Plutonium Found at Former San Francisco Naval Shipyard – Navy Faces Cover-Up Claims

ENVIRONMENT, 1 Dec 2025

Rohit David | International Business Times - TRANSCEND Media Service

US Navy faces cover-up claims over airborne radiation.
Jaxon Matthews Willis : Pexels

Multiple tests have detected radioactive compounds in residents’ blood and urine, including plutonium.

28 Nov 2025 – In a shocking revelation on 27 November 2025, airborne plutonium was detected at the former Hunters Point Naval Shipyard in San Francisco, sparking Navy cover-up claims amid health risks to the Bayview neighbourhood.

The Superfund site, contaminated from Cold War nuclear activities, showed plutonium-239 levels twice the federal threshold in November 2024 samples, yet the Navy delayed disclosure for 11 months.

As community outrage mounts over environmental hazards and radiation exposure, advocates demand transparency in this ongoing cleanup saga.

Historical Context of Hunters Point Contamination

The Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, an 866-acre site in San Francisco, served as a staging ground for nuclear weapons testing during the Cold War. In the 1950s, the Navy decontaminated 79 ships irradiated during Pacific Ocean nuclear tests, leading to profound radiological contamination.

The Environmental Protection Agency designated it a Superfund site in 1989 due to hazardous radioactive materials. Additionally, the yard housed a secret Navy research lab where animals were injected with strontium-90, exacerbating environmental hazards. Estimates suggest about 2,000 grams of plutonium-239 remain, posing ongoing risks.

Operations at this Cold War lab exposed at least 1,073 people to radiation, with persistent threats to nearby communities. This history underscores the site’s legacy of fallout and experimentation, fuelling current concerns over incomplete cleanups.

The 2024 Plutonium Detection and Delay

In November 2024, the Navy collected 200 air samples at Hunters Point and detected plutonium-239 in one sample at twice the federal action threshold. The sample, from Parcel C adjacent to residential condos and a public park, raised alarms when results emerged in March 2025.

However, the Navy withheld this information from San Francisco officials for 11 months, only disclosing on 30 October 2025. The Navy claimed a re-check showed non-detect, but advocates question this. Navy officials sent the sample to a lab for analysis, and the initial results came back in March 2025, showing high radiation levels.

An X post from Jerry Chamberlain highlighted the Guardian article on the cover-up. This delayed disclosure has intensified scrutiny on the Navy’s transparency.

Navy’s Response and Community Backlash

At a community meeting on 17 November 2025, Navy environmental coordinator Michael Pound apologised: ‘I’ve spent a fair amount of time up here getting to know the community, getting to know your concerns, transparency and trust, and on this issue we did not do a good job.’

City health officials echoed concerns: ‘Full transparency with our communities and the department of public health is critical, and we share your deep concerns regarding the 11-month delay in communication from the navy.’ Despite assurances of no immediate action needed, residents express frustration over health risks like lung cancer and radiation sickness from inhaling plutonium particles.

The presence of radioactive air contaminants compounds risks in the Bayview-Hunters Point neighbourhood, burdened by generations of toxins. Multiple tests have detected radioactive compounds in residents’ blood and urine, including plutonium. Advocates allege the Navy only reports above background levels without explanation, signifying a botched cleanup.

Federal regulators, including the EPA, have intensified oversight of the Hunters Point cleanup, vowing to conduct independent air monitoring to verify the Navy’s claims and restore public confidence. Local activists are pushing for comprehensive health screenings for Bayview residents, emphasising the long-term effects of low-level radiation exposure that could manifest in future generations.

Go to Original – ibtimes.co.uk


Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Share this article:


DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

There are no comments so far.

Join the discussion!

We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.

− 1 = 9

Note: we try to save your comment in your browser when there are technical problems. Still, for long comments we recommend that you copy them somewhere else as a backup before you submit them.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.