The Mask Comes Off: The Psychologists Protecting Israel, Not Jews

TRANSCEND MEMBERS, 17 Aug 2026

Roy Eidelson – TRANSCEND Media Service

Gaza-image-in-the-public-domain-courtesy-of-Heidi-Levine-and-The-Washington-Post

12 Aug 2026 – Sometimes the mask comes off. That seems to be what happened last week, just before the American Psychological Association (APA) held its annual convention in Washington, DC. A group called Gesher Community Care (GCC) published an online open letter to APA leaders demanding that they do more to ensure the “safety” of Jewish attendees. The letter was introduced with this photo (please see update at the bottom of this piece):

To be clear, that is not the “Jewish flag,” as some want you to believe. No, it’s something very different: the official flag of the state of Israel which, according to leading human rights organizations and scholars, is engaged in the ethnic cleansing and genocide of the Palestinian people.

Overall, there’s a distorting hall-of-mirrors quality to the GCC letter’s elevation of concerns about the “psychological safety” of Israel-defending convention attendees. Despite the fact that over 20,000 Palestinian children have been slaughtered in Gaza (with several times that number injured or orphaned), APA is told that expressions of distress and outrage over Israel’s documented war crimes must be suppressed. Why? Because otherwise some Jewish conference-goers may feel uncomfortable. Consider too that the open letter promotes the importance of “viewpoint diversity” while simultaneously calling for the APA to silence voices of opposition to Israel’s actions. This all sounds a lot like traumatic invalidation to me.

It’s worth noting as well that several members of GCC’s advisory board are among those who’ve contributed in various ways to weaponizing antisemitism charges against the APA, leading to unwarranted government investigations of the Association. Antisemitism is indeed a very serious problem, but support for Palestinian rights and freedom is not antisemitic.

GCC is also aggrieved that its supporters might experience discomfort from Palestine-focused convention events, from the sight of keffiyehs, and from hearing a land acknowledgment that includes this truth:

We must also recognize — with sorrow and outrage — that this presentation takes place amid the ongoing violent dispossession of Indigenous peoples from their lands across the globe, particularly the genocide in Palestine that is actively supported by the United States government. As psychologists, we have a responsibility to speak out and actively resist systemic oppression and violence wherever they occur, both here and globally.

But despite the GCC letter’s alarmist language, there was no silencing of Jewish voices at the APA convention. There was no assignment of “collective guilt to Jews.” And there were no “ideological tests on Jewish participation.” That misleading narrative may play well within the Israel-supporting echo chamber, but it’s quite simply false.

I am among the many Jewish psychologists who are thankful for the growing and broadening awareness that Palestinian liberation is a matter of urgent justice, long denied and long overdue. And we recognize that the rights, dignity, and freedom of the Palestinian people are ultimately essential for the safety and well-being of Jews worldwide. In contrast, it seems the foremost priority for advocacy groups like Gesher Community Care is defending the state of Israel rather than protecting the Jewish people — and they apparently hope none of us will notice the difference. But the photo they’ve chosen for this latest misguided attack on the APA certainly lifts the veil, and that should dispel any lingering doubts.

********

Update: Apparently in an effort to put the mask back on after the publication of this piece, Gesher Community Care has removed the Israeli flag from their letter to the APA. Fortunately, I took several screenshots before they did so, and here is one of them:

_______________________________________________

Note: This opinion piece reflects my personal views and not those of any group with which I am affiliated.

Roy Eidelson is a member of the TRANSCEND Network and was a member of the American Psychological Association for over 25 years, prior to his resignation. He is a clinical psychologist and the president of Eidelson Consulting, where he studies, writes about, and consults on the role of psychological issues in political, organizational, and group conflict settings. He is a past president of Psychologists for Social Responsibility, former executive director of the University of Pennsylvania’s Solomon Asch Center for Study of Ethnopolitical Conflict, and a member of the Coalition for an Ethical Psychology. Roy is the author of Political Mind Games: How the 1% Manipulate Our Understanding of What’s Happening, What’s Right, and What’s Possible and can be reached at reidelson@eidelsonconsulting.com.

Go to Original – royeidelson.com

Share this article: email mastodon facebook 🔗 copy link

DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

There are no comments so far.