The Healthcare System Isn’t Interested in Anything Other Than Covid… Not Even Lung Cancer
DEBATING COVID-19, 26 Oct 2020
21 Oct 2020 – A new report has shown how people with lung cancer may have been misdiagnosed as coronavirus sufferers, which is already contributing to avoidable deaths. The obsession with Covid-19 is beginning to take its toll.
The UK’s deadliest cancer, which kills around 35,300 people annually, may be in for a record-breaking year. And it is all thanks to lockdowns. As we know all too well, when it comes to cancer, early intervention is everything. With lung cancer, a delay of just 40 days to a surgery can cause a 16 percent increase in mortality, and three months can be the difference between a treatment and a death sentence. Now, a report by the UK Lung Cancer Coalition has lifted the lid on a scandal bubbling in the NHS: the appalling toll that government coronavirus rules are taking on lung cancer patients.
Lung cancer referrals fell by 75 percent in spring. At least one third of patients with lung cancer have already died since the outbreak began. And according to Professor David Baldwin, a respiratory medicine consultant, this is likely an underestimate, as “Some deaths will not have been recognised as lung cancer and may have even been labelled as Covid-19.” What this all boils down to, according to the report, is an additional 1,372 deaths due to lung cancer.
Totally foreseeable circumstances
Harrowing as these figures are, none of them can come as any surprise. Many experts warned, and continue to warn, of exactly these consequences. Anyone with a brain in their head foresaw that strangling all health care in order to ‘fight’ one relatively mild respiratory disease would cause a lot of needless deaths. Anyone with a heart wondered why a Covid sufferer’s life was apparently worth so much more than anyone else’s.
One former national cancer director told the report that, because cough is a symptom of both Covid and lung cancer, potential lung cancer sufferers were told to stay at home in case they had Covid. Just let that sink in for a moment. Are doctors, consultants or whoever made those decisions really that incompetent? I hope so, because the alternative is far more sinister…
Tip of the iceberg
If you can manage it, there has been another important report, this one by a union of lung cancer nurses. When surveyed, 61 percent of them said that they would normally expect to see more new patients presenting with lung cancer. If they are right, and I see no reason to doubt these diligent specialists, it is a massive red flag. There can be only one possible explanation for such a drop off, which is that people who should be receiving lung cancer diagnoses are not. This means that a tsunami of late cancer diagnosis is on its way to the UK.
There are also dismaying statistics on how many patients are presenting already at the point of emergency. In addition, most consultations are now being done digitally (to protect everyone from Covid, of course). That personal touch is a thing of the past in the new normal.
Nurses described patients for whom “the fear of Covid has been greater than the fear of their cancer.” It would be easy, and accurate, to blame government scaremongering for this. But there is something even more insidious at work. One nurse noted her patients were terrified that, if admitted to hospital, they “may never see loved ones again.” Again, it isn’t the virus itself that scares people: it’s the rules. The cruel separation of frightened families in hospitals, nursing homes and even funeral parlours is the demand of Johnson, Hancock and co. Of all their bad deeds, this is probably the evilest.
One only has to read the accounts of the families who have already lost loved ones to cancer and other diseases unnecessarily to see the consequences of the government’s playing god. Sadly, these accounts will keep coming as the shocking toll of lockdowns comes to light in the coming months and years (but don’t look out for them in the mainstream media). Many have died, and will die yet, on the altar of the pride of politicians. Make no mistake about it: there is blood on their hands.
Peter Andrews is an Irish science journalist and writer based in London. He has a background in the life sciences, and graduated from the University of Glasgow with a degree in genetics.
Tags: Bill Gates, COVID-19, Conspiracy Theories, Coronavirus, Economy, Elites, Environment, Health, Lockdown, New World Order, PCR Tests, Pandemic, Public Health, Research, Science and Medicine, Vaccines, WHO, World
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Join the discussion!
We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article: