Natural Immunity Denial Disorder: Diagnosing a Dangerous Condition
TRANSCEND MEMBERS, 3 Jan 2022
31 Dec 2021 – Natural immunity has been known for centuries. It has not been questioned until now.
The apparent compulsion to deny an irrefutable, previously universally accepted reality invites a psychological diagnosis. What is going on? Is this a cognitive disorder, a personality disorder, a character disorder, a defense mechanism, a syndrome, or what? At the end, I will propose some differential diagnostic possibilities.
Before I dare venture a diagnosis of Natural Immunity Denial Disorder (NIDD) I must first make a compelling case for the validity of natural immunity. If you are already convinced you may skip to the diagnosis. First, I address:
· The Reality of Natural Immunity towards Herd Immunity
· Evidence for Enduring Natural Immunity
· Evidence for Robustness and Superiority of Natural Immunity
· Unheeded Warnings: Adding Injury to Recovery
· Coercive Measures for Covid Survivors
· CDC’s Knowing Denial of Natural Immunity
· Propaganda Against Natural Immunity
· A Squandered Best-Case Scenario
· A Proposal for a Natural Immunity Universal Access Pass
· Diagnosis of Natural Immunity Denial Disorder
The Reality of Natural Immunity towards Herd Immunity
When those infected with a virus recover, they develop natural immunity. Viruses have been known to mutate over time to become more transmissible and less lethal, thus conferring natural immunity on more people. Once a critical mass of a population develops natural immunity, herd immunity is reached. This is the way past pandemics have ended.
The Amish in Pennsylvania quickly achieved herd immunity to Covid by May, 2020 without social distancing, lockdowns, masks or vaccines, in fact, going to church together and drinking out of the same cup. So have some Haredi Orthodox communities in Israel. This phenomenon has been understood for centuries.
Natural immunity cannot be improved upon. Dr. David Brownstein, interviewed by Dr Paul Thomas on Against the Wind, stated that no vaccine in existence has ever protected better than natural immunity.
Dr. Paul Elias Alexander, documented 140 Research Studies Affirm Naturally Acquired Immunity to Covid-19: Documented, Linked, and Quoted
“Public health officials and the medical establishment with the help of the politicized media are misleading the public with assertions that the COVID-19 shots provide greater protection than natural immunity. CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, for example, was deceptive in her October 2020 published LANCET statement that ‘there is no evidence for lasting protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2 following natural infection’ and that ‘the consequence of waning immunity would present a risk to vulnerable populations for the indefinite future.’ ”
Note: By “waning immunity” Walensky is probably deceptively referring to waning antibodies which does NOT indicate “waning immunity” at all. Antibodies may wane naturally while memory B cells can produce new antibodies upon future exposures. Some Covid survivors have 0 antibodies, but do have T-cell immunity.
The focus on antibodies is an example of propaganda and mystification, a plausible misrepresentation of reality.
In October, 2021, the International Alliance of Physicians and Medical Scientists issued a Physicians Declaration II – Updated Global Covid Summit, signed by over 16,000 physicians.
“… after 20 months of research, millions of patients treated, hundreds of clinical trials performed and scientific data shared,” Resolved (among other claims), that
- Natural immunity is the most protective, and longest-lasting solution against the development of COVID-19 disease and its more serious outcomes.
- Naturally immune persons are at the lowest risk of transmission, thus should not be subject to travel, professional, medical or social restrictions.
- Natural immunity provides the best source of herd immunity, a condition necessary for eradicating the Covid virus.
For short perspectives from 9 multidisciplinary experts, see this excellent WEBINAR – Natural Immunity Matters: Follow the REAL Science (1:41)
Evidence for Enduring Natural Immunity
Survivors of the 1918 flu pandemic acquired natural immunity that protected them 90 years later. In a 2008 article in Nature, Dr. Tshidi Tsibane, post-doctoral fellow, Mount Sinai School of Medicine Department of Microbiology, said, “… survivors of the pandemic have highly effective, virus neutralizing antibodies to this powerful virus, and humans can sustain circulating B memory cells to viruses for up to 9 decades after exposure. These findings could serve as potential therapy for another 1918-like virus. ” What happened to that?
The 2009 Swine flu offers ‘extraordinary super immunity’ was published January 11, 2011. “In beating a bout of H1N1, the body makes antibodies that can kill many other flu strains, a study in the Journal of Experimental Medicine shows.” This motivated scientists to work on a “widely applicable” universal flu vaccine to replace the yearly race to predict flu strains and mass produce a new vaccine each flu season. Oxford University virologist, Dr Sarah Gilbert said, in 2011, “It will take at least five years before anything like this could be widely available.” That would be by 2016. What happened to that project?
Furthermore, those who had SARS Cov1 have immunity to SARS Cov2, with 80% similarity, 17 years later.
In 2008 and 2011 it was permissible for scientists to write about long-lived immunity. While widely accepted around the world, natural immunity is suddenly disregarded in the US. Is “the Science” changing?
Evidence for Robustness and Superiority of Natural Immunity
When naturally exposed to the virus through inhalation, the immune system reacts to all dimensions of the virus. By contrast, mRNA and DNA Covid shots in the arm, bypass the large mucosal immune system of the respiratory tract and induce the cells to produce one tiny fragment, training the immune system to react only to this specific spike protein variant which can mutate. This can render “vaccines” obsolete. (Abundant evidence of “vaccine” induced immune pressures to mutate, notably by Geert Vanden Bosshe, is beyond the scope of this article.)
James Lyons-Weiler describes “50 Ways Survivors Can Be Immune,” “that do not involve the spike protein.” He criticizes studies that focus solely on spike-protein immunity as unethical. “They will scare people who already have robust and broad immunity into altering their immunity with a vaccine that does not even target Omicron.”
“Given the 50 ways people with natural immunity can be immune, reports on “natural immunity” that only measure spike protein neutralization need to stop.”
“The other proteins have names you won’t read about in the news, like envelope protein, membrane glycoprotein, helicase, RNA-Cap methyltransferase, nucleocapsid, phosphoprotein, NSPs 1-16, and a variety of Orf’s (open reading frame) proteins.
Again, the exclusive focus on the spike protein is another example of mystifying propaganda that misleads the public with convincing, compelling, seemingly authoritative false information. Beware.
Unheeded Warnings: Adding Injury to Recovery
Not only do Covid survivors have no need or benefit from the shots, they have a 3 – 6 times higher risk of adverse reactions and deaths following unnecessary Covid shots.
A King’s College study finds Covid vaccine side effects up to three times more common in those who have had virus, especially with the Pfizer shot.
Greyson Follmer is among many naturally immune athletes whose career ended following an unnecessary Covid shot. Exclusive: Athlete Who Recovered From COVID Facing ‘Very Different Future’ After Second Dose of Pfizer Vaccine Triggers Myocarditis
Jumal Nache, a Minnesotan, medical assistant from Nigeria had both legs and hand amputated after being instructed to take the Pfizer shot without being screened to detect her Covid infection.
Dr. Hooman Noorchashm, an accomplished surgeon, patient safety advocate and staunch supporter of the new COVID vaccines, has written several letters to many institutions urging all to “screen before you vaccine” for previous infections in order to reduce COVID injection injuries and deaths.
Dr. Hooman Noorchashm wrote many letters to many universities and businesses.
Noorchashm said in a letter to FDA officials, “Pfizer and Moderna should “institute clear recommendations to clinicians that they delay immunization in any recently convalescent patients, as well as, any known symptomatic or asymptomatic carriers — and to actively screen as many patients with high cardiovascular risk as is reasonably possible, in order to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2, prior to vaccinating them.”
One Covid survivor who died after receiving the shots, was 32-year-old Benjamin Goodman, who went to a pop-up “vaccine” site at a local Walgreen’s, feeling pressured to get the travel pass.
Noorchashm’s email, addressed to Dr. Janet Woodcock, acting commissioner of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was copied to the FDA’s Peter Marks, several Pfizer executives, CBS News, Fox News and The New York Times and other reporters, scientists and colleagues.
Dear Dr. Woodcock,
Here I am writing to report to you the death of Mr. Benjamin G. Goodman of NY within a day following vaccination with the J&J COVID-19 vaccine.
This is his obituary. He was 32 and otherwise healthy:
Attached, you may read his mother’s Facebook posting about his death.
Dr. Woodcock, it is untenable for you and your colleagues to be ignoring these death and vaccine complications without lifting a finger to do anything — simply this: These complications are mounting and CDC and FDA’s surveillance systems are missing the signal — the signal is deafening on social media!
But, as I’ve told you before, we are deploying this defensive weapon wildly indiscriminately in the midst of a pandemic outbreak, while many are “the recently infected.” It is my professional opinion as an immunologist and physician that this indiscriminate vaccination is a clear and present danger to a subset of the already infected.
But you cannot go on like this — you must see Benjamin Goodman, J. Barton Williams, Kassidi Lyn Kurill, Marvin Hagler, Hank Aaron, Larry King …
There will be many more in the coming months as we carelessly and indiscriminately vaccinate the already infected, millions a day … It is a near certainty.
Hooman Noorchashm M.D., Ph.D.
Noorchashm also mentions 36 year-old Dr. J. Barton Williams, Doctors suspect COVID delayed immune response in young surgeon’s death. He died in February, 2021after receiving the “vaccine.” “What we think so far is that he suffered from multi-system inflammatory syndrome (MIS),” said Baptist infectious disease expert Dr. Stephen Threlkeld.
Coercive Measures for Covid Survivors
The CDC pretends that natural immunity is fragile and wanes. Using extreme social pressure, fear-mongering propaganda, mass hypnosis inducing helplessness and mass hysteria, those with robust natural immunity are being coerced into getting Covid shots. They are threatened with job loss, draconian restrictions and ostracism.
Some who refuse to submit to pressures and risks of injury and death must resort to lawsuits. Suddenly, previous common knowledge now requires an expert legal opinion. Dr. David Brownstein, on Against the Wind, said this is like opining that water is wet and the sky is blue.
Many institutions are being sued for requiring unnecessary, risky shots. See Civil Rights Group Sues George Mason University on Behalf of Professor Required to Get COVID Vaccine Despite Having Natural Immunity and world expert, Dr. Peter McCullough’s expert opinion in a lawsuit against THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA.
Health conscious, well-informed Covid survivor, Aaron Rodgers became the Green Bay Packers’ all-time leader in touchdown passes on Christmas day.
Before becoming infected, Rodgers refused the Covid shots, legitimately concerned about reactions to known toxic ingredients. He became a target of ridicule by ignorant, mindless, conformist, Big Pharma funded popular talk show hosts. His refusal was wise given the alarming increase in heart damage, career-ending injuries, athlete collapses and sudden deaths around the world.
Rodgers recovered well using Ivermectin and immune boosting treatments. Now, with precious natural immunity, he is being coerced to get the shots, losing sponsors and being penalized.
“In the real world, natural immunity does not count,” political commentator Kim Iversen pointed out. “Vaccinated people can enjoy more events and restaurants and even keep their jobs to earn a living to feed their families whereas unvaccinated people can’t” — even though, Iversen said, studies show vaccine effectiveness wanes within months.”
CDC’s Knowing Denial of Natural Immunity
Shockingly, in December, 2020, CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) issued a report by 15 scientists falsely claiming that a Pfizer study proved the vaccine was highly effective for people who recovered from Covid. See Scientists Challenge Health Officials on Vaccinating People Who Already Had COVID.
When challenged by Congressman Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), an award-winning scientist, ACIP acknowledged that it was false. But instead of correcting their misinformation, they changed the wording to phrase their mistake differently. “So, at that point, right now I consider it a lie. I think the CDC is lying about the efficacy of the vaccine based on the Pfizer trials, for those who have already had the coronavirus,” Massie said.”
“On Feb. 23, Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), published a blog post stating that people who’ve had COVID still needed the vaccine, while referencing a study that suggested they didn’t.”
On November 4, the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions held a hearing on Next Steps: The Road Ahead for the COVID-19 Response. Senators questioned CDC Director, Rochelle Walensky, NIAID Director, Anthony Fauci, Acting FDA Commissioner, Janet Woodcock, and Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Dawn O’Connell on a variety of issues, including natural immunity.
Several Republicans asked about natural immunity. Not one Democrat had the brains or guts to raise natural immunity. Why? What does party affiliation have to do with recognizing science? Does membership in the Democratic party require denial of natural immunity? Their mindlessness clinched my decision to leave the party (to be independent, post-partisan).
Informed Consent Action Network’s Attorney Aaron Siri writes that “CDC Admits Crushing Rights of Naturally Immune Without Proof They Transmit the Virus: After formal demand, the CDC concedes it does not have proof of a single instance of a naturally immune individual spreading the virus.”
“You would assume that if the CDC was going to crush the civil and individual rights of those with natural immunity by having them expelled from school, fired from their jobs, separated from the military, and worse, the CDC would have proof of at least one instance of an unvaccinated, naturally immune individual transmitting the COVID-19 virus to another individual. If you thought this, you would be wrong,”
The CDC has also “crushed rights” in my own family and countless others by issuing guidelines that forbid my son’s children to play with their beloved cousins, my daughters’ naturally immune young children, disrupting their relationships for a significant part of their childhoods (not to mention the fact that children do not transmit Covid and have low risks).
Propaganda Against Natural Immunity
Big Pharma funds mainstream media. Gates Foundation and Johnson & Johnson fund highly respected, now coopted public radio and TV who constantly distort, exaggerate, and lie about the dangers of Covid and the safety, efficacy and necessity of Covid shots while demonizing, pathologizing and inciting hostility against the “unvaccinated.” Anthony Fauci, Rochelle Walensky, Leana Wen and others urge people with natural immunity, as well as children and pregnant women, horrifically, to get Covid shots, technically NOT vaccines.
They dishonestly promote these shots falsely claiming that
· “natural immunity ‘varies from person to person’
· ‘experts do not yet know how long someone is protected,’stated on CDC’s website
· It is likely to wane.
· Covid shots will make their natural immunity, which for the first time in human history is not good enough, even stronger.
· Covid shots will give them “hybrid immunity” – a new, fake, deceptively plausible seeming concept.
· Shots are safe for them – disregarding data showing those with natural immunity have a far higher risk of adverse reactions from getting shots they do not need
· They changed the definition of “herd immunity” to exclude natural immunity.
· We need to “vaccinate” the masses to achieve herd immunity, 70%, no, we mean 80%, and for Bill Gates,100% although they actually prevent herd immunity.
And worst of all, while about 50% of US children have natural immunity, there was no warning at all to screen little ones before giving dangerous, life-altering mass injections to children who are still developing and have powerful innate immune systems. Why?
A Squandered Best-Case Scenario
Despite what the CDC leads you to believe, Covid survivors cannot get or give Covid. They are the safest people to be around. This is understood in most countries. But in the US, the CDC advises Covid survivors to get Covid shots and follow coercive social restrictions.
Treating safe people as dangerous is irrational and a loss to society. In a rational, ideal society, Covid survivors would both have universal access and freedom from restrictions, while also accepting additional responsibilities and being eligible for employment. (In fact, some families wisely required previous infection as a requirement for hiring nannies). They could have been part of the solution in so many ways like
· tending to the sick, vulnerable and lonely quarantined, incurring no risk.
· teaching, assisting, and playing tag team with vulnerable remote teachers to keep schools open, where 50% of children have natural immunity and the rest could get asymptomatic and mild cases, safely providing a buffer and contributing to herd immunity. Kids could play, mask-free. Worldwide data shows children, relying on their innate immune systems (not adaptive), do not transmit to others. There have been no school outbreaks. Adults do transmit to children.
· keeping up enough of the work force, teaming up with the vulnerable quarantined so small businesses would not have had to close.
There is a virtual consensus among multidisciplinary independent experts (virologists, immunologists, molecular biologists, evolutionary biologists, epidemiologists, successfully treating physicians and researchers, cell biologists) that the best-case scenario would have been to
· quarantine and protect those at high risk (older, obese and with co-morbidities)
· boost everyone’s health with a healthy diet, exercise
· check everyone’s vitamin D levels
· promote nutraceutical bundles, including D3 + K, high doses of C, quercetin, zinc, etc., which is even distributed to the public in some countries
· allow children to be safely exposed and provide herd immunity.
· Keep college campuses open, providing all with prophylactic immune support nutraceuticals supplied in the cafeteria, and stocking up on treatment protocols, allowing healthy young people to continue their education and social life, safely getting covid and the great gift of lifelong natural immunity contributing to herd immunity, while quarantining vulnerable students and staff.
Like the Amish, we might have achieved herd immunity by 2020 with no lockdown, educational setbacks, financial devastation, anxiety, depression, suicide and other traumas.
We would have avoided variant mutations caused by the “vaccines” that provoke immune pressures for immune escape, described by Geert Vanden Bossche a world authority on virology, and summarized by Jessica Rose, citing his main message:
“Never mass vaccinate a population with a non-sterilizing product (one that does not prevent infection and therefore transmission) across all age groups during a pandemic.”
Furthermore, “mass ‘vaccination’” destroys the possibility for natural herd immunity, thus prolonging the “pandemic.”
Criteria for Covid Shots
Criteria include 1. Necessity 2. Safety 3. Efficacy
For the Naturally Immune
1. Necessity. Yes__ No X
2. Safety Yes__ No X
3. Efficacy Yes__ No X
4. Social Acceptance Yes X_ No__
#3 Natural immunity is “Robust complete and durable and cannot be improved upon”
A Proposal for a Natural Immunity Universal Access Pass
Given all of the above, the logical, rational, humane, scientific conclusion is that the safest people to be around, who can neither get nor give Covid, should have no social restrictions and be available, though not mandated, to assist as needed and as possible. They can be helpful to the vulnerable, eligible for employment and volunteer activities,
Both freedom and responsibility – the way of life.
They should not have anything resembling the “Vaccine Passport” subject to surveillance and social control. Perhaps it can be something like a drivers’ license.
Natural immunity can be confirmed if they had a documented case of Covid, positive antibody tests or T-Cell test. Some Covid survivors have no antibodies, but do have T-Cells which are more reliable and enduring.
This group should increase as new people, ideally with immune support for mildness and rapid recovery will be welcomed into the club until we reach herd immunity, like the Amish! It seems now that highly infectious, more mild Omicron might dramatically accelerate the trend towards herd immunity.
And Now ….
Diagnosing Natural Immunity Denial Disorder
Below are my initial musings and some relevant concepts about diagnosis of NIDD, to be further developed. I welcome your input in the comments. This is a work in progress, neither perfect nor complete.
Why diagnose NIDD?
Denying the Undeniable
Since the universe is dripping with evidence for natural immunity, it is quite a stretch to deny its existence. Something very powerful is going on.
Pathologizing the pathological
Having established the irrefutable reality of natural immunity, we can assert that disagreements are not a matter of opinion. Something unhealthy is going on. Failure, refusal, or inability to recognize an undeniable truth invites a diagnosis.
Many of us wonder whether those who misrepresent natural immunity know they are lying or whether they believe their falsehoods. Among those manipulated are true believers, legitimately fearful and self-protective, self-censoring, cowardly, conformists, mindless and/or callous. There are a variety of manifestations, personality types, and rational social risk factors. To make sense, we must discriminate between the manipulators and the manipulated.
For now, I will highlight 3 major variants of denial (there are more.)
1. Manipulative, exploitative, intentionally deceiving dominators in power with conflicts of interest who capture agencies and control media to promote denial of natural immunity
2. Naive, manipulated, frightened, passive receivers who believe the propaganda
3. Members of the Democratic Party with mindless, automatic, compulsive denial by disidentification with Republicans who recognize natural immunity.
Denial as a Defense Mechanism
Denial is an unconscious psychological defense mechanism by which people ignore the reality of situation or its consequences to ward off anxiety to protect against unbearable pain.
This is not the case with the masses who deny natural immunity.
Denial as a Character Disorder
The other form of denial is not a true defense mechanism but a character disorder, involving deliberate use of manipulative tactics of exploitation,” impression-management, and responsibility-avoidance.”
In Understanding Denial as a Defense Mechanism, Dr George Simon differentiates these. “One is an unconscious mechanism of protection from deep emotional pain; the other is a deliberate, calculated lie. Yet many use the same term to describe these very different behaviors.”
The first is a noun – a state of denial. The second is a verb – the manipulative act of knowingly denying a reality for ulterior motives.
The CDC, FDA, NIH, NIAID, Fauci, Walensky, Woodcock, NPR, PBS, and the endless promoters of this lie must know they are deceiving the public.
Some Concepts and Mechanisms that Influence Denial
Some Manipulators’ Techniques
· Mystification– RD Laing defined this as a “plausible misrepresentation” of reality. “By representing forms of exploitation as forms of benevolence, the exploiters bemuse the exploited into feeling at one with their exploiters, or into feeling gratitude for what (unrealized by them) is their exploitation, and, not least, into feeling bad or mad even to think of rebellion.” Mystification maintains power dynamics by inducing confusion and masking truth with false constructions of what is actually happening and what a conflict is actually about, though people may not feel confused. In fact, they may feel quite assured of their position.
· Fabrication – weaving together half-truths, exaggerations, distortions to create a convincing
· Censorship of all opposition
· Defamation of experts with opposing views
· Threats of job loss and ostracism
· Use of fear
Some Qualities of the Manipulated
· Vulnerability to Propaganda and Hypnotic Susceptibility – Some people are more susceptible to manipulation, have a greater capacity for absorption and imaginative involvement
· Poor Reality Testing – “Reality testing” is an ego function regarding the evaluation of the world outside the self. With “poor reality testing,” accurate perception of objective reality is impeded by emotions, desires, beliefs and socialization.
· Groupthink – Defined by Yale psychologist Irving Janis, is a “mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group. “ Pressure for consensus implicitly or explicitly discourage independent thinking, creativity, the expression of doubts, humility, consideration of alternative views, facts and bodies of knowledge. Groupthink impairs sound decision-making processes, often leading to irrational, flawed and hasty decisions. Freedom of thought, new, accurate information, and independence from vested interests may meet with resistance, threats or punishment.
· Conformity – is the tendency of people to follow the unspoken rules or behaviors of their social group. Experiments by social psychologist Solomon Asch demonstrated that people conform to social pressures even when they know the group is wrong.
Here are some characteristics of each form of denial. Again – this is a work in progress to be evolved.
1. The Manipulators – Natural Immunity Denial as a Character Disorder
Excessive power seeking
Denial of their own vulnerability
Denial of death and attempts to master death
Some are used, captured, coerced and compromised by powerful forces
Indifference to human suffering
Insatiable Megalomaniacal Compulsion to Inject Everyone in the World
Delusions of Grandeur
Naturaphobia – contempt for everything natural compulsion to dominate nature
2. Natural Immunity Denial Syndrome – Note: This is not a character disorder and the individuals with this syndrome do not necessarily have individual psychopathology, but collectively they support a dangerous status quo. They are many of our friends and relatives who believe apparently trustworthy authorities. They have been successfully seduced by omnipresent, well-designed PsyOps.
They may possess some of the following qualities regarding Covid, but not in other areas.
· Vulnerable to manipulation by fear
· Unquestioning belief in exaggerated threats
· Failure to discriminate actual threat
· Induced helplessness and denial of personal agency over health
· Naïve trust and submission to authority – CDC, FDA, Fauci, etc.
· Close-minded refusal to dialogue or read articles with opposing views
· Contempt and condescension towards those with opposing views
· A license to treat people with hostility
· Willingness to suddenly reject lifelong relationships
· Unfamiliarity with propaganda techniques
· Ignorance of subject matter being misrepresented (biological science)
· Attachment to a particular belief or belief system
· Psychological attachment to a particular belief or belief system
· Convinced by respected sources, credible on some issues, like NPR and PBS
· Conditioned belief in allopathic model of treating symptoms, not causes
· Ignorance of terrain theory and host resistance to disease
3. Political Party Denial by Disidentification –
Mindless, automatic rejection of everything the other party stands for
Compulsive mutual disparagement
Lack of curiosity
Fear of sticking neck out
Democratic Party Automatic Natural Immunity Denial by Disidentification –
Mindless compulsion to reject natural immunity, lab origins, Ivermectin, HCQ
Mindless rejection of data, science
Silence and self-censorship
Poor reality testing
Pretending not to know
Lack of curiosity
Courageous and Propaganda Resistant Personality – While so many people fall for propaganda, some have a capacity to know when they are being lied to. They have
· Curiosity, open-mindedness, questioning authority
· Familiarity with propaganda, ability to recognize techniques and tone
· Familiarity with the subject matter being propagandized. Knowledge of truth, facts, studies, primary sources
· Intuitive personality style (Jung, Myers-Briggs)
· Intuitive knowledge of that being misrepresented. (People may not recognize propaganda about subjects of which are ignorant.)
· Psychological maturity including willingness to revise opinions and beliefs based on new information
· Non attachment to belief system, willingness to face truth no matter what it is
· Learning from previous experience of being lied to, (“fool me twice”) deceived, betrayed leading to a healthy skepticism, scrutiny, investigation, and discernment
· Life experience
For the Manipulators – Natural Immunity Denial as a Character Disorder
· Don’t argue facts
· Call them out
· Find other trusted authority figures and institutions to discredit them
· Take legal action for lying, causing harm, defamation
For Natural Immunity Denial Syndrome – For those submissive to authority and willfully ignorant, these may gradually make a difference
· Plant seeds of doubt
· Convincingly discredit the authority, i.e. the CDC
· Encourage more courageous, respected authority figures willing to speak out
· Make it safe for health care professionals and others to speak out (check out Steve Kirsch’s Substack initiatives
· Find other reliable, trusted authorities challenge the CDC (clergy, school authority, political authority, trusted scientific authority
· Have a personal experience that defies the narrative (won’t work for many)
· Build a critical mass
For Democratic Party Automatic Natural Immunity Denial by Disidentification
· Call them out
· Form a group of “Future Former Democrats” and threaten to leave the party en masse if they are completely incapable of accepting the reality of natural immunity, among other measures like mandates, recommending Covid shots to children and pregnant women. Give them an opportunity to self- correct
· Find a courageous Democrat willing to speak up and say their emperor has no clothes.
For Both Political Parties Denial by Disidentification –
· Recognize how the dualistic party divisions is part of the problem and preventing the solution (See Let’s You and Him Fight: Can We Overcome a Manipulated Conflict?
· All of us make a “Declaration of Independents,” get “outside the boxes”
· Shed our partisan skins
· Think for ourselves
I wish you all a very happy, joyous, healthy, peaceful, loving New Year. Let’s work together to make 2022 the year of awakening and healing.
King’s College research finds people with prior infection far more likely to report effects, particularly if they have had Pfizer jab
(Scientists Challenge Health Officials on Vaccinating People Who Already Had COVID. Scientists warn vaccinating people who already COVID could potentially cause harm, or even death. by Megan Redshaw).
 This is part of a series to “Call things by their real names.” We are in a “mass hypnosis” (NOT a psychosis, IMHO). Since language, framing and symbols, which shape thoughts beliefs and emotions, are beig used intentionally to induce mass hypnosis, we must use accurate language, including diagnosing pathology rather than arguing facts, as antidotes in the service of breaking the spell.
 While recognizing “the Power of Natural Immunity” Makary still recommends that Covid survivors can get one shot. I and others disagree.
 While people have told me that they know people who got Covid more than once, some, like Dr. Peter McCullough, claim that suspected cases were not positively confirmed. PCR tests do not differentiate Covid from the flu and at high cycle thresholds PCR tests yield false positives.
 I am now a “future former Democrat” driven from the party by their mindlessness. I am politically independent and post-partisan.
 I am now a “future former Democrat” driven from the party by their mindlessness. I am politically independent and post-partisan.
Diane Perlman, PhD is a clinical and political psychologist, devoted to applying knowledge from psychology, conflict studies and social sciences to designing strategies and policies to reverse nuclear proliferation, to drastically reduce terrorism, reduce enmity, and to raise consciousness about nonviolent strategies for tension reduction and conflict transformation. She is a visiting scholar at the School for Conflict Analysis and Resolution at George Mason University, is active in Psychologists for Social Responsibility, the TRANSCEND Network for Peace Development Environment, and on the Global Council of Abolition 2000. Some of her writings can be found on her websites, www.consciouspolitics.org and www.SanityandSurvival.com. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Tags: Airborne contagion, COVID-19, Community, Compassion, Coronavirus, Economy, Empathy, Environment, Health, Ivermectin, Lockdown, Medical Industrial Complex, Omicron, PCR Tests, Pandemic, Public Health, Research, Science, Science and Medicine, Variants, Vitamin C, Vitamin D, WHO
DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
One Response to “Natural Immunity Denial Disorder: Diagnosing a Dangerous Condition”
Join the discussion!
We welcome debate and dissent, but personal — ad hominem — attacks (on authors, other users or any individual), abuse and defamatory language will not be tolerated. Nor will we tolerate attempts to deliberately disrupt discussions. We aim to maintain an inviting space to focus on intelligent interactions and debates.
Click here to go to the current weekly digest or pick another article: