Global Coalition of Scholars Calls for Added Pressure on China over Uygur Internment Camps in Xinjiang
- A statement delivered on behalf of 278 academics from 26 countries called for the release of detainees and an end to China’s campaign against Muslim minorities
- The group also included an appeal to countries engaged in China’s Belt and Road Initiative
27 Nov 2018 –A global coalition of nearly 300 scholars on Monday [26 Nov] called on Beijing to abolish its “transformation through education” campaign against China’s ethnic Uygur population, and appealed for increased diplomatic and legislative pressure on the Chinese government over the matter.
In a statement delivered on behalf of 278 academics from 26 countries, the group of self-titled “concerned scholars” said immediate action was needed “to prevent setting negative future precedents regarding the acceptability of any state’s complete repression of a segment of its population, especially on the basis of ethnicity or religion.”
Up to 1 million ethnic Uygurs, Kazakhs and members of other largely Muslim ethnic groups are reported to be detained in extrajudicial internment camps in northwestern China’s Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region, a crackdown that began in early 2017.
After scrutiny by the United Nations and other international bodies, official statements from Chinese authorities have recently shifted from denial to justification, arguing that re-education is needed to combat the spread of extremist religious ideology and terrorism.
The scholars’ call for action – which also included an appeal for countries engaged in China’s Belt and Road Initiative to make their involvement in the infrastructural development programme contingent on the abolition of mass internment camps — comes amid mounting evidence that Beijing is expanding its security crackdown in Xinjiang.
Speaking at a press conference convened at the National Press Club in Washington, Sean Roberts, director of George Washington University’s International Development Studies Program, said: “We felt it critical for the scholarly community to also take a stance on this issue.”
Members of the coalition came from a variety of fields, including China studies, Central Asian studies and Islamic studies, said Roberts, an associate professor of international affairs.
Referring to the Chinese president and to Chen Quanguo, the new Communist Party chief in Xinjiang, the scholars’ statement said: “We call on states and institutions to issue formal statements demanding that Xi Jinping and Chen Quanguo immediately abolish the ‘transformation through education’ detention system and release all Uyghur, Kazakh, Kyrgyz and other detainees.”
The petition also included demands on governments around the world to levy economic sanctions on Chinese officials and firms – both Chinese and foreign – that are engaged in the provision of technology being used in the execution of the government’s security policies.
Such action is already under consideration by the US Congress, after the introduction of bipartisan legislation this month.
The bill, the Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act of 2018, would commit the US government to pursuing economic sanctions against a number of Chinese officials, including Chen, who is widely considered to be the driving force behind the crackdown on the region’s Uygur, Kazakh and other largely Muslim ethnic groups.
That legislation was welcomed by Mihrigul Tursun, a Uygur woman invited to speak at Monday’s press conference to share her experience of being held at a mass internment camp.
Speaking through a translator, Tursun, 29, recounted her ordeal of a three-month detention this year, during which she said she was beaten and tortured, forced to sing songs in Mandarin professing loyalty to the Chinese president and kept in a cell with more than 60 other women, nine of whom she said died during the time she was interned. She said she was released in April after being made to sign a statement vowing that she would “never do anything to harm China” and that the police never interrogated or tortured her.
“My people look to the United States as the beacon of hope for the oppressed people around the world,” said Tursun, who fled to Egypt after her release and arrived in the US in September. “I hope that the US will lead the world community to condemn China’s gross violations of universally recognised human rights”.
Beyond pressure from the international community, the group of scholars also called for heightened protection of Uygurs living outside of China who may be subject to surveillance or coercion by Chinese authorities.
“[We] urge relevant states and institutions where [Uygur] communities reside to make the protection of Uyghurs a matter of priority in their diplomatic relations with Beijing,” the statement said.
Beijing has previously bristled at any criticism of its policies in Xinjiang, frequently invoking its own non-interventionist approach to international relations as a shield from scrutiny.
But representatives of the scholars’ coalition expressed confidence that pressure from the academic community could act as a powerful force in attempts to elicit a shift in the Chinese government’s position.
“The kind of lobbying we’re doing, talking to Congress, talking to the media and getting this out into the larger discourse, I think it is making a difference”, said Darren Byler, a lecturer in the anthropology department at the University of Washington in Seattle.
“The number of people that have signed on to this statement is something that would have been unimaginable just one or two years ago”, said Byler, who cited academics’ involvement in pushing back against South Africa’s apartheid policies as an example of how the scholarly community could effectively exert public pressure on governments.
Such pressure is crucial at a time when Beijing is seeking to deepen connections with trading and strategic partners around the world and elevate China’s standing in the global community, said Michael Clarke, an associate professor at the Australian National University’s College of Asia and the Pacific.
Beijing “wants respect from the rest of the world, for its position, for its weight in global affairs”, Clarke said. “The international community needs to demonstrate to Beijing that it will not actually get that while it’s doing this to a significant portion of its own citizens.”
Owen Churchill joined the Post as US correspondent in 2018 after several years working as a reporter and editor in China. He covers US-China relations, trade, and wider issues concerning China’s global presence. A co-founder of the Shanghai-based news outlet Sixth Tone, he is an alumnus of London’s School of Oriental and African Studies and Fudan University in Shanghai.
This article appeared in the South China Morning Post print edition as: Scholars tell Beijing to abolish Uygur internment policy.
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article:
- Studies on COVID-19 Lethality
- Better World Info: Extensive COVID-19 Resource
- Why East Beat West on COVID-19
- Amid COVID-19 Pandemic, Thousands Stranded in Bay of Bengal ‘Unable to Come Ashore'
- Can a Virus Undermine Human Rights?
- Ending the Unthinkable Injustice of Human Chaining
- Victory in Brazil: Evangelical Missionaries Barred from Uncontacted Tribes’ Land
- A Call for Review of the Historical Facts Surrounding the UNGA Resolution of 1959 That Recognized Attainment of Self-Government for Hawaii
- New Citizenship Law in India ‘Fundamentally Discriminatory’: UN Human Rights Office
- Duterte Does the Right Thing for a Change
- Coronavirus Emergency: Here's What We Know So Far
- AI And Predictive Justice in Our Courts: Paying Heed to Exigencies of the Responsibilities and the Risks
- W.H.O and China: A Case of Geo-Political Misdirection
- The Pandemic of Fear: A View from Moscow
- COVID-19: How China Broke the Chain of Infection