ICC Will Not Investigate U.S. War Crimes in Afghanistan
15 Apr 2019 – The International Criminal Court announced Friday [12 Apr] it was refusing to pursue an investigation into possible war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by the United States and other actors in Afghanistan.
The court suggested the U.S.’s lack of cooperation with the investigation was behind the decision. Earlier this month, the U.S. revoked the visa of ICC prosecutor Fatou Bensouda, who asked ICC judges to authorize the investigation in 2017.
Human rights groups condemned the decision. Katherine Gallagher of the Center for Constitutional Rights said the ICC was
“bowing to President Trump’s pressure campaign” and that “With its decision, the International Criminal Court sends a dangerous message: that bullying wins and that the powerful won’t be held to account.”
Tags: Central Asia, ICC, Justice, Military, Military Intervention, Military Supremacy, NATO, Politics, Power, US Military, USA, Violence, War, War crimes
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article:
- The Day UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres Becomes Relevant Israel Calls for His Resignation
- UN Chief Says ‘Clear Violations of International Humanitarian Law’ in Gaza--Israel Demands His Head
- Russia-Africa Summit Ends with Signing of Final Declaration
- An Open Letter from Editors and Publishers on Julian Assange --> Publishing Is Not a Crime
- Gaza and the Dilemmas of Genocide Scholars
- The ICJ’s ‘Plausibility Test’ Undermines the Crime of Genocide
- How the CIA Destabilizes the World
- With Netanyahu Threatening Rafah Invasion, Biden Prepares to Send Israel More Bombs
- U.S. Chooses Genocide Over Diplomacy in the Middle East
- US Strikes in Iraq and Syria Kill about 40, Including Civilians
- Biden Must Choose between a Ceasefire in Gaza and a Regional War
- Trilateral Missile Defense System a Step towards Asian NATO
- Pakistan: A Quagmire of Strange Democracy at Work
- Citing World Court, Japan Firm Cuts Ties with Israel Arms Maker
- Pakistan: The Generals Plan Fraudulent National Elections
- Pakistan: The US Toppling of Imran Khan
- Pakistan in Search of New Life
- Pakistan: How Did Neo-Colonial Leaders Stab the Nation?