Top Nuclear Experts: Technology Doesn’t Yet Exist to Clean Up Fukushima

ENERGY, 8 Oct 2012

Washington’s Blog – Global Research

Containing Fukushima Is Beyond Current Technology

World-renowned physicist Michio Kaku said recently:

It will take years to invent a new generation of robots able to withstand the radiation.

(The radiation inside the reactors is too hot even for robots.)

AP reports:

Hiroshi Tasaka, a nuclear engineer and professor at Tama University who advised the prime minister after the disaster …  said the government target of removing all the rods by the end of next year may prove too optimistic because of many unknowns, the need to develop new technology and the risk of aftershocks.

The world leader in decommissioning nuclear reactors, and one of the main contractors hired to clean up Fukushima – EnergySolutions – made a similar point in May:

Concerning the extraction of fuel debris [at Fukushima], which is considered the most challenging process, “There is no technology which may be directly applied,” said [top EnergySolutions executive] Morant.

A top American government nuclear expert – William D. Magwood – told the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works:

It is very difficult to overstate how difficult the work is going to be at that site. There will need to be new technologies and new methodologies created to be able to enable them to clean the site up and some of these technologies don’t exist yet, so there’s a long way to go with that …. There’s a long, long way to go.

(Magwood is a Commissioner for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, former 7-year Director of Nuclear Energy with the U.S. Department of Energy , where he was the senior nuclear technology official in the U.S. government and the senior nuclear technology policy adviser to the Secretary of Energy, and the longest-serving head of the United States’ civilian nuclear technology program, serving two Presidents and five Secretaries of Energy from 1998 until 2005.)And Greenpeace notes that even storing the waste removed from Fukushima is a challenge:

A group of scientists from the Science Council of Japan (SCJ) are advising the government via the Japan Atomic Energy Company (JAEC) to completely overhaul its nuclear waste disposal plan. Currently, the government plans to bury spent nuclear fuel 300 meters below ground, where it will need to stay for tens of thousands of years until it is no longer radioactive.

The SCJ group said that because Japan is so prone to earthquakes and volcanic activity, there’s no guarantee of safety for future generations.

Instead, the researchers recommend storing the waste in “temporary safe storage” facilities, either above ground or underground, for up to a few hundred years—and in the meantime, actively working to develop new technology to ensure safe burial of the highly radioactive material. That technology does not exist at this point. “Based on current scientific knowledge, we cannot determine a geological formation that would be stable for hundreds of thousands of years …. But discussions on where the spent fuel should ultimately be stored have not even begun.

Postscript:  We don’t mean to imply that the situation is hopeless. Indeed, we are big believers in the ability of humans to come up with ingenuous solutions … when we put our minds to it.

For example, Sandia National Laboratories has engineered a special “molecular sieve” which can more efficiently remove radiation from wastewater.

And one of the world’s leading authorities on fungi and bioremediation says that certain types of mushrooms can naturally reduce radiation.

Engineers are also furiously working on developing robots which can withstand higher levels of radiation.

But before we can tame this monster, we have to admit that Fukushima is one of the top short-term threats to humanity and deploy the resources necessary to develop the required technologies.

Go to Original – globalresearch.ca

 

Share this article:


DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


One Response to “Top Nuclear Experts: Technology Doesn’t Yet Exist to Clean Up Fukushima”

  1. satoshi says:

    Let me briefly discuss the following three points:

    First: It is time for the Japanese government to tell the truth to the nationals. There is no technology that cleans up the after-effects of the nuclear disaster, as nuclear experts admit. The first step for the disaster management is not to hide the truth from the public.

    Second: The radioactivity of nuclear waste, buried 300 meters under the land, will remain tens of thousands of years, as the above article warns. Compare the Japanese history (some 2,700 years) with the length of the remaining effect of the buried radioactivity. In the past, Japan was called, the “land of rising Sun”. In the future, it might be called, the “land of buried nuclear waste” or worse, the “land of rising danger of buried radioactivity”.

    Third: Review the choice of energy systems. The conventional fuel energy system emits more than 200 times of carbon-dioxide than the nuclear energy system. Besides, the supply and the price of petroleum are not necessarily stable. It is understandable that the decision was made to choose the nuclear energy system some half a century ago. Accordingly, the nuclear reactor models, including those of Fukushima, which Japan has used over the decades, depend on some 40 years old nuclear technology (and many of the nuclear reactors were built some 30 years ago or so). But today, the environmental and energy situations are different. Solar, wind, tide or any other energy systems are available. Why still the nuclear energy system is chosen? (=>> One of the hidden reasons that the government never officially admits is that nuclear energy technology can easily be switched, in a short period of time, to the production of nuclear weapons. Note that both nuclear reactor and atomic bomb use “nuclear fission”. While the nuclear reactor controls the speed of nuclear fission, the atomic bomb does not control the speed of the fission. An atomic bomb releases a huge amount of energy, which was produced through the process of nuclear fission, all at once. That is to say, a damaged nuclear reactor that is unable to control the speed of nuclear fission creates the same effect (= the explosion) of the atomic bomb. Fukushima Dai Ichi was one of the typical examples. As such, to produce a small nuclear reactor without the speed control system of nuclear fission is relatively easy, because it means to produce an “atomic bomb”.)