Rohingya Campaigners Say Won’t Be ‘Silenced’ by Online Threats


Usaid Siddiqui – Al Jazeera

Ro Nay San Lwin and Maung Zarni tell Al Jazeera they fear for their lives but will not be ‘silenced’ by online abuse.

Lwin, left, and Zarni have been in exile outside Myanmar for the past 18 and 30 years respectively.  [DW News/Anadolu]

6 Dec 2019 – Two prominent Rohingya campaigners say they are facing increased online abuse, including death threats, for their work, with the latest warning coming from the grandson of former Myanmar ruler Ne Win who called for their abduction.

Ro Nay San Lwin, a prominent Rohingya activist based in Germany, and Maung Zarni, an academic living in exile in the United Kingdom, have told Al Jazeera that they fear for their lives but will not be “silenced” by the online harassment.

Lwin, 42, and Zarni, 56, have been fiercely critical of the Myanmar government’s persecution of the mainly Muslim Rohingya community over the past seven years, irking many in Myanmar’s government and its supporters.

Accusations and threats

The latest threat posted by Myanmar millionaire Aye Ne Win last month has Lwin and Zarni worried.

Ne Win, one of Myanmar’s most well-known entrepreneurs, has demanded that the activists be abducted and brought back to Myanmar in a video interview posted on YouTube.

Win told local media outlet AkonThi that it was “high time” the Myanmar military launched an “Israeli-style kidnap operation” against the exiled activists – similar to the capture of Nazi leader Adolf Eichmann in Argentina.

“These creatures should not dare to come to our country. They scream foul from abroad but they need to be tried here [In Myanmar],” Win said in the interview.

Lwin and Zarni said they had alerted authorities in Germany and the UK respectively about the latest threats.

“I shouldn’t take this threat lightly. I am very much concerned,” said Lwin, adding that, while he had been receiving threats since 2016, largely from ordinary people, this was different because Win still had strong ties with the country’s government, military and intelligence services.

On why the prominent businessman would specifically target them, Zarni – who is a Buddhist – told Al Jazeera he had “provided the first-comprehensive study of Rohingya persecution using Lemkin’s genocide framework, and have helped maintain the genocide argument through  international conferences in 7 years”.

Watch: Covering the Rohingya: Separating fact from fiction

“If your anti-genocide activism is sustained and effective, you get singled out … our activism naturally angers Myanmar genocidaires,” Zarni said.

Lwin said that he had received online messages insinuating he should be assassinated in a manner similar to the late Ko Ni – a prominent Myanmar lawyer who had criticised the country’s nationality law, which rendered the Rohingya stateless.

“They called me a master of fake news, traitor and all the swear words they can use,” Lwin, cofounder and coordinator of the Free Rohingya Coalition (FRC), told Al Jazeera.

Zarni told Al Jazeera he had been accused of receiving millions of dollars from the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC).

During a teaching stint in Malaysia in 2013, Zarni said he was informed by the Special Branch (SB), the intelligence arm of the country’s police, that he was the target of a possible attack by a group of individuals with links to the embassy of Myanmar in Kuala Lumpur, forcing him to move to a safe house.

“I would not go anywhere without texting the SB,” said Zarni, who is also associated with the FRC.

Nevertheless, Zarni and Lwin have stood firm and continue unapologetically in their campaign to highlight the suffering of the Rohingya people.

Myanmar’s government at the ICJ

More than 750,000 Rohingya now live in cramped refugee camps in neighbouring Bangladesh following a 2017 crackdown by Myanmar’s military, which UN investigators said demonstrated “genocidal intent”.

The Myanmar government has come under intense criticism from human rights groups for stifling dissent in recent years and over its treatment of Rohingya people.

Sectarian violence in 2012 forced hundreds of thousands of Rohingya to take shelter in refugee camps in Myanmar’s Rakhine state, dubbed “concentration camps” by the New York Times.

In September last year, two Reuters journalists were sentenced to seven years in prison for investigating the massacre of nearly a dozen Muslim Rohingya men by Myanmar security forces and Buddhist civilians in Rakhine state during a military operation in August 2017.

Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo were released in May this year under a presidential amnesty following an international outcry.

Analysis: No justice for crimes against Rohingya, 2 years on (3:40)

Zarni said the threats against him and Lwin needed to be taken in the context of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) case on the Myanmar state’s role in the persecution and illegal killing of Myanmar’s Rohingya community in August 2017, set to begin this month in The Hague.

The lawsuit was lodged by The Gambia, a Muslim-majority West African nation, after garnering support from the OIC.

Myanmar has denied the charges and said its crackdown was in response to an armed attack by Rohingya rebels.

Nobel Peace Prize laureate Aung San Suu Kyi, Myanmar’s de facto ruler who has been criticised for her silence on the Rohingya issue, will lead the country’s legal defence team at the ICJ. The hearings will commence on December 10.

Lwin, left, and Zarni at the UN in Geneva at the launch of the International Independent Fact-Finding Mission for Myanmar in September 2018.  [Ro Nay San Lwin/Al Jazeera]

“The specific threats against Maung Zarni and Nay San Lwin are dangerous not just to the personal security of these men and their families,” Katherine Southwick, international legal expert and visiting scholar at George Mason University’s School for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, told Al Jazeera.

“These threats also create a climate of fear and intimidation against any individual or non-governmental group that might call for, support, or cooperate with justice efforts like the ICJ case,” she added.

Southwick said attempts to intimidate the activists could undermine the search for “accountability and justice that is so clearly needed in Myanmar”.

Lwin will also be attending the hearing at The Hague.

“This hearing is the first ever. It is historic. We have been victims of genocide for more than 40 years. This is first time at international court,” Lwin noted.

“I’m concerned for my safety but I can’t skip.”




A Buddhist humanist from Burma, Maung Zarni is a member of the TRANSCEND Network for Peace Development Environment, former Visiting Lecturer with Harvard Medical School, specializing in racism and violence in Burma and Sri Lanka, and Non-resident Scholar in Genocide Studies with Documentation Center – Cambodia. Zarni is coordinator for Strategic Affairs for Free Rohingya Coalition and an adviser to the European Centre for the Study of Extremism, Cambridge, UK. His analyses have appeared in leading newspapers including the New York Times, The Guardian and the Times. Among his academic publications on Rohingya genocide are The Slow-Burning Genocide of Myanmar’s Rohingyas (Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal), An Evolution of Rohingya Persecution in Myanmar: From Strategic Embrace to Genocide, (Middle East Institute, American University), and Myanmar’s State-directed Persecution of Rohingyas and Other Muslims (Brown World Affairs Journal). He co-authored, with Natalie Brinham, Essays on Myanmar Genocide. Zarni holds a PhD (U Wisconsin at Madison) and a MA (U California), and has held various teaching, research and visiting fellowships at the universities in Asia, Europe and USA including Oxford, LSE, UCL Institute of Education) , National-Louis, Malaya, and Brunei. He is the recipient of the “Cultivation of Harmony” award from the Parliament of the World’s Religions (2015).

Go to Original –

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Share this article:

DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Comments are closed.