777,000 Tons of Radioactive Waste to Be Dumped in Pacific
ENVIRONMENT, 17 July 2017
teleSUR – TRANSCEND Media Service
“In the broad scale of things, if they do end up putting the material in the Pacific, it will have minimal effect on an ocean basin scale.”
16 Jul 2017 – Approximately 580 barrels of radioactive water is to be released into the Pacific Ocean, according to the head of the company responsible for the Fukushima clean-up operation.
Residents are displeased with the plan to release 777,000 tons of tainted water, from the 2011 Fukushima nuclear plant, into the sea.
The water is a radioactive from of hydrogen, called tritium – which was used to cool the nuclear plant’s damaged reactors.
Takashi Kawamura, chairman of the Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco) said: “The decision has already been made.” But, Tepco is awaiting the go-ahead from the government. “We cannot keep going if we do not have the support of the state,” Kawamura explained to Japan Times.
Shunichi Tanaka, chairman of the Nuclear Regulation Authority, who strongly supports releasing the water into the sea has criticized Tepso’s indecisiveness. “An operator lacking the will to take the initiative does not have the right to resume operation of nuclear reactors,” he said.
Unlike Tanaka, the local fishermen are against the proposed ocean release, fearing that the negative publicity will affect their livelihoods.
“Releasing (tritium) into the sea will create a new wave of unfounded rumors, making our efforts all for naught,” said Kanji Tachiya, head of a local fishermen’s cooperative.
According to NRA chairman Tanaka, the chemical is “so weak in its radioactivity won’t penetrate plastic wrapping.”
Tritium reportedly poses little danger to humans unless exposed to high quantities.
Oceanographer at the University of Southampton, Simon Boxall, told the Guardian that: “In the broad scale of things, if they do end up putting the material in the Pacific, it will have minimal effect on an ocean basin scale.”
Environmental activists fear that dumping the tritium-laced water into the ocean will set a poor example.
“They say that it will be safe because the ocean is large so it will be diluted, but that sets a precedent that can be copied, essentially permitting anyone to dump nuclear waste into our seas,” Aileen Mioko-Smith of Green Action Japan said.
The clean-up operation from the Fukushima disaster is estimated to cost about $20bn (£14bn).
DISCLAIMER: In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
One Response to “777,000 Tons of Radioactive Waste to Be Dumped in Pacific”
Join the discussion!
We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article: