Systems of Alternative Defense for States
EDITORIAL, 23 Jul 2013
#281 | Johan Galtung, 23 Jul 2013 - TRANSCEND Media Service
The Senate, Rome: Your Excellencies, Foreign Affairs, Defense, EU:
SYSTEMS: A Reorientation
 Transarmament: States use armies for defense, and for offense, for wars. Si vis pacem, para bellum, peace through security tries to cover both; but offensive military threatens, provokes arms races, even wars. Si vis pacem para pacem, security through peace is not disarmament leaving regions, states and local level defense-less; rather, it identifies conflicts and traumas underlying violence in order to solve them, builds peaceful state relations, and defensive defense “just in case”.
 Nonalignment: Solidarity and help to victims of aggression should be based on the merits of the case, not by alliance membership. This implies NATO and EU transarmament to regional defensive defense, and UN world collective defense under representative military command.
 Being useful to other countries: having developed positive relations such that others want to enhance, not destroy the country. There are many ways: through mutually beneficial trade, tourism for nature or culture, through support when suffering attacks, or social and natural catastrophes, by serving as experts in peace-building.
 Being less vulnerable: political-military decentralization so that aggression against any sector-part does not paralyze the whole country; resistance, and much normal life, can be continued.
Economic self-reliance, especially energy/food–self-sufficiency only as a possibility in emergencies–not to be tempted into attacking others if trade fails, keeping economic sectors–primary, secondary, tertiary, quaternary for reproduction–intact; producing for basic needs at home as much as possible, getting the rest through trade.
Defense against spying by not having secrets; transarmament works openly, to prevent and deter. A more cooperative, less competitive economy (more cooperatives, less companies); inviting others to join.
ALTERNATIVE: Building Peace
 Conflict resolution. Conflict means incompatible goals; conflict resolution means making goals compatible in an acceptable and sustainable way. The method is dialogue with all parties to map goals and test them for legitimacy; then try to bridge legitimate goals through compromise or by creating some new reality. Making solution orientation a part of the culture and media; not just “winning”. Massive education-practice for domestic-global conflict resolution.
 Trauma reconciliation. Clearing the past by revisiting traumatic events, acknowledging wrongs done, dialogue about why it happened, building peaceful futures together; making reconciliation orientation a part of the culture and media; not just “forgetting”. Massive education-practice for domestic-global trauma reconciliation.
 Empathy for harmony. Promoting knowledge of how the world looks from the angle of the other gender, generations, races, classes, nations, states, regions, civilizations–professions like business, military, religion, politics–not only one’s own angle; capability to suffer the suffering of others and to enjoy the joy of others, for harmony. Understanding their traumas and glories is a major part of education in geography and history in the age of globalization.
 Cooperation. Building projects for mutual and equal benefit, also across conflict borders and faultlines in general, for parity among genders, generations, races and nations, states and regions, civilizations, and for massive reduction of inequality.
Politically that calls for regionalization, one state one vote.
Militarily that calls for solidarity within and between regions.
Economically that calls for transactions with equal long term side-effects, like challenge to develop further and to the environment.
Culturally that calls for more than tolerance: for dialogue based on mutual respect and curiosity, and for openness to mutual learning.
DEFENSE: Defensive Defense
 Non-offensive, non-provocative, only deploying weapons one would tolerate in others, limited to defense; not offense, attack, war. This calls for short-range arms and platforms; ditches that can be made unbridgeable, mining fields, armed vehicles, PGMs, MTBs, coast artillery, helicopters, air defense also by beams; for defense only.
 Conventional Military Defense, to mark land, sea and air borders, neither provoking arms races, nor instilling fear of war.
 Para-Military Defense, militia, locally based and supported, using guerrilla tactics, prepared for the long haul.
 Non-Military Defense, preparing, training the population[i] for massive civil disobedience/non-cooperation with any illegitimate regime imposed on the country, cooperating with CMD and PMD above.
 A MINISTRY OF PEACE for coordination of as many steps on as many of the 12 points above as possible; sections and sub-sections as indicated. Could be under the Prime Minister’s Office.
A country based on security through peace, nonaligned, useful to others, invulnerable, mediating relevant conflicts and traumas, high on empathy and equitable projects, only non-provocative arms, prepared to defend its borders and any part of its territory with military and nonmilitary defense and a Ministry of Peace; attack very unlikely.
A country with long range military, aggressive alliances, useless, vulnerable, with victory as approach to conflict and amnesia to traumas inflicted, autistic, exploitative, no defensive defense, with no Ministry of Peace; attack, and being attacked, likely. Most countries are mixes.
A country with high scores is not only more secure but a gift to the world, surrounded by expanding circles of friendship; one with low scores is a threat, surrounded by enemies. Switzerland in Europe and Nepal in Asia are high-score countries almost never attacked; EU in Europe and ASEAN in Asia are examples of regions with wars (almost) unthinkable.
[i]. See : “La Loi Peillon des formations á la prévention et á la résolution non-violente des conflits” pour les enseignants et tous les personnels de l’éducation en formation initiale et continue dans le cadre des Ecoles Supérieures du Professorat et de l’Education (ESPE)”, adopté le 25 juin 2013.
Johan Galtung, a professor of peace studies, dr hc mult, is rector of the TRANSCEND Peace University-TPU. He is author of over 150 books on peace and related issues, including ‘50 Years-100 Peace and Conflict Perspectives,’ published by the TRANSCEND University Press-TUP.
Editorials and articles originated on TMS may be freely reprinted, disseminated, translated and used as background material, provided an acknowledgment and link to the source, TRANSCEND Media Service-TMS, is included. Thank you.
This article originally appeared on Transcend Media Service (TMS) on 23 Jul 2013.
Anticopyright: Editorials and articles originated on TMS may be freely reprinted, disseminated, translated and used as background material, provided an acknowledgement and link to the source, TMS: Systems of Alternative Defense for States, is included. Thank you.
This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC 4.0 License.
13 Responses to “Systems of Alternative Defense for States”
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article: