Brex’It, So Be’It; And Then What?
EDITORIAL, 24 Jun 2016
#434 | Johan Galtung
The vote turned out like the two referenda held in Norway in 1972 and 1994. And much for the same reason: Protestant break with Rome–Catholic, imperial–Henry VIII made himself head of the Anglican Church in 1534. Religion was not the only reason, there are Protestant Nordic members of EU, closer to the continent and closer to Russia. World history, a short while after Pope Francis-Patriarch Kirill also made world history, bridging the Catholic-Orthodox 395-1054 gap.
The Disunited Queendom is now London with surroundings; England. The implications are enormous, for UK-GB and the British Isles in general, for EU and Europe in general, USA and the world in general. The US Trojan horse decided to leave the EU on 23 June 2016.
* UK-GB and the British Isles in general.
Goodbye United Kingdom, UK, we may get United Ireland, UI, instead.
Goodbye Great Britain, GB, we may get Scotland in EU instead.
Welcome to Britain of England-Wales, if they care for that vocabulary.
Welcome to new-born England, 23 June being the Day of Independence.
Independence? Washington, having lost its inside EU ally, will soon remind London of their “special relationship” as unsinkable aircraft carrier also doing the killing job–maybe some wanted that. And yet. England had the whole Global Establishment, if there ever was one, mobilized to pressure them to remain. They did not. There is something very impressive in that, however bad the campaign.
And yet. There is something to those British Isles, a shared and twisted history between Anglo-Saxons and Celts–Vikings, Normans–an enormous impact on the world now torn to pieces, torn into new pieces. Maybe time has come for something this author proposed in an NGO encounter at the Houses of Parliament on Northern Ireland-Ulster right before the 1998 Good Friday Agreement: CBI, a Confederation of the British Isles, with United Ireland, Scotland, England-Wales and smaller islands.
* EU and Europe in general.
On the possible positive side is EU independence of the USA, not choosing US foreign-military (and university system!) policy instead of working out its own. EU can now follow France-Germany in a Ukraine they know much better than the USA. They nay one day meet Russia in some “European House”–may Gorbachev see that before he passes away–and they may one day, hopefully soon, have a European Parliament recognizing Palestine as a state, making it clear this is not anti-Semitic, anti-Israel, but pro the other Semitic, pro-Palestine.
On the possible negative side is Germany winning the two “world wars” in Europe over who shall run Europe: Germany or England-France. Germany had visions of something close to an EU with economic center in Brussels and political in Berlin. After 1945 it was France, not England that stretched out a hand to beaten Germany, the 1950 coal and steel handshake that morphed into the Treaty of Rome (what a bad choice of name). France will have to do that again, but this time not from the strong position of being on the winning side of a war, but the weak position of being in layer 3 of the present 5 in EU with Germany on top and Greece at the bottom, the Nordics no 3, then the Latins, then Eastern Europe. This pyramid has to be flattened; many of the exit movements derive their momentum from that sad EU reality.
But also from a boring EU in spite of having to its credit, “acquis” open borders, the euro, a Europe with war held unthinkable. Could some of that come from not being masters in their own house, always listening to His Master’s Voice? Could healthy regionalism inspire a new deal, like healthy nationalism could for England? Freed from fighting US wars, liberated to build peace all over, like in EU?
Making an ever stronger or weaker union? Maybe stronger in peace policy. And maybe with the euro as common, not single currency, and not pressing members into a solidarity with no historical basis?
USA and the world in general.
This might be one more wake-up call for the USA, at a time with everybody but Hillary already awake. Talk about NATO as out of date, Europe and the Middle East taking care of their own affairs, wars as non-affordable, as counter-productive, some awareness that there are other victims than Americans in the wars, had been unthinkable, unspeakable. But old addictive habits are hard to change.
That opens for a possible widening slit between USA-England and EU-Europe. There is a model: the split between the West Roman (Catholic) and East Roman (Orthodox) empires in 395, the former lasting about 81 more years, the latter more than a thousand. This time the religious split would be between evangelical-protestant in the West and catholic-orthodox in the East, with a smart federation at the border, Ukraine, as a possible solution. A major test.
Another: defensive defense against IS brutality, negotiations with them, recognizing their right to have an IS when Europe has EU, and a Caliphate when Christianity has Vatican and the Patriarchy(ies). Learning from Islam about togetherness and sharing, how to overcome loneliness and alienation, admitting that the West needs to learn.
And China? Learning from them like they do from the West, inviting them to join the world from “between heaven and earth”.
The world in general? Moving away from states, toward regions. Be a good, caring Mother of regions, sharing solutions and problems generously with other regions around the world. With Latin America-Caribbean, Anglo-America–maybe with Mexico as MEXUSCAN–the African Union, the European House, SAARC, ASEAN. And the three badly missing ones in Asia: West Asia with Israel and Palestine, Iraq and Syria; Central Asia with Afghanistan, and Northeast Asia with the two Chinas, the two Koreas, Far East Russia and Japan now at nuclear logger-heads.
EU: a wake-up call! Don’t despair, grow, and help the world.
Johan Galtung, a professor of peace studies, dr hc mult, is founder of the TRANSCEND Network for Peace, Development and Environment and rector of the TRANSCEND Peace University-TPU. He has published 164 books on peace and related issues, of which 41 have been translated into 35 languages, for a total of 135 book translations, including ‘50 Years-100 Peace and Conflict Perspectives,’ published by the TRANSCEND University Press-TUP.
Tags: Brexit, Europe, Regions
This article originally appeared on Transcend Media Service (TMS) on 24 Jun 2016.
Anticopyright: Editorials and articles originated on TMS may be freely reprinted, disseminated, translated and used as background material, provided an acknowledgement and link to the source, TMS: Brex’It, So Be’It; And Then What?, is included. Thank you.
If you enjoyed this article, please donate to TMS to join the growing list of TMS Supporters.
This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC 4.0 License.
12 Responses to “Brex’It, So Be’It; And Then What?”
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article:
Yes, an Excellent piece of writing based on stark realities. England was like a brick in the EU and when it came out, it has not only weakened the entire building (EU)but has put it (EU) in great danger of disintegration. I am afraid, if other nations follow the same path, there would be no EU in coming years. And that would be a disaster for world so far peace and understanding is concerned.
Who else than Galtung can turn brexit into another foaming anti-US diatribe.. :-D
Nigel Young says:
Two points to Johan ; 1)If PROTESTANT Scotland is independent in the EU it will scrap the USA(UK)s strategically important Nuclear weapons submarine base – at Faslane; Multi-faith England will not renew Trident Missiles or a base in England.
Wales will not have it – either ——because whilst east Wales voted with Little Englandism’s – The WEST (CELTIC) . Wales, voted for the European Union. A Celtic REGION !!!
Northern Ireland could become autonomous within the EU in a regional cooperation structure eventual federal possibly wit its two EU neighbours (Ireland and Scotland) Northern Ireland voted to remain across tghe Catholic/Protestant community divide- immediate reunification will bring back the old divisions. The idea of an independent NI. will be revived.
And don’t write off Protestant Wales — it doesn’t want to be ruled by a Boris/Trump England!
Prof. Galtung’s reply to Nigel Young:
Excellent comment Nigel.
As predicted, Obama and Hillary Clinton came out right after LEAVE with the “special relation” USA-UK, followed by the US tool as SG of NATO about England as a trusted NATO member.
Independence from the USA is needed to scrap the bases-offensive capabilities you mention–maybe in a deal with Russia–not independence from the EU. But one spirit of independence may lead to the next.
Thank you so much for this bravely optimistic analysis Antonio. I particularly like your outrageous idea of MEXUSCAN.
It’s certainly been a wake-up call for me personally.
Love and peace,
Dear Liz, it was not me but Prof. Johan Galtung who wrote the editorial. I merely posted it.
Thanks for your kudos. In the name of Johan.
Congratulations on your excellent article in Counterpunch this morning.
Which article are you referring to? From whom? Tks.
Not sure what Jason referred to, but the article was also reproduced on CP:
Paul Reimer, tks for the info. Jason Smith too. I searched CP with our title but they changed it there.
Although I can glean the thoughts behind this article and appreciate what is trying to be said here, the writing style is so amateurish, so choppy, it reads like it was dictated by the author while driving. Incomplete sentences, and poor organization of thought make it almost unreadable.
Was very surprised to see such a sloppy piece on Counterpunch.
Many thanks to Mr Galtung for taking a larger historical perspective on Brexit than the usual suspects do. In particular, mention of the Vatican as a major player on the global political and economic scenes is welcome—-his comments are the first I’ve read on the topic, albeit not in the current detail I would like. So much of the punditocracy is devoid of any sort of global historical perspective, focusing, for example, on the latest (ten minutes ago) Trump tweet about his golf courses, or Ms Brunhilde Clinton’s sojourn into obfuscating her neoliberal heritage (35 minutes ago, repeated ad nauseam for the next 48 hours)…all of this being considered “news” by the idiots who purvey the propaganda we are expected to stomach without comment.