Koodankulam Nuclear Power Plant Faked Emergency Drill
KUDANKULAM ANTI-NUCLEAR SATYAGRAHA, INDIA, 9 Jul 2012
Sun Jul 8, 2012 – The official claim of having conducted a mandatory three-stage emergency drill at Nakkaneri hamlet, situated within seven km from the Koodankulam Nuclear Power Plant (KKNPP) in Tirunelveli district, on June 9 was termed ‘a blatant lie’ by the People’s Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL), which sent a fact-finding team to the place on June 13 and 20, after the villagers denied the version of the authorities.
No drill was conducted and the people of Nakkaneri were surprised to read about it in the newspapers the next day, the PUCL said, and accused the district administration of spreading falsehood through the media. Announcing the findings in Chennai on Saturday, the team members said that they spoke to 22 people, including senior citizens and panchayat officials, and learnt that on June 9, a team of about 40 policemen had landed at the village, blocking the roads and checking a few vehicles before dispersing in the evening. The next day, a press note was released saying an offsite emergency drill was held successfully in Nakkaneri. PUCL national secretary P Suresh said that the offsite emergency preparedness exercise was mandatory to get clearance from the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) to load fuel into the reactor.
It may be recalled that the agitation at Idinthakarai, which started in August 2011, was triggered by an emergency drill as it caused panic among the people.
The team obtained written affidavits from the villagers they spoke to. S Balamurugan, state secretary of the PUCL and a member of the team, said, “When we met the KKNPP station director Sundar, he said that he did not go to the village on the day of the drill.” “Only my department personnel went there. We only provided logistics support to the administration. So, if you have any queries, you may please contact the district administration,” he quoted Sundar.
“When we met the Collector, he asked us to meet the sub-collector. The sub-collector said that since the collector had given the press note, he was not supposed to explain,” he also said.
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article:
KUDANKULAM ANTI-NUCLEAR SATYAGRAHA, INDIA: