Myths of the Green Revolution and GMOs


A backgrounder by Dr Vandana Shiva – TRANSCEND Media Service

Prof. Vandana Shiva

Prof. Vandana Shiva

Myth of the Green Revolution

15 Aug 2015 – I wrote a book for the United Nations University titled ‘The Violence of the Green Revolution’, which has been republished by many publishers globally, including the Kentucky University Press. Extracts from the book are available on Google.

My study was reinforced by the study done by Dr Jatindar Bajaj, with whom I did MSc Hons in Physics from Punjab University in 1973. His study comparing  pre and post Green Revolution performance showed that the rate of growth of aggregate crop production was higher in the years before the Green Revolution was introduced (1967-68) than after it.

The Green Revolution did not save India from famine, as the proponents of Industrial Agriculture and GMO technology would argue, in fact the Green Revolution reduced India’s production. More information about the Green Revolution here: Nothing Green in the Green Revolution (India Today)

GreenRevolutionFailure vandana shiva ge gmo

Aggregate crop production was higher before the introduction of the Green Revolution in 1967-68

Myth of GMO Golden Rice as a Solution to Malnutrition

I enclose our analysis that establishes that our indigenous biodiversity and knowledge is far superior than Golden Rice to address malnutrition. Syngenta owns Golden Rice. It’s promotion as the fruits of public sector research are a blatant lie and an attempt to mislead people across the world.

The analysis can be found here:

Further, the Golden Rice paper had to be retracted, any fabricated claims made based on the paper do not stand.

Myth That Obesity Is the Only Disease Related to Food

The epidemic of cancer has affected the farmers of Punjab because of pesticides. It has affected farmers of West UP. In a single village, our recent field survey revealed, there were 100 cancer victims. The farmers are getting into debt and committing suicide buying the pesticides, and the citizens are dying of cancer because of the same poisons.

This is why we started the Anna Swaraj Abhiyan 2020  from Meerut, the sacred land of our first movement of independence .

Our book Health per Acre shows we can feed 2 India’s with nourishing , poison free food through Organic.

Our book Wealth per Acre, for which the Forward was written by the Hon Agriculture Minister, Shri Radha Mohan Singh, shows how the negative externalities of farming with poisons are costing the country $ 1.26 trillion annually.

Myth of Safety 

While the Literature on Biosafety is vast, and I was  appointed as a member of the expert group on Biosafety by UNEP to create the framework for the International Law on Biosafety, 2 recent publications show that the assumption of safety and “substantial equivalence” is false.

One study is from the Norwegian Government, Another by an Indian scientist from MIT who invented Email.

New research is showing that there is no evidence of GMO safety .

Research is also showing the falseness of the  assumption of substantial equivalence .–disrupts-plant-metabolism-suggests-peer-reviewed-study-calling-for-21st-century-safety-standards-300112959.html

Myth of the GMO Story as One of Science

The GMO story is not one of science, but of an unscientific and illegal takeover of our Seeds and Food.

This is why Bija Swaraj and Anna Swaraj are imperatives to defend india’s freedom and the freedom of our farmers and citizens .


TRANSCEND Member Prof. Vandana Shiva is a physicist, ecofeminist, philosopher, activist, and author of more than 20 books and 500 papers. She is the founder of the Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology, and has campaigned for biodiversity, conservation and farmers’ rights, winning the Right Livelihood Award [Alternative Nobel Prize] in 1993. She is executive director of the Navdanya Trust.

Go to Original –


Share this article:

DISCLAIMER: The statements, views and opinions expressed in pieces republished here are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of TMS. In accordance with title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. TMS has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is TMS endorsed or sponsored by the originator. “GO TO ORIGINAL” links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the “GO TO ORIGINAL” links. This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

One Response to “Myths of the Green Revolution and GMOs”