A New Fukushima in the Making? South India’s Kudankulam!

ACTIVISM, NONVIOLENCE, ASIA--PACIFIC, BRICS, ECONOMICS, ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, DEVELOPMENT, KUDANKULAM ANTI-NUCLEAR SATYAGRAHA, INDIA, 22 Apr 2013

R. C. Camphausen – Digital Journal

The Kudankulam Nuclear Power plant in the southernmost tip of India has been contentious for years, but now a senior scientist alleges that the use of inferior building materials poses a real threat to its safety.

A mere few weeks before the plant’s first reactor is to go online, in April or May 2013, new hints arise that allege the plant to be unsafe. Government agencies, as is their habit, claim that the installation is state-of-the-art and safe, even in the event of a tsunami; yet one of India’s foremost nuclear specialists is not convinced.

Last week, the Times of India carried an article in which A. Gopalakrishnan, former chairman of Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB), raises questions about the quality of the equipment used in building the plant.

Sub-standard materials have come to the Kudankulam plant and they are causing problems, he said, adding Dangerous things have been done undercover. AERB officials are not responding to any queries. There are reports from Russia about the supply of substandard atomic energy equipment. This has to be investigated before they go ahead with the commissioning. Since faults may not be known for a few years, safety concerns of the people have to be cleared.

The Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant, often referred to as KNPP or KKNPP, is located very close to the beach in a densely populated district of the southern Indian state of Tamil Nadu. More than a million people, villagers and fishermen, live in a 30 km radius of the plant; way too many people to quickly evacuate if an accident should happen. This alone should have prevented the site from being chosen, but neither on-site protests not court action has prevented it from being built.

One case has even been to the Supreme Court, and while the Court has stated it would not hesitate to stop the project if it was found unsafe, the local population is of course very concerned that such closure may come too late.

The project has been in the making since 1991 and has seen several delays, not only by demonstrations, protests and court cases, but also with delivery of goods from Russia and the death of Sergei Ryzhov, chief designer of the light water VVER nuclear reactors used at the site, who was killed in a plane accident.

Next, there were problems with fresh water supply for the cooling system, and an additional tank had to be built, plus a desalination plant that had not been planned earlier.

Note: Kudankulam is also spelled as Koodankulam, at least on a few Indian websites.

________________________

R. C. Camphausen – Digital Journalist based in Groningen, Netherlands. Expertise in Books, Travel, Politics, Health, Education,   Religion, Ethnic cultures.

Go to Original – digitaljournal.com

Share this article:
facebook twitter diaspora* email

DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Comments are closed.