The Nobel Foundation Taken to Court on the Peace Prize


Jan Oberg – TRANSCEND Media Service

Jan Oberg

Jan Oberg

Lund, December 10, 2015

On the day of the Nobel Peace Prize Award Ceremony at Oslo City Hall

To whom it may concern, including the media:

We know – and Alfred Nobel knew – how devastating war and arms races are, and how little security we get for all the money we spend on military forces.

The campaign to reclaim the Nobel Peace Prize is first and foremost a campaign to revive the idea that global peace requires global cooperation on disarmament and replacing the law of force with the force of law. Every day more and more of us see, from the Middle East warfare, from the refugee crisis, and many other chilling reminders, the mandatory urgency of a change in world politics.

Alfred Nobel decided to give one fifth of his fortune for a prize to promote disarmament and resolution of all conflicts through negotiations and legal means, never through violence.

Can such a prize, with a so clearly stated goal, be turned to serve the opposite idea and be given again and again to recipients who promote arms races and believe in militarism and war?nobel peace prize 2015

This question will soon be answered, after Mairead Maguire, Jan Oberg, Davis Swanson, and Lay Down Your Arms took the case to the Stockholm District Court on Friday 4th of December 2015. Here is the full text of the summons.
and all other relevant information is available at the Nobel Peace Prize Watch.

Test case: the award to the European Union in 2012

The court case will test one of the most obvious violations of the Nobel idea of building global peace by peaceful means, namely the prize for the European Union in 2012 (the option to test the Obama prize in 2009, had lapsed – a three years limit applies).

“We are not going to court for our own financial benefit,” says Fredrik Heffermehl, “but to get a court order on Nobel’s purpose and the limits the peace prize must keep within. To this end we had to sue the board of the Nobel Foundation to restitute to the Foundation the one million Euro paid to the EU in 2012. The money was paid to the EU against protests from a.o. Desmond Tutu, Mairead Maguire, Perez Esquivel and the International Peace Bureau.”

The campaign to reclaim the Nobel Peace Prize was started in 2007 by Fredrik Heffermehl and Jan Oberg.

Fredrik S. Heffermehl has spent the last eight years to research the peace program of Alfred Nobel and Bertha von Suttner, and how the Norwegian Nobel Committee has step by step disconnected the prize from the will expressed by the testator.

“We have had years of negotiations, the Nobel Foundation knows the facts, they have the order of the Foundations authority, and we have not given up the hope of an amicable solution; it would be sad to see the Foundation spend money and energy to oppose the visionary peace and disarmament plan that Nobel intended his money to promote”, says Tomas Magnusson.

“If the board of the foundation gives a satisfactory promise to, in the future, respect and promote the disarmament work and ideas Nobel and Suttner had in mind, we will immediately drop the court case,” says Fredrik Heffermehl.

“All money raised for this case will be used to promote the original Lay Down Your Arms idea of Nobel,” says Tomas Magnusson.


At the time when Alfred Nobel wrote his will there was a clear division between those believing in the military way, and those insisting on other ways to solve conflict, through cooperation, international law, international institutions, arbitration and global disarmament – as it is today! Alfred Nobel chose side in this debate, he joined and funded Suttner´s peace movement, the Austrian Verein der Friedensfreunde and the International Peace Bureau.

There is no room for doubt what “champions of peace” Nobel wanted to support with his will. Here are examples of who they were in 2015.

For more information, all relevant documents, including the application for summons go to The Nobel Peace Prize Watch.

The plaintiffs

The plaintiffs are represented by the law firm Lewis and Partners in Stockholm, are the following

Mairead Maguire, Belfast, Northern Ireland, Nobel Laureate (1976), peace activist.

Jan Oberg, Lund Sweden, Dr.hc., co-founder and director of the independent Transnational Foundation for Peace and Future Research and nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.

David Swanson, USA, World Beyond War organizer, nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Lay Down Your Arms, organization registered in Sweden, to promote the Nobel Peace Prize and its vision. Running the Nobel Peace Prize Watch.


TFF Director Prof. Jan Oberg is a member of the TRANSCEND Network for Peace, Development and Environment.

Fredrik S. Heffermehl, cand. jur, LLM NYU, is a member of the TRANSCEND Network for Peace, Development and Environment and ex-Vice President of the International Peace Bureau. He is the author of The Nobel Peace Prize, What Nobel Really Wanted (Praeger, 2010 – expanded versions in Chinese, Swedish, Finnish, Spanish and [2014] Russian). fredpax@online.no

Mairead Corrigan Maguire, co-founder of Peace People, is a member of the TRANSCEND Network for Peace, Development and Environment. She won the 1976 Nobel Peace Prize for her work for peace in Northern Ireland. Her book The Vision of Peace (edited by John Dear, with a foreword by Desmond Tutu and a preface by the Dalai Lama) is available from She lives in Belfast, Northern Ireland. See:

David Swanson is the author of War Is A Lie and Daybreak: Undoing the Imperial Presidency and Forming a More Perfect Union. He holds a master’s degree in philosophy from the University of Virginia and has worked as a newspaper reporter and as a communications director, including press secretary for Dennis Kucinich’s 2004 presidential campaign, media coordinator for the International Labor Communications Association, and three years as communications coordinator for ACORN.

Go to Original –


Share this article:

DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

One Response to “The Nobel Foundation Taken to Court on the Peace Prize”

  1. “We are not going to court for our own financial benefit,” says Fredrik Heffermehl, “but to …. ” secure an annual support of Euro one million to the work of the “champions for peace” for disarmament based on international law and agreements that Nobel intended to support. Please be aware that the litigation will cost substantial amounts and we welcome all donations, small and big – Paypal, bank transfer and card instructions can be found at (under Participate). We have a strong case and expect that investments in the law costs will yield a very handsome return to future peace and disarmament work. (See under Candidates 2015 to see what kinds of nominees were qualified to win for 2015)