ICC Will Not Investigate U.S. War Crimes in Afghanistan
15 Apr 2019 – The International Criminal Court announced Friday [12 Apr] it was refusing to pursue an investigation into possible war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by the United States and other actors in Afghanistan.
The court suggested the U.S.’s lack of cooperation with the investigation was behind the decision. Earlier this month, the U.S. revoked the visa of ICC prosecutor Fatou Bensouda, who asked ICC judges to authorize the investigation in 2017.
Human rights groups condemned the decision. Katherine Gallagher of the Center for Constitutional Rights said the ICC was
“bowing to President Trump’s pressure campaign” and that “With its decision, the International Criminal Court sends a dangerous message: that bullying wins and that the powerful won’t be held to account.”
Tags: International Criminal Court, Justice, MILITARISM, Military, Military Intervention, Military Supremacy, NATO, Politics, US military bases, USA, Violence, War, power, war crimes
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article:
- Dead Man Walking: The Return of the Federal Death Penalty in the USA
- The World Is Uniting for International Law, against US Empire
- Trump Imposes Economic Embargo against Venezuela
- 'A New Hawaiian Renaissance': How a Telescope Protest Became a Movement
- The Indian Government Is Revoking Kashmir's Special Status. Here's What That Means
- India Moves to Strip Kashmir of Autonomy, Potentially Setting Up Conflict in Disputed Territory
- Omission of Atrocities Committed by the Venezuelan “Opposition” Discredits UN Human Rights Report
- IPCC Special Report: Climate Change and Land
- UN Calls for Sanctions, Arms Embargo against Myanmar Army
- The Abrogation of Kashmir's Special Status: Why Now?
- Listen to People of Jammu & Kashmir: End ‘Reign of Occupation and Terror’
- Kashmir: A Coup against the Constitution and the Kashmiris
- More British Complicity Exposed in Latest ‘CIA Torture Unredacted’ Report
- Brazil Supreme Court Minister Rules to Protect Press Freedom for Glenn Greenwald and The Intercept
- Judge’s Ruling Throws Huge Spanner into US Extradition Proceedings against Assange