US Shutting Down Consulate for Palestinians in Jerusalem

ANGLO AMERICA, 22 Oct 2018

Middle East Eye – TRANSCEND Media Service

US claims concerns for ‘efficiency’ are behind closing consulate for Palestinians, but is accused of further siding with Israelis.

US mission for Palestinians to be downsized into department within embassy for Israel. A worker is seen inside the new U.S. embassy compound during preparations for its opening ceremony, in Jerusalem, May 13, 2018.

18 Oct 2018 – The United States has decided to close its consulate for Palestinians in Jerusalem, the State Department announced today, potentially further downgrading relations between the US and the Palestinian government.

After the controversial US embassy move to Jerusalem is completed in May 2019, the former consulate in Jerusalem, which had been tasked with relations with Palestinians, will operate as the Palestinian Affairs Unit within the embassy.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo described the move in his statement as a merger of the new embassy and existing consulate in Jerusalem, and insisted it did not signal a change in policy towards Palestinians.

However, the announcement follows the US closure of the Palestinian Authority’s mission in Washington DC in September.

“The United States continues to take no position on final status issues, including boundaries or borders. The specific boundaries of Israeli sovereignty in Jerusalem are subject to final status negotiations between the parties,” the statement said, apparently to assuage Palestinian concerns about the change.

Relations between the sides have been tense since President Donald Trump decided to move the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, recognising the city as Israel’s capital despite its status being disputed by the international community and Palestinian claims that East Jerusalem should be the capital of their own state as part of a negotiated two-state solution.

Saeb Erekat, secretary general of the Palestine Liberation Organisation, claimed the decision to close the consulate was proof Trump’s administration “has fully endorsed the Israeli narrative”.

“[The] Trump administration is making clear that it is working together with the Israeli government to impose Greater Israel rather than the two-state solution on the ’67 border,” he said in a statement. “The Trump administration is part of the problem, not part of the solution.”

Trump’s embassy move represented a significant break in US policy on the status of Jerusalem and the Palestinians have argued it endangered a two-state peace solution.

Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison reportedly told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday that he had been considering doing the same – a potential move which, if enacted, would make Australia the largest country since the US to recognise Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

Go to Original –


Join the BDS-BOYCOTT, DIVESTMENT, SANCTIONS campaign to protest the Israeli barbaric siege of Gaza, illegal occupation of the Palestine nation’s territory, the apartheid wall, its inhuman and degrading treatment of the Palestinian people, and the more than 7,000 Palestinian men, women, elderly and children arbitrarily locked up in Israeli prisons.

DON’T BUY PRODUCTS WHOSE BARCODE STARTS WITH 729, which indicates that it is produced in Israel.    DO YOUR PART! MAKE A DIFFERENCE!



Share this article:

DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Comments are closed.