OMG, Omicron! Why It’s too Soon to Panic about COVID Vaccines and the New Variant
COVID19 - CORONAVIRUS, 6 Dec 2021
3 Dec 2021 – We won’t know whether Omicron evades COVID vaccines for another few weeks. Here’s why.
Researchers around the world are trying to work out whether existing COVID vaccines protect us from the latest variant, Omicron.
The worst-case scenario is the virus has mutated so much in the crucial parts of its genome that it can escape COVID vaccines designed to protect us from earlier versions of the virus – with devastating consequences globally.
.@WHO Technical Lead on Covid-19 @mvankerkhove lays out what you need to know about Omicron: “We’ll get some information on transmissibility and severity in the coming days,” she says, though it’ll take 2-4 weeks for preliminary information on the impact of vaccines on Omicron. pic.twitter.com/H48JLsOEkI
— Christiane Amanpour (@amanpour) November 29, 2021
But it’s too soon to panic. And vaccines may end up protecting us against Omicron after all, as they have done with earlier variants.
The World Health Organization (WHO) says it will take us another two to four weeks to figure out what’s going on. Here’s what scientists around the world are racing to find out.
Why the concern?
The reason Omicron has caused global alarm is due to the number of new mutations throughout the genome of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID.
Omicron has now been detected in several other countries around the world.
The Omicron COVID-19 variant is now classified as a ’variant of concern’ (VOC). While data on the Omicron is limited, here’s what we know about this variant so far. https://t.co/UpwcQH58Kj
— Healthline (@Healthline) December 1, 2021
We’ve already seen some Omicron mutations in other variants.
Individually, some of these mutations have been associated with resistance to neutralising antibodies. In other words, these mutations help the virus evade recognition by an immune system primed with a COVID-19 vaccine.
Some of these individual mutations have also been linked with increased transmissibility of the virus from one person to another.
However, Omicron has many unique mutations. For instance, on the spike protein, the protein used in many current vaccines, Omicron has about 30 mutations compared with the virus that came out of Wuhan. Delta has only ten mutations in its spike protein. So you get an idea of the scale of change.
Investigating the way these multiple mutations interact with one another, rather than individually, will be key to understanding how Omicron behaves compared with other variants.
Looking at these interactions will tell us more about Omicron’s ability to infect cells, cause disease and escape vaccines. And experiments are under way to investigate these mutations and their impacts.
While we wait for the results, we heard this week from some of the vaccine manufacturers. Moderna said its vaccine would be less effective against Omicron than against Delta. Meanwhile, Pfizer/BioNTech said its vaccine would still protect against severe disease. Both companies said they could produce tweaked booster vaccines, if needed.
Why will it take weeks to get answers?
Here’s what researchers around the world are working on and why we won’t have answers for a few weeks.
Growing the virus
Researchers are taking samples of Omicron from infected people and growing the virus in laboratories. This gives them working stocks of the virus to conduct experiments. This can take time as you’re often starting with tiny amounts of virus from a swab.
This process also relies on access to the right types of cells to grow the virus in.
Finally, this needs to be done in laboratories that offer a high level of biosafety, to contain the virus. Not all researchers have access to these facilities.
Make your own ‘virus’
Researchers can also use genetic tools to produce the virus in the laboratory, requiring only the genome sequence of SARS-CoV-2 to begin production. This removes the reliance on patient samples.
They can also produce genetically engineered viruses, called pseudotyped viruses, in the laboratory. These carry only the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2.
Researchers can also express small portions of the spike protein on the surface of other organisms, such as yeast.
All of these options take time to set up, optimise and be used in the types of studies outlined below.
Both methods are useful
Initial studies will look at how Omicron’s mutations impact the fitness of the variant – its transmissibility and ability to evade vaccine-induced immunity.
For instance, initial experiments will look at Omicron’s ability to infect cells. These studies will tell us how well Omicron’s spike protein interacts with the ACE2 receptor, the gateway to infecting our cells. Further studies will investigate how well Omicron can replicate in cells after gaining entry.
Neutralisation studies will investigate how well antibodies – induced by current SARS-CoV-2 vaccines – can neutralise Omicron, or prevent it from infecting cells. Such studies rely on access to serum from vaccinated people and are likely to compare the neutralising capacity of Omicron against other SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Studies are also likely to investigate the effect of vaccine booster regimes and earlier SARS-CoV-2 infection on how well antibodies neutralise Omicron.
So what can we expect? Until we get the results of these experiments, it’s difficult to say for certain.
Studies of how effective COVID-19 vaccines are against other variants show they are generally less able to induce the type of antibody response we’d like to see (neutralising antibodies). However, when previous variants have emerged, vaccines have continued to protect against severe disease.
Vaccine protection is not all or nothing. We are unlikely to get a perfect neutralising antibody response against Omicron, or no response, rather something in between.
We’ll also know more as we see more cases
Continued monitoring of real-world data will also be essential to determine how Omicron impacts the broader pandemic.
Whether Omicron is able to spread from seeding events around the world or compete with Delta are questions to be answered in the coming weeks.
Whether infection with Omicron causes less or more serious disease also remains unclear. Monitoring hospitalisation rates will be key here.
We still need to tackle Delta
Currently fewer than 200 genetic sequences of Omicron have been compiled compared with more than 2.8 million Delta sequences. Delta remains the most dominant variant. So we should continue to use vaccines and therapies we know work against Delta.
It’s also essential we continue with public health measures, such as wearing masks and social distancing, alongside continued vaccination, to combat the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and the emergence of further variants.
Have you read?
- The hunt for coronavirus variants: how the new one was found and what we know so far
- There’s Only One Way to Stop the Emergence of Variants Like Omicron
- COVID variants: we spoke to the experts designing a single vaccine to defeat them all
Tags: Airborne contagion, COVID-19, Community, Compassion, Coronavirus, Economy, Empathy, Environment, Health, Ivermectin, Lockdown, Medical Industrial Complex, PCR Tests, Pandemic, Public Health, Research, Science, Science and Medicine, Variants, Vitamin C, Vitamin D, WHO
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article:
COVID19 - CORONAVIRUS: