the effectiveness of a western counter-terrorism strategy since 9/11 that has seen US-led invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, drone strikes in Pakistan and Yemen and the use of proxy forces around the world.
The “war on terror” launched by the Bush administration after the 2001 attacks on New York and Washington has failed to eliminate or reduce terrorism in spite of Washington having spent $4.4tn (£2.8tn) on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and operations elsewhere.
According to the index figures, the number of fatalities has steadily grown over the last 14 years, from 3,361 in 2000 to 11,133 in 2012 and 17,958 in 2013.
Supporters of the US strategy can find solace in a decrease in the four years from 2007, which could be attributed to the US troop surge in Iraq. The next steep rise began in 2011 as a result of the Syrian civil war, which was born out of the Arab spring rather than US-led action.
But the emergence of Isis can be attributed directly to the US invasion of Iraq. Its genesis can be traced to the insurgency against the US forces. It grew from al-Qaida in Iraq.
Steve Killelea, executive director of the Institute for Economics and Peace, an independent thinktank with offices in Sydney, New York and Oxford, said there had been a “significant and worrying increase in worldwide terrorism” over the last two years.
He did not have the figures for this year yet but “my gut instinct is that it will be worse. I think we will see an increase.”
The Isis beheadings account for only a tiny proportion of terrorist incidents but have a huge emotional impact. “What beheading a Westerner does is evoke a strong reaction,” he said.
“If you have 20 people killed in an attack in Iraq, it has an effect. But if 20 people are killed in downtown London, it has a much stronger effect.”
The US and UK have been boasting in recent years that al-Qaida is on the run, its leadership decimated. But as al-Qaida’s influence has declined, other groups such as Isis have replaced it.
According to the index, the number of Taliban fighters is estimated at between 36,000 and 60,000, with Isis at 20,000, al-Qaida 3,700-19,000, and Boko Haram 500-9,000.
Eighty per cent of lives lost to terrorism in 2013 were in only five countries: Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Nigeria and Syria. Since 2000, about 5% of all the 107,000 terrorist deaths have occurred in developed countries, members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, which includes most of Europe and the US.
As well as a rise in fatalities, terrorism has also become more widespread. The number of countries experiencing more than 50 deaths rose to 24 in 2013; the previous high had been 19 in 2008.
Thirteen countries are identified as being at risk of increased terrorist activity: Angola, Bangladesh, Burundi, Central African Republic, Ivory Coast, Ethiopia, Iran, Israel, Mali, Mexico, Burma, Sri Lanka and Uganda.
Killelea said among the causes of terrorism are group grievance, political instability, state-sponsored terrorism such as torture and extrajudicial killings, and, over the last 14 years, the rise of Sunni extremist theology.
He called on Sunni Muslim nations to champion moderate forms of Sunni theologies to counteract the radicals.
Isis “needs a military response but a military response on its own is not enough. Sunnis in Iraq have a lot of legitimate grievances,” he said.
The report says that the two most successful strategies for ending terrorist groups since the late 1960s have been policing and the initiation of a political process. “These strategies were the main reason for the ending of more than 80% of terrorist organisations that ceased operation. Only 10% of terrorist groups could be said to have achieved their goals and only 7% were eliminated by full military engagement.”
The report says that there were 437,000 murders in 2012 compared to 11,113 terrorist deaths.
This is the second Global Terrorism Index report. The first was published in 2012.
Go to Original, Look at 2 Graphs – theguardian.com
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.