Nagorno-Karabakh: Protecting the Heritage of Humanity

TRANSCEND MEMBERS, 30 Nov 2020

René Wadlow – TRANSCEND Media Service

Nagorno-Karabakh (in red). Southeast Asia/Eurasia

27 Nov 2020 – On 18 November 2020, the Director General of UNESCO Audrey Azoulay received representatives of Armenia and Azerbaijan to discuss the situation in and around Nagorno-Karabakh.  She reaffirmed the universal dimension of cultural heritage as a witness to history and as an indispensable element in the identity of peoples.  The international community has a duty to protect and preserve the heritage for future generations beyond the current conflict.  She recalled the provisions of the 1954 Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict to which both Azerbaijan and Armenia are parties.  She proposed sending a UNESCO field mission to draw up an inventory of significant cultural assets and to discuss how best to protect them.

Conserving a cultural heritage is always difficult.  Weak institutional capabilities, lack of appropriate resources and isolation of many culturally essential sites are compounded by a lack of awareness of the value of cultural heritage conservation.  On the other hand, the dynamism of local initiatives and community solidarity systems are impressive assets.  These forces should be enlisted, enlarged, and empowered to preserve and protect a heritage.  Involving people in cultural heritage conservation both increases the efficiency of cultural heritage conservation and raises awareness of the importance of the past for people facing rapid changes in their environment.

Early efforts to protect cultural heritage in times of armed conflict were undertaken by Nicholas Roerich (1874-1947) Russian and world citizen. Roerich had lived through both the First World War and the Russian Revolution and had seen how conflict could destroy cultural heritage and institutions. He envisaged a universal symbol that could be placed on cultural sites and institutions the way the red cross is place on medical institutions.  He drew what he called “The Banner of Peace”, three red balls representing past, present and future.

Roerich mobilized artists and intellectuals in the 1920s for the establishment of this Banner of Peace.  Henry A. Wallace, then the US Secretary of Agriculture and later Vice-President was an admirer of Roerich and helped to have an official treaty introducing the Banner of Peace − the Roerich Peace Pact − signed at the White House on 15 April 1935 by 21 States in a Pan-American Union ceremony.  At the signing, Henry Wallace on behalf of the USA said that,

“at no time has such an ideal been more needed.  It is high time for the idealists who make the reality of tomorrow, to rally around such a symbol of international cultural unity.  It is time that we appeal to that appreciation of beauty, science, education which runs across all national boundaries to strengthen all that we hold dear in our particular governments and customs.  Its acceptance signifies the approach of a time when those who truly love their own nation will appreciate in additions the unique contributions of other nations and also do reverence to that common spiritual enterprise which draws together in one fellowship all artists, scientists, educators and truly religious of whatever faith.”

As Nicholas Roerich said in a presentation of his Pact,

“The world is striving toward peace in many ways, and everyone realizes in his heart that this constructive work is a true prophesy of the New Era.  We deplore the loss of libraries of Lou vain and Overdo and the irreplaceable beauty of the Cathedral of Rheims.  We remember the beautiful treasures of private collections which were lost during world calamities.  But we do not want to inscribe on these deeps any worlds of hatred.  Let us simply say: Destroyed by human ignorance − rebuilt by human hope.”

After the Second World War, UNESCO has continued the effort, and there have been additional conventions on the protection of cultural and educational bodies in times of armed conflicts.  The most important is the 1954 Hague Connection for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict. UNESCO has designed a blue and white shield which is to be placed on cultural sites, but it has not received wide recognition as yet.

The protection of cultural heritage is only one of the many challenges concerning Nagorno-Karabakh, the Russian peacekeeping troops, and relations between Azerbaijan, Armenia, Turkey, and Iran.  A situation that merits watching.

______________________________________

René Wadlow is a member of the TRANSCEND Network for Peace Development Environment. He is President of the Association of World Citizens, an international peace organization with consultative status with ECOSOC, the United Nations organ facilitating international cooperation and problem-solving in economic and social issues, and editor of Transnational Perspectives.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 

This article originally appeared on Transcend Media Service (TMS) on 30 Nov 2020.

Anticopyright: Editorials and articles originated on TMS may be freely reprinted, disseminated, translated and used as background material, provided an acknowledgement and link to the source, TMS: Nagorno-Karabakh: Protecting the Heritage of Humanity, is included. Thank you.

If you enjoyed this article, please donate to TMS to join the growing list of TMS Supporters.

Share this article:

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC 4.0 License.


2 Responses to “Nagorno-Karabakh: Protecting the Heritage of Humanity”

  1. Ernst von Waldenfels: Nikolai Roerich – Kunst, Macht und Okkultismus – Osburg Verlag, Berlin 2011, ISBN 918-3-940731-71-5
    I have read the book. Roerich was a mad impostor and fantasist. Worse still, his wife Helena, she was really insane. Roerich’s painting is naive surrealism. As surreal as irrational is the whole story of the Roerich family. How one could tame trigger-happy Caucasians with such a “culture” may be a cosmic mystery.
    Here is a review of the book, unfortunately only in German:
    https://www.tagesspiegel.de/kultur/der-hoechststapler/6200988.html

  2. Aleksid says:

    Richard Maxheim is NOT right. Nicholas Roerich was a great humanist who dreamed about peace in all the world. He also was artist, philosoper and writer. I recommend to read books or articles of Nicholas Roerich to create your own opinion about this person. Helena Roerich a wife of Nicholas Roerich also was a great philosopher.

Join the discussion!

We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.

*

code

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.