Portugal: The Prospect of a Full Bailout and More Austerity Looms in 2011

EUROPE, 17 Jan 2011

Socialist Worker, LeftBanker – TRANSCEND Media Service

Portugal is the latest European country to face a financial crisis, the likelihood of a bailout by the European Union and International Monetary Fund–and savage austerity measures that come with the “rescue.” The cutbacks, layoffs and regressive tax increases are being championed by the center-left Socialist Party government, with the support of the country’s main conservative party, the Social Democratic Party.

As in Greece and Ireland before it, Portuguese workers are showing their anger at being made to pay for the bankers’ crisis. In late November, a one-day general strike paralyzed the country. An estimated 80 percent of Portugal’s workers honored the strike call by the two main union federations. This was only the second time that the two federations collaborated in a general strike since Portugal’s 1974 revolution that brought down a fascist regime.

Here, a Scottish writer–formerly an expert on financial markets for Goldman Sachs International and a member of the Scottish Socialist Party, who blogs at the site LeftBanker–analyzes Portugal’s financial situation in an article published by The Bullet, an e-bulletin produced by the Socialist Project in Canada.

A FULL financial bailout of Portugal involving the European Central Bank (ECB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) looks set to happen in the first half of 2011. This will involve severe austerity conditions being imposed on the Portuguese people by the ECB and IMF.

The indications are clearly there, as at the end of 2010, Fitch Ratings joined the two other credit rating agencies to downgrade Portugal’s debt to A+, which is just above junk status. They are concerned that the current account deficit running at 9 percent is unsustainable with the ruling Socialist Party unable to impose the effective 4 percent budget cuts in 2011 that they outlined at the end of 2010.

The risk of this happening is seen in the dramatic increases in the price that Portugal must pay to borrow money on the financial markets–this has leapt from 1.8 percent per year in November 2010 to 3.4 percent in December 2010. The ECB is effectively carrying out an indirect bailout, as it is the only buyer of Portuguese government bonds when these are auctioned on the financial markets.

In the first half of 2011, Portugal must repay or renew $27 billion of debt and take out fresh loans of $12 billion, which in total is 17 percent of its economy (GDP). It will be unable to raise this on the financial market, and the ECB will not be able to follow the current route of bond purchases, as the sums are too large.

These figures are likely to be worse as Fitch and many other economists estimate that the economy will go into recession in 2011 and shrink by 1 to 2 percent because of the already planned cuts and the weakness of the Portuguese economy. This will take the debt-to-GDP ratio to well over 90 per cent in 2011, the third highest in the Eurozone.

A rescue package will be put together by the ECB and the IMF, with them effectively controlling the economy, spending and austerity measures.

These will be much more severe than those planned by Portugal’s Socialist ruling party. The IMF in its 2010 report on sovereign debt sees Portugal’s public spending growing by no more than 0.5 percent over 20 years, with the annual deficit being reduced to 6 percent by 2020, with 80 percent of the reduction happening by 2013. This can only be achieved by massive cuts in public services, wages and jobs, with a corresponding rise in taxes.

Of course, as we have seen in the case of Ireland and Greece, this only further weakens an economy and drives the deficit wider and creates a larger debt problem, which is answered by more cuts. It is a race to the bottom which will impoverish an already poor country.

While Portugal did not experience a property bubble like Spain and Ireland, its banking sector has cross-exposure to the other country’s banks in Europe which are involved in the current debt crisis: Ireland, Spain and Greece. Portuguese banks have $39 billion of exposure to the banks of these countries, while the banks of these countries have $52 billion exposure to Portuguese banks.

This will mean that Portuguese banks are likely to suffer losses in 2011 because of this exposure and require capital injections themselves. They are currently finding it as hard as the Portuguese government to raise money on the international financial markets. This will mean that they will need an ECB/IMF bailout similar to Ireland’s banks.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

PORTUGAL’S PROBLEMS do not lie in its lack of competitiveness–a report by the World Economic Forum in 2005 ranked Portugal for competitiveness above Spain, Ireland, France and Hong Kong.

It is its membership of the Eurozone that is the source of Portugal’s problems. Portugal joined the euro at a very uncompetitive rate that reflected the strength of the German and French economies. Up until recently, the euro increased in value to most major currencies since its inauguration, making weaker economies such as Portugal very uncompetitive.

Since joining the euro, Portugal has seen unemployment go from 5 percent to over 11 percent, and its economic growth rates have stayed well below those of the Eurozone as whole. To compensate for the structural weakness of the Portuguese economy caused by the strength of the euro, Portuguese governments increased its public sector and promoted personal debt to sustain demand in the private sector. As a consequence, the current account deficit has been running at near 10 percent for several years.

The private sector is dominated by the service industries that have been hit by the credit freeze from the banks and the deep recession in Spain, which is Portugal’s largest trading partner. The agriculture and fisheries industries employ 13 percent of the workforce, but make up only 4 percent of the GDP and contribute to a low-wage economy–average wages in Portugal are 804 euros ($1,040) a month, with the minimum wage being 475 euros ($614) a month.

The Portuguese people are not responsible for the crisis–it is membership in the Eurozone, and the politicians who took them into it, that is to blame.

An alternative to austerity for the Portuguese people is:

— Default on the government debt to end the spiral of debt and cuts and debt;

— Withdraw from the euro to improve the economy’s competiveness;

— A mutual cancellation of the debt and loans of the Portuguese banks, and taking the banks under social ownership to control and socialize their loans;

— Raise the minimum wage to increase demand for basic goods and services to boost the economy;

— Energize the agriculture and fisheries industries through social ownership to boost food supplies internally and create a larger export market for them; and

— End political and corporate corruption which wastes billions of euros a year.

These measures would start to transform the Portuguese economy, put it under the control of the Portuguese people, and build a society based on meeting need and not profit.

First published at LeftBanker and republished at The Bullet.

Go to Original – socialistworker.org

Share this article:


DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Comments are closed.