Agent Orange Lives On in Vietnam, Poisoning Children and Ruining Lives

ASIA--PACIFIC, 8 Sep 2014

The Advocacy Project – Peace & Collaborative Development Network

September 2, 2014 – While Le Ba Thuan was recruiting soldiers for the Viet Cong during the Vietnam War, he would watch American planes spraying herbicide and try to avoid the contaminated areas. He never quite succeeded and for the past fifty years he has suffered from heart disease, high blood pressure, constant headaches, and skin rashes.

But compared to his family Thuan is lucky. His first daughter died of nose cancer. Another child died with severe birth defects. A third miscarried. Thuan’s fourth child, Hang, is epileptic, blind and paralyzed from the neck down (photo left). The only members of the family to escape the catastrophe are Thuan’s two sons and wife.

Thuan and his family are among millions of Vietnamese suffering from dioxin poisoning caused by the deadly herbicide Agent Orange. They were also among 500 victims who were surveyed in August by the Association for the Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities (AEPD), a Vietnamese advocacy group, and The Advocacy Project (AP). AEPD and AP will use data from the survey to develop a program of support for their families.

Between 1961 and 1971 US planes dropped 11.4 million gallons of Agent Orange across a quarter of South Vietnam. The dioxin found its way into the human food chain, affecting Vietnamese and Americans who were exposed and family members. At the same time, the poison strikes in an arbitrary manner, making it difficult to establish a direct link to individual cases, particularly second and third generations. For example, no one can explain why Thuan’s two boys were spared while his daughters have been stricken.
In addition, while the US and Vietnam have created a Dialogue Group to deal with Agent Orange, most US funding has gone to cleaning up heavily contaminated “hotspots” around former US air bases. Advocates would like to see more spent on Agent Orange victims, without discriminating against people with other forms of disability.

The AEPD-AP survey was designed in the spring, with help from Rebecca Scherpelz, a former Peace Fellow and disability expert. The first objective was to establish whether the victim or a family member served in the south during the war and suffers from one of the conditions associated with dioxin poisoning. These are the two criteria used by the US and Vietnamese governments in awarding compensation to veterans. The questionnaire then assessed family needs.

AEPD trained a team to interview 500 individuals and their families in two districts of Quan Binh province, where AEPD operates. Peace Fellow Seth McIntyre, from AP, helped AEPD with training and profiled families through powerful blogs and photos.

The survey shows that the challenge facing Vietnam is not limited to the south. According to the Aspen Institute, 3,800 gallons of Agent Orange were sprayed on Quang Binh province (compared, for example, to the 1.8 million gallons dropped around the former US air base of Bien Hoa). But many fighters, like Thuan, went south from Quang Binh and ingested the poison before returning home. According to the Vietnamese Red Cross, around 3 million Vietnamese are affected throughout the country.

The Vietnamese government offers financial compensation, but the needs are so great that many families surveyed are not covering the cost of medical treatment. Thuan and his daughter receive the equivalent of $126 a month. Another veteran, Pham Van Giang, was also exposed but lost his military papers and receives only $28 for his handicapped son Dung. Another victim sold his house to raise $6,000 to have part of his stomach removed.

But families remain steadfast and loving, as Seth notes in a poignant blog about Thuan: “Because Hang is completely immobile by herself, Thuan and his wife must carry her to their pit latrine multiple times per day. They bathe her, feed her, massage her, and play the radio for her-soft Vietnamese ballads, the only thing that seems to calm her through the night.”

AP’s involvement in this project has been led by AP Board member Scott Allen, and inspired by Peace Fellows who have worked at AEPD. In 2012, Jesse Cottrell produced a powerful video on Agent Orange and helped AEPD produce squares for the Vietnam Disability Quilt, which describes the impact of climate change on Vietnamese with a disability. In 2013 Kelly Howell produced profiles and research.

Their work has brought Peace Fellows face to face with real suffering. Seth reports on a visit to the home of a former sea captain, Pham Van Giang, whose son Dung is severely handicapped: “The sight of me (a white, Caucasian, American male) sends Dung into a frenzy. He cries out in Vietnamese, ‘Don’t let him arrest me! Don’t let him arrest me!’ A fully grown man thrashing his arms and screaming. No one in the family treats this behavior as out of the ordinary, yet I am growing increasingly uncomfortable. However, Giang looks on, softly assuring me: ‘It’s OK, just wait.'”

* Families featured in this post asked that their photos be used

Go to Original – internationalpeaceandconflict.org

Share this article:


DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Comments are closed.