President Donald Trump—Israel’s Pick for War in Iran?
ANGLO AMERICA, 19 Dec 2016
James M. (“Mel”) Rockefeller | Hidden Tax on Humanity – TRANSCEND Media Service
8 Dec 2016 – The pro-Israelis who produced the presidency of the dysfunctional George Bush to take us to war in Iraq also produced the presidency of narcissist Donald Trump—to take us to war in Iran. Were that not the case, the Trump transition would not be dominated by pro-Israeli right-wingers. Below I show how supporters of the Israeli Right delivered an Electoral College victory for a reality show host who likely remains unaware who is manipulating his self-absorbed needs on behalf of Tel Aviv.
As can be proven by my life experience as the out-of-wedlock son of Nelson Rockefeller, Jewish elites and extremists are the source of serial wars and crises dating to no later than 1850 when Rothschild-affiliate Hallgarten & Company investment bankers opened their Manhattan office to finance both sides in the Civil War. A century later, my Uncle David Rockefeller razed Hallgarten’s headquarters to build One Chase Manhattan Plaza. He also personally allied with these German-Jewish bankers from the same Hesse region as Leo Strauss, a mentor to the predominantly Jewish neoconservatives who devastated our national security by deceiving us to invade Iraq.
Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, raised in an Orthodox Jewish household, was architect of the Trump campaign’s digital and social media strategies along with senior campaign strategist Steve Bannon. In the presidential primaries, New York hedge fund manager Robert Mercer singlehandedly funded the campaign of Senator Ted Cruz, a Zionist Christian from Texas. When the pro-Israel Cruz campaign collapsed, Mercer shifted his support to Trump and to funding Cambridge Analytica, specialists in data mining and analysis as key to voter targeting.
In the U.K., Cambridge Analytics (CA) identified “persuadable” voters to win a surprise June 2016 electoral victory for those who sought to see Britain exit the European Union (Brexit). In the U.S., CA claims to have collected up to 5,000 data points on more than 220 million Americans. When Ted Cruz won in the Iowa caucuses, CA and its Mercer-funded “behavioral microtargeting” was credited with the win. CA has such confidence in its profiling that it claims a capacity to detect aspects of a voter’s personality that he may not even know himself.
Its data mining relies heavily on “onboarding”—the widely prevalent self-profiling undertaken voluntarily online, much of it on Facebook. Those data points enable microtargeting to segment voter audiences so that psychographic advertisements can be sent online as “dark posts” seen by no one but those targeted. Thus, for instance, selected Black voters were targeted in key electoral states to receive reminders that Hillary Clinton used “super predator” language offensive to Blacks. Online personality data informs the content and tone of the messages sent.
Instead of heavy reliance on more conventional media buys, the Trump campaign invested in digital, especially Facebook-enabled microtargeting. Stuck more in a traditional media model, Clinton outspent Trump an estimated 3:1 on less effective media. Since his victory, he’s changed his position on at least a half-dozen hot-button issues that motivated those targeted to vote, including his stances on immigration, deportation, Obamacare, waterboarding, climate change and a promise to name a federal prosecutor to fulfill an anti-Clinton demand (“Lock her Up.”) among Trump supporters.
The point, however, is not which issues he subsequently dismissed, the point is which ones has he not: unflinching support for Israel, opposition to the nuclear accord with Iran and support for Israeli settlements in the occupied territories, a stance certain to reduce any chance of a two-state solution.
Pre-staging The Donald
Pro-Israelis inside the Trump Organization include general counsel Jason Greenblatt (a former settler), bankruptcy attorney David M. Friedman (a two-state solution skeptic), special counsel Michael Cohen and key family members, including son-in-law Kushner and his wife Ivanka Trump who converted to Orthodox Judaism. Israeli settlers were heartened by an interview that Greenblatt, lately described as a Trump “foreign policy adviser,” gave to Israel’s Army Radio after the election in which he said that Trump did not view the settlements as “an obstacle for peace.” That statement led to several celebratory announcements in Israel claiming “the era of the Palestinian state is over.”
Greenblatt lived in a settlement in Israel. Post-election rumors speculated he could be appointed as Trump’s Middle East envoy though Kushner is also seen as qualified. Kushner is a real estate developer and Greenblatt a real estate attorney. Neither have diplomatic experience.
Israeli Ambassador Ron Dermer has repeatedly visited the transition team. An American who forfeited his U.S. citizenship to serve Israel, he’s a key Trump intermediary not only for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu but also Sheldon Adelson, the casino mogul who spends an estimated $50 million per year publishing for free Israel’s most widely read free newspaper (Israel Today). The paper is steadfastly supportive of Netanyahu and the Israeli Right. Dermer arranged for Republican Congressional leaders to secretly invite Netanyahu to deliver a nationally televised speech on March 3, 2016 to a joint meeting of Congress in opposition to then ongoing negotiations on the Iran nuclear accord—that Trump now opposes.
Six days after that speech, Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton sought to undermine negotiations by releasing a letter to Iranian leaders signed by 47 Republican Senators suggesting that any accord with Iran could be undone by the next president. The role played by Israel and its lobby was apparent. Those skeptical that a 37-year old freshman Senator would take this step on his own initiative noted that Cotton’s Senate campaign received nearly $1 million five months earlier from the Emergency Committee for Israel led by Jewish neoconservative William Kristol, co-founder of the Project for a New American Century established in 1997 to lobby for regime change in Iraq.
In 2012, Dermer broke with long-standing diplomatic protocol to campaign for Mitt Romney, the Republican presidential candidate, an opponent of the Iran deal and, importantly, a Mormon. Also known as the Lost Tribe of Israel, youth in this uniquely American version of Zionism are routinely recruited for employment in the F.B.I. and our intelligence services, an issue to which I will return.
By stirring up the settlements issue, the Israel Right may well ignite another war-catalyzing intifada reminiscent of the Ariel Sharon-led march to the Al Aqsa Mosque (Temple Mount) in September 2000. That provocative armed march triggered the Second (Al Aqsa) Intifada one year prior to the war-catalyzing provocation of 9/11. Sharon organized that march after helping ensure the failure of international negotiations on a proposed agreement to designate Jerusalem an international city protected for use by adherents of all three faiths that consider the ancient city sacred.
Purposefully aggravating the settlements issue is also consistent with the influence wielded within the Republican Party by Mr. Adelson. He and his equally rightwing Israeli wife used their influence to ensure that any mention of the two-state solution was removed from the Republican Party platform. Democrats saw a similar scouring of their platform by the Israeli Right to ensure that the term “occupied territories” was stricken.
Adding to those provocations, the Knesset took up legislation allowing settlers to gain title to privately owned Palestinian land on which the settlers illegally built. As usual with rightwing pro-Israelis and their deployment of simultaneous provocations, multiple goals are routinely pursued at the same time. Senator Pat Leahy of Vermont summarized how:
“One of the most effective ways that ISIS and other terrorist groups have attracted recruits is by tarring the United States with Israel’s expanding occupation of the West Bank. This legislation to retroactively legalize illegal settlements will be welcomed by those murderous groups as further evidence that America’s closest ally in the region is bent on destroying a peaceful solution, including the possibility of a Palestinian state.”
Election By Way of Deception
Taking full advantage of the new media ecosystem offered by social media, the Trump team was the primary beneficiary of an onslaught of fake news as one in five social-media users modified their views about a political or social issue due to a social media post, according to a Pew Research survey published in October 2016. Almost half of Americans now rely on Facebook as a source of news. According to BuzzFeed, among the 20 most popular fake election stories that generated the most audience engagement on Facebook in the last three months of the campaign, all but three were either pro-Trump or anti-Hillary.
During that period, the top-performing made-up election stories on Facebook generated more engagement than the top 20 stories by established media outlets, including the New York Times, Washington Post and NBC News. The fact-displacing/opinion-shaping capacity of social media was used to great effect by digital strategist Jared Kushner and Trump political strategist Steve Barron. Profiling voters is now like “baking a cake” according to Cambridge Analytics. Microtargeting those voters was required to win key electoral states. Victory went to the campaign best able to support its data points with appealing psychographics. “Facebook is the microtargeter’s ultimate weapon.”
Though this Facebook-enabled duplicity was well known for at least two years, only after this pro-Israeli victory did Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg concede a need to address the problem. On the 15th anniversary of 9/11 (seven weeks prior to the November 8 election), Facebook’s ‘trending’ algorithms directed its 1.8 billion users to a “9/11 Truther” conspiracy theory claiming that the U.S. government orchestrated the attacks. The next day it was announced that Facebook and Israel agreed to work together to rein in content that Israel says incites violence.
By tweaking its algorithms to reduce “click bait,” it’s long been known that Facebook editors can put a political campaign out of business. Or promote a campaign its editors favor. Analysts have since confirmed that much of the fake news was targeted at Facebook users in swing states such as Florida and Ohio, benefitting Trump’s campaign. Exposure of its role in the 2016 election will provide Facebook with the excuse it needs to censor online content—such as this—that exposes the shared pro-Israeli bias of those using this social media platform to win an election—by way of deception.
The Next (Israeli) Narrative
Post-election, those who produced the Trump presidency began to assemble a transition team, aided by a corps of Jewish advisers to the Trump Organization. His campaign advisers include General Keith Kellogg who served as chief operating officer for the Coalition Provisional Authority that governed Iraq following the 2003 invasion. It was on his watch that U.S. Ambassador Paul Bremer disbanded the Sunni-dominant Republican Guard that became ISIL. No one knows how much of the 363 tons of U.S. currency flown into a war zone on his watch found its way to ISIL.
When Trump named Congressman Dan Pompeo, a critic of the Iran accord, as Director of the C.I.A., the Republican Jewish Coalition (largely funded by casino multi-billionaire Sheldon Adelson) described him as a “wonderful choice” and a “true friend of Israel.” When Mitt Romney made Trump’s short list as a potential Secretary of State, the war-with-Iran agenda came sharply back into focus. A lay bishop in the Mormon Church, a Romney Administration would by now have led us into Israel’s long-sought war with Iran.
During Romney’s 2012 campaign, foreign policy adviser Dan Senor told journalists that if Israel launched a strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities, Romney “would respect the move.” Regardless of their personal differences (Romney called Trump a “phony” and a “fraud”), his hardline position on Iran qualified Romney to serve as Trump’s Secretary of State.
Should Romney be included in a Trump administration, Trump will be portrayed as magnanimous and Romney’s role will be cast as unifying the party. In truth, it will confirm that Zionists have consolidated their power in a presidency produced for the purpose of taking us to war in Iran. Those promoting the narrative of “Russian interference” in the 2016 presidential election fail to mention that Israeli Ambassador Ron Dermer campaigned for Romney in 2012; Netanyahu was prominently featured in a Romney campaign ad in Florida warning of the Iranian threat.
Romney adviser Dan Senor hailed Pompeo as a “superb pick” (Romney’s July 2012 trip to Israel is described as the “brainchild” of Senor and Dermer). As chief spokesperson for the Coalition Provisional Authority and senior adviser to Bremer, Senor put a positive spin on the disastrous post-invasion policies that devastated Iraq and pre-staged the conditions required for the emergence of ISIL. While in Iraq, the neoconservative Senor represented not U.S. but Israeli interests.
Trump’s transition confirms that Jewish elites and extremists have amassed enough control to pick presidential advisers able to shape U.S. foreign policy for the next fifty years. Lt. General Michael Flynn, former Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, was quickly named National Security Adviser. After the attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya in 2012, General Flynn kept asking his intelligence officers to look for a link to Iran—i.e., in much the same way that intelligence officers were pressed to look for a 9/11 link to Iraq. In neither case was there any link.
In July 2016, as the nominating convention convened in Cleveland, General Flynn published The Field of Fight: How We Can Win the Global War Against Radical Islam and Its Allies co-authored by neocon Michael Ledeen. The book named China is one of the nations in a “working coalition” allied with “radical Islamists and regimes in Havana, Pyongyang, Moscow and Beijing.” The book’s well-timed release foreshadowed a post-election victory call to President-elect Trump from Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen, unsettling almost four decades of a One China policy and igniting foreseeable tensions in U.S.-China relations.
The foreword to the book features former Senator Joseph Lieberman, a self-described Jewish Zionist, who—along with Senator John McCain—sold us the false intelligence that induced us to war in Iraq. Ledeen worked closely over decades with three of the most strategically well-placed neocons: Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Feith. The Flynn/Ledeen insistence on a stronger rhetorical stance on Islam found its way into Trump’s speeches when he routinely chastised President Obama for not using the phrase “radical Islamic extremists.”
If we see another mass murder that can plausibly be blamed on “radical Islamic extremists,” President Barack Obama will be responsible due to his failure to engage the facts of what can be proven by my life experience. Had the intelligence I uncovered in Iraq been engaged in good faith by the FBI on my return from Baghdad in February 1997, Saddam Hussein could have been removed without a war.
The FBI is complicit in blocking an investigation able to confirm that the source of this corruption traces to those skilled at waging war “by way of deception,” the operating motto of the Israeli intelligence services. To avoid engagement, FBI agents (many of them Mormons) repeatedly sought to portray me as the problem. As my father pointed out in a 1964 speech at Harvard University during his second of four terms as Governor of New York, those posing the greatest threat to our nation exhibit a “tireless genius for crisis.” Thus the well-timed revival of Hillary Clinton’s email scandal ten days prior to the election by FBI Director James Comey, creating a campaign crisis that helped shift votes to Trump whose ego makes him an easily manipulated asset.
Pro-Israeli Steve Bannon
Trump “senior strategic counsel” Steve Bannon was recruited as an adviser late in the campaign from the alt-right Breitbart News where he served as Executive Chairman. His prominent role in the Trump presidency set off charges that he is a white nationalist, a racist and an anti-Semite. That false portrayal lays the foundation for manipulating both the Black Lives Matter movement and hate-mongering white power advocates.
Bannon is a political product of the Israeli Right. Andrew Breitbart’s worked at The Drudge Report and The Huffington Post before his concept for Breitbart News originated—while in Israel—as a media outlet that would be unapologetically pro-Israel. On his death in 2012, he was praised by pro-Israelis Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich. Like his former boss, Bannon lavishes praise on extremists among the pro-Israeli Right, including Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann.
When Israeli Ambassador Ron Dermer left his meeting with President-elect Trump, he was quick to praise Bannon as was Zionist Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz. In 2015, Bannon joined Breitbart’s (Jewish) CEO Larry Solov to launch Breitbart Jerusalem “specifically to cover the region from an unabashedly Zionist perspective.” Bannon also hosted 29 interviews with Frank Gaffney whose Center for Security Policy is known for its ultra-right Zionist views. Bannon praised Gaffney, insisting he is “doing amazing work, doing God’s work…Just fantastic.”
Tellingly, Bannon featured six interviews with Pamela Geller (“her time has come”). Founder of the pro-Israeli, Islam-bashing American Freedom Defense Institute, she was an outspoken post-9/11 opponent of the so-called “ground zero mosque,” an opposition effort supported by Robert Mercer. Geller was also one of five recipients of a Zionist “manifesto” written by Norwegian Anders Behring Breivik who killed 77 people on July 22, 2011 to draw attention to his manifesto. That mass murder marks when Zionist extremists shifted their focus from anti-Semitism to anti-Islam.
Based on Bannon’s well-known support for the Israeli Right, one can only marvel at media attempts to brand him anti-Semitic. That false portrayal only further heightens my concern at how soon that deceptive portrayal will be used to support the next agenda-advancing crisis. Those who wage war “by way of deception” routinely pre-stage collateral crises to draw attention away from a main event—such as undermining the nuclear accord with Tehran. Based on the media coverage given both to the Black Lives Matter narrative and the white nationalist narrative, conflicts based on race or ethnicity are poised to obscure the manipulation of Trump to take us to war in Iran.
When candidate Trump did not immediately disavow the endorsement of David Duke, a former Ku Klux Klan leader, that delay both energized his alt-right base and laid the foundation for a race-based conflict. The parallels with how fascists assumed power in Germany are chilling. Only this time, anti-Islam rather than anti-Semitism is positioned as the hate-mongering catalyst. With a mass murder provocation (such as a dirty bomb) plausibly traceable to “radical Islamic extremists,” it’s easy to imagine how an anti-Islam version of Kristallnacht could lead to the burning of mosques and the murder of Muslims. That violence, in turn, could ignite racially motivated riots—particularly if such civil unrest helps distract attention from those pre-staging another war in the Middle East.
But For the U.S.-Israel Relationship
Had the U.S. not agreed to a “special relationship” with the Zionist experiment now known as Israel, would a U.S. president-elect, in effect, be assembling a War Cabinet? I’ve no reason to believe that Donald Trump is aware of how his personal needs were profiled and serviced to produce this presidency. When, as President-elect, he met with Barack Obama in the Oval Office, he looked like a deer in the headlights. His need to protect his ego, his image and the Trump brand makes him highly susceptible to manipulation by those who will use him just as other presidents were used.
Trillions of dollars have been wasted due to our ill-advised relationship with Israel. The tinderbox in Syria, set in motion by Israel, could trigger the next global military crisis. When CNN describes conditions in Aleppo as a Holocaust, you know manipulators of the national narrative are nearby. Notwithstanding CNN’s pro-Israeli reporting, we still do not know if the use of chemical weapons in Syria was a false flag attack meant to induce us to wage war in Syria as an interim step to take us to war in Iran—for Israel. What we do know is that an emergent Trump Administration is thoroughly rightwing pro-Israel. For a candidate who forswears regime change, his transition team is loaded with people long committed to regime change.
Senate Democrats elected pro-Israeli New York Senator Chuck Schumer as Minority Leader and Illinois Senator Dick Durbin as Minority Whip. No media outlet mentioned that Durbin was handpicked by the Israel lobby in 1982 to replace Congressman Paul Findley and then groomed for the Senate. That 1982 race was the first time the Zionist lobby openly removed a member of Congress after Findley committed political suicide by challenging Israeli policy. By promising unity between Democrats and Republicans, Schumer made it more difficult to identify the influence of Israel and its lobby when another Pearl Harbor-like provocation is staged to induce another war in the Middle East.
When Schumer announced the new Senate leadership, he signaled Israeli confidence in what can be accomplished with Trump and his pro-Israeli team in the White House allied with pro-Israeli Republicans and Democrats in key positions of influence in the Congress. When introducing his Senate team, including progressive Bernie Sanders, this Zionist New Yorker described the two parties as standing “shoulder-to-shoulder.” That signature phrase was made famous by rightwing Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. He routinely used it to describe how, after 9/11, the U.S. and Israel would stand “shoulder-in-shoulder” in combating terrorism.
Schumer’s choice of words serves as ‘code’ signaling Israelis and pro-Israelis much as, ten days prior to 9/11, Tel Aviv announced a $1 million gift to Israeli super-spy Jonathan Pollard who did as much to undermine U.S. national security as any American in modern history—and then was granted Israeli citizenship. As a former C.I.A. Director conceded, the 9/11 attacks took ten years to plan and execute and required the assistance of a stable nation-state with active intelligence operations inside the U.S. That description fits only one nation.
The Cost of an Entangled Alliance
Both Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Al Gore in 2000 won the popular vote. In both cases, their loss in the Electoral College traced to key states—particularly Florida where pro-Israelis wield outsized influence. The Trump campaign lacked the ground game to generate those electoral results. Thus the microtargeting of voters as Kushner, Bannon & Co. focused on a few key states. That outcome was shaped by those who wanted the malleable Trump in 2016 just as they wanted the dysfunctional and pliable Dubya in 2000—to wage a war for Israel. Hillary Clinton was far less likely to invade Iran.
She attended enough classified briefings to know the role that Israel and its lobby play in deceiving us to act against our interests. The same holds true for Al Gore who was too knowledgeable and, unlike Dubya, too functional to lead us to war in the Middle East. By manipulating the 2000 election to make it appear that George Bush stole the election, pro-Israeli operatives retained a plausible cover (“We really wanted Gore.”) had the intelligence I gathered in Baghdad been engaged in good faith.
They required Dubya and his unfulfilled needs to pull off 9/11 and induce him to remove Saddam. Making it appear that Trump stole the election is a “double blind cover” meant to obscure the fact that Jewish elites and extremists knew they could more easily manipulate Trump’s needs than persuade Hillary to advance their agenda as she did in Libya. Though a hawk, Hillary Clinton—like Al Gore—would have been far more difficult to manipulate. Trump’s needy ego makes him easy.
Dubya was deceived to lead our allies into an unnecessary war reliant on false and outright fixed intelligence. Deploying classic game theory warfare, Tel Aviv knew it could rely on the Sunni-Shia conflict to catalyze the radical Islamic extremists of ISIL. An invasion-induced cascade of reactions reignited an ancient conflict-of-opposites (Sunni vs. Shia) that, in turn, enabled Israel to ally with Saudi Arabia, its perceived enemy with a shared dislike of Iran. The only winner: Jewish elites and extremists skilled at leveraging their small numbers to great effect through game theory warfare.
The Bush/Trump Doctrine
When Israeli policy was embraced as the Bush Doctrine (“go anywhere and kill anyone seen as a threat”), the U.S. forfeited its moral leadership. That’s a key reason Zionists wanted George Bush and Dick Cheney in 2000 not Al Gore and Joe Lieberman. Plus Israel needed Lieberman in the Senate post-9/11 as the key salesman—along with John McCain—for the false intelligence that induced us to pursue Israel’s destabilizing regime change strategy in Iraq, a nation that played no role in 9/11. With the Israel lobby emboldened the Trump victory and John McCain again serving as chairman of the Senate Committee on Armed Services, the risks of another war remain very real.
Without the mass murder provocation of 3,000 people on 9/11, Zionist Christian George W. Bush could not have been induced to lead the U.S. and its allies to war in Iraq in March 2003. When, in March 2015, right-winger Bibi Netanyahu addressed a joint meeting of Congress in an attempt to scuttle negotiations with Tehran, had a crisis been staged with extensive U.S. casualties—plausibly traceable to Tehran—the major world powers would not now enjoy a nuclear accord with Iran. Thus the ongoing risk of continuing an alliance with an enclave of extremists known to have a “tireless genius for crisis” and a history of waging wars “by way of deception.” Or, more accurately, deceiving others to wage their wars for them.
Those who induced Donald Trump to run for president (he never expected to win) prompted his promise to scrap the accord with Iran. If he withdraws U.S. support, the accord will likely remain in place. The impact would ensure that we isolate ourselves internationally, alienate our allies and further discredit ourselves worldwide, leaving us with Israel as one of our few remaining allies, an outcome that Trump transition team advisers appear to relish. That agenda could be accelerated with another mass murder during the transition period or early on in the Trump presidency—as with Bush when the crisis of 9/11 was staged less than nine months after his inaugural.
History Repeats Itself
Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner may be the Eddie Jacobson of the Trump Presidency. After serving together in the same artillery unit during WWI, Jacobson and Harry Truman returned to Kansas City to open a haberdashery that soon failed. That’s when the Pendergast component of organized crime began producing Truman’s political career. After the National Crime Syndicate was formed in 1929, Truman was placed in the Senate in 1934 and his career groomed to ensure he would become president with the death of President Franklin Roosevelt in April 1945. Truman and Roosevelt had spoken only twice prior to that fateful day.
Three years later, Zionist Chaim Weizmann appealed to Jacobson’s Jewish identity to have him plead with Truman for a meeting. After assurances from Weizmann that the Jewish state would not do what it has since done, that meeting induced a Zionist Christian President to recognize as a legitimate state an enclave of Jewish elites and extremists—over the strong objections of his Secretary of State George Marshall, the diplomatic corps, the C.I.A. and the Pentagon’s Joint Chiefs of Staff who feared that Zionists would draw the U.S. into serial conflicts in the region.
Since managing the Trump digital media campaign, Jared Kushner has become a trusted voice of a transition team tasked with staffing the executive branch with the 4,700+ positions that an incoming president appoints. The influence of Mitt Romney supporters Bibi Netanyahu and Sheldon Adelson became apparent when Trump agreed to meet with Romney who both men supported for president in 2012, anticipating he would lead us to war with Iran. Now they are relying on Trump and those to whom he is being induced to turn for advice, including Rahm Israel Emanuel, President Obama’s first White House chief of staff. Trump’s 35-year old Orthodox Jewish son-in-law signaled his expertise—and interest—in brokering an accord between Israel and the Palestinians.
Selling Conflicts of Opposites
As Russian President Vladimir Putin conceded in July 2013 at the Jewish Museum in Moscow, the first Soviet government “was 80-85 percent Jewish.” In the U.S., the expansive Israel lobby—founded as the American Zionist Council—has long been feared for its political influence. Add to that power the influence wielded by mainstream media and the major film studios (both dominantly Jewish-owned or controlled) and it becomes clear how difficult it is to protect our national interests from those adept at manipulating our national narrative to “wage war by way of deception.”
As the profitable Cold War conflict-of-opposites receded into the background, the storyline of the West vs. Islam emerged in the foreground as a new opportunity for war profiteering. A Vladimir Putin-led Russia poses an existential threat not to the U.S. but to those hoping to use the Trump presidency to take us to war in Iran, an effort the Russian leader is certain to resist. Those promoting that war are reviving The Clash of Civilizations, an agenda-advancing narrative first coined in 1990 by Zionist Bernard Lewis, a professor at Princeton University. The portrayal of Vladimir Putin as the foreign manipulator of our presidential election is meant to obscure both an electoral manipulation and manipulation of the national narrative by Zionists and their lobby.
Here’s one example of the sinister, costly and profitable nature of this duplicity. In the seven-year interval between the Communist-bashing House Un-American Activities Committee hearings of 1947 and the Senate’s “Red Scare” McCarthy hearings in 1954, Hallgarten & Co. investment banker Donald Stralem produced the film Duck And Cover. Shown by mandatory attendance to more than 40 million American schoolchildren nationwide, the film instructed them, when they saw the flash of an atomic bomb, to duck under their desks and cover their heads. At a 1951 cost of $350,000 ($3.2 million in 2016 dollars), this senior manager of Rothschild interests in the U.S. succeeded with this film in terrifying an entire generation of post-WWII Baby Boomer children and their parents.
The rationale cited for that psy-ops film was the “emotion management” requirements of Civil Defense during the Truman presidency. Stralem’s true goal was to internalize—at an early age—the fear and insecurity required to ensure support for decades of Cold War defense spending. That 9-1/2 minute film seared into the national psyche the threat of an imminent “atomic” attack by Soviet Evil Doers With the help of Hollywood, pliable politicians and mainstream media, that internalized narrative sustained tens of trillions of dollars in national security spending from WWII until the collapse of the Soviet Union. That perceived threat was recently revived along with another costly price tag—a pledge to spend $1 trillion on updating and upgrading America’s vast nuclear arsenal—despite knowing the weapons can never be used. Thus the need to cast Vladimir Putin as an Evil Doer to revive the profitable Cold War conflict-of-opposites.
The depth and duration of this duplicity can be difficult to grasp. In 1948, Chaim Weizmann assured Harry Truman that the Zionists would take no more land. Now we know that’s what they intended all along. Ariel Sharon assured us that, if Saddam Hussein were removed, they would make peace with the Palestinians. Now they’ve made a two-state solution impossible and extremist members of Israel’s rightwing governing coalition seek to grant legal title to privately owned Palestinian lands occupied by Jewish settlers who believe that, as descendants of David, they have a God-given right to that land.
Both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump proposed to relocate our embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, granting Zionists the worldwide perception that U.S. leaders recognize that ancient city as “the eternal capital of Israel.” That provocation would be certain to outrage Muslims worldwide and further endanger the U.S. The history of this “special relationship” suggests that’s precisely the outcome intended by the Israeli Right.
Pre-staging the Next Conflict-of-Opposites
The mainstream media portrays Trump supporters as uneducated white nationalists and racists when in truth, many of them are simply upset at being left behind by Washington’s embrace of the financial markets-obsessed “consensus” model of economics and the job-displacing forces set in motion by the current version of globalization. When it becomes clear to this disaffected base that a Trump presidency won’t deliver what was promised—and they expect—they will mobilize. If those who produced the Trump presidency can induce him to lead the U.S. into another war, we could see this nation fracture as never before under the strain of multiple crises, generating an outcome that will only further empower those doing this.
The annual budget for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) now totals $42 billion. The Patriot Act, drafted well prior to 9/11, authorizes suspension of the Constitution, including habeas corpus. DHS was founded not to protect Americans from radical Islamic extremists but to protect the perpetrators from Americans when they realize that this duplicity traces to a common source.
If, as the facts suggest, the goal is to trigger domestic violence, the DHS (and the National Guard) can be mobilized to detain the disaffected, including Trump’s base—adding outrage to their frustration, resentment and disillusionment. Based on the pre-staging to date, the most likely conflict-of-opposites will be provoked between those branded as white nationalists and those active in the Black Lives Matter movement for social justice.
Political strategist Steve Bannon is being branded by mainstream media as a plausible instigator conspiring from the shadows to mobilize the disgruntled alt-right. This social media-savvy adviser knows how to mobilize dissenters to achieve a political objective, as he proved on November 8th. Conventional politics can be displaced with the use of divisive rhetoric (that can later be disavowed) designed to penetrate online “filter bubbles” and reach the disaffected in their social media silos. For those skilled at advancing their goals by way of deception under the cover of well-timed crisis, he’s perfect.
If It Looks Like Fascism…
No one knows what will happen when Americans become well informed enough to realize that their liberty depends on freeing their government from the outsized influence wielded by Israel, pro-Israelis and the Israel lobby. What happened when that knowledge reaches a critical mass?
What we now see emerging is Fascism Lite. Donald Trump’s easily profiled ego ensures he will do whatever is required to keep from being exposed as a political fraud and a reality show clown. That doesn’t mean he’s an evil person, only that he can be easily influenced by those masterful at manipulating the needs of such assets. With both houses of Congress in the hands of pro-Israeli Republicans and the White House in the hands of rightwing pro-Israelis, the Zionist vision of global domination by The Chosen is now seen by them as a real possibility.
An enemies list is usually the first step in creating a fascist state like Germany in the 1930s. Lists created during the “Red scare” of the 1950s (traceable to this same trans-generational syndicate) helped consolidate the Far Right control now emergent in Washington. When this rightward political tilt interacts with those with a ‘tireless genius for crisis,’ the outcome risks the suspension of key rights guaranteed under the Constitution.
Those complicit in this duplicity have long operated in the U.S. and worldwide as war profiteers. Their genius for well-timed crisis enables them to create serial conflicts-of-opposites (the two sides are irrelevant) in order to profit off the misery of both. As their Cold War wound down, they ramped up radical Islam as their new profit-making narrative. Muslims are now the target of hate just as the broader Jewish community was targeted by those who produced the conditions that created German Chancellor Adolph Hitler. Anti-Semitism enabled these duplicitous few to hide in plain sight as WWII segued seamlessly into the profitable Cold War and, without missing a beat, the war on terror as it morphed into the War on Islam.
Without the mass murder of the WWII Holocaust, even Harry Truman, a dysfunctional Zionist Christian Democrat, could not have been persuaded to recognize this enclave as a legitimate state. Without the mass murder of 9/11, even George Bush, a dysfunctional Zionist Christian Republican, could not have been persuaded to invade Iraq, a nation that had nothing to do with 9/11. At each hinge of modern history, the facts point to the same source of duplicity.
Those complicit financed both sides in our Civil War of the 1860s. Even now, no one can explain how the world’s great powers were induced to wage the senseless slaughter of WWI. The post-war reparations burden imposed on Germany was certain to humiliate a proud people, catalyzing an angry reaction that—consistent with classic game theory warfare—ensured the emergence of an extremist form of nationalism (sound familiar?) that became the National Socialist German Workers Party (Nazis). At every step we see at work in the background those with a tireless genius for crisis.
The past 150+ years have been a study in senseless murder, mayhem and forgone opportunities while a sociopathic few profited off the misery of millions. That includes the U.S. being induced to wage an earlier unwinnable war in Vietnam that killed more than 58,000 Americans and as many as 1.5 million Vietnamese—for what? President Kennedy wanted us to disengage. After his murder, successor Lyndon Johnson, another Zionist Christian, led us even deeper into that morass. When he withdrew from the presidential race in March 1968, a Henry Kissinger-advised Richard Nixon expanded the war into Cambodia and Laos, ensuring another five years of war-profiteering.
In the age of transparency, those doing this—over centuries—know they now risk exposure. With exposure comes the prospect of accountability under law for crimes against humanity. That possibility may motivate those chronicled to stage crises that are more severe in their impact and more wide-ranging in their reach. For those who view themselves as the Chosen of God accountable only to God, they may opt for self-destruction rather than personal responsibility. When world leaders are forced by an informed public to acknowledge that Israel is the problem, what then happens when, in the interest of peace, those leaders insist on a nuclear weapons-free Middle East?
Who Should Be Held Accountable?
Accountability must begin by acknowledging that the Israeli Right and it lobby have long manipulated Jewish identity and preyed on the fear and insecurity of the broader Jewish community. In 1948, that community knew that Zionist elites and extremists posed a threat to their assimilation. Skeptics of the Zionist experiment have been proven correct—at enormous cost to the U.S. and other nations induced to ally with the Jewish state. The consistency of the behavior exhibited by the Israeli Right confirms that Albert Einstein and 27 other prominent Jews were correct in 1948 when describing Israeli leaders as “Jewish fascists.” Jewish novelist Hannah Arendt called them simply “Jewish Nazis.” They’ve become steadily more rightwing.
The facts are crystal clear—this is not “a people” doing this. Those responsible are our leaders—both civilian and military—who knew about this duplicity yet continued to allow those complicit to operate with legal impunity. That includes President Barack Obama who has long been aware of what can be proven by my life experience profiling those who specialize in befriending in order to betray and creating relationships of trust in order to defraud. Israel is not a friend but an enemy within. The cost of their treachery is incalculable—and growing.
I was encouraged by a November 20 comment by Henry Kissinger when he pointed out that Donald Trump comes to office with “absolutely no baggage” in foreign policy. However, the pro-Israeli, regime-change baggage picked up during the transition may corrupt his presidency before it begins. No U.S. President can Make America Great Again without dramatically reforming—or disavowing—the U.S.-Israel relationship. This entangled alliance has for far too long imposed a hidden tax on humanity. The restoration of our national security requires accountability.
 Donald Stralem was the son of Hallgarten co-founder Casimir Stralem. For the role played by Donald Stralem in placing a Rothschild operative in my home when I was four years old, see the draft introduction to The Hidden Tax on Humanity: http://hiddentaxonhumanity.com/hidden-tax-on-humanity/introduction-2/
 Leo Strauss also played a key role in the “pagan fascism” that served as the foundation for what became the Nazis led by Adolph Hitler. For an overview of the multi-decade role played in this systemic criminality by my Uncle David Rockefeller, see draft excerpts from The Hidden Tax on Humanity posted on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com
 As of June 2016, Mercer had donated $13.5 million to the Cruz campaign and $2 million to a John Bolton political action committee. President-elect Trump named Bolton as a possible choice for Secretary of State. One of the signers of the January 26, 1998 letter to President Bill Clinton from the neoconservative Project for a New American Century urging regime change in Iraq, Bolton served as a foreign policy adviser to Mitt Romney’s 2012 presidential campaign. Presidential aspirant Newt Gingrich announced that he would ask Bolton to serve as his Secretary of State. Active in the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), Bolton suggested three times during the 2008 presidential campaign that Israel may attack Iran after the U.S. elections in November. As a U.N. Assistant Secretary during the G.H.W. Bush presidency, he led an effort to rescind a U.N. resolution from the 1970s that equated Zionism with racism.
 See John Bolton, “Brexit victory is a true populist revolt,” Boston Globe, June 24, 2016.
 This combination of self-profiling and micro-targeting dates to no later than the ‘tear sheets’ included in magazines such as Seventeen and T.V. Guide owned by Triangle Publications controlled by Walter Annenberg, son of Moses (“Mo”) Annenberg, a former Chicago mobster and innovator of the racing wire service that served as a financial backbone for the National Crime Syndicate. Owner of the influential Philadelphia Inquirer, Walter Annenberg was Ronald Reagan’s “best friend for 50 years” according to First Lady Nancy Reagan.
 Walid Phares claims that his promise to relocate the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem ill be done under consensus. That’s the only Israel issue on which there’s been any change in Trump’s radically pro-Israeli stance.
 Dermer, the closest adviser to Netanyahu, co-authored with Natan Sharansky The Case for Democracy (2004). Sharansky’s book featured an endorsement by President George W. Bush who is widely known to be a non-reader.
 Not since Winston Churchill has a prime minister addressed such a joint meeting three times. House Speaker John Boehner presented Netanyahu with a statue of Churchill commemorating the event. The influence of the Israel lobby was also on display when Netanyahu was given a raucous standing ovation that lasted more than two minutes.
 Cotton’s 2014 Senate campaign was advised by Cambridge Analytics. Funders included a John Bolton political action committee that, in turn, was supported by Robert Mercer who invested in Breitbard.com and Cambridge Analytics. Cotton’s behavior suggests he is a classic asset who was identified, profiled and his political career produced by those chronicled in this account. He is well positioned to replace asset John McCain. The production and management of McCain’s career is chronicled in Guilt By Association—How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War (2008) aka “the McCain book.” See www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com for three chapters detailing McCain’s reliable performance. Like McCain, Cotton’s military career enables him to be portrayed as a patriot while pursuing an agenda for the Israeli Right.
 Dermer’s father and his brother both served as mayor of Miami Beach. The role they played in local politics further confirms why I was criminally stalked when visiting that city in 2005 and again in 2013.
 I was routinely stalked by Mormons, including during my youth in Michigan where Mormon George Romney, Mitt’s father, served as Governor, in Arizona by Warren Rustand and in Orange County, California by Doug Skeen. See Guilt By Association—How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War (2008). See also online draft chapters for The Hidden Tax on Humanity. The “Introduction” and “The Indonesia Connection” can be found on www.hiddentaxonhumaniy.com
 “Israel’s Alarming Settlement Bill,” The New York Times (editorial), November 17, 2016.
 Joseph Dussault, “Facebook’s news algorithm promotes 9/11 ‘truther’ article,” The Christian Science Monitor, September 11, 2016.
 “Facebook and Israel to work to monitor posts that incite violence,” The Guardian, September 12, 2016.
 “The harsh truth about fake news,” Financial Times, November 22, 2016, p. 9.
 See Armin Rosen, “Trump’s Jews,” Tablet, July 15, 2016.
 That Zionist agenda motivated casino mogul Sheldon Adelson and his equally rightwing Israeli wife to give more than $150 million to the 2012 presidential campaigns of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney. In June 2016, Gingrich urged the creation of a new House Un-American Activities Committee to combat Islamic extremists. He said nothing about Jewish extremists. It’s unclear how much of Adelson’s $32.8 billion personal fortune was deployed to sway voters in the key Electoral College states required for Trump to become Commander-in-Chief. The Adelsons publish a free daily newspaper that has become the most-read publication in Israel. Devoted to promoting the rightwing views of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Adelsons lose a reported $50 million per year on the paper.
 In May 2008, Senor joined a delegation that accompanied President Bush to Jerusalem for the celebration of Israel’s 60th anniversary. In September 2012, Senor said that Obama’s failure to overthrow Syrian President Assad made the U.S. look “impotent.” John McCain appeared May 27, 2013 in Syria voicing support for opposition forces. Two weeks later, McCain and Bill Clinton appeared together in a June 11th forum in New York for the McCain Institute for International Leadership where Clinton agreed with McCain on Syria and called Obama a “wuss” and a “total fool” if he remained too cautious in his approach toward Syria. His support for McCain further confirmed that both men are reliable assets whose political careers were produced and managed by the same parties. I am confident that Clinton was told to change the text of his speech while enroute to Israel for the June 19th celebration of the 90th birthday of Shimon Peres that was also attended by asset Tony Blair. To the surprise of his hosts, instead of his prepared text, Clinton said that unless Israel accepts the two-state solution, Israel may cease to exist. He also agreed to donate his $500,000 honorarium to charitable causes in Israel. In national security circles, Shimon Peres is best known for deceiving the U.S. when he led Israeli efforts to acquire nuclear weapons. My experience interacting my entire life with those chronicled suggests that President Kennedy’s insistence that Israel shut down their nuclear weapons program led to his murder in November 1963.
 Senor previously advised Lt. General Jay Garner who was appointed in 2003 as Director of the Office for Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance for Iraq following the March 2003 invasion. He was soon replaced by Ambassador Paul Bremer and the successor organization to ORHA, the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA).
 Dan Senor exemplifies the nonlinear way that this influence works without the public’s knowledge and regardless of political affiliation. In 2009, he founded the Foreign Policy Initiative (FPI) with neocon Republicans William Kristol and Robert Kagan, co-founders in 1997 of the now defunct Project for A New American Century advocating regime change in Iraq—to which FPI is a successor. Victoria Nuland, Kagan’s wife and Obama Administration Assistant Secretary of State for Europe, was active in bringing about regime change in Ukraine, including a February 2014 phone call with the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine in which she is recorded saying, “f–k the EU.” After the neocons sparked a new Cold War with a putsch in Kiev, Carl Gershman, president of the neocon National Endowment for Democracy, called for regime change in Moscow by removing Vladimir Putin who helped orchestrate Syria’s surrender of its chemical weapons and the nuclear weapons accord with Iran, undercutting Israeli plans for U.S.-led wars in those two countries.
 For 15 years, his sister, Wendy, ran the Jerusalem office of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
 For clear indications of problems within the D.I.A., see the experience chronicled in “The War in Iraq Could Have Been Prevented” posted online at www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com.
 While working as a New Republic correspondent in Italy for editor Martin Peretz, CIA station files described Michael Ledeen as an agent of influence of a foreign government (Israel). Ledeen was then hired in 1981 by neocon Paul Wolfowitz, director of policy planning at the State Department. In 1983, he was hired on the recommendation of neocon Richard Perle as a Defense Department consultant on terrorism before becoming a consultant to the National Security Council and later a consultant to the Pentagon’s Office of Special Plans led by neocon Douglas Feith. He previously served on the board of the Jewish Institute of National Security Affairs along with Richard Perle and Stephen Bryen (see below). Part of the neocon-dominated American Enterprise Institute, he is also affiliated with the pro-Israel Foundation for Defense of Democracies where Joe Lieberman serves as an adviser along with former C.I.A. Director James Woolsey, an outspoken neocon and a key promoter of the false intelligence that took us to war in Iraq by claiming a meeting in Praque five months before 9/11 between lead terrorist Mohammad Atta and a senior Iraqi official.
See “The Poland Connection,” a draft excerpt from the The Hidden Tax on Humanity posted on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com This serial criminal staking—still ongoing—was undertaken in collaboration with Israeli agents such as Jerome Corsi, author of numerous pro-Israeli psy-ops books made into New York Times best-sellers, including Unfit for Command, Atomic Iran, The Obama Nation and Why Israel Can’t Wait.
 Trump’s campaign stance on immigration, if pursued, threatens to further fracture the nation, beginning with some 39 “sanctuary cities” throughout the U.S.
 Joel B. Pollak, “Stephen K. Bannon: Friend of the Jewish People, Defender of Israel,” www.breitbart.com November 14, 2016. Mr. Pollak, who describes himself as an Orthodox Jew, serves as Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News.
 Widely regarded as a conspiracy theorist, Gaffney began his government career in the 1970s as an assistant to neocon Richard Perle while working as an aide in the office of Democratic Senator Henry (“Scoop”) Jackson.
 In his writings, Breivik expressed his support for the ethno-nationalism of Israel’s “far-right Zionism.” Two days prior to this mass murder, the grave in Germany holding the remains of Adolph Hitler deputy Rudolf Hesse was destroyed so that it could no longer be used as a pilgrimage site by neo-Nazis. In February 2012, Geller’s website, Atlas Shrugged, published the Islam-critical film, “A Movie about Muhammad: An Idea Whose Time Has Come.” Her website promotes the market fundamentalist theories of Ayn Rand (né Russian novelist Alisa Rosenbaum) that emerged as a core premise of the Washington consensus. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan served on her board of editors at The Objectivist. House Speaker and former Romney Vice-Presidential candidate Paul Ryan credits her writings for his entry into politics. A movie based on her bestseller, Atlas Shrugged, opened in theatres October 2012 the same week that the vice-presidential debates were televised. She earlier organized opposition to an Islamic Center near the ground zero site of 9/11. In September 2012, Geller posted ads in New York subway stations, “In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel. Defeat Jihad.” U.S. District Court Judge Paul A. Engelmayer granted Geller a judgment that deemed her provocative posters free speech-protected. John Bolton, a G.W. Bush recess appointee as U.N. Ambassador, wrote the foreword for Geller’s 2010 book, The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America.
 From November 9 to November 10, 1938, in an incident known as Kristallnacht (the breaking of glass), German Nazis torched synagogues, vandalized Jewish homes, schools and businesses and killed close to 100 Jews.
 My life experience suggests that Donald Trump, the son of a well-known New Jersey real estate developer, may well have been identified, profiled and his career produced, starting at an early age. He emerged as a success in an industry dominated by those profiled in a city long dominated by those profiled.
 Seventeen years with The Jerusalem Post, CNN anchor Wolf Blitzer is featured on “the most trusted name in news.” His broadcasting booth, branded “The Situation Room,” grants him credibility by its association with the White House Situation Room. In 1989, he published Territory of Lies, a sympathetic account of Israeli super-spy Jonathan Pollard.
 “During a 2015 trip to Russia, Donald Trump’s pick to be national security adviser, Lt. Gen. Michael, said he didn’t know whether the 2013 sarin gas attack in Syria was conducted by the Syrian Army or by other forces in an attempt to draw the U.S. into the conflict” (i.e., a false flag attack). At the time of the attack, General Flynn was director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. Andrew Kaczynski, CNN, November 20, 2016.
 When, in 1984, the lobby bragged about their removal from Congress of Congressman Pete McCloskey and Senator Chuck Percy, that Israeli operation served notice on Congress that whatever Israel wants, Israel gets—or you’re gone.
 In April 2016, Senator Sanders was provided two detailed memos chronicling the common (pro-Israeli) source of this duplicity and ongoing treason, its implications for national security and the cost that this hidden tax has long imposed on people and the planet. That correspondence will be posted on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com.
 Ellis Shuman, “Pollards reject $1M Israeli compensation offer,” Haaretz, August 31, 2001.
 Double blind covers are explained in more detail on the Hidden Tax on Humanity website.
 Prince Turki al-Faisal, former Saudi intelligence chief and ex-ambassador to Washington and London, urged on November 10 that the Iran accord remain intact: “To scrap that willy-nilly as it were will have ramifications, and I don’t know if something else can be put in its place to guarantee that Iran will not go that route if the agreement is scrapped.”
 For an explanation of game theory warfare and Israeli expertise in this geostrategic form of duplicity, see Chapter 1 of Guilt By Association—How Deception and Self-Deceit Took America to War. The chapter, titled “Game Theory and the Mass Murder of 9/11,” can be found on www.hiddentaxonhumanity.com
 Israel is notorious for staging well-timed crises and geostrategic provocations. For example, Operation Cast Lead killed some 1,400 Palestinians, including at least 300 minors under age 18. That provocation was timed to begin two days after Christmas 2008 and conclude two days prior to the Obama inaugural of January 20, 2009. Similarly, Israel’s Operation Sinai (aka the Suez Crisis) was timed for the last week of President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s re-election campaign in November 1956. The propensity of the Israel lobby to stage war-catalyzing provocations (using well-timed crises) again became clear when WINEP’s Patrick Clawson candidly called for “crisis initiation” and a false-flag incident to “step up the pressure” for a U.S. war with Iran. Capturing such Zionist candor on film is both instructive and highly unusual. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfoaLbbAix0&feature=player_embedded The Washington Institute for Near East Policy was founded as the research arm of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), a key component of the expansive Israel lobby. Founded as the American Zionist Council, Attorney General Robert Kennedy and Senator J. William Fulbright, chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations, sought to force the Council to comply with the requirements of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). At the same time, President Kennedy sought to shut down the Zionists’ nuclear weapons program. With the murder of Kennedy and his replacement by Lyndon Johnson, both initiatives were abandoned. AIPAC continues to operate without FARA compliance.
 In late 1947, the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) wrote that “A decision to partition Palestine, if the decision were supported by the United States, would prejudice United States strategic interests in the Near and Middle East” to the point that “United States influence in the area would be curtailed to that which could be maintained by military force.” On March 31, 1948, the JCS released “Force Requirements for Palestine.” In that paper, they predicted that “the Zionist strategy will seek to involve [the United States] in a continuously widening and deepening series of operations intended to secure maximum Jewish objectives.” Mark Perry, “Petraeus wasn’t the first,” Foreign Policy, April 2, 2010. See also Alison Weir, Against Our Better Judgment (If America Knew, 2014).
 White House speechwriter David Frum (Jewish) originated the phrase “Axis of Evil” that first appeared in George Bush’s 2002 State of the Union address, linking Iran, Iraq and North Korea. In 2004, neocon Richard Perle, former (Jewish) chair of the U.S. Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee, 2001-2003, co-authored with Frum An End to Evil (2004). The recurring need for a plausible enemy is closely associated with the hate-mongering routinely pursued by those adept at waging war by way of deception.
 The first head of Homeland Security was Presidential Assistant Bernie Kerik who was forced to resign when his ties to organized crime as a New York Police Commissioner became too obvious. The first Secretary of DHS was Tom Ridge, former Governor of Pennsylvania from that state’s mobbed-up political machine previously overseen by publisher and GOP diplomat Walter Annenberg, son of Chicago mobster Moses (“Mo”) Annenberg. According to Nancy Reagan, Walter was “Ronnie’s best friend for 50 years.” The second Secretary of DHS was Michael Chertoff from a long family line of rabbis and previously in charge of the criminal division at the Department of Justice where he reportedly allowed several known Mossad suspects to return to Israel after 9/11. Former Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano took over from Chertoff. In December 2005, I submitted to her and Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard, a 3-volume compilation of facts and analyses. Had those materials been engaged in good faith and investigated, the common source of this systemic criminality and ongoing treason could have been identified and addressed almost 11 years ago.
The HToH website documents the common source of an ongoing criminality that has long imposed a hidden tax on humanity. Most recently, that tax includes the cost of unnecessary and preventable wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Next could be the cost of a war with Russia, a nuclear incident by North Korea or any of a dozen other pre-staged crises that could be triggered when those identified realize they may be held accountable for their crimes against humanity. The facts and analyses pivot off the life experience of James M. (“Mel”) Rockefeller. Since the January 1979 death of Nelson Rockefeller, his biological father, Mel has dedicated more than three decades to profiling those identified. Proven here is an ancient nonlinear form of criminality that, until now, has enabled the perpetrators to avoid detection, exposure and personal responsibility under traditional linear law.
DISCLAIMER: In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
7 Responses to “President Donald Trump—Israel’s Pick for War in Iran?”
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article: