Major Banks Prepare to Pay Billions for Foreign Exchange Manipulation

CAPITALISM, 3 Nov 2014

Richard Smallteacher, CorpWatch – TRANSCEND Media Service

moneyexchange3_1 banks billions fines1 Nov 2014 – Multinational banks are preparing to pay out billions of dollars in fines to settle charges of foreign exchange manipulation. Some 19 investigations in ten different legal jurisdictions are now winding their way to completion and analysts says the final tally may hit $41 billion.

The first set of settlements are likely to emerge in November in response to an investigation by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK, which has notified six banks that it wants to come to an agreement for them to pay out £1.5 billion ($2.5 billion)

“The discussion around a potential U.K. settlement as well as certain U.S. banks taking related provisions in their recent results suggests a kick-start towards overall FX (foreign exchange) litigation settlement,” Kinner Lakhani of Citibank told Bloomberg. (His team came up with the estimate of $41 billion in a research report published last week)

These six banks number among a total of 15 that are being investigated for rigging the $5.3 trillion global market. Just four of the 15 together control over half the foreign-exchange market, according to Euromoney, an industry publication. Barclays of the UK has 10.2 percent of the market, Citigroup in the U.S. has 14.9 percent, Deutsche Bank from Germany has a 15.2 percent share while UBS of Switzerland has 10.1 percent.

Some 30 traders at these banks have been suspended to date over the last year, although some have since been allowed to return to work. A lawsuit filed earlier this year named a group that took part in an electronic chat room dubbed “The Cartel” – one of many where traders would collude on fixing prices to increase profits. (Other chat rooms had names like “The Bandits’ Club,” “One Team, One Dream” and “The Mafia.”)

Members of the “Cartel” named in the lawsuit included Chris Ashton and Matt Gardiner of Barclays, Rohan Ramchandani of Citigroup, Richard Usher from JPMorgan and Niall O’Riordan of UBS, all of whom worked in London, where 40 percent of global foreign exchange trading takes place.

To date UBS of Switzerland has had more employees suspended than any of the others. Seven traders have been suspended from UBS offices in London, New York, Singapore and Zurich.

Experts say part of the problem is the lack of proper regulation of foreign exchange markets.“This is a market that is far more amenable to collusive practices than it is to competitive practices,” Andre Spicer, a professor at the Cass Business School in London, told Bloomberg News.

Regulators have tried to defend themselves. “I have never come across myself in any of these meetings or discussions specific allegations of people rigging the market … in particular, the allegations now about the dealers themselves colluding to rig markets,” Paul Fisher, former head of foreign exchange at the Bank of England told the British Parliament earlier this year. “It would be very odd for them to have come to one of these meetings and said: ‘We’ve been rigging the markets, what do you think?’

Recently the regulators have gone into overdrive. Some 19 different probes are being conducted by a slew of agencies from around the world including the Australian Securities & Investments Commission, the European Commission, Bafin in Germany, Hong Kong Monetary Authority, the Japan Financial Services Agency, the Commerce Commission in New Zealand, the Monetary Authority of Singapore, Finma in Switzerland, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Department of Justice in the U.S.

The banks have already started to warn their shareholders of the size of the fines. In mid-October, JP MorganChase was effectively the first to announce that it was going to need to spend as much as $1 billion in legal costs over the next year, much of which is expected to stem from the foreign exchange scandal. (In July, UBS of Switzerland set aside $2.08 billion for future legal costs, although those provisions were related to a much wider variety of investigations.)

Other banks followed suit this week. On Thursday, Barclays Bank of the UK announced that it was setting aside $780 million to pay the fines, followed by Citibank from the U.S. with $600 million. On Friday Royal Bank of Scotland announced a $640 million provision and HSBC of the UK is expected to announce it will set aside $640 million on Monday.

The foreign exchange trading scandal has come on the heels of the global interest setting scandal for which a number of the very same banks have had to pay out a total of $5.8 billion in fines to date.

That scandal involved LIBOR – or the London Inter Bank Offer Rate – a global system of interest rates for $360 trillion in international deposits. The rates are set by the British Bankers Association which makes a considered average of rates reported to them verbally by participating bankers. Such “LIBOR” rates exist for as many as 150 different kinds of loans – mostly for overnight transfers between banks although they ultimately also affect the price of consumer loans like mortgages, car loans and credit card loans.

Go to Original – corpwatch.org

 

Share this article:


DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Comments are closed.