Spain, Ireland, Slovenia Boycott Eurovision over Israel’s Inclusion, Set to Air Palestine Films Instead
EUROPE, 18 May 2026
The Cradle - TRANSCEND Media Service
(Photo credit: Nearchos/Splash News/ABACAPRESS.COM)
Tel Aviv is pouring hundreds of millions into its Hasbara propaganda machine in an effort to reverse its reputational freefall.
11 May 2026 – Public broadcasters from Spain, Ireland, and Slovenia announced on 11 May that they will not air this week’s Eurovision Song Contest in protest of Israel’s participation.
“For the next 10 days, instead of the Eurovision circus, the national television program will be colored by the thematic program series ‘Voices of Palestine,’” Slovenian broadcaster RTV said.
Featured documentaries and films will include Gaza Twins, Come Back to Me, No Other Land, The Voice of Hind Rajab, and The Teacher.
The broadcaster will also air a special episode examining the political and ethical debate around Eurovision, including the contest’s voting system and arguments for and against the boycott.
Ireland’s RTE will air a comedy show instead, while Spain will broadcast a special musical program during the contest, which begins on Tuesday in Vienna.
Spain, Ireland, and Slovenia have now joined The Netherlands and Iceland in boycotting the contest over the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) decision to allow Israel to participate, as Tel Aviv’s global reputation continues to plummet over the ongoing genocide in Gaza and its continual crimes against humanity.
A recent New York Times (NYT) investigation found that Israel ran a coordinated, multi-year campaign to turn Eurovision into a soft-power tool, spending at least $1 million on marketing, including funds from Netanyahu’s Hasbara office, while Israeli embassies pressured European broadcasters to keep Tel Aviv in the contest.
This broader reputation freefall comes as Israeli officials pour roughly $730 million into Hasbara, the state’s global propaganda machine, in a desperate attempt to reverse the collapse of Israel’s cultural and diplomatic standing.
The spending push includes mass digital outreach, foreign delegation trips, influencer campaigns, AI-driven targeting, and coordinated efforts to suppress dissenting content, including material exposing the scale of Israeli war crimes.
Analysts say Israel’s massive propaganda spending is unlikely to reverse the damage, as global anger is driven by its genocide, apartheid policies, and military conduct rather than poor messaging.
Communication scholar Nicholas Cull said public diplomacy can only help “on the margins,” because people form their views based on “the actual policies, not how well you sell those policies.”
Despite the massive efforts, Israel’s reputation continues to collapse in the US, where nearly 60 percent of citizens now view it unfavorably as younger demographics, opposition to Netanyahu, and economic pressure from the US-Israeli war on Iran drive a sharp shift in public opinion.
JOIN THE BDS-BOYCOTT, DIVESTMENT, SANCTIONS CAMPAIGN TO PROTEST THE ISRAELI BARBARIC GENOCIDE OF PALESTINIANS IN GAZA.
DON’T BUY PRODUCTS WHOSE BARCODE STARTS WITH 729, WHICH INDICATES THAT THEY ARE PRODUCED IN ISRAEL. DO YOUR PART! MAKE A DIFFERENCE!
7 2 9: BOYCOTT FOR HUMAN JUSTICE!
Tags: Boycott, Crimes against Humanity, Culture of Peace, Europe, European Union, Eurovision, Gaza, Genocide, Ireland, Israel, Morality, Music, Palestine, Peacebuilding, Rogue states, Slovenia, Spain, State Terrorism, War crimes, West Bank
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Join the discussion!
We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.