We Are Militarism’s Hostages

EDITORIAL, 24 Jan 2022

#729 | John Scales Avery, Ph.D. – TRANSCEND Media Service

Do our “Defense Departments” really defend us? Absolutely not! Their very title is a lie. The military-industrial complex sells itself by claiming to defend civilians. It justifies vast and crippling budgets by this claim; but it is a fraud. For the military-industrial complex, the only goal is money and power. Civilians like us are just hostages. We are expendable. We are pawns in the power game, the money game.

Nations possessing nuclear weapons threaten each other with “Mutually Assured Destruction”, which has the very appropriate acronym MAD. What does this mean? Does it mean that civilians are being protected? Not at all. Instead they are threatened with complete destruction. Civilians here play the role of hostages in the power games of their leaders.

A thermonuclear war today would be not only genocidal but also omnicidal. It would kill people of all ages, babies, children, young people, mothers, fathers and grandparents, without any regard whatever for guilt or innocence. Such a war would be the ultimate ecological catastrophe, destroying not only human civilization but also much of the biosphere.

There is much worry today about climate change, but an ecological catastrophe of equal or greater magnitude could be produced by a nuclear war. One can gain a small idea of what this would be like by thinking of the radioactive contamination that has made an area half the size of Italy near to Chernobyl permanently uninhabitable. The Fukushima disaster also reminds us if the dangerous long-term effects of radioactivity.

The testing of hydrogen bombs in the Pacific half a century ago continues to cause cancer and birth defects in the Marshall Islands today. This too can give us a small idea of the environmental effects of a nuclear war. But the radioactivity produced by a nuclear war would be enormously greater.

In 1954, the United States tested a hydrogen bomb at Bikini. The bomb was 1,300 times more powerful than the bombs that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Fallout from the bomb contaminated the island of Rongelap, one of the Marshall Islands 120 kilometers from Bikini. The islanders experienced radiation illness, and many died from cancer. Even today, more than half a century later, both people and animals on Rongelap and other nearby islands suffer from birth defects. The most common defects have been “jelly fish babies”, born with no bones and with transparent skin. Their brains and beating hearts can be seen. The babies usually live a day or two before they stop breathing.

The environmental effects of a nuclear war would be catastrophic. A war fought with hydrogen bombs would produce radioactive contamination of the kind that we have already experienced in the areas around Chernobyl and Fukushima and in the Marshall Islands, but on an enormously increased scale. We have to remember that the total explosive power of the nuclear weapons in the world today is 500,000 times as great as the power of the bombs that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki. What is threatened by a nuclear war today is the complete breakdown of human civilization.

Besides spreading deadly radioactivity throughout the world, a nuclear war would inflict catastrophic damage on global agriculture. Firestorms in burning cities would produce many millions of tons of black, thick, radioactive smoke. The smoke would rise to the stratosphere where it would spread around the earth and remain for a decade. Prolonged cold, decreased sunlight and rainfall, and massive increases in harmful ultraviolet light would shorten or eliminate growing seasons, producing a nuclear famine. Even a small nuclear war could endanger the lives of the billion people who today are chronically undernourished. A full-scale war fought with hydrogen bombs would mean that most humans would die from hunger. Many animal and plant species would also be threatened with extinction.

Incidents in which global disaster is avoided by a hair’s breadth are constantly occurring. For example, on the night of 26 September, 1983, Lt. Col. Stanislav Petrov, a young software engineer, was on duty at a surveillance center near Moscow. Suddenly the screen in front of him turned bright red. An alarm went off. It’s enormous piercing sound filled the room. A second alarm followed, and then a third, fourth and fifth, until the noise was deafening. The computer showed that the Americans had launched a strike against Russia. Petrov’s orders were to pass the information up the chain of command to Secretary General Yuri Andropov. Within minutes, a nuclear counterattack would be launched. However, because of certain inconsistent features of the alarm, Petrov disobeyed orders and reported it as a computer error, which indeed it was. Most of us probably owe our lives to his brave and cool-headed decision and his knowledge of software systems. The narrowness of this escape is compounded by the fact that Petrov was on duty only because of the illness of another officer with less knowledge of software, who would have accepted the alarm as real.

Narrow escapes such as this show us clearly that in the long run, the combination of space-age science and stone-age politics will destroy us. We urgently need new political structures and new ethics to match our advanced technology.

Recently the United States has made provocative moves that seriously risk starting a war with Russia that might develop into a nuclear war. These include sending armaments and military advisers to Ukraine, and NATO exercises on the Russian border.

At the same time, the United States is making aggressive moves in an attempt to “contain China”.

Thus Washington’s power-holders are threatening war with both Russia and China. The effect of these colossally misguided US actions has been to firmly unite China and Russia. In fact the BRICS countries, with their vast resources, are now moving away from using the dollar as a reserve currency for international trade. The probable effect will be the collapse of the already-strained US economy, and as a consequence, the fall of the US Empire.

What can be the reason for these actions, which seem to border on insanity? One reason can be found in the power-drunk thinking of the “Project for a New American Century”, one of whose members was US Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, Paul Wolfowitz.

The Wolfowitz Doctrine states that “Our first objective is to prevent the re-emergence of a new rival, either on the territory of the former Soviet Union or elsewhere, that poses a threat on the order of that posed formerly by the Soviet Union. This is a dominant consideration underlying the new regional defense strategy and requires that we endeavor to prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources would, under consolidated control, be sufficient to generate global power.”


In other words, the Wolfowitz Doctrine is a declaration that the United States intends to control the entire world through military power. No thought is given to the protection of civilian populations, either in the United States or elsewhere. Civilians are mere hostages in the power game.

The money game is important too. A great driving force behind militarism is the almost unimaginably enormous river of money that buys the votes of politicians and the propaganda of the mainstream media. Numbed by the propaganda, citizens allow the politicians to vote for obscenely bloated military budgets, which further enrich the corporate oligarchs, and the circular flow continues.

The giant, immensely wealthy and politically powerful arms manufacturers of military-industrial complex do not really want war. What they want is the threat of war.  As long as tensions are maintained; as long as there is a threat of war, the military-industrial complex gets the money for which it lusts, and the politicians and journalists get their blood money. The safety of civilians plays no role in the money game. We are just hostages.

There is a danger that our world, with all the beauty and value that it contains, will be destroyed by this cynical game for power and money, in which civilians are militarism’s hostages.  Will we let this happen?


John Scales Avery, Ph.D., who was part of a group that shared the 1995 Nobel Peace Prize for their work in organizing the Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs, is a member of the TRANSCEND Network and Associate Professor Emeritus at the H.C. Ørsted Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. He is chairman of both the Danish National Pugwash Group and the Danish Peace Academy and received his training in theoretical physics and theoretical chemistry at M.I.T., the University of Chicago and the University of London. He is the author of numerous books and articles both on scientific topics and on broader social questions. His most recent books are Information Theory and Evolution and Civilization’s Crisis in the 21st Century (pdf). Website: https://www.johnavery.info/

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This article originally appeared on Transcend Media Service (TMS) on 24 Jan 2022.

Anticopyright: Editorials and articles originated on TMS may be freely reprinted, disseminated, translated and used as background material, provided an acknowledgement and link to the source, TMS: We Are Militarism’s Hostages, is included. Thank you.

If you enjoyed this article, please donate to TMS to join the growing list of TMS Supporters.

Share this article:

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a CC BY-NC 4.0 License.

2 Responses to “We Are Militarism’s Hostages”

  1. Thank you John, for your message full of truth.

    Ministries of Defense I have all my life called them Ministry of ‘Attack’ and Defense or simply War Ministry.

    The problem is, what else can politicians do? their responsibility is make sure their industry sells what it produces. So they have no option than invent and lie all the time, because they cannot tell the electorate they are planning, concocting, negotiating wars. They cannot tell people ‘we need to create or invent enemy countries, to justify the obscene sums of money we spend, in order to be ready to ‘defend’ you.

    You say “We urgently need new political structures and new ethics to match our advanced technology.”, but advanced technology is fabulous. What we need is the Abolition of Militarism, so that scientists can work exclusively on using technological advences for the benefit of of humanity, not to destroy humanity.

    As to the American threats, they couldn’t do them with the agreement of Russia and China, who also have a military Industry to protect, to promote. Chinese, Russian, American and Ukrainian politicians and diplomats are in permanent contact among themselves, concocting, negotiating all the barbarities we read in the Media (and many more we don’t read). This is why they all have embassies in each other’s country, complete with military and trade attachés. In addition they all meet daily at the United Nations in New York and Geneva.

    I always remind people of Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s words: ‘no war happens by accident; if war breaks out, it means it was agreed, negotiated by all fighting parties.

    Best wishes,


  2. Thank you, John. Covert Action Magazine publishe this morning a similar articlo to your and as it is now past 3 am and I must go to bed, I’ just copy and paste what I wrote for CAM.
    Alberto Portugheis January 25, 2022 At 8:16 am
    Who’s the aggressor it doesn’t matter to the War Corporations. Wars are lethal games that like all games, must have someone who kicks the ball first. In his excellent article, Dee Knight says “Threats and counter-threats flying between Washington and Moscow over Ukraine”, but this is only for the Media, so that the masses can follow the drama. The reality is different. Threats do not exist. It is all negotiated in the most civilized way, by American and Russian diplomats, both in permanent consultations with the Ukrainian counterparts. This is why Governments spend so much money in diplomatic missions; to negotiate many things for them – wars included -. All three countries have \embassies in each other’s country, complete with military and trade attachés, who are in daily negotiations with the host country. Additionally, they meet daily at the United Nations buildings in New York and Geneva.

    We should not forget the Ukraine is one of the founding members of the United Nations, that is, very experienced at war diplomacy, war negotiations and Arms Trade. Additionally, Relations between the European Union (EU) and Ukraine are paramount, shaped through the Ukraine–European Union Association Agreement and the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA). Don’t forget Ukraine is a priority partner within the Eastern Partnership and the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP).

    Dee Knight says Europeans are wary of war, but this is neither here nor there, because MIC is not wary of making money to pay the millions of workers who make wars possible. Without the huge labour force that works day and night to produce the killing toys and the labour force prepared to kill and die, wars could never take place.

    Only the Universal Abolition of Militarism will bring about a warless world..