Impacts of India’s Transit Warfare against Nepal

ASIA--PACIFIC, 19 Oct 2015

Professor Bishnu Pathak – TRANSCEND Media Service


Nepal promulgated the New Constitution with signatures of 90 percent of the Constituent Assembly (CA) II members on September 20, 2015. The world congratulated Nepal for its success, but Nepal’s roji-roti-beti closest neighbor India sent a cold-note and a mild-warning. India informally conveyed a proposed 7-point constitutional amendment the following day supporting 10 percent of Nepal’s CA II, which are agitating Madhesi groups. Such amendments interfere with landlocked Nepal’s sovereign and internal affairs, but Nepal was full of confusion in answering it. Moreover, India initiated an undeclared transit trade warfare, blocking Nepo-India borders. The blocking at borders is freezing the life of all Nepalis. Now Nepal suffers from an acute shortage of cooking and oxygen gas, gasoline, medicines and other daily humanitarian supplies. Worse still, India’s transit warfare was conducted in a period when Nepo-China borders were blocked by the post-Earthquake. India’s proposed Amendment in the Constitution for Madhesi groups is just a drama; clearly the myopic interest of India is to control Nepal’s natural resources and to restore the Hindu Kingdom. Ranjit Rae, India’s Ambassador to Kathmandu gathering agitating Tarai-Madhes leaders into the Embassy just before Prime Minister’s election said, “The winning of Oli[1] as a Prime Minister of Nepal is a defeat of India”[2]. Rae further hurts the Nepali as he followed Goebbels’ style of reporting to New Delhi. As a result, angry masses are displaying arson effigies of India and PM Modi[3] across the country ranging in Tarai, Hill and Mountain. The 21st century’s great socialist leader Modi now becomes known as a bully leader in the eyes of Nepali and South Asian people. If the talented and clever Modi does not abandon his ego and ambition, he might do suicide in the same way Nepal’s former King Mahendra did in 1972 when he honestly realized the error of his past mistakes and wrongdoings.


“Big, strong and rich should not bully small, weak and poor.”
Xi Jinping, President of China[4]

While the Constituent Assembly (CA) II promulgated one of the most liberal New Constitutions in Nepal by nine-tenths of the elected representatives at 5.55 PM on September 20, 2015 Sunday, India unofficially initiated transit warfare against Nepal, blocking all custom checkpoints the following day. They are: Kakarvita (Panitanki), Biratnagar (Jogbani), Birgunj (Raxaul), Bhairahawa (Sunauli) and Nepalgunj (Rupaidia). Nepal heavily depends on supplies from neighboring India[5]. The transit or trade blockade (threat of blockade[6]) or warfare appears to be a power bargaining tool because of jealousy, emotion, ego and a superiority complex. Nepal’s proclaimed Constitution, representing a sovereign, independent and landlocked country, ignores the myopic advices of so-called big brother, the bully, of India. Indeed, India has imposed an unofficial blockade over its new constitution. Yet India denies its imposition of blockade[7].

The crisis surprisingly came as India adopted three-pillar policies: first, support Kathmandu ruling elites, second, encourage the Hindu Kingdom and third, control Madhesi feudal leaders, all at one time[8]. Thus, big III parties are not supportive enough towards Tarai-Madhes agitation and their demands, due to India’s full moral, technical, and financial and warfare, which supports them.

All walks of life are presently crippled in Nepal. There is no cooking and oxygen gas, no fuel for vehicles[9] even in diplomatic missions, no turbine fuel, no essential daily commodities, no distribution of humanitarian supplies, no security of cargo vehicles and their staffs in India-bordering land, no factories/industries running[10], no print media working, no meal for daily wage laborers, no hotels to eat available to pedestrians[11], no schools for students, no medicines for serious parents and lives are about to freeze. Prices of daily essential commodities have skyrocketed across the country. Public frustration, emotion and anger are escalating over New Delhi’s perceived interference in Nepal’s internal affairs. Yet India is saying, “Madhesi protesters are in no-men’s-land, blocking the roads at custom checkpoints, so loaded trucks are not being able to supply towards Nepal,” but this is not true. What is true is, India urges to initiate meaningful dialogue with their protected protesters to end the standoff of transit in Nepal.

The term “warfare” in this concept applies how a powerful state, being like big brother, bullies and imposes its myopic interest to suppress people’s voices, livelihoods, and people’s rights to life, liberty, security and dignity in the weaker state. In this context, warfare distorts the normal course of economic, socio-cultural, information and political system.

Sadly, warfare imitates Goebbels’ propaganda[12]. Propaganda is a principal tool of warfare that says one thing, but acts differently. This propaganda warfare falls under conspiracy and intervention theory. The weak, poor, small, but landlocked Nepal suffers in all-round dimensions while India imposes a deliberate transit blockade against Nepal, which was just celebrating promulgation of a new 2015 constitution.

The Goebbels trend pursued by Ambassador Rae, External Intelligence Agency named Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) and Subrahmanyam Jaishankar and Abhay Thakur of Ministry of Foreign Affairs, New Delhi and PM Modi swung into action without further analysis, readings and reporting. India internationally denied that it was imposing a transit blockade against Nepal, but on October 3, 2015, India’s Ministry of External Affairs instructed its customs officials to release stranded cargos to Nepal from its border[13]. Despite this, hurdles continue to block import of petroleum products and daily essentials from India into Nepal[14]. The instruction came just as Nepal’s land-route to China opened, clearing the post-earthquake debris from the road.

The principal objective of this study is to tell the truth across the globe about what is going on after the promulgation of Nepal’s constitution. It gives a clear picture of Madhesi agitation and their demands, India’s short-sighted-love with Madhesis only[15] and the stand of three mainstream political parties, reasons behind the initiation of transit warfare, landlocked countries’ rights, and others. The paper follows primary, secondary and tertiary information. Required information was gathered through networking tracking methods or snowball techniques. The article is prepared based upon a practical observation approach rather than pursuing theoretical perception. The analyses are mostly drawn from yesterday’s learning, experiencing difficulties today and hope for tomorrow. India, herewith, generally refers to the Government of India and its permanent Government called bureaucrats, but not people of diverse professions there.

Constitutional Provisions

Nepal’s 7-decade long, cherished dream of writing its 7th[16] New Constitution through an elected congress of people, finally came true on September 20, 2015, when the President officially promulgated it as a Federal Democratic Republic with secular Nepal amidst a grand ceremony organized in the Constituent Assembly (CA) II hall. Ninety percent of the people’s representatives out of 597 assembly members signed the Constitution. After promulgating the Constitution, the CA II dissolved and turned into the Legislative Parliament.

The Preamble opens with, “We, the people of Nepal…” The Preamble embraces the right to autonomy and self-rule by the people, stating Nepal is an independent, sovereign country with geographical integrity, national unity, freedom and dignity. It ends all forms of discrimination created by the feudal, autocratic, centralized and unitary system, but now respects multi-caste, multi-lingual, multi-cultural and geographical diversities. It firmly opposes class, caste/ethnicity, region, language, and religion and gender discrimination. However, it protects and promotes unity in diversity, social and cultural solidarity, tolerance and harmony. The Preamble aims to create an egalitarian society based on the principles of proportional inclusion, participation, equitable economy and social justice. It advocates ensuring socialism adopting peoples’ competitive multi-party democratic governance system, civil liberty, fundamental human rights, adult franchise, periodic elections, complete press freedom and an independent, impartial and competent judiciary and the concept of the rule of law.

A few of the salient features of new constitution are: Preamble as a People’s Constitution; federal republican as fundamental principle; seven-province federal division; provision for no-confidence motion against the PM for two years; in case the PM fails to win the trust-vote, president shall dissolve the parliament and declare a date of fresh elections within six-months, but PM cannot dissolve the parliament; mixed electoral system with reservations for underprivileged groups; president and vice-president to be different in terms of gender and community; one either (speaker or deputy speaker) to be a woman; inclusive Cabinet with maximum of 25 members; separate Constitutional Commission each of Madhesis, Dalits, Janjatis, Tharus, Muslims and women; all languages spoken in Nepal as national languages; separate rights for center, provinces and local bodies; flexible provisions regarding citizenship and separate fundamental rights to health, food, housing, children, dalits, women; and social security and justice[17].


People celebrated the Constitution proclamation day by carrying out welcome rallies with flags across Nepal. The CA II hall was magnificently decorated with national flags, flowers, lights and festoons[18]. Sporadic fireworks lit up the sky in the front side of the CA II hall after the constitution was promulgated. Thousands of euphoric people marched through the streets and many of them gathered outside the CA II hall to celebrate the much-awaited promulgation of a new constitution. Many of them were swaying flags by their hands and exchanging greetings with each other. Some of the young people painted the national flag on their faces. A few of them sang a song of national anthem while shouting, saying “Nepal! Nepal!!…” Many houses and buildings were lit up with butter and oil lamps and fancy electric lights in all major cities. People believed that promulgation of a new constitution was a logical conclusion to the transitional justice which began along with 12-point understanding in November 2005[19].  A wide range of people of all professions celebrated the promulgation as a first-ever Constitution written by the People’s Representatives, lighting candles, oil lamps, drawing Nepal’s flags and maps in every crossroad and in communities. The Government appealed to all to illuminate their residences and declared a two-day holidays to celebrate the momentous occasion. At the same time, a statute was protested in a few of the Tarai-Madhes districts such as Saptari, Mahottari[20].


On Behalf of the Government of India, its Minister of External Affairs sadly said, “Throughout the process of Constitution-making in Nepal, India has supported a federal, democratic, republican and inclusive Constitution. We note the promulgation in Nepal on Sunday of a Constitution”[21]. The Ministry further said, “We are concerned that the situation in several parts of the country bordering India continues to be violent. Our Ambassador in Kathmandu has spoken to the Prime Minister of Nepal in this regard”. Indian Foreign Secretary S. Jaishankar, who visited September 18 to 19 in Kathmandu as a special envoy of PM Narendra Modi, had conveyed similar messages to the leaders of Nepal.

US State Department spokesperson John Kirby congratulated the people of Nepal on their persistent commitment to democracy. He said, “The promulgation of the constitution is an important milestone in Nepal’s democratic journey.” He further stated that the constitution embraces measures consistent with globally accepted norms and principles, including gender equality, religious freedom, and the right to citizenship. He argued, “We encourage all Nepalis to continue to engage in the democratic process through peaceful, nonviolent means”[22].

During a dinner reception hosted by US President Barack Obama on September 29, 2015 in honor of the head of the states and delegates taking part in the 70th session of the UN General Assembly in New York, he congratulated Nepal and Nepali people for the promulgation of the new constitution[23].

The following day of constitution promulgation, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hong Lei sincerely congratulated Nepal in the hope that the country would take this opportunity to realize national unity, stability and development. He said “China attaches great importance to relations with Nepal, and stands ready to further deepen bilateral friendly cooperation and provide assistance for Nepal’s economic and social development to the best of her capacity”[24].

On September 27, 2015, addressing the ongoing 70th session of the United Nations General Assembly, Chinese President Xi Jinping said, “Big, strong and rich should not bully the small, weak and poor” nations without mentioning the current problems faced by Nepal. He stressed rejection of an outdated mindset that one gain means the other’s loss, or winner takes all[25]. He further said, “China will never pursue hegemony, expansion or spheres of influence”. Mr. Xi said, “The principle of sovereign equality underpins the UN Charter. The future of the world must be shaped by all countries. All countries are equals”. He, speaking for the first time in the UNGA, further said, “The principle of sovereignty not only means that the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries are inviolable and their internal affairs are not subjected to interference”. He focused on mutual respect as win-win cooperation on the course to handling their relations without conflict and confrontation. He stated, “Big countries should treat small countries as equals, and take a right approach to justice and interests by putting justice before interests”[26].

German Foreign Minister Frank Walter Steinmeier welcomed the promulgation of the new constitution, saying. “This is an important step toward reconciliation and further democracy. Nepal is entering a new chapter in its history and is now a country with a democratic constitution,” He further said, “I am hopeful that the violent unrests which have erupted these past weeks, especially in the Tarai region, will be resolved through dialogue between demonstrators and the government, and that the inclusion of all nationalities be continued”[27].

A few days before the Constitution promulgation, UK Minister for Asia, Hugo Swire, welcomed the progress made by Nepal over the last few months toward the adoption of a new constitution. Swire said, “We hope that the new constitution will be inclusive, broadly supported and meet international standards of equality and respect for human rights, and lay the foundations of stability and prosperity as Nepal continues to rebuild following the devastating earthquake on 25th April”[28].

The French Foreign Ministry through statement said, “France welcomes the promulgation of the new constitution by Nepal, which therefore completes the political process initiated in 2008”. His spokesperson also quoted that the constitution is a key step toward continuing national reconciliation, restoring political stability and returning to the path of development[29].

The office of UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon issued a rather terse statement on the adoption of the constitution that merely “acknowledged” and without any congratulatory warmth[30] on September 21, 2015. Within four days, though, the UN issued a second statement, with Ban Ki-moon “commending the Nepali people on the adoption of the new constitution” calling it “a milestone in the peace process” [31]. The second UN statement, by his spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric, seems more accurate, realistic and balanced. Indeed, this statement has commended the spirit of all Nepali people.

Nepal’s development partners welcomed the Constitution. Swiss Ambassador to Nepal Urs Harren on behalf of all donor agencies said, “Promulgation of a new constitution has closed the chapter of the peace process in the country[32]“. Besides, Harren mentioned that they are fully aware of the problems Nepal faced during delivery of the Constitution.

Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Japan, European Union, Denmark, Norway, among others, have welcomed the promulgation of the Constitution and have sent congratulatory remarks to all Nepalis. Even, Bhutanese PM Tshering Tobgey congratulated Nepali people on the promulgation of the new constitution with wishes to find a path to lasting peace and sustainability[33].

Impacts of Transit Warfare

Tarai-Madhes centric leaders of the Nepali Congress, UML, Maoists and RPP-Nepal heartily welcomed the New Constitution. However, 10 percent of the small Tarai-Madhes-based cultural parties in CA II rejected the proclamation of the new constitution, keeping themselves under the umbrella of Indian power, politics and property. These Madhesi groups turned down major parties’ request to join in the constitution-making process, stating that the process was a mere formality. They made a demand to keep the southern belts of Jhapa, Morang and Sunsari districts as their Madhes province and constituencies based on population in the Tarai-Madhes. People of the number two Madhes province, ranging from Saptari to Parsa districts, suffered either from an indefinite general strike or curfews clamped on by local administration. More than 40 demonstrators and one-dozen security forces, including a Senior Superintendent of Police, have already lost their lives in a two-month period of protest.

However, the same Tarai-Madhes parties casted their votes in favor of Sushil Koirala, president, Nepali Congress during Prime Minister’s election on October 11 under the same new constitution. The people from the Tarai-Madhes ask. Why did you boycott the CA II’s constitution-making process? What did you participate on the PM’s election? Who is “Rae”? Why are you behind “Rae”? etc. Tarai-Madhes people frustrated a lot while their leaders went to Indian Embassy in Kathmandu in the evening of October 10 and followed ambassador’s directive.

Because of wrong or Goebbels’ trend reporting of Ranjit Rae and the RAW, India initiated its imposition of transit blockade in all custom checkpoints, claiming that there was a security issue. India listens and supports the one-tenth percent of elected representatives’ voices of Tarai-Madhes in the CA II, turning deaf-ear to uplift the blockade on Hindu’s greatest festivals.

Nepal suffers a lot due to this transit blockade. Moreover, India further restricted import of gasoline products in Nepal. Even Indian Embassy in Kathmandu asked Nepal Oil Corporation (NOC) to produce petroleum products[34]. The NOC has received written requests for gasoline from 16 diplomatic missions in Kathmandu[35]. Due to the acute scarcity of gasoline, many of the hotels are already closed. Many hospitals are out of oxygen and other essential live-saving medicines. Rare ambulances or fire-brigades operate. The Government has imposed an odd-even system in vehicular movement. The Government is restricted from providing gasoline for private vehicles and motor bikes. Government vehicles are also restricted.

Dairy centers refused to collect milk, citing the lack of fuel and transport services to supply dairy products to major cities. Most of the schools are shut down. Even students who are studying in Kathmandu or other major cities are deprived from going to their houses on the greatest Hindu festival, Dashain, due to the lack of fuel for transportation. More than 400 vehicles are already experiencing arson by the Madhesi agitators. There are no counts of vandalized vehicles. The staffs of cargo vehicles stranded in queues for a long time are thrashed by the goons in India. Their belongings are looted, but security forces are biased against providing security for them. None of the international flights have received aviation turbine fuel from Nepal from September 29 onwards, but have been asked to fuel abroad. Operation of many flights are stopped. Tourists are either compelled to walk or leave Nepal. Nepal lacks livelihood and essential supplies. Tension between Pahade[36] and Madhesis[37] may erupt. It is to be noted that this is what would happen as communal violence erupts if Nepal should survive in an Indian-controlled economy.

Such crises had long been prepared for by Shyam Saran, former Indian ambassador to Nepal. He split a few ambitious and selfish-centered Madhesi leaders and asked them to function as cultural parties. Huge minds, muscles and moneys were invested for such fissions. The cultural groups were established to enhance India’s bargaining power on the course to control Nepal’s natural resources and to reestablish Nepal as a Hindu state. The 2007 Madhes movement erupted immediately after that while 2,280,000 people received citizenship certificates in Tarai-Madhes. Reports say that many of Nepali citizens’ holders are citizens of India too.

On October 6, 2015, the European Union Delegation, the Heads of Mission of Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the UK, and the Heads of Mission of Norway and Switzerland in Nepal pledged their support and encouragement for resolving the current troubles affecting the supply and distribution of humanitarian supplies. The press statement reads, “The lack of basic goods is taking a heavy toll on the economy of Nepal, where recent earthquakes have pushed an additional 3.5 percent of the population under the poverty line, according to the estimates of the Post-Disaster Needs Assessment”[38]. Finance Minister Dr. Ram Saran Mahat also spoke against the humanitarian crisis and asked China to open its many customs checkpoints[39].

Upset, India put forwarded seven amendments[40] to a new constitution to make Nepal acceptable to the agitating Madhesi groups. Some of the most important amendments to the New Constitution, recommended by India, are: to re-insert the right for Madhesi to participate in state structures on the principles of proportional inclusion; to stipulate that citizens by descent can hold high-ranking government posts[41] expanded to include those, like many Madhesis, who have acquired citizenship by birth or naturalization; foreign women married to Nepali citizens may acquire naturalized citizenship, and to be provided for in a federal law; Madhesi representation in National Assembly to be based on population of the Provinces; Timeframe for delineation of constituencies to be 10 years rather than the 20-year period laid out in the latest version of the Constitution. The disputed Kanchanpur, Kailali, Sunsari, Jhapa and Morang districts are homes to large populations of Madhesis and they should be included in the Madhes province[42]. While these amendments received many comments, even in India, Spokesperson Vikas Swarup of the Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi reacted by saying the report was incorrect[43].

Socialist leader Ashok Rai publicly stated that India has supported their agendas[44]. Uprendra Yadav stated that the 7-point demands are not of the United Democratic Madhesis Front (UDMF)[45], and Laxman Lal Karna said that the 7-point proposal was put forward by the Madhesi parties[46]. Thus, even agitating Madhesi groups are not happy with the proposal put forwarded by India.

India stated that majority of the population in Jhapa, Morang and Sunsari districts are Madhesis, but India is wrong as there are 55.5 percent population[47] Pahade including Bahun, Chhetri, Ethnicity and Dalit. India was wrong for two reasons: first, they twisted the real data to fulfill their myopic interests against Nepal and second, they relied more on information provided by their own biased sources, i.e., Ranjit Rae and Tarai-Madhes leaders.

After promulgation of the constitution, a few of the Indian newspapers adopted the Goebbels’ trend to defame provisions of Nepalese citizenship as incorporated into the new constitution. Such journalists often said, “Madhesi and Janajati are non-inclusive or fall in the category of naturalized citizens”. Others say, “Children of Nepalese woman cannot enjoy citizen status unless the husband accepts Nepalese citizenship…” They deliver misinformation owing to bias in nature, loathe to admit rights and too lazy to attain real truth[48].

These are complete fictions regarding Nepalese citizens. Article 10.1 of the constitution writes, “No Nepali citizen shall be denied the right to acquire citizenship”. Article 11.3 says, “A child of a citizen who has acquired citizenship of Nepal by birth before the commencement …shall be entitled to Nepali citizenship…” Article 11.4 says, “Every child found in Nepal whereabouts of whose paternity and maternity is not known shall, until the mother or father is traced, be deemed a citizen of Nepal by descent”. Article 11.5 mentions, “A person born to a Nepali citizen mother and having his/her domicile in Nepal, but whose father is not traced, shall be conferred the Nepali citizenship by descent”.

Articles 5 to 11 in Part II of the Constitution of India addressed the previsions of citizenship. It mentioned several fundamental rights for persons who migrated to India from Pakistan and India to Pakistan, persons of Indian origin residing outside India, acquiring citizenship of a foreign State, continuing the rights of citizenship and parliament to regulate the right of citizenship by law[49]. Nepalese law does not have dual citizenship as does India. India does not have a provision to receive citizenship certificate for third gender or transgender rights, but Nepal has, “The person who is entitled to citizenship of Nepal by descent may obtain the citizenship certificate of Nepal from name of his/her mother or father along with gender identity” under article 12. Nepal’s Article 11.7 ” …if his/her father and mother both are the citizen of Nepal at the time of acquisition of the citizenship, he/she, if born in Nepal, may acquire citizenship by descent”, but such provisions have not been incorporated in India’s own Constitution. Besides, India wants to extend its influential political role for former Princess Himani Shah, as she is the daughter of India.

The present ruling Government of India should also remember how they reacted in 2004 when Indian National Congress became the largest party in the Lok Sabha and Congress tried to make Sonia Gandhi Prime Minister of India. Sonia was rejected on the basis of her foreign origins[50]. There was an allegation that she had not renounced her Italian Citizenship. The current Foreign Minister, Sushma Swaraj, provocatively said she would shave her head and renounce politics if Sonia Gandhi became Prime Minister[51]. She had challenged this because of Sonia’s citizenship status. If the BJP leaders read their own history, they will respect Nepal’s new constitution and citizenship provisions.

It is to be remarked that the Nepalese Constitution is more progressive on minority rights, third gender rights, women’s rights, inclusive rights and electoral rights than any Constitution in this region of Asia. The new constitution ensures full fundamental rights to all. Nepal’s Constitution assures both electoral rights: first-past-the-post system as well as proportional representation unlike the first-past-the-post system alone in India. Nepal’s constitution guarantees 33 percent reservation for women[52], but India does not. Further, it is an open document which can be amended any time. Indeed, Nepal’s constitution is a far more progressive, inclusive, participatory and gender and human rights friendly than India’s. Thus, when India expresses dissatisfaction over Nepal’s liberal constitution, they must realize that the same fundamental rights shall be demanded by the disadvantaged, marginalized and vulnerable groups residing across India.

Protest against Warfare

Student organizations affiliated with ruling parties such as Nepali Congress and CPN (UML), as well as the main opposition party UCPN-Maoist, staged protest rallies against the blockade in Kathmandu, Gulariya and several parts of the country. Hundreds of local people near Bhairahawa’s custom checkpoint chased away the agitators who were sitting on the Nepo-India border to obstruct the Sunauli border point. Local people at Buddha Chowk in Bhairahawa burnt the effigies of Madhesi parties’ leaders. Two agitating leaders, namely Upendra Yadav and Rajendra Mahato, were termed as the compradors of India. The protestors of Dhangadi in Kailali district claimed, “India never wants to see a peaceful and prosperous Nepal”[53]. People staged protest against India’s blockade in Jumla, Kanchanpur, Rupendehi, Nawalparasi, Kaski, Syangja, Lamjung, Palpa, Gulmi, Itahari and others in Nepal and burned the effigies of PM Modi and Indian flags[54]. The Nationalist Civil Forum staged a demonstration against the blockade in Kakarvita custom in Jhapa district on September 28, 2015. The protestors chanted anti-India and anti-Modi slogans. Rae warned that the supplies of goods and petroleum products may further be delayed if anti-Indian protests are staged and anti-Indian sentiments cannot be stopped[55]. But, angry masses would never care for his warning.

Similarly, cable TV operators cut off all Indian channels indefinitely, starting on September 29, Tuesday, as a symbolic protest against India’s blockade[56].

India’s CPI-Marxist slams India’s Modi government for ‘arrogant intervention’ in Nepal[57]. CPI-Marxists called upon the Central Government to ensure country-to-country and people-to-people relations between India and Nepal. CPI-Marxist General Secretary Sitaram Yechuri said, “the constitution was an internal matter of Nepal and that there is no point in taking an interventionist approach to a constitution that has been adopted by a majority”[58]. “Indian position to Nepal is unfortunate,” stated the Polite-bureau meeting of the CPI-Marxist. Main opposition Indian National Congress Spokesperson Pramod Tiwari said, “Indian National Congress expresses deep concern over the recent developments and statements questioning the time honored Indo-Nepalese relationship with little initiative being seen on part of Government of India towards corrective action”[59]. The Indian Congress expressed deep concern over India’s ties with Nepal amidst growing unease after framing its Constitution for the crisis could compel Nepal to drift towards China[60].

Backdrop of Warfare

Tarai-Madhes have put forward four-point proposals to end the impasse. They seek to amend the constitution to ensure proportional representation of underprivileged groups; revise constitutional provision to redraw electoral constituencies following population basis; revisit the delineation of provinces and initiate dialogue with disgruntled parties[61]. These demands are just a short-form of what the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India accelerated as 7-point amendments. Some background information on these measures is given below.

First, Nepalese mainstream parties in the Constituent Assembly II such as Nepali Congress, CPN (UML), UCPN-Maoist and Madhesi People’s Rights Forum (Democratic) struck a historical 16-point agreement at the time of post-earthquake, on June 8, 2015. The leaders agreed to promulgate a constitution with an eight-province federal structure, delineating the boundaries of federal provinces through a Federal Commission, with the name of the each federal state to be determined by two-thirds of the State Assembly[62]. However, India stated its reservations on the agreement and invited former PM Prachanda in mid-July and former PM Sher Bahadur Deuba at the end of July, 2015. India wanted to know more regarding the details of the federalism working modality. India expressed its dissatisfaction, especially regarding demarcation in the federal provinces[63] and provision of Hindu state. It is learnt that both leaders agreed with ‘Nepal as a Hindu state’. As the Constitution incorporated secularism, PM Modi adopted an offensive strategy against Nepal. On the other, India did not invite to the UML party.

However, India did not receive full assurance from Prachand and Deuba to make “One Province” in plain areas of Tarai-Madhes. Similarly, India failed to distract the relations between Prachanda and incumbent Prime Minister K P Oli. History has been a witness that India succeeded in adopting a “divide and rule” (philosophy) among the communist parties in Nepal. Close working relations between UML and Maoists made India still more unhappy and that further tightened conspiracy ties against Nepal.

While India failed to convince Pranchanda and Deuba on Madhesi groups, India made a strong bond among United Democratic Madhesis Front or UDMF (Federal Socialist Forum Nepal, Sadbhawana Party, Tarai-Madhes Loktantrik Party and Tarai-Madhes Sadbhawana Party) to counter a great majority of the populace. However, this bond is very weak in terms of their representation in the Constitution Assembly, influence of politico-ideology and their strategic dimensions. The UDMF represents just 34 (5.7%)[64] of CA II members out of 598. Moreover, only 8 members were elected from first-past-the-post and the remaining members were selected from proportional representation. Human rights worker Subodh Pyakurel said, “Let me tell you that those who are creating a furor in the name of Madhesis are the same individuals who were defeated by the voters in the past CA II elections. They ran away from the Constituent Assembly, but did not resign”[65]. After being defeated by the CA II elections, Rajendra Mahato stated that it was not his defeat, but “is India’s defeat”[66].

India took the side of such poor and weak cultural groups who have minimal effect in Nepal’s political, social and cultural arenas due to their low impact on people’s representation, population diversity and geography, but a great majority of them are Hindu. This is a great shame to India as it provides ethical, monetary, strategical and religious support to Madhesi factions, disrespecting democratic values. The minority never rules a great majority of people. ‘Might is right’ has been rejected, even in authority regimes in the present world.

UML leader Pradip Gyawali, who went India as a special envoy[67] on behalf of K P Oli, said “Indians can fulfill their vested zest and zeal from the resource of rivers if Morang-Sunsari be kept in province no. 2…”[68] The concept of “One Tarai Madhes” Province did not come from Nepal, but for harnessing hydropower and water resources projects for India with minimum obstacles. India wants to control all natural resources of Nepal in the name of security and strategic interest. This policy is an open secret. Nepalese leaders have been afraid to provide autonomous ‘One Madhes One Pradesh’ since they fear possible secession and formation of a separate nation-state or merger into an Indian state: Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. That is why prominent leaders are reluctant to demarcate the boundaries of Morang, Sunsari and Jhapa into a no. 2 federal province. The one province demand of Madhesi people has been voiced by the new citizens of Nepal, not by older ones. The Madhesi who have been living in Tarai-Madhes for generations want to live with unity in diversity, including hills and mountains.

Second, the promulgation of a new constitution caused a backyard of instability in Nepal, stating political and security implications. But, the blockade had been planned for a long time. There has been a huge discrepancy between what India says and does[69]. One month ago (August 30), regarding the view point of Madhesi parties, former President of the BJP and present Union Home Minister Raj Nath Singh publicly said, “Although the Madhesi problem is an internal issue of Nepal, the Indian government will protect the interests of one-crore Indians living there” [70]. He further said, “Madhesis are Indians who had migrated to Nepal years ago. While many have received Nepali citizenship, the majority of them are still without a nationality”[71]. The statement itself proves what India thinks and perceives regarding Madhes who are citizen of Nepal. The truth us that anybody can have a citizenship certificate from the concerned district headquarters, CDO office.

Srivastava writes, “The Madhesis allegedly said that several political and militant organizations have been targeting them and inflicting atrocities to force them to leave Nepal. However, the BJP has been supporting the Madhesis for a long time”. Even the BJP members of parliament have accused their leaders of being responsible for fishing in muddy water in the name of Nepal’s constitution-making. He further said, “Yogi Adityanath, BJP MP from Gorakhpur and Mahant of Gorakshnath Temple, has often been accused of providing logistic support to the movement of the Madhesis against the Nepal government”[72].

Third, senior BJP leaders have a clear understanding that Madhesis are predominantly Hindu. However, article 4 of the new constitution has mentioned a secular state. The same article has further mentioned the purpose of it stating … “‘secular’ means protection of religion and culture being practiced since ancient times and religious and cultural freedom”. It is to be understood that most of the prominent leaders are Hindu, but largely influenced by mind and money of Christian states. The Christianity-influential leaders neglect the Hindu religion. The Hindu Gurus and leaders encourage their activists to initiate transit warfare opposing such trends. More than 80 percent of the people in the incumbent Legislative-Parliament are Hindu.

Fourth, the frustration of India was further aggravated while two mainstream communist parties[73] in the legislative-parliament improved their relationship for the sake of communist coalition Government. India’s RAW and bureaucrats invested huge sums of money, muscle and mafia to “split and rule” the communists, but they failed unlike in the past. They have a fear that Indian communists (revolutionary and liberal democrat) may learn a lesson from Nepal and their united strength shall aggravate the political situation there. They have not forgotten the fact that “large numbers of sophisticated and modern weapons reached communist revolutionaries in India” from Nepal’s rebels. The RAW succeeded in weakening the Maoist party, splitting them three times in the past. However, they failed to widen the gaps between two major community parties on this occasion. RAW used its final weapon, ousting former PM Dr. Baburam Bhattarai from the UCPN-Maoist[74]. Baburam Bhattarai wishes to be a hero in the Madhes movement[75]. Therefore, he gave a resignation on September 26, 2015 on the whisper of India. Bhattarai who spent more than a dozen years studying on scholarship in India is known as a permanent dissident of the UCPN (Maoist)

Bhattarai’s resignation shall be a suicidal decision this time as Bhattarai has shallow influence inside the party, parliament and people. Bhattarai was chased away from Janakpur on September 29 by Madhesi youths. His aide-de-camp, Ram Chandra Jha and Ram Kumar Sharma, were beaten[76]. India has forwarded Bhattarai as an alternative candidate of the PM. This is just a daydream as anti-Indian sentiments are intensifying in all professions across Nepal for the first time in the history.

Fifth, addressing a Conference on Cooperative Development, Peace and Security in South and Central Asia, Indian President Pranab Mukherjee gave top priority to South Asian Neighbors as Indispensable partners for shared prosperity and security. He articulated a desire to pursue a policy of three Cs: greater connectivity, closer cooperation and broader contacts to promote closer ties in the region[77]. Theoretically, these are excellent statements for sovereignty, territorial integrity, non-aggression and peaceful co-existence.

What are the practical stands of India to implement these Panchsheel principle? Speaking and practice of it are two different dimensions. The President also knows that India continues transit warfare by blocking vehicles entering Nepal, but time and again says, “This is not a transit blockade, but supporting agitating Madhesi seeking security to them”. Hundreds of loaded vehicles are stranded more than 100 km in distance from the custom checkpoints. What a shame! What true-liars! A friend can be changed, but neighbors never.

Sixth, there were a total of 116 seats from Tarai-Madhes out of 240 first-past-the-post (FPTP) CA II elections in 2013, but only 11 (9%) of the representatives boycotted the constitution-making and signature on it in September 2015. Even India disrespected 90 percent CA members’ signatures in the New Constitution. India forgot its own history of Constitution-making where a total of 67 percent (just two-thirds) of CA members signed the Constitution in January 1950. In response to the British government on the drafting of Constitution by the CA, Jawaharlal Nehru responded, “We have decided on how our Constitution is to be drafted”[78]. You must be aware of how you have been treating conflicted, sandwiched people at Jammu and Kashmir.

Although, Nepal is weak, small and poor, India can learn a lot from Nepal’s democracy practices, human rights works and human security attempts. Nepal’s human rights stalwart Professor Kapil Shrestha said, “India shall learn a lot on moral values, norms and principles of democracy and human rights from the newly established democratic country Nepal”[79]. None of the civilized governments introduce hypocrisy in the name of democracy. The imposition of transit warfare is the principal example of “demon” and “crazy”, deriving from democracy. Nepali are afraid of being Bhutanization and Bhutanization may turn to the process of Sikkimization.

Seventh, India initiated a blockade in the period of Nepal being totally blocked after the devastating April earthquake, while most of the custom checkpoints with China were blocked. Nepali Congress leader Bimalendra Nidhi, Physical Infrastructure Minister who represents the Central Tarai-Madhes, ignored removing the debris from the blocked road of Tatopani and Rasuwa-Kerung. Nidhi did not release money to open the roads following a conspiracy theory under the camouflage of India. If both Chinese custom checkpoints were operating, India would not dare to impose such a tough transit blockade.

Eight, we should not just blame India alone. The existing mainstream parties took huge benefit from the course of their formation and growth and protection. India is a home ground of the Nepali Congress. The Nepali Congress was established on Indian soil, grown up by the support of India and taking shelter in India. The Nepali Congress is silent because of its past connections, affiliations, stands to deliver natural resources, ideology (protect a few elites and rule to the great majority weak and poor, similar to bourgeois controls to proletariat) and current activities. The outgoing Prime Minister and other influential members of the Nepali Congress has ignored bringing gasoline products from China. Despite a huge public outcry to resolve the impasse, Nepali Congress leaders have turned deaf ears. They have a fear that they will never be appointed as ministers and other positions or step-down positions they are now acquiring, once they act or speak against India. Monetary support to them is also a great asset.

Former PM Sushil Koirala instructed all concerned institutions and actors to open Nepo-China transit as soon as possible[80], but it could not go beyond lip-service. Despite repeatedly asking “what humanitarian and commodity supports you are looking for from China, please tell us” by Chinese authorities, Nepal has failed to put forward a concrete proposal. Besides, Nepal’s Ambassador in New Delhi, Deep Kumar Upadhyay, did not play a significant role to minimize the Nepo-India differences through diplomacy. He represents the Nepali Congress and Nepali Congress party, always encircled by vicious circle of confusion. That is repeated this time again.

Last, Nepal never tries to materialize the experiences learnt from past blockades by India. Jawaharlal Nehru initiated the soft blockade to Nepal in July 1950 for not entering third countries’ goods into Nepal via India [81]. The then PM Indira Gandhi also introduced a transit blockade in 1970, demanding a revisit on the provisions of trade transit treaty. Moreover, PM Gandhi wanted to use indigenous people[82] to intervene in Nepal[83]. While late King Birendra brought weapons from China, India’s PM Rajib Gandhi initiated a trade blockade showing trade and transit rights which expired in 1988. The blockade made a shortage of Indian imports such as gasoline, cooking oil, salt, food, and other essential commodities. However, the Panchayati Government brought the above-mentioned essential commodities by airlifting from Bangladesh, unlike the mute-procession of the former Nepali Congress-led Government. The principal cause was that India puts Nepal under its bigoted security umbrella. The blockade helped to restore multi-party democracy in Nepal in 1990[84]. There is a passport system even in Pakistan and Bangladesh[85] and Indo-Pakistan and Indo-Bangladesh borders are sealed, but Nepo-India wipes out such restrictions. Even Nehru once said, “Aggression against Nepal is tantamount to aggression against India”[86]. Unlike restricted border in the world, Nepo-India has a porous border which covers more than 1,600 km; east, west and south.

India supported democratic movement in 1950 and restoring democracy in 1990 in Nepal. In return, Nepal has delivered most of the noted irrigation projects to them. Most such deliverances were signed to India by heads of the Nepali Congress Government, initiated by its founder B P Koirala. Most of the times, Nepali Congress has been heading Nepal after 1990[87]. Nepal has rojiroti-beti[88] relations[89] with India. Even though, communists are closer to China. India has a fear that, once the Communist Government forms in Nepal with a strong tie between two major community forces[90], India’s hegemony from Nepal would be gone. Present transit warfare is also a failed step to stop communists from capturing state power. From communist-led Government of Nepal, India felt insecure. However, both never try to resolve such fear and suspicion through mutual dialogue[91]. The Government of Nepal has never dared to talk on this matter due to its inferior intricacy, but India by superior complexity.

Even the CPN (UML) was given a birth at Calcutta, India. The UCPN (Maoist) took full-fledged moral, financial, technical and shelter support from India while they were fighting against Nepal’s constitutional forces and monarchy in the name of the People’s War. However, UML and the Maoist did not bow their heads this time (2015) in the face of power, politics and property of India. None of the governments in Nepal in seven decades of democracy have been able to complete their full tenure successfully due to India’s influential role in the Government of Nepal[92].


The present crisis of transit warfare is the talk of the town, even in diplomatic communities. On October 8, 2015, the US Department of State advised its citizens to consider their plans to visit Nepal because of India’s blockades[93]. Therefore, Nepal produces huge speculations, horizontally and vertically. First, the PM Modi led-government tries to keep all neighbors under its umbrella rather than pursuing sovereign equality, territorial integrity, non-intervention and aggression and mutual respect. Second, India disrespects rights of transit trade of landlocked countries, humanitarian law, human rights conventions and treaties and world trade organization. Third, India is trying to re-elect present President Ram Baran Yadav again or from Tarai-Madhes leader, fully aware of the fact that the next President shall be from Pahade community. Fourth, Nepal has a fear that the delineation of boundaries of Tarai-Madhes province based on the population may lead to succession of Nepal in the long run, sending more people from the neighboring Bihar and UP. Besides, the more representation of Madhesi in Nepal’s state mechanism proliferates India’s power bargaining for its vested interests.

Fifth, a large number of Nepali believe that Modi took retaliation as his visit to Janakpur[94], Lumbini[95] and Muktinath[96] were cancelled. Those visits were scheduled in the last 18th SAARC summit held in Nepal in November 2014. Last, Modi was severely humiliated while Nepal’s Legislative-Parliament raised a serious objection over the agreement of Lipu-Lekh Pass that was signed between India and China in May 2015. Nepal claims that Lipu-Lekh is a part of Nepal’s territory and asked both of them to correct the pact immediately[97]. Modi seems very clever, similar to late King Mahendra. However, his bold decision and repetition of mistakes and wrongdoings may lead to a suicide similar to what Mahendra did in 1972.

CPN-UML Chairman K P Oli[98] has been elected as a new Prime Minister with 338 (56.5%) votes from the Legislative Parliament on October 11, 2015. Oli defeated outgoing PM Sushil Koirala against 249 votes. Koirala violated the gentlemen agreement to support Oli for PM that had agreed in 16-point deal in June 2015[99]. India dispatched former RAW Chief A B Mathur with 930 million Indian currency[100] to defeat the candidate of PM Oli. To plot Koirala’s victory, a skull session (consultative meeting) was help among President Dr. Ram Baran Yadav, PM Sushil Koirala, former PM Sher Bahadur Deuba, Mathur and Ambassador Rae on October 10[101]. Same night, Mathur and Rae invited Tarai-Madhes agitating leaders of the United Democratic Madhesis Front into the Indian Embassy. Rae, skipper of Tarai-Madhes agitation said, “India has been supporting your Tarai-Madhes agitation. You could not stay as neutral. The winning of Oli as a Prime Minister of Nepal is a defeat of India. You need to cast votes to Koirala. If you do not support him, we will uplift the blockade”[102]. They voted in favor of Koirala, but he defeated with a huge margin. It is to be remarkable that the Front leaders boycotted the Constitution-making process in the CA II, but voted under the same Constitution. Thus, India has been providing moral, financial, technical and sending people to support Tarai-Madhes agitation.

India is alone in this South Asian region as its border directly and indirectly links with all member states of the SAARC. Except Bhutan, all neighboring countries such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka and among others have been competing “anonymity” relations with India as compared to peace, harmony and friendship. This happens while Indian Government tries to impose democratic oligarchy, security feudalism, capitalist socialism, justice anarchy, controlled friendship and authoritarian rule of law.

After Pakistan, Nepal’s transit warfare is India’s biggest foreign policy failure[103]. PM Oli told the Indian Ambassador to mind his own business. Prachanda says that Nepal is not India’s yes-man. Sushil Koirala is suspicious of India[104]. On September 22, from the Tudikhel speech, Prachanda expressed his unhappiness with Modi’s special envoy S. Jaishankar as Jaishankar humiliated and disrespected him[105]. Does Nepal’s special envoy visit in India disrespect any former PM of mainstream leader in such an ungrateful manner? The answer is no. Nepali Congress Prime Ministers never feel humiliation while an Indian ambassador directly holds a meeting with them, frequently without informing the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and without noticing protocol status. Can Nepal’s ambassador residing in New Delhi enjoy such talk with the Prime Minister of India? No, never. It is very difficult to meet even with a concerned Minister at New Delhi, despite repeated requests by Nepal’s ambassador.

Nepal’s mainstream leaders, despite the politico-ideological spectrum, are united against India’s Constitutional amendments[106]. Nepo-India relations should be redefined by India to safeguard both nation’s interests. The Kathmandu elite should realize that Nepal needs to deal with a new agreement as per the wishes of people with India[107]. India should remember how Nepali people were recruited[108] in the past to sacrifice against the British for Indian people.

General people turn to China for its active role of “warm-friendship” in Nepal, ignoring generations-old cold-friendship diplomacy, silence-negotiation, sadistic policy and mute-procession. Continuing the silence may raise a security threat from Nepal for the secession of Tibet due to a 1,400 km long porous Nepo-China border. China’s positive cooperation in Nepal may help to promote Panchasheel in this region. The need of SAARC is collapsed unless India abandons expansionist hegemony or China’s active participation in the SAARC.

The present crisis of Nepal, rather than being homegrown, has been imported from India. All agitating Tarai-Madhes leaders accepted that they are being backed by India. That is why people of Nepal are pressing the Government not to bow down their heads in front of India. There is a huge voice to take stern action to Ambassador Rae against the Goebbels’-style reporting. The whipping up of anti-Indian sentiments shall only be stopped once India lifts up the transit blockade and makes a public apology in front of the people.


[1] “Oli” is a surname of K P Sharma (or K P Sharma Oli) who is a Chairperson of the Communist Party of Nepal (United Marxist-Leninist)

[2] Ratopati. October 15, 2015. Bharatle Afulai Phasayeko Madhesi Morcha Netako Arop (Leader of Madhesi Front allegedly said India Deceived Us). Online Available in (Accessed on October 16, 2015).

[3] The author appreciates Modi’s synergy of societal transformation following the bottom up approach. He analyzed Modi’s works into seven freedoms doctrine to Nepal. See, Pathak, Bishnu. September 28, 2014. India’s Seven Freedom Doctrine to Nepal. Online Available in (Accessed on October 10, 2015).

[4] President Xi Jinping of China addresses during the 70th session of the UN General Assembly, UN Headquarters in New York

[5] BBC. September 24, 2015. Nepal constitution: New border protests block supplies from India. London

[6] Bhaumik, Subir. October 5, 2015. “India needs no Monroe Doctrine”. The Hindu. New Delhi

[7] CNN. October 3, 2015. Nepal accuses India of ‘trade blockade’ amid fuel crisis. Washington

[8] 10 percent Madhesi dwellers at the CA II

[9] Private vehicles including motor bikes are restricted to purchasing gasoline from the public pumps. Himalayan Times. September 30, 2015. Private vehicles barred from purchasing fuel. Kathmandu

[10] Most of the industries are closed in the lack of raw materials and petroleum products. Himalayan Times. October 4, 2015. “Industries on the verge of collapse”. Perspectives. Kathmandu

[11] Kathmandu Post. ’40pc of hotels, restaurants shut’. Kathmandu.

[12] Pathak, Bishnu. 2005. Politics of People’s War and Human Rights in Nepal. Kathmandu: BIMIPA Publications.

[13] Nepali Times. October 3, 2015. Blockade lifted. Kathmandu

[14] Kathmandu Post. October 5, 2015. India commits not to stop goods supply. Kathmandu

[15] ignoring great majority population

[16] The Government of Nepal Act 1948, the Interim Government of Nepal Act 1951, The Constitution of Kingdom of Nepal 1959, The Constitution of Nepal 1962, The Constitution of Kingdom of Nepal 1990 and the Interim Constitution of Nepal 2007.

[17] Constitution of Nepal 2015.

[18] Nepali Times. September 20, 2015. People’s Constitution. Kathmandu

[19] Some of the major events those led to promulgate a republic constitution were: last monarch reinstated parliament on April 24, 2006; 25-point code of conduct of truce on May 26, 2006; King’s power scraped by parliament on June 10, 2006; Comprehensive Peace Agreement on November 21, 2006; Nepali Congress decided to go into Republican State on September 26, 2007; the CA I elections held in April 2008; the first meeting of the CA I declared Nepal a Republic on May 28, 2008; the CA I dissolved on May 27, 2012; while Bhattarai-led Government failed to hold CA II elections, parties formed a neutral government under the Chief Justice on March 14, 2013; the CA II elections held in November 2013; NC, UML and UCNP-Maoist 16-point agreement on June 8, 2015; and a new Constitution promulgated on September 20, 2015.

[20] Himalayan Times. September 21, 2015. Statute protested in Saptari, Mahottari. Kathmandu

[21] Indian Express. September 20, 2015. India asks Nepal to resolve differences via peaceful dialogue. New Delhi

[22] US Department of State. September 21, 2015. Daily Press Briefing. Washington.

[23] Eherald post. September 29, 2015. Obama expresses happiness for new constitution in Nepal. Online Available in (Accessed on September 29, 2015).

[24] Kathmandu Post. September 21, 2015. China congratulates Nepal on the promulgation of the constitution. Kathmandu.

[25] The New York Times. September 27, 2015. Xi Jinping of China Calls for Cooperation and Partnerships in U.N. Speech. New York.

[26] Kathmandu Post. September 30, 2015. Xi: Respect another country’s sovereignty. Kathmandu

[27] Republica. September 23, 2015. Germany, France, US greet new constitution UN ‘acknowledges’. Kathmandu

[28] Republica. September 16, 2015. UK, Germany, Russia welcome new constitution. Kathmandu

[29] Republica. September 23, 2015. Germany, France, US greet new constitution UN ‘acknowledges’. Kathmandu

[30] Gautam, Kul Chandra. September 28, 2015. Opinion: U.N.’s Mixed Messages on Nepal’s Constitution. Inter Press Service News Agency.

[31] Gautam, Kul Chandra. September 28, 2015. Opinion: U.N.’s Mixed Messages on Nepal’s Constitution. Inter Press Service News Agency.

[32] Himalayan Times. September 29, 2015. New Constitution Welcomed. Kathmandu.

[33] Republica. September 28, 2015. DPM Singh holds meeting with Bhutanese PM. Kathmandu

[34] Kathmandu Post. October 7, 2015. Indian Embassy asks NOC for Oil. Kathmandu

[35] Ibid

[36] Hill and Mountain dwellers

[37] Inhabitants of Tarai-Madhes, plain areas bordering with India

[38] Republica. October 6, 2015. EU countries to distribute humanitarian supplies in Nepal. Kathmandu

[39] Himalayan Times. September 29, 2015. Mahat warns of humanitarian crisis. Kathmandu.

[40] The Indian Express. September 24, 2015. Make seven changes to your Constitution: India tells Nepal. New Delhi.

[41] Namely, President, Vice-President, Prime Minister, Chief Justice, Speaker of Parliament, Chairperson of National Assembly, Head of Province, Chief Minister, Speaker of Provincial Assembly and Chief of Security Bodies.

[42] Kashmir Monitor. September 24, 2015. Make seven changes to your Constitution: India tells Nepal. Srinagar

[43] The Hindu. September 26, 2015. Vikas Swarup to be new spokesperson of External Affairs Ministry. New Delhi

[44] The Kathmandu Post. September 27, 2015. India has supported our agitation: Leader Rai. Kathmandu

[45] The Himalayan Times. September 26, 2015. Upendra Yadav stresses on implementation of past pacts, says 7-point demand not of UDMF. Kathmandu

[46] The Himalayan Times. September 24, 2015. 7-point proposal put forth by Madhesi parties: Laxman Lal Karna. Kathmandu

[47] Central Bureau of Statistics, Government of Nepal on September 30, 2015

[48] For instance, The Times of India. September 24, 2015. Nepal messed up its constitution, India messed up its handling of Nepal. New Delhi

[49] The Constitution of India. Modified on December 1, 2007. Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India.

[50] Hasan, Zoya. 2004. Indian Elections 2004: A Setback for BJP’s Exclusive Agenda. New Delhi: Nehru University.

[51] Vembu. June 30, 2012. Sonia-as-PM in 2004: Has Kalam backtracked or is Swamy wrong? Firstpost.

[52] Article 84.8 under federal Parliament, “Notwithstanding anything contained elsewhere in this Article, women should account for at least one third of total members elected from each party in Federal Parliament. In case, one-third percentage of women are not elected while being elected under section (a) of clause (1), and section (a), clause (2) of Article 84, the party that fails to ensure one-third representation shall have to elect at least one-third of total numbers as woman in the Federal Parliament while electing members under section (b) of clause (1)”.

[53] Kathmandu Post. September 29, 2015. Protests rage across country against India’s blockade. Kathmandu

[54] Nepalese Students burnt effigies of India PM Narendra Modi (, Modi’s effigy burned in Nepal (, Indian PM Modi’s effigy burned at Dhangadhi in Nepal (Online Available in (Accessed on September 29, 2015) and Republica. September 26, 2015. Narendra Modi’s effigy burned in Dhangadhi. Kathmandu

[55] Kathmandu Post. September 30, 2015. Delhi concerned over ‘whipping up of anti-India sentiments. Kathmandu.

[56] India-Forums. September 28, 2015. Nepal cable operators to stop broadcast of Indian channels. Indo Asian News Service

[57] OneIndia. September 23, 2015. CPI (M) slams Modi govt for ‘arrogant intervention’ in Nepal. Online Available in (Accessed on September 29, 2015)

[58] Kathmandu Post. September 28, 2015. Indian position on Nepal ‘unfortunate’: CPI (M). Kathmandu

[59] Republica. October 6, 2015. Indian Congress urges PM Modi to restore India-Nepal ties. Kathmandu

[60] The Economic Times. October 5, 2015. Congress urges PM Narendra Modi to restore India-Nepal ties amidst crisis. New Delhi

[61] Kathmandu Post. September 29, 2015. NC Madhes leaders table 4-pt suggestion. Kathmandu

[62] Setopati. June 9, 2015. Parties sign 16-point agreement to draft constitution (With full text of agreement in Nepali). Online Available in (Accessed on October 3, 2015)

[63] Karki, Rohit. India’s Interest on Nepal’s Federalism. Online Available in (Accessed on October 3, 2015)

[64] Nepal Research. Elections of 19 November 2013. Online Available in (Accessed on October 4, 2015).

[65] Pyakurel, Subodh. September 28, 2015. 15 point open letter to Modi from an angry Nepali. CatchNews

[66] Ibid

[67] September 14 to 18, 2015

[68] Nepal. October 4, 2015. Dakshin Dhakka (South Shaking). Kathmandu: Kantipur Publications.

[69] Nepal Foreign Affairs. September 28, 2015. Commentary: Back off India. Online Available in (Accessed on September 30, 2015)

[70] Srivastava, Pyush. August 30, 2015. Home Ministry fears for Madhesis in Nepal after alleged atrocities against the community. MailonlineIndia.

[71] Ibid.

[72] Ibid.

[73] CPN (UML) and the UCPN (Maoist)

[74] Nepali Times. September 26, 2015. Bhattarai quits Maoist party. Kathmandu

[75] Himalayan Times. September 28, 2015. BRB keep to join Madhesis. Kathmandu.

[76] Himalayan Times. September 29, 2015. Baburam Bhattarai’s stage set on fire, Ram Chandra Jha beaten up in Janakpur. Kathmandu

[77] Inaugural Address by the President of India Shri Pranab Mukharjee at the Concluding Conference on “Cooperative Development, Peace and Security in South Asia and Central Asia” on September 30, 2015. Online Available in (Accessed on October 1, 2015)

[78] Pyakurel, Subodh. September 28, 2015. 15 point open letter to Modi from an angry Nepali. CatchNews

[79] Personal communication on October 3, 2015 at park village resort, Kathmandu

[80] Kantipur. September 29, 2015. Chiniya Naka Khulaun Pahal (Initiation to Open China Transit Point). Kathmandu

[81] Nepal. October 4, 2015. Dakshin Dhakka (South Shaking). Kathmandu: Kantipur Publications

[82] Gurung, Limbu, Rai, Magar and so forth.

[83] Gurung, Khagendra Jung. Ashar 20, 2067 BS. “Indira Gandhilai Vedta (Meeting with India Gandhi)”. Nepal Weekly. Kathmandu

[84] Pathak, Bishnu. May 23, 2009. Nepal-India Relations: Open Secret Diplomacy. Situation Update 84. Kathmandu: PCS Center.

[85] Religious split occurred in India to Pakistan in 1947 and linguistic split to Bangladesh from Pakistan in 1971.

[86] Nepali Times. August 02, 2000. The enigma of distance. Kathmandu

[87] That attains restoration of multi-party democracy

[88] Pathak, Bishnu. May 23, 2009. Nepal-India Relations: Open Secret Diplomacy. Situation Update 84. Kathmandu: PCS Center.

[89] relation of employment, bread and daughter

[90] UML and the Maoists

[91] direct/indirect and formal/informal

[92] Pathak, Bishnu. May 23, 2009. Nepal-India Relations: Open Secret Diplomacy. Situation Update 84. Kathmandu: PCS Center.

[93] Kathmandu Post. October 10, 2015. Border blockade: US warns visiting citizens. Kathmandu

[94] a birth place of Hindu goddesses Sita

[95] the birthplace of Lord Buddha

[96] place of liberation (moksha) for both Hindus and Buddhists.

[97] The Economic Times. June 9, 2015. Nepal objects to India-China trade pact via Lipu-Lekh Pass. New Delhi

[98] 6th Prime Minister from the communist party and 4th from the UML

[99] Kathmandu Post. October 12, 2015. UML’s Oli elected new PM. Kathmandu

[100] The money was transferred via the State Bank of India to Indian Embassy Official. Josse, MR. October 14, 2015. “Urgently needed: strategy to ‘contain’ India”. People’s Review. Online Available in (Accessed on October 16, 201).

[101] Ibid

[102] Ratopati. October 15, 2015. Bharatle Afulai Phasayeko Madhesi Morcha Netako Arop (Leader of Madhesi Front allegedly said India Deceived Us). Online Available in (Accessed on October 16, 2015).

[103] Bhushan, Bharat. September 23, 2015. India’s spectacular policy failure in Nepal. Catchnews.

[104] Ibid

[105] Dhakal, Bindesh. September 29, 2015. “Indian designs”. Republica. Kathmandu

[106] Bhushan, Bharat. September 23, 2015. India’s spectacular policy failure in Nepal. Catchnews.

[107] Ibid

[108] Gorkha Rifles Regiments and British Indian Army since 1815.


Bishnu Pathak, a Ph.D. holder in conflict management and human rights, is president and director of the Conflict Study Center. He is a Board Member of TRANSCEND International for Nepal and also a BM of the TRANSCEND Peace University. Besides writing the book Politics of People’s War and Human Rights in Nepal, he has published a number of research articles on issues related to Human Rights, UN, Security, Peace, Civil-Military Relations, Community Policing, and Federalism.


This article originally appeared on Transcend Media Service (TMS) on 19 Oct 2015.

Anticopyright: Editorials and articles originated on TMS may be freely reprinted, disseminated, translated and used as background material, provided an acknowledgement and link to the source, TMS: Impacts of India’s Transit Warfare against Nepal, is included. Thank you.

If you enjoyed this article, please donate to TMS to join the growing list of TMS Supporters.

Share this article:

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC 4.0 License.

36 Responses to “Impacts of India’s Transit Warfare against Nepal”

  1. Professor Dr. Mohan Lohani says:

    Thank you, Prof. Pathak, for forwarding your excellent scholarly paper which throws light on how a transit country like India seeks to strangulate a land-locked country like Nepal. It is a well argued paper that should be read by all our policy makers.

    All the best and a Happy Vijaya

  2. Amrit Ratna Tuladhar says:

    This is to acknowledge the receipt of your esteemed message. Many sincere thanks for the same. I shall study your worthy papers during my leisure hours and let you know my humble comments thereafter. It is a big shot like you that can help us all make this world a better place to live in. The different designations that you hold as featured below deserves a paramount applause indeed. You are to be trusted as an all round intellectual.

    We anticipate your fervent cooperation and look forward to your generous consideration in the annals to arrive. Long live Pathak-Tuladhar solidarity ! Long live Nepalese unity ! Praise be the Great Himalayas ! Thanking you once more, I remain.

  3. Satish Chandra Gupta says:

    Just to acknowledge your vast amount of degrees, awards, positions etc and yourself being seemingly staunch Gandhian.

  4. Dirgha Raj Prasai says:

    Thanks Dr. Pathak jee!
    This article is very praiseworthy.
    Thank you!

    Dirgha Raj Prasai

  5. BR Sapkota says:

    How to send this article Pmo India,

  6. Dr. Tilak Shrestha says:

    Thanks for your timely article.
    India should state which part of our constitution discriminates against any Nepalese, including Madheshis. On the contrary, Nepalese constitution is much more progressive than Indian constitution. India wants special privilege for Indian immigrants, to have their hold in Nepal. We just cannot afford it. Nepal is made of over 100 ethnic groups, all minorities. The Jatiya Sanghiyata is the recipe for ethnic division. We must absolutely reject it.
    As you wrote, it is mostly about controlling our internal affairs and natural resources. We all Nepalese, across political and ethnic spectrum, must stand against this arms twisting by India.
    Let us take the case to UN and SAARC. Let us explore the option of buying oil from China.
    It is true that Nepal is culturally and geographically close to India. We may even give into minor demands, but must draw line and not compromise on long term detrimental to our nation.
    We also must insist on Ratification of our Constitution. The ratification makes the constitution more robust and acceptable to the nation. The voting in the CA is a part but not the whole process. The draft constitution was put out and people’s opinion was sought as a part of the ratification in the last July, for 2 weeks. What happened to the public opinion expressed in the poll? It is ignored and not even published. The people’s mandate must be published and honored in the constitution. As it is, the constitution is not ratified, lacks mandate, and is invalid. A constitution against people’s mandate is Treason.
    The people’s wish is clearly for ‘Hindu rastra’, and against ‘Sanghiyata.’ The Hindu rastra does not mean theocracy, but merely pride in our heritage. A nation is not just a group of people put together, but united by common heritage, roots and values. The separate poll by news media also makes same issue clear. The survey clearly states less than 20% Nepalese are for secularism, and more than 73% are for keeping 5 Economic zones by joining Himal, Pahad and Tarai. That is, overwhelming majority of Nepalese is for Hindu rastra and against Sanghiyata / Federal states.
    Himal Media Nationwide Public Opinion Survey, Ayesha Shakya, Nepali Times Aug 14-20, 2015
    Constitution supported, not only by CA members but also by people, will be strong and the bulwark against charge that it does not cater to all Nepalese. We also must insist why and who did not publish the poll? We must know which interests, domestic and foreign, preventing it.
    This is the time for all of us to stand for internal unity and against foreign aggression.

  7. Ram B Chherti says:

    Dear Tilak ji and Bishnu ji,

    Happy Dasain.

    I am sure that the ideas expressed by both of you will be fully endorsed by all,who love Nepal, without exception.
    Let us go ahead.
    I will do my own humble part.

    Thank you for everything.

  8. Ravi Kant Manandhar says:

    Prof Pathak,

    It would be the insanity if India if it really wants to restore monarchy that was killed by the illegal 12-Point agreement of it’s own making. If the 12-Point agreement had been signed in Dullu of Dailekh, Dunei of Dolpa or Dallu of Kathmandu, it would not have been illegal. It is a pity that India is not guided by law to kill the monarchy in Nepal.

  9. anand says:

    Use correct map! Kalapani and Lipulek are Nepal’s territory. Dont create a scene over it and use false maps! Indians go and settle issues of Askai Chin and Arunachal with China, rather than bully its small neighbors!

  10. Krishna says:

    Dear Ram B Chhetri, Thank you for your very brief note; and, many thanks for this paper writer who have put foreward his views/ review notes on existing un-spelled (but, obviously defined by supar-power countries with some theorising pathway-diplomacy) and unethical Indian-trade/ commerce blockade to our Independently Sovereigned UN Member Country, Nepal under the Indian-side hip-pocket strategic policy agenda/ interests.

    With this uprising review further needs Nepal-side periodic reviews on agenda specific intellect exercises for our important prospective developments in Nepal policy agendas and there by India-blockade causing resistances&immunity upliftments to prospare long run Nepal’s pride!”

    Thank you.

  11. The Weekly Mirror says:

    Published part I linking in and Part II linking from

  12. Nirmal Kumar Raut says:

    Dear Dr. Pathak,
    Thank you for the timely piece.

    This looks to me more of a narrative than research. Although insightful in terms of acquainting global community about what I would call a “quasi-reality”, some random responses from diverse community across a Nation would have added value to the paper. But a good read given the constraints. Sincerely.

  13. drasha says:

    Dear Bishnu Pathak ji

    NAMASKAR !!! Dashain ko Shubhakaamanaa

    This is a humble reminder to you on what you said and what you did. I respect your view through the recently posted article on current crisis in Nepal created with economical blockage from India (As you claimed). There are many good points you have listed to sell your PITHO but ignored many points to sell good aromatic CHAMAL that were genuine to most people of Nepal. You have used NEPALI or NEPALIS ( to confuse readers) as it was used in suffering of prejudices and also Nepalese where you think Nepali does not work. Mentioning of Madhes as part of Nepal but people of Madhes (identity) are not NEPALI (nationality ) is another fault point in your writing. As I wrote to RAM Chhetri, I claimed current NEW constitution (NC) is worse than the Interim constitution (IC)in many aspects. But the supporters of the NC do not points out the erroneous aspect of NC as you humbly tried to ignore, This is not acceptable to majority of Nepalese people but it may be acceptable to NEPALI speakers only. They get state protection under NC but rest of others are punishable under Surakshya KAANOON. this clearly discriminates the people of NEPAL.

    In one section, you have listed Bahun and Chhetri but no mention of other groups of People and then Madhesis. As you belong to PAHADE samudaaye you forgot to accept yourself as a member of KHAS group but claimed as NEPALI and listed BAHUN and CHHETRI only. Please revisit where you said that.

    In this way, there are many flaws in your article. please be independent writer and stay free from taking side and eliminate the prejudices of Panchayat root planted in your academic knowledge, and I would also suggest you to avoid KOI KAAKHAA KOI PAAKHAA policy endorsed in the current NC. This is an on going discussion until correction is made. WHAT you wrote is 100 % right for your supporters but do not hold true in many ways.

    My final question is that WHY the Anista happened to Nepalese people soon after the promulgation of the NC. Because IT IS DISCRIMINATORY for large number of people. Hope you will have time to respond for further communication. Thanks for making us awake to read the NC under current crisis. NEPAL CAN NOT BE RULED BY THE SAME GROUP OF PEOPLE FOR EVER…….


    • Tara says:

      So @drasha you will take the help of INDIA to materialize thelast statement of yours, isn’t it? If it is justified for you to achieve your ambitions and dream by importing help from a foreign nation, won’t it be pragmatic for the same body of people to seek help from China to protect the security and sovereignty of its beloved nation? A tooth for a tooth and an eye for an eye is indispensable if it’s all a game to you. Yes all of the problems should be dealt in a fair manner just as you say but it is the common people’s wish that this be done without the hegemonic interference from India.

      • AV says:

        Just because you live next to India and you are dark, you are an Indian. And just because we are determined to bring in amendments to the New Constitution, we are licking India’s boots. How does that even make sense? Do you by any chance have ability to think rationally and make logical statements? The new constitution largely treats women as second-class citizens by depriving a single (Nepali) mother’s children from ‘citizenship by descent’. If they fix this problem and build institutional capacity to stop any illegal issuance of citizenship to non-citizens, and provide special opportunities, services and facilities to oppressed communities of Nepal (such as Kamalari/Kamaiya, Dalits and other indigenous groups), I think many more of us will support the Constitution!!

  14. Keshab says:

    Nepal thanks Dr Pathak for timely publication of such an important paper which is mirror reflection of prevailing people’s sentiment, well thought stance of political leaders in the country and widely deplored naked intervention of so called big and democratic south.

  15. Namrata Sharma says:

    Bishnuji, a very interesting and timely article indeed. Slowly and steadily the embargo has crept around Nepal in such a way that it has crippled life here. It is high time that intellectuals like you bring out discussions like this to let people know the crux of the issue and hope to bring about a policy intervention from an international level. Do keep up your good work and keep us posted,

    Namrata Sharma

  16. Damodar Mukti says:

    Thanks for this informed paper. Need to spread all over the worldwide.

  17. Suresh says:

    Warning: If this article qualifies to be called scholarly than you may consider my write up for “noble prize worthy”.

    I seriously doubt if this writer in conferred with the Ph D degree by any legal institution. This article a mere collection of chronology of news, and I bet any Facebook user is better informed, unless s/he has not logged in for past one month. My horror escalated when I read writer is dangerously positioned as “director’ of some conflict study center. I already feel sorry for its pupil, graduated or currently enrolled.

    Any decent person habituated of reading an international write up feels like sentence being repeated again and again. Neither there is flow nor consistency and full of references from “gray literature” which doesn’t carry any credibility, especially when the self-proclaimed messiah cum writer wants ‘globe to read this”.

    What the write up misses is “analysis”, no attempt has been made to explain how we (Nepal) end up being in this position, polarized as pahade and Madeshi. The current outcome is a legacy of series of broken promises, greed, mis-trust within faction in Country and beyond Nepal i.e. India.

    It was (and will be) our grave mistake to consider India carries best wishes for Nepal. Let be practical, no it doesn’t, India looks for its own vested interest. And this short term “romance” with agitating madehsis will develop into “empowering” them and catapult them in decision making position “democratically” and make them “return favor” by signing the same document that they (India) produced before King Birendra, days before democracy was “restored” (read R.N.Pandy Rajniti and Kutniti pg 314& 315) in 1990. We may cry foul calling it “double standard” (as India was also opening supporting opposition)..but the Indian beourocratic mercenary, the student of “Indira Doctrine”, simply laugh off “this is how diplomacy idiots”. Country continues to suffer if we remain “vulnerable” with our domestic feud.

    Problem lies within us, Madeshies are righteous citizen of this country. I have travelled extensively in Madesh and have always praised and overwhelmed by their hard work under simmering sun and in torrential rain. Yet deprived off reciprocate respect for centuries. Chronic poverty, malnutrition has been a permanent character of our southern fellow countrymen. But why? Madeshies also needs to explore it “why it is so”? Have they tried to be in mainstream?

    When they carry poster “We support India” … other side read it as “We are Indian”. Why no Nepali flag in there is protest? They are repeatedly crying out for “40 diseased soul” yet not a single word of “sympathy” over the mob killing of “a dozen of security personal”.

    History, be it scintillating glorious or agonizingly painful, has been made and can’t be changed. We may choose to keep on exchanging “blame game” but we are not going to live in history but in the future. This is our internal affair, let’s tell our neighboring country that we wish to solve it on it on our own and solve this issue once and for ever.

    For now onwards, we should put “emotional” brotherly relation with neighboring countries i.e. India and China, into trash can and treat them as “buyers” or “sellers’. As of today, this is the best way I see Nepal start crawling towards a dignified life.

  18. Bishnu Paneru says:

    Thanks Dr. Pathak for publishing this insightful article. You missed some points. The Madhesi elites are in the movement who are reluctant to resolve some serious social problems like dowry system, caste discrimination, low wages, gender discrimination,low rate of literacy, superstition, state of being homeless etc. These ordinary villagers in Terai are provocated by the leaders saying that the people of Hilly region are suppressing them and not telling people that Nepal’s present constitution is more progressive than Indian constitution. As a whole poor people in terai are fighting for the rights of their Mukhiya(leader).

  19. Kedar Neupane says:

    Good summary of chronological events. Countries conduct affairs of the state on the basis of their national interests and the current situation a consequence of this. Over the last 50/60 years Nepal has faced three (I think) blockades from India and Nepali leadership and bureaucracy have not even noticed this and learned any lesson from it. Politicians in Nepal should have anticipated the looming problems while making decision when India presented its list of demands. Why did they failed and did not make prior arrangements to ameliorate the ensuing difficulties? How long Nepali politicians would want to play India/ China card and do nothing to address obvious national security issues? Over-playing of nationalism card can not resolve political issues and it can have serious economic implications for Nepalese in Nepal and in the region. The origin of the current crisis lies with political elites of Nepal who keep on inciting its citizens on elements that can not delivered by them. Political problems are to be handled politically. This write up clearly shows India’s intransigence towards Nepal,but,then what were Nepal’s leaders and planners doing in so many years? When are we to wake up? Wake up calls have been given by India but is anyone listening in Nepal? Need wisdom not emotions to deal with international issues.

  20. This is an insightful article. Hopefully it will help to bring about a policy intervention from an international level. Thanks for this timely article.

  21. Raj says:

    Sorry, I say it carries partial realities, the article applies the methodologies to review the newspapers infact thats not true. I think its important to carry out the true and real message. Also, Humanitarian watch report has to be analyzed.

    Its Nepals leaders who created space for India due to lack of intelligent and unbiased people rule the nation. Intellectual more suffering of power primacy and elite supremacy that routed in RANA and Transformed to Bahun and Chhetri.
    I found even Modi alone cant trun throughout the Indian policy over neighbours. Its Modi’s failure on unable to understand his internal bureaucratic control and mechanisms before he embarks to spread a good faith and oral commitment immediately after being the president. He missed the version state leaders has less to work with international relation where he played miracally to win the hearts of Indian commoners.

  22. Dr.JN Pandey says:

    Dear Pathak jee

    It is surprising to got from you an email, more than that you are so highest personality how I can touch with you being so small person. I do not know your motive to send me all this thing. I am a medical practitioner practicing day by day life for bread and salt. Your high so high up to sky, how I can touch you from ground being a grass.I know all this situation laying in front of Nepali people.In fact I myself was not infavour of thin on came constitution which is not favor of all Hindus living in Nepal.I think all default lead from Nepalese leadership myopic unconscious and ambitious decision on constitution promulgation. Anyhow I had said to concern party not to pronounce Nakabandi.I understand Indian Prime minister Narendra Mody ambition to make Nepal a Hindu state that was the support for all Nepalese Hindu population.I think India is not like to Hindusthan, Nepal is a Hindusthan country because here live almost 85 % Hindus. More than that Nepal should be famous in world community as a unique Hindu state. Of course it is not to easy to look that being a big country India should think overall Nepalese people not only Madheshi interest. Moreover in India serving 40000 Nepalese hilly region solders and their family are suffering from present problem, what they will fell about India action.That is the interesting think.Those mother and wife children sending to serve in Indian army and they are suffering day to day consuming materials. A state should not thing not only political horizon but he need to look over humanity and humanity basis that is the deficit of modern political scenarios all over the world.I think this thing will not remain long,both good genetically bounded neighbor will get mutual understanding to solve this problem in a sound way. We Nepalese peoples are not hesitation by this suppliers at all because we can tolerate all kind of trouble that we believe own-self, the fate and the god.The great holly Pashupati Nath will guide our life and so on.Thank you sending me this research paper. Although, I am not so academic I tried to read it how far I could.

    Friendly yours
    Prof.Dr.DR.JN Pandey Himali
    Suprime consultant physician general and internal medicine,hepatobiliary gastroenterologist
    Angio/endocrinologist/Echosono/endoscopist,Laser Endoscopic surgeon,chirropractor
    Former chair NMA Nepal,Vice chair person,patriotic layer council
    Member Nepal BAR association,Life member Nepal Medical association,lifemember,Nepal PhD association,freelance journalist
    Docter,Doctorate,advocate,journalist,philosopher and medical scientist

  23. portugheis alberto says:

    Dear Bishnu, thank you for this report, which I’ll print and read when travelling, as my days are already very long, with maximum 5 hours in bed. On top of my intense music work, the countdown for the big rally in London’s Trafalgar Square has started. I’m sure you’ve seen the flyer. Just in case you haven’t, I attach it herewith.

    I wish Nepal and England were not so far apart, as I’d have loved you to speak at this important occasion.

    I also have an online Petition, which I hope you and your colleagues will kindly sign, to show your suport. Just click her:
    Alberto Portugheis (@APortugheis) | Twitter

    Hope you’re well,

  24. Rabindra B Shrestha says:

    It is a very well written Research Article. For the wider circulation / consumption a concise version and a Nepali traslarion will be very useful.

    Since the birth as a democratic nation in 1951, many books were written on India’s assistance, interference and micro-management in Nepal’s administration, socio-economy and politics.

    Most of the writer highlighted the mythological, religious, historical and cultural relations with India and blamed on the weaknes of Nepalese administrator and political leaders for all unequal treaties and agreements. Some of the so called diplomats and expert on Nepal India relation seems more concerned about ‘India’s security’ and propagate the out dated notion that ‘as we can’t change our neighbor, Indian depending is our fate so as an younger brother, we must accept the domination (Thicho Micho) of India’.

    Nepal is not a small country, taking account of bio-diversity and population, Nepal is larger than Australia. Nepal’s contribution to Indian economy is much larger than Indian to Nepal. So we must bury the out dated theory / concept and address Nepal India relation and the pending issue with a new approach / beginning.

    I am forwarding one of my articles ‘Nepalese constitution and Indian Blockade’. Your valuable comments are highly appreciated.

    With best regards,

    Rabindra B Shrestha
    Hydropower Engineer

  25. Irina Rusu says:

    Dear Professor Bishnu Pathak

    We publish books in the form of monographs, which means that our books are independent scientific publications (and not journal articles). Thus, we would be interested in publishing your work in its entirety and your work should be written in English and should have at least 42 pages to be considered for publication. Should you have written academic papers and you consider them suitable for publishing, I would be happy to review them.

    Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

    I look forward to hearing back from you.

  26. Rajesh Pathak says:

    Dear Bishnu Sir,

    Hope you doing great and I followed your articles too, Actually, these days I am in US. I came to University of Pittsburgh in July and now to visit my relatives in Minnesota. Getting back to Nepal. Actually, I am intending to pursue my further study in USA, may be next year. Specially, I am social science student comes from economics background, and literature in masters and Mass Comm in masters. But these days I am more inclined to International Relation kind of further study. Yea bit confused either to link with media or not, either to link with like Human Right issues or Not, or More to go intense study of Implementation aspects of Nepal’s Constitution – a focused current interest of mine. Yea for people like me gets bit confused. To this regard, i am looking for your suggestion and definitely your guidelines ahead. I would appreciate you response. I need a mentor – person like you. I know the kind of busy life do not permit though.

    Thanks Rajesh

  27. Nina Meyerhof says:

    Hello ..have sent your article the many friends I have who are focused on this crisis..thank-you for this very comlete article…nina

  28. Rose-Marie Boylan says:

    Hello Bishnu,
    so nice to hear from you. Well that is quite the article you have written, very impressive, sounds like structural, behavioral & economic violence of the worst kind. I will put it on some of my social media sites, I am sending it to specific people of influence. Are you safe? Take care of yourself, keep up the great work you are doing,

  29. Mohammad Nawaz Bhatti says:

    Dear Sir, its really a great analysis of indian mindset. I prey for the complete success of the People of our brother country, Nepal.

  30. Norma Procter says:

    A very interesting paper, which so far, I have just skim read. I will send it to those who might have an interest. Norma

  31. Padam Simkhada says:

    Excellent analysis and interesting paper.

  32. Dr. Rita Thapa says:

    Thank you, Prof. Bishnu.
    Despite the India Blockade, Nepali spirit continues to survive as you see in this picture. With the help of Scholarly Nepali like yourself, Nepal will thrive too, I believe.

    With best wishes for Happy Tihar,
    Dr. Rita

  33. Buddhi Narayan Shrestha says:

    Border blockade from India has been internationalized by your paper. Congratulations, please keep on going. I shall forward this mail with your attachment to some of my friends.